The Next Train Wreck: Failed States

Meredith Whitney is on the warpath against out-of-control state spending. The banking analyst warns today in the Wall Street Journal that a wave of municipal defaults and indiscriminate bond selling will prompt the next big federal bailout. Indeed, she writes, the bailout has already begun.

More than 20% of California’s debt issurance in 2009 and 30% in 2010 to date has been subsidized by the federal Build America Bonds program, in which Uncle Sam covers 35% of the interest paid by the bonds. The BABs have subsidized an even higher percentage of bonds issued by Illinois and Nevada.

But debt subsidies are the tip of the iceberg. Writes Whitney:

General federal government transfers to states now stand at the highest levels on record. Traditionally, state revenues were primarily comprised of sales, personal and corporate income taxes. Over the years, however, federal government transfers have subsidized business-as-usual state spending not covered by state tax collections. Today more than 28% of state funding comes from federal government transfers, the highest contribution on record.

Get this: New York state expenditures represented 250% of its tax creceipts over the past decade. The figure for the 15 largest states by GDP was 220%. “Clearly,” says Whitney, “states have been spending at unsustainable levels without facing immediate consequences due to federal transfer payments and other temporary factors.”

Doo doo, as the saying goes, rolls downhill. Local governments depend upon state government transfers for 33% of their funding. If the federal government has to cut aid to states, the states will likely cut aid to localities. Expect a huge uproar from entrenched political interests when the house of cards collapses.

That day is not far off. States are staring at the second consecutive year of $200 billion budget shortfalls. Says Whitney: “Rainy day funds are depleted, pension-fund contributions are already at record lows, and almost all of the major federal government subsidy programs will run out in June 2011.”

One of the early tests of the new Congress will be whether or not to bail out the states and municipalities. If Congress refuses to act, we could see that wave of state and municipal bankruptcies. If Congress buckles, it opens up giant barrel of moral hazard.

Virginia’s General Assembly has hardly covered itself with glory when it comes to spending, but it has been less reckless than most states. We don’t need a bailout. And our elected representatives should not vote to approve bailouts for states that are chronically undisciplined and profligate. I’ll be following this issue closely, and I won’t be the only one. If any Virginia congressmen vote to bail out other states, they can expect one heck of a voter backlash.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “The Next Train Wreck: Failed States”

  1. Congress has been ordered to cut spending. Maybe they will start by cutting support to the states.

  2. If a state fails and isn't bailed out, who pays?

    If a state fails, what next? Shut it down and divvy it up among the neighboring states?

  3. Groveton Avatar

    It is VERY debatable whether the federal government can legally allow a state to go bankrupt. In fact, I'd say it's more than safe to say that no state can be allowed to go bankrupt. Why? A variant of Dillon's Rule. States are very much references in the US Constitution. They are very much part of the fabric of the country as originally envisioned by the founding fathers.

    I think you'll see several states managed like the World Bank manages financially inept countries. The money to stave off bankruptcy will be provided only if the state undertakes a set of serious guarantees to ensure that they will clean up their financial house.

    The real question is how far a state should have to go to get a bail out. A balanced budget provision in the state constitution? No new debt until the bailout is repaid?

    Anybody willing to wager on which state will need the tough love first?

    My money is on California.

  4. One way or another, the same folks wind up paying the bill: US.

    Well, at least if our bonds go under we will have paid the bills due without raising taxes.

  5. What would be the effect of states receiving or practicing "tough love"?

    Let's take Virginia.

    What will happen to Virginia when the Federal Gov Stimulus runs out in 2011?

    I'd say somewhere between 5-20% layoffs to include local school teachers and deputies/law enforcement.

    Any disagreement with that?

    So we're going to end up with higher levels of unemployment and/or people take much lower paying jobs… giving up their homes and living in apartments and being mobile with a used 4-door econobox rather than the Lincoln Navigator SUV.

    In this regard, EMR and a phalanx of others have said that too many of us are living too far above our means and that …HORRORS.. we.. MIGHT have to live more like Europeans and Japanese!!

    Ultimately that's what happens.

    States don't go broke and the Feds should NOT keep them from having to downsize – because unlike the Feds or the European guys – our states …most have to balance their budgets.

    But Groveton/others DID touch on an interesting concept and that is – if you took your Federal Income Tax and figured out how much of it came back to you via your state – as opposed to what the Feds kept to operate govt and the military.. what percent of your income tax would that be?

    How much of what you pay in Fed income Tax – do the Feds keep and not spend on your state?

    If you knew what the impacts would be if your Fed Taxes were cut by that amount and your state would have to figure out what to do about it – would you be okay with that?

    Would you be okay with cutting the schools by a 1/3 or 40%?

    How about Law Enforcement?

    Would you be willing to have maybe 1/2 the law enforcement that we have right now?

  6. Anonymous Avatar

    Larry, we could start layoffs with non-teaching staff, who have been protected in many school systems, including Fairfax County. FCPS has more than 200 curriculum specialists. I attended a school board meeting where a team of eight people appeared to talk about how to measure the value of music and art education.

    Then we have both Fairfax County and FCPS with separate IT and HR departments. We have a police force and a sheriff's office.

    There is room for some cutting without harming actual services to the public.

    TMT

  7. Anonymous Avatar

    Weren't most of the states that formerly participanted in the Confederacy bankrupt or virtually bankrupt for years after the Civil War? Uncle Sam didn't bail them out, as I remember my Reconstruction history.

    TMT

  8. Anonymous Avatar

    Perhaps if the Virginia congressmen don't vote to assist California and New York, then the congressmen from those states will vote to stop sending their federal tax dollars to underwrite Virginia.

  9. Groveton Avatar

    TMT – I recall the Bankruptcy Act of 1867 but not state bankruptcies. My hazy recollection is that 1867 act was intended to allow northern creditors to collect from southern debtors regardless of individual state laws.

    In a voluntary bankruptcy – where would state even file for bankruptcy?

  10. Right.

    Either states go under and we bail them out or they fail and the bonds our retrement funds bought go south and we bail them out that way.

    Whether the feds bail out the states and states bail out localities or not, we are gong to pay the bill.

    Most probably it will mean higher taxes, which is going to be a bitter pill for the new Republican majority to swallow.

    They will probably filibuster like Flubadub and kick the can down the road some more.

  11. Right.

    Either states go under and we bail them out or they fail and the bonds our retrement funds bought go south and we bail them out that way.

    Whether the feds bail out the states and states bail out localities or not, we are gong to pay the bill.

    Most probably it will mean higher taxes, which is going to be a bitter pill for the new Republican majority to swallow.

    They will probably filibuster like Flubadub and kick the can down the road some more.

Leave a Reply