New Richmond Schools Administrative Scandal

Another day, another K-12 education scandal.

The latest news: A state investigation has found that more than 1,000 Richmond public school students received credit for high school courses they shouldn’t have, reports the Richmond Times-Dispatch. The lack of compliance with state standards affected more than 1,500 credit hours.

Among the six major “errors” identified in a Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) audit, which will be released later this month:

  • Some students were awarded two credits when they should have received one. Most of these courses were in career and technical education classes.
  • Some students received credit for taking the same class multiple times and for taking classes not approved by the state for credit.
  • Some middle-school students took high school-level classes and received credit when those classes weren’t eligible for credit by the state.

Of the more than 1,000 students who earned credit when they shouldn’t have, writes the T-D, 300 are now seniors. Richmond schools have roughly 1,200 a year in the senior class, suggesting that roughly one in four students were affected.

Bacon’s bottom line: Are these just random errors, or do they reflect another example of how educrats game the system? Richmond city schools have long been criticized for having one of the highest dropout rates of any school district in Virginia, and school officials have been working to improve the numbers.

In 2107, the dropout rate was reported to be 17.08%. Stated Interim Superintendent Thomas Kranz in a press release at the time:

As we continue our work with VDOE, our expectation is that with their support we will be successful in achieving our ultimate goal of 100% On-Time Graduation Rate. We are committed to increasing our On-Time Graduation Rate by 5 percent and lowering our dropout rate for this school year.

Despite a system-wide dip in the on-time graduation rate that year, some high schools experienced improvement:

Armstrong High — 4 percentage point increase to 80.8%
Franklin Military Academy — 2 percentage point increase to 100%
John Marshall High School — 1 percentage point increase to 90.1%

There is a very easy way to determine if the errors reflect random bureaucratic ineptitude or a deliberate gaming of the system: Find out how many of the students receiving extra credits needed them to graduate on time. If the students getting the extra credits wouldn’t have graduated anyway, we may be talking about random error. But if the “mistakes” were putting a lot of students over the top, so to speak, there is a strong likelihood they were intentional.

My usual philosophy is never to attribute to evil intention what can be explained by simple incompetence. But given the prevalence of administrative cheating in Virginia schools, I’m tempted to suspend that principle and make the opposite assumption. If errors occur in the reporting of educational metrics, they aren’t accidental. Find out who benefits.

Oh, and one more thing. According to the T-D, Richmond is the only school district in Virginia under VDOE scrutiny. If it turns out that Richmond administrators figured out a trick for improving dismal dropout rates, their counterparts in other districts may have too. Whenever you see sudden, dramatic improvements in on-time graduation, it’s time to start digging.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

3 responses to “New Richmond Schools Administrative Scandal”

  1. djrippert Avatar

    Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that there is widespread and deliberate falsification of records and results. At what point does this become a criminal matter? Certainly an executive in private enterprise who falsified material financial results would be in violation of various federal statutes and would be subject to indictment, trial, conviction and incarceration. Ask Bernie Ebbers. The only way to end this fraud is to start putting some of these people in the slammer.

  2. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Really, really disappointing to see career and technical classes highlighted for this problem. If those programs are dismissed and distrusted by potential employers, the students are the long term losers. But in all these scandals, whether incompetence or fraud, it is the students who bear the deepest scars.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    I’m disappointed but not really shocked.. There have many ongoing warning symptoms and School administrators and teachers in low-income, low performing schools are under increasing pressure to “do something”.

    Now I give VDOE credit for ordering the audit… instead of turning a blind eye …

    And then I ask this – what should be done after they clean house?

    Does anyone think that there is a non-public school alternative that will do better?

    I’m all in favor of any/all alternative paths – as long as they are also held to the same standards.

    But who in their right mind would want to take on this task?

    Seriously.

    Government is responsible for public education. Nothing is more about equality and opportunity than the right to receive an education. Those who want to or can pursue non-public options can do so but at the end of the day – for the kids who do not have that option – the state and locality take that responsibility and clearly when it comes to educating kids from lower income demographics.. .it’s a serious problem.

    This is what happens to kids who do not pass the 3rd grade SOLs – we know this. What exactly is supposed to be done when kids who fail the 3rd grade SOLs get to high school after we “hold accountable” and affix blame?

Leave a Reply