Next Virginia Tax Reform: Index for Inflation

by Barbara Hollingsworth

Most Virginians are painfully aware ­­­­that it’s becoming much more difficult to make ends meet. Prices for fo­­­­od, housing, gasoline and other necessities have soared. Inflation hit a 40-year high of 9.1 percent in June, the largest yearly increase since January 1982. And a recent study from the University of Iowa found that a typical American had to pay $669 more for basic living expenses than they did just two years ago.

All while the Commonwealth of Virginia was pocketing $2 billion in “surplus” revenue that was not anticipated and therefore not included in the two-year $165 billion state budget the General Assembly passed earlier this year. Most of that windfall was the result of the Federal Reserve’s monetary inflation, which made the prices of consumer staples soar because there were suddenly a lot more dollars chasing the same amount of goods and services.

But inflation had another unwelcome effect. It also pushed Virginia taxpayers into higher tax brackets despite the fact that their actual living standards went down, not up.

Governor Glenn Youngkin wants to set aside $400 million for tax relief in his revised budget, which he will present to the state legislature in December. But that’s less than a quarter of the total surplus. The budget signed by Youngkin also includes $450 million to pay for potential cost overruns on the commonwealth’s capital projects due to … you guessed it …. inflation.

No additional money was set aside to cover transportation overruns, although that may be coming. Referring to the higher material and fuel costs faced by road construction companies, Virginia Transportation Secretary Shep Miller said that “we don’t want anybody to get crushed here through this inflationary process.”

That same logic should apply to taxpayers being pushed into higher tax brackets due to the same inflationary process. It’s called “bracket creep,” and it has the same effect as a tax hike – without lawmakers actually having to vote for one.

The commonwealth has four graduated-rate individual income tax brackets, with the lowest marginal rate of 2 percent and the highest of 5.75 percent as of January, according to the nonprofit Tax Foundation. The top bracket is triggered at $17,000, so all but the lowest income earners pay the highest rate.

Virginia is one of 13 states that have not indexed their state income taxes for inflation. And unlike other states, the commonwealth does not adjust standard deductions or personal exemptions for inflation either.

“The absence or insufficiency of cost-of-living adjustments in many state tax codes is always an issue, as it constitutes an unlegislated tax increase every year, cutting into wage growth and reducing return on investment. During a period of higher inflation, however, the impact is particularly significant,” according to Jared Walczak, vice president of state projects at the Tax Foundation.

The easy cure for this problem is indexing, which is simply adjusting state tax rates to account for inflation. Indexing is not rocket science. Under indexing, standard deductions and tax brackets rise in conjunction with the Consumer Price Index so that taxpayers are not forced to pay more taxes in addition to inflated prices for goods and services. It’s the same idea behind the Social Security Administration’s cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) to the monthly checks it sends to retirees, blunting the impact of the hidden tax of inflation on people living on a fixed income.

Indexing is also an issue of equity. According to the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, “the long-term effect [of inflation] can be a substantial tax hike – and one that falls hardest on low- and middle-income taxpayers.”

But the General Assembly balks whenever indexing is considered, even though bracket creep forces Virginians to pay higher taxes without any corresponding increase in their standard of living. This makes taxpayers poorer and the commonwealth richer.

The 2022 General Assembly did pass a number of new tax laws, which went into effect on July 1, including a reduction of the sales tax on groceries, an increase in the standard deduction for state income tax filers if certain revenue targets are met, and a one-time income tax rebate ($250 for single filers and $500 for couples filing joint returns).

But the legislature fell short of indexing state income taxes to account for the inflation that is currently ravaging the economy. This means that bracket creep will increase state income taxes automatically, without members of the General Assembly actually voting for it, which is apparently just fine with them. Politicians love having more of other people’s money to spend without the political liability of voting for a tax increase.

But it’s not fine for Virginians hit with a double whammy, watching their state income taxes rise just as the buying power of that same income declines.

Youngkin knows this. “We have been overtaxing Virginians,” the governor noted in an interview with Yahoo!Finance, calling inflation “the silent thief.” But the $4 billion in tax relief Youngkin included in the state budget that went into effect on July 1 does not address bracket creep, thus allowing the “silent thief” to continue to prey on Virginia taxpayers.

Indexing state income taxes to account for inflation to prevent this recurring, non-legislated tax hike is common sense tax reform that the Thomas Jefferson Institute has long urged our leaders in Richmond to enact. With the cost of everything rising faster than most Virginians’ income, voters should demand that both the governor and members of the General Assembly take care of this unfinished business.

First published this morning by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy.  Barbara Hollingsworth is a Visiting Fellow  and former editorial page editor at the Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star.  


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

15 responses to “Next Virginia Tax Reform: Index for Inflation”

  1. DJRippert Avatar

    The Biden Recession has already begun. As liberal Democratic icon Bill Clinton correctly said, “A recession is two quarters in a row of negative economic growth.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOC3EgImXog

    We’re already there.

    Mealy-mouthed liberals can try to excuse Biden’s stagflation based recession by attempting to redefine “recession” but it won’t work. Clinton was right then and he is right today. We’re already seeing stagflation and we’re already in a recession.

    Meanwhile, the S&P500 is falling fast and will probably cross the level inherited by Biden on his inauguration (3,798.18) today. As of this writing, the S&P sits at 3,868.67 and is dropping like a stone. This morning FedEx reported a drastic slowdown in demand and its stock fell 21%.

    Despite the inflation-driven recession Biden (or whoever is really pulling the strings) has created the administration has done everything possible to make the situation worse. From passing the asinine “Inflation Reduction Act” to excusing billions of student debt, Biden and the rest of the Democratic clown show have demonstrated that they will put buying votes ahead of fiscal sanity.

    The current stagflation-based recession is likely to only get worse.

    Gov Youngkin would be well advised to study what happened in Virginia during the last recession. While that recession didn’t have Carteresque stagflation it did put tremendous fiscal pressure on Virginia.

    Indexing tax brackets may be a good start at combating the Biden Recession but it is only a start.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      looks like a worldwide issue, no?

      global recession they say.. must be Biden’s fault, eh?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      looks like a worldwide issue, no?

      global recession they say.. must be Biden’s fault, eh?

  2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    End the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit organization that hires employees or agents to lobby or try to influence public opinion. Left, right or anywhere else on the political spectrum. If they want to do it all with unpaid volunteers, let them keep their tax-exempt status. How much money would this bring in?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I don’t really see how that changes anything myself especially since some non-profits are funded by dark money and others purely from people who support the organization.

      And then you still have other municipal and industry associations and pretty much all of them would still exist and operate even if they are taxed.

      what would it change?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      I don’t really see how that changes anything myself especially since some non-profits are funded by dark money and others purely from people who support the organization.

      And then you still have other municipal and industry associations and pretty much all of them would still exist and operate even if they are taxed.

      what would it change?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        It would reduce the amount of deductions some people could claim, thereby increasing their tax liability.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          so churches and charitable orgs like St. Judes or Doctors without borders out also?

    3. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Do you mean to end the tas exempt status of PACs which are ordinarily tax exempt?

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    Virginia gave a tax rebate in 2019 and Northam had another one in his last budget.

    Not a new idea much less by the GOP/Youngkin.

  4. Paul Sweet Avatar

    A lot of the surplus is from requiring taxpayers who claim the federal standard deduction to also use the standard deduction for their state taxes.

    Virginia’s income tax brackets and standard deduction are long overdue for a change because they haven’t changed since the 1970s. Back then the average income was $10 – 15K, which is less than you would make at a full-time minimum wage job today.

    The standard deduction was 15% of adjusted gross income, with a minimum of $500 and maximum of $2000. The exemption was $1000 each for husband and wife, and $300 for each dependent.

    Tax rates were the same as today:
    2% on the first $3000 taxable income
    3% on the next $2000
    5% on all over $5,000
    I’m not sure when the 5.75% on all over $17,000 took effect, but it was long ago.

    The Consumer Price Index has increased from 38.8 in 1970 to 296 in 2020, which is 7.6 times higher. If Virginia tax rates were adjusted by this amount for inflation, the standard deduction would be a minimum of $3800 and a maximum of $15,200. Exemptions would be $7600 for husband & wife, and $2280 for each dependent. Tax rates would be:
    2% on the first $22,800
    3% on the next $15,200
    5% on the next $45,600
    5.75% on all over $91,200

    Lower income people are paying higher rates than they would if there had been some adjustment for inflation over the past 50 years.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I agree with all you say here … and

      ” A lot of the surplus is from requiring taxpayers who claim the federal standard deduction to also use the standard deduction for their state taxes.”

      Why doesn’t Virginia do away with that requirement and let people choose which way is best for them?

      1. Paul Sweet Avatar

        Because the delegates want to brag about all the things they got the state to do for the voters when they are running for reelection.

        Of course they won’t mention that the money to do this (minus a not-so-small administrative fee) came from the voters in the first place,

      2. Paul Sweet Avatar

        Because the delegates want to brag about all the things they got the state to do for the voters when they are running for reelection.

        Of course they won’t mention that the money to do this (minus a not-so-small administrative fee) came from the voters in the first place,

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      I agree with all you say here … and

      ” A lot of the surplus is from requiring taxpayers who claim the federal standard deduction to also use the standard deduction for their state taxes.”

      Why doesn’t Virginia do away with that requirement and let people choose which way is best for them?

Leave a Reply