6,000 Violent Crimes in Virginia Involved Guns Last Year


by James A. Bacon

After a spate of mass shootings, gun control has moved to the top of the Democratic Party agenda. Here in Virginia, we got a reminder this morning of the omnipresent threat that gun-wielding thugs pose to public safety. Police arrested two illegal immigrants who were allegedly plotting to shoot up a July 4th celebration in Richmond. The duo was found in possession of two rifles, a handgun, and 223 rounds of ammunition.

Oh, brother. Not only do we have to worry about political radicals, Jihadists, mentally ill teenagers, and suicidal middle-aged men, now we can add homicidal illegal immigrants to our list of worries!

As the rhetoric about guns inevitably heats up, it is worthwhile reviewing the firearms-related data in the 2021 Crime in Virginia report. There were 6,102 firearms among the 17,456 weapons catalogued in crimes last year, or 35% of the total.

Source: 2021 Crime in Virginia report

The graph above shows that firearms are the weapon used in 446 Virginia homicides last year — about 80% of cases. Knives came in at a very distant second place with 34 homicides.

Of the 13,800 weapons used in aggravated assaults, 5,900 were firearms — or 43%.

Clearly, people don’t need guns to get into serious fights. They will use knives, fists, and teeth. They will hit each other with blunt objects, strangle one another, and run each other down with cars. Remarkably, there were 60 cases of poisoning! But, as implied by the high rate of involvement of guns in homicides, use of a firearm is far more likely than fists or knives to result in a death.

Police record the type of weapon used in kidnapping, sexual assaults, and robberies as well. Firearms are relatively rarely involved with kidnapping and sexual assaults, but are commonly used in robberies. Of the almost 3,000 weapons catalogued in the commission of robberies, guns were used about 47% of the time.

Holding up someone at gunpoint makes it a lot easier to rob someone, but the frequent use of other weapons suggests that if the bad guys didn’t have guns, Virginians would still experience a lot of robberies.

The 2021 Crime in Virginia report also catalogues the type of firearms used to commit crimes. The following chart shows the breakdown of violent crimes by  type of firearm. (The state police does not have a separate category for semi-automatic weapons.)

Bacon’s bottom line: Two bottom lines, actually.

First, the prevalence of guns as the weapon used in homicides implies that guns tend to cause more serious injuries than other weapons. This reality lends credence to the idea that if society could find a way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals — a very big if — it could reduce the number and severity of injuries stemming from crime, if not the number of assaults and robberies.

Second, if you want to make a dent in crimes committed with guns, you need to target handguns. The use of shotguns and rifles is almost trivial. I am a know-nothing when it comes to weaponry, but I don’t think there is such as thing as a semi-automatic shotgun. Therefore, semi-automatic rifles are a subset of the rifle category. Of the nearly 6,200 weapons identified in violent crimes in Virginia last year, 209 were rifles — less than one in 30. The number of semi-automatic rifles would have been even more trivial.

One uncertainty here is that police declined or failed to report the type of firearm for a large percentage of violent crimes, so it is possible that the number of rifles (and, by implication, of semi-automatic rifles) is larger than the numbers shown here. However, if a semi-automatic rifle were used in a crime, I expect that police would have been far more likely to have recorded the fact, so I’m not persuaded this is a material consideration.

These graphs provide a one-year snapshot in time of the use of guns in crimes. They do not show trends. The critical question I have been asking on this blog is what caused the increase in the number of murders between 2019 and 2020? Was there a change in the availability of guns that might have contributed? I’ll delve into those questions next.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

51 responses to “6,000 Violent Crimes in Virginia Involved Guns Last Year”

  1. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Here’s the Wikipedia definition of a semi-automatic weapon … ” A semi-automatic firearm, also called a self-loading or autoloading firearm (fully automatic and selective fire firearms are also variations on self-loading firearms), is a repeating firearm whose action mechanism automatically loads a following round of cartridge into the chamber (self-loading) and prepares it for subsequent firing, but requires the shooter to manually actuate the trigger in order to discharge each shot.”

    I suppose that by Wikipedia’s definition almost all shotguns are semi-automatic. Even the over-and-under shotguns I use for sporting clay shooting allow for two shots with two successive trigger pulls (although the two shells have to be manually loaded before firing so the action of the first shot doesn’t load the next shot).

    I’d be happy to hear alternate definitions but it seems to me that almost all guns sold today meet the definition of semi-automatic. A single shot Derringer might not, a single-shot shogun (rare) might not and some kinds of bolt action rifles might not be classified as semi-automatic.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Just FYI – with regard to Wiki – It USUALLY points to a REFERENCE – it usually does not make up its own.

      It’s a compendium of references – not a source reference.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      The key point missed in the Wikipedia definition is that for a weapon to be semiautomatic it must, in addition to autoloading, automatically eject the spent shell after a round is fired.

      Manual load/single shot weapons, revolvers, pump action, bolt action and lever action rifles and shotguns, etc., do not automatically eject the spent shell after a round is fired.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Thanks. Once again, the gun control debate gets confusing. How does ejecting a spent shell make a firearm any more or less dangerous? Is a semi-automatic pistol really any more dangerous than a revolver? I guess it’s quicker to reload a semi-automatic revolver (fed by a magazine or clip) then to reload a revolver.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          For normal, mortal, humans, a semi-auto is faster to shoot and reload.

          However, I once watched a guy empty a 6-shot revolver, reload it, and empty it again in the same amount of time it took another guy with a semi-automatic 1911 .45 ACP to empty a single 7-shot magazine. It was amazing. Of course, this man was very talented and spent a lot of time practicing.

          Oh, and all 19 shots were on target.

        2. WayneS Avatar

          For normal, mortal, humans, a semi-auto is faster to shoot and reload.

          However, I once watched a guy empty a 6-shot revolver, reload it, and empty it again in the same amount of time it took another guy with a semi-automatic 1911 .45 ACP to empty a single 7-shot magazine. It was amazing. Of course, this man was very talented and spent a lot of time practicing.

          Oh, and all 19 shots were on target.

          This is a pretty good ‘cut-away’ animation showing how a semi-automatic firearm cycles:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG-FXLxLOSM

  2. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    “I don’t think there is such as thing as a semi-automatic shotgun” There are some – couple of Mossburgs, Smith & Wesson & Remingtons. Probably more.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Don’t forget the ever expensive Benelli, they’ve made their bread and butter off of semi-auto shotguns.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      There are dozens of them. At least one manufacturer makes a AR-15-style 12-gauge semi-automatic shotgun.

      If you want a really deadly weapon, it’d be hard to beat a semi-auto shotgun with a 30 round magazine filled with 12-gauge slugs or 00-buck.

      Enough of that modern crap, though, this is my all-time favorite semi-auto shotgun.

      https://gundigest.com/gun-reviews/shotguns/browning-auto-five-shotgun-started-it-all

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        There are also those are styled after AK’s.

  3. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    So basically you add everything up and you find that firearms are outnumbered by all the others. Consider the number of murders committed with a car IE drunk drivers and all drunk driver should be charged with 2nd degree murder. Basically the fbi has reported that more people are killed by hand and feet than long guns.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The bigger question is why Germany, Sweden, Japan, Korea and a slew more don’t have these issues.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      NIH.

    2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      So, are you moving? They don’t have anything comparable to the Second Amendment. Indeed, they are not common law countries, but rather are code law nations.

      I read so many folks on the left claiming that democracy has died. Yet, none of them talk about going through the process of trying to change the Constitution and U.S. Code. Needless to say, the average person on the street and 98.9999% of media don’t understand anything about the American system of government. It’s really sad.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        I guess more people have to die first. How many more kids…??

        1. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          I am glad you are up with closing to borders to stop the 100k deaths from Chinese fentanyl

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Most drugs do not enter the country via land borders, you know… 🤷‍♂️

      2. And those countries don’t kill babies like we do.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The bigger question is why Germany, Sweden, Japan, Korea and a slew more don’t have these issues.

  6. WayneS Avatar

    Was there a change in the availability of guns that might have contributed?

    There was a change in the availability of firearms. Under the new laws which went into effect in Virginia on July 1, 2020, guns are less readily available than they used to be.

    At least that is what the governor and the democrat-controlled GA said at the time.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      No effect. Those guns were earmarked for NY, NYC, and NJ.

  7. I fully confess my ignorance about semi-automatic shotguns and I’m willing to stand corrected.

    However, is it fair to say that most shotguns are not semi-automatic?

    Alternatively, is it fair to say that most gun-control regulations are aimed at semi-automatic rifles like AR-15s, not semi-automatic shotguns?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      It is probably fair to say that most shotguns are not semi-auto. I cannot find any statistics, but my guess is that the pump action shotgun would be the most prevalent, followed by break action (single & double barrel) and then semi auto. There are also lever action and bolt action shotguns, but unlike rifles with these actions, they are pretty rare.

      It is also fair to say that most gun control regulations are aimed at rifles, followed by handguns.

      The most important shotgun regulation you need to remember is that the minimum allowable barrel length is 18″. It is a federal crime to possess one with a shorter barrel, unless you subject yourself to the same background check, tax, etc, as required to own a full-auto firearm or a suppressor. Don’t ask me why, though, only the people who wrote the National Firearms Act of 1934 know why a short barreled shotgun should be treated the same as a Thompson submachine gun.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      It is probably fair to say that most shotguns are not semi-auto. I cannot find any statistics, but my guess is that the pump action shotgun would be the most prevalent, followed by break action (single & double barrel) and then semi auto. There are also lever action and bolt action shotguns, but unlike rifles with these actions, they are pretty rare.

      It is also fair to say that most gun control regulations are aimed at rifles, followed by handguns.

      The most important shotgun regulation you need to remember is that the minimum allowable barrel length is 18″. It is a federal crime to possess one with a shorter barrel, unless you subject yourself to the same background check, tax, etc, as required to own a full-auto firearm or a suppressor. Don’t ask me why, though, only the people who wrote the National Firearms Act of 1934 know why a short barreled shotgun should be treated the same as a Thompson submachine gun.

    3. WayneS Avatar

      It is probably fair to say that most shotguns are not semi-auto. I cannot find any statistics, but my guess is that the pump action shotgun would be the most prevalent, followed by break action (single & double barrel) and then semi auto. There are also lever action and bolt action shotguns, but unlike rifles with these actions, they are pretty rare.

      It is also fair to say that most gun control regulations are aimed at rifles, followed by handguns.

      The most important shotgun regulation you need to remember is that the minimum allowable barrel length is 18″. It is a federal crime to possess one with a shorter barrel, unless you subject yourself to the same background check, tax, etc, as required to own a full-auto firearm or a suppressor. Don’t ask me why, though, only the people who wrote the National Firearms Act of 1934 know why a short barreled shotgun should be treated the same as a Thompson submachine gun.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        The 1934 NFA, the gift that keeps on giving.

        What’s a yearly tax per item between friends. /s

    4. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I’d caveat that statement, gun-control regulations are aimed at rifles that have the appearance of an AR-15. Not necessarily the semi-auto action of the firearm.

      That was illustrated in the 1994 AWB, it wasn’t about the firearms mechanism of fire, but rather its appearance.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Good point.

    5. JayCee Avatar

      I was in GreenTop today and asked a sales person what they sell the most of. Semi-auto outsells over under, side by side, break action and pump combined. It is by far the most popular shotgun among sportsmen and their shelves are full of semi-auto inventory.

    6. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      There is no difference in background checks, there is a difference in technical issues like length of barrel or ammo but when it comes to laws affecting the buyer or seller no.

  8. Alex Tate Avatar
    Alex Tate

    My concern is it only takes ONE semi-automatic gun to inflict mass casualties at a school, Wal Mart or house of worship. The second prong to this equation is a third party owning a gun or giving someone access to a gun. A local family lost their daughter because a kid was given access to a gun. If that was your child?

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      “A local family lost their daughter because a kid was given access to a gun. If that was your child?”

      This is an emotional appeal, anyone that is emotional should not be making law.

      The loss is and would be terrible and I would hope that the Justice Department would bring charges of negligent homicide against the individual.

      Furthermore the additional prongs of your comment are as such:

      1) It is unlawful to provide someone you have reason to believe should not be in possession of a firearm, access to a firearm.

      2) It only takes one deranged or evil individual to inflict a mass casualty event at any please at any time. The tool they use to inflict that damage has no impact.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Thousands upon thousands of individuals owning or with access to firearms is a proportion that invites one individual inflict damage. The comment you criticize was not purely emotional but an example of what can occur. The commenter is not making law but expressing an opinion not deserving of scorn.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          “Thousands upon thousands of individuals owning or with access to firearms is a proportion that invites one individual inflict damage.”

          There are approximately 393 million firearms circulating in the United States at this moment. The fact that there are a number of firearms in the United States does not indicate it’s the result of all damage (correlation does not imply causation).

          “The comment you criticize was not purely emotional but an example of what can occur. ”

          The author invoked an emotional appeal and invalidated anything that they were trying to convey.

          “The commenter is not making law but expressing an opinion not deserving of scorn.”

          Please using one of the 3 definitions of scorn, outline where I “scorned” the individual for expressing their opinion. Also, indicate in my statement where I stated that author was or was not creating law.

          : open dislike and disrespect or mockery often mixed with indignation
          2: an expression of contempt or derision
          3: an object of extreme disdain, contempt, or derision : something contemptible

        2. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          “Thousands upon thousands of individuals owning or with access to firearms is a proportion that invites one individual inflict damage.”

          There are approximately 393 million firearms circulating in the United States at this moment. The fact that there are a certain number of firearms in the United States does not indicate they will result of all damage (correlation does not imply causation).

          “The comment you criticize was not purely emotional but an example of what can occur. ”

          The author invoked an emotional appeal and invalidated anything that they were trying to convey.

          “The commenter is not making law but expressing an opinion not deserving of scorn.”

          Please using one of the 3 definitions of scorn, outline where I “scorned” the individual for expressing their opinion. Also, indicate in my statement where I stated that author was or was not creating law.

          : open dislike and disrespect or mockery often mixed with indignation
          2: an expression of contempt or derision
          3: an object of extreme disdain, contempt, or derision : something contemptible

          1. Alex Tate Avatar
            Alex Tate

            The author is a human being therefore capable of human emotion. It’s amazing how that works.

            Most gun owners I know have tremendous respect for their weapons. They keep them locked in a safe place.

            As we’ve seen in many instances recently, there are gun owners who might not have the sense given to them.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            1)Emotion has no place in law.

            2)Correct, thereby negating your own comment.

            3) False, you’ve seen instances where people have little to no respect for life. Not that they don’t have any sense, they are keenly aware of what they are doing but are indifferent.

            None of the those statements are relegated to firearms alone.

          3. James Kiser Avatar
            James Kiser

            The same applies to gasoline, cars, knives and anything else you care to come up with.

  9. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Astonishing that the discussion about firearms and death devolves into a senseless debate about a definitional term. Simply astonishing!!

    1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Definitions in law are important.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        In firearm law they are very important without the exact definition of 18″ from the 1934 NFA we wouldn’t know what an SBR was.

        Not that is has any relevance or difference on a firearm, but hey it lets Uncle Sugar get that pound of flesh yearly.

  10. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Oh, brother. Not only do we have to worry about political radicals, Jihadists, mentally ill teenagers, and suicidal middle-aged men, now we can add homicidal illegal immigrants to our list of worries!”

    You forgot political extremists – or just mentally ill males who are attracted to political extremists…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      And UVa haters…

  11. Randy Huffman Avatar
    Randy Huffman

    What I wonder the most in gun violence is how many of the guns were legally purchased. It is frequently stated by politicians of States with stricter gun laws (like Illinois, where I spent half my life) that they can’t stop guns from coming over “from Indiana”. I don’t buy that argument one bit. Criminals are going to get guns, just like they get illegal drugs, they will find a way.

    In any event, Jim said he was going to look at whether guns are more available, and it would be interested to see what research is out there on this question. I did a quick search and it was stated in several articles and arguments the vast majority of murders were with illegal guns, but it seemed anecdotal, or referencing studies done many years ago.

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      You night check out John Lott’s website and Just Facts website

      1. Randy Huffman Avatar
        Randy Huffman

        Thanks. I glanced at Just Facts and did not see that addressed. But it had a wealth of good information, such as repeating what I saw and posted on the next article Jim wrote on htis topic, that mass shootings are a fraction of annual murders.

        1. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          I have the Just Facts and Lott have actual citations to research and information that has been vetted.

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    There’s a solution that works and implemented by a dozen democracies in the G20. I guess guns and the movement of money associated with them makes up a large part of the GDP.

    “You can count on America doing the right thing, but not until they exhaust all other possibilities.” — Winnie.

  13. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    How many involved the same person ?

Leave a Reply