MWAA Backtracks on PLA, Full Steam Ahead for Dulles Rail

The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) board of directors voted today to eliminate its preference for Project Labor Agreements in the bidding for Phase 2 of the Rail-to-Dulles project, clearing the way for construction of the project estimated to cost $2.7 billion. Only a negative vote by the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors can sidetrack it now.

“Today’s vote is a major turning point for the Dulles rail project,” said Airports Authority Chairman Michael A. Curto in an official statement.  “This project is vital to the economic growth of this region and the Board is determined to do whatever is necessary to finish the project as quickly and cost effectively as possible”.

“Dropping the PLA preference was what we needed to do to move forward with this project and with our funding partners,” Thomas M. Davis III, MWAA vice chairman and chairman of the Dulles Corridor Committee, also in the prepared statement.  “This has brought us all closer to recognizing that this project is important to the entire region and requires a team effort.”

Other reactions to the 11-to-1 vote:

“This vote was a huge victory not only for the 97.4 percent of Virginia’s construction workforce that chooses not to join a union and for the taxpayers and toll road users who will be financing this important project, but also for Loudoun County and all regional transportation and economic development initiatives,” said Patrick Dean, president of Associated Builders and Contractors, Virginia Chapter, in a prepared statement.

Tweeted Fairfax County Board Chair Sharon Bulova, a Democrat: “Glad to see the MWAA board drop the PLA incentive. I looked forward to the state upholding its commitment just as we have done.”

The Loudoun County Chamber of Commerce tweeted, “We applaud” the decision. Loudoun Rail Now also took to Twitter to stated that it was “pleased” with the outcome.

Please note: The MWAA vote does not in any way discriminate against contractors using a union shop. There is a reasonable chance that Dulles Transit Partners, which constructed Phase 1 under a voluntary project labor agreement, could win the Phase 2 work as well. The board vote simply reversed a previously stated policy that would have given preference to bidders committing to PLAs over contracts using non-union labor.

While there still are concerns about the project — especially projected rates increases on the Dulles Toll Road — the PLA issue was the critical issue blocking the project. The McDonnell administration has no reason now not to contribute the $150 million it promised as part of a funding deal brokered by U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. While Loudoun County still must approve its participation, I question that the toll issue is big enough to derail a project that nearly all of the powers-that-be in Northern Virginia want to see built. Personally, I still have major reservations, but I doubt Dulles Rail can be stopped now.

— JAB

Update: This response comes from Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth:  “Now that Governor McDonnell has secured a political victory that removes his stated objection to helping to fund the Dulles Rail project, it’s time for the state to make a fairer contribution.  Otherwise, the Governor is asking northern Virginians to shoulder far too much of the burden.  $150 million is far too small a contribution, leaving Fairfax and Loudoun tax payers and Northern Virginia drivers shouldering 95 percent of the cost.  The state should be contributing at least $500 million to Phase 2.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Maybe Tom Davis is being quietly effective after all. An 11-1 vote sounds like some selling / threatening / lobbying was going on inside the MWAA.

    That’s two defeats for union supporters in the last 24 hours.

    It will be interesting to see what, if anything, the pro-union Obama Administration has to say about this.

    Could Davis be so smart that he held this vote on the morning after the Wisconsin recall election knowing that the smoke from the fire in Madison would cover his actions on the MWAA?

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Now, what will Jim Bacon find to complain about?

    I am confident he will find something.

    1. There’s always something to complain about!

  3. I predict Phase II will now be built. It will trigger rezonings that, in turn, will cause more and more traffic congestion in the Dulles Corridor. This is like the old Little Rascals’ short, where wishing Cotton was a monkey didn’t actually make him one. Wishing rail will reduce traffic congestion won’t make it happen.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      “This is like the old Little Rascals’ short, where wishing Cotton was a monkey didn’t actually make him one.”.

      Wow. I just have to ask, “How old are you?”.

      I would have thought somebody who uses Little Rascals “shorts” (whatever that means) as an example would think some more iron horses are the cat’s meow.

      Ahoy!

  4. larryg Avatar

    I PREDICT that the people that were up in arms about all that Union stuff …will now depart the scene en-mass and leave MWAA to continue it’s other odious practices…. crony capitalism, etc, et al…

    now that they’ve killed the union rodent.. all is well..

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Gotta love the “crony capitalism” comment. One minute, Fairfax County is clueless because the Metro at Vienna and Dunn Loring didn’t create high density, high value real estate. The next minute Phase II is “crony capitalism” because it will inevitably create high density, high value real estate.

  5. larryg Avatar

    well no… I do not think Fairfax is “clueless” under any stretch of perspectives but I think MWAA is far from being transparent and accountable on how it is conducting it’s affairs with regard to the building and development of METRO.

    I STILL question WHY METRO is not in charge of it’s own expansions as most subway systems in the country are. Why do we have this separate entity in charge and why is it operating as an independent authority immune from those whom it is imposing De facto taxes on?

    DO we really want MWAA to become a model for more authorities?

  6. HardHatMommy Avatar
    HardHatMommy

    I never understood that either Larry. Not that WMATA seems to be any more effective or ethical than MWAA … but it didn’t make sense to me as to why this fell on MWAA’s to do list.

    I also still don’t get why we don’t have these boards stacked with people with real credentials. What about a pilot, a retired TSA dude, a variety of engineers, a lawyer, a financial pro and some people who just love aviation? I think that would make a great little MWAA board. Instead everyone is politically connected.

    The LoCo board is 4 FOR rail and 2 who are nuts and are just flat OPPOSED to rail no matter what. The 3 in play are mysteries. I haven’t met anyone who claims to know how they will vote. I definitely question the numbers – both ridership and the financial investment and I’m not sold on this as a transportation solution. But nonetheless I think it is a hell of an opportunity to squander. The economy is depressed and construction is bruised and battered. The industry takes jobs for very little profit just to keep people working. This is a good deal in terms of construction expenses. The timing is right. I hope Loudoun realizes that.

    I imagine my kids working in a vibrant Dulles corridor someday and riding the Silver Line. I imagine the green space that makes Loudoun such a jewel remaining intact because we center development around the Silver Line and improve the road network around the airport. I imagine my kids working from home and driving half as much as I did. I hope that’s the way it all goes down.

  7. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “I STILL question WHY METRO is not in charge of it’s own expansions as most subway systems in the country are”.

    Because Tim Kaine gave the authority to MWAA not WMATA.

    And why would he do that?

    Even before the board expansion, Virginia had 5 of 13 votes on the MWAA but only 2 of 8 voting seats on WMATA (38% to 25%).

    As for transparency – it happens in one of three ways –

    1. It is required by law
    2. The charter of the organization has bylaws that require transparency
    3. The board members provide information to the public without being forced to do so by the law or the charter

    There was no law requiring transparency in multi-state compacts, so #1 was out.

    The charter was poorly written by the Imperial Clown Show in Richmond and the Night Owl Patrol (DC City Council). So, there is apparently no required transparency.

    The board members are either forbidden to disclose information (through the charter) or they simply choose not to be transparent.

    What can be done?

    Change the charter to mandate compliance with FOIA requests.

    Why doesn’t it happen?

    Because the Clowns and Night Owls don’t instruct their board members to do so.

    ” … immune from those whom it is imposing De facto taxes on?”.

    That’s rich. The expanded board will have 17 members, 7 from Virginia. That’s 41% of the vote. All they need to do is convince 2 more board members to “see it their way” and they have a majority.

    And …. as has been stated perhaps 1,000 times – they can impose defacto taxes because Gov Tim Kaine gave them that right.

    As always, the Imperial Clown Show in Richmond created the mess.

  8. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    And complimenting the Imperial Clown Show in Richmond, the Night Owl Patrol –

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-dc-councils-stain-spreads/2012/06/06/gJQAZiylJV_story.html

    Gee, I wonder why Maryland didn’t join that two state compact?

  9. “I imagine my kids working in a vibrant Dulles corridor someday and riding the Silver Line.” But what is the real capacity of the Silver Line? No one has ever said for sure.
    We do know it is limited by the Potomac River tunnel (27 trains per hour max), the needs of the Blue Line (today 13 trains per hour max), and the needs of the Orange Line (today 14 trains per hour max). The Blue Line is down three trains from 13. That leaves 17 trains per hour to be shared by the Orange & Silver Lines. I think I read where 240 people can be jammed into a rail car. Multiply that by 8 cars for 1920 passengers at any time. But how many trains will the Silver Line have?
    The Orange Line has 14 trains per hour max today. Say 6 cars per train to be conservative. That’s 1440 maximum passengers per train. So the Orange Crush maxes out at 20160 passengers per hour. It would take 10.5 eight-car trains per hour to serve the same number of passengers. Round down to 10 trains for the Orange Line. That’s seven trains per hour max for the Silver Line or 13440 passengers, cattle car style. Does that do the job?
    What about head-ways? The RB corridor gets 17 trains per hour max. That’s one train every 3.5 minutes during rush. From East Falls Church to Vienna, the Orange Line gets 10 trains per hour, for a train every six minutes. The Silver Line gets 7 trains per hour, for a train every 8.6 minutes. Isn’t the place to locate an office or live apartment style in Arlington’s RB corridor? How much money is it worth to Fairfax and Loudoun to make Arlington more competitive?

  10. larryg Avatar

    re: METRO capacity – You can bet your boots that “Phase III” will be to correct that “deficiency”.

    As far as “Tim Kaine DID IT”… I’m skeptical… Is Tim Kaine truly the sole blame for the MWAA mess?

    For some reason, we have a region transportation facility – WMATA – and the parts in Va are the manifest destiny of an entity dominated by Virginians.

    Is this essentially why MWAA took on the Dulles expansion? Was WMATA indifferent or not in favor (perhaps without a known/viable funding source?)

    so anyhow…now ROVA will cough up $25 per person to “help” pay for GS-15’s catch their flight to Vegas?

    ;-]

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      “so anyhow…now ROVA will cough up $25 per person to “help” pay for GS-15′s catch their flight to Vegas?”

      Each $25 will be but a small payback on the billions of subsidy flushed from NoVa (and Tidewater) to the rest of the state. Remember, what happens in Richmond stays in Richmond.

  11. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    TMT makes some good points but implies that the capacity is fixed.

    The rate limiter through the tunnel is the speed of the switches. Faster switches = more trains per hour.

    The rate limiter for the number of cars on a train is the power capacity of the track. Increase the power capacity and add more cars.

    Finally, the blue line can divert trains up to DC over the Yellow Line bridge, thus reducing blue line trains going through the tunnel.

    All of which brings us to a point made frequently by LarryG – MWAA will build the metro extension but WMATA will operate it. Questions like the speed of switches in Rosslyn or the power capacity of existing lines are WMATA questions, as is the question of diverting Blue Line trains over the Yellow Line bridge.

    And …. once the people who read and post on BaconsRebellion get a load of WMATA they will be wishing for the days when MWAA was the centerpiece of the conversation.

  12. abroderick Avatar
    abroderick

    The benefits of bringing the Metro to Loudoun County outweigh the costs. The Metro is fundamental to growth in the area. We can’t afford to miss out on this opportunity. I vote yes to Metro.

  13. DJR – I don’t know about the switch issue. It sounds like it would be worth investigating. Longer trains are not so likely for two reasons. First, the station platforms are not long enough to accommodate trains longer than eight cars. A longer train would be required to stop; let off, and pick up, passengers from the front cars of the train; move up; and finally let off, and pick up, passengers from the front cars of the train. That would be a big mess and likely slow down the trains.
    Second, the power traction system cannot handle trains larger than eight cars. The Silver Line will have limited capacity. How much, we don’t yet know.
    abroderick “The benefits of bringing the Metro to Loudoun County outweigh the costs. The Metro is fundamental to growth in the area.” Anyone can say this, but what supports your conclusions? If Loudoun gets rail and allows significant density around the stations, it will need massive investments in additional roads and other public facilities to support the density. Has anyone considered those costs? I doubt it.

  14. I have major problems with Stewart Schwartz’s position. Building the added road capacity that is needed to support the urban growth triggered by the imminent arrival of Dulles Rail is a more critical need for state money than is Phase II of the rail project. The traffic studies done for Tysons are predictive of what will happen with traffic volumes for Reston, Herndon, the Airport and station areas in Loudoun County.
    Second, an infusion of cash from the Commonwealth to Phase II is likely to wind up in Bechtel’s pockets unless the cash comes after the construction costs are fixed. Given the US DOT IG report, it is impossible to expect MWAA could prevent Bechtel from getting a significant sum of money that would otherwise buy down tolls. This is not a partisan issue. Democratic Delegate Bob Brink and GOP Delegate Barbara Comstock have both argued for the need to keep state money away from Bechtel.
    Third, IAD must pay more for the construction of Phase II. It should impose a toll on users of the Airport Access Road, surcharge rail passengers using the IAD station. Given airport parking and cab rates, a $5 surcharge seems reasonable. Airport merchants that will likely see increases in sales, should also contribute to the Phase II construction costs.

  15. larryg Avatar

    all this tax this and “fee” that sounds like New York City or LA, eh?

    more “proof” that density “pays”!

    😉

  16. Brooke Avatar

    SO tired of the arguing and illogical arguments and bipartisan issues surrounding this. Its time to get this project underway, people have been waiting for years. Stop the arguments and do what is right for the county, not just today but into the future. YES TO METRO!

  17. Tippecanoe and Tyler too!

    The public deserved and still deserves a discussion of the issues with as many facts as possible. IMO, most people believe (as did the audience at the recent Vienna meeting on Tysons Corner) Dulles Rail will make an appreciable positive impact on reducing traffic congestion, which is NOT going to happen. At this stage, rail needs to be completed to the Airport. But it’s wrong to let people think rail will reduce traffic congestion. They need to know traffic congestion, even with billions of dollars in additional road capacity and non-rail transit, will get much, much worse in the Dulles Corridor.

Leave a Reply