Helen Dragas

By Peter Galuszka

The antagonist in the drama against Teresa Sullivan is a rich real estate developer from Virginia Beach who holds undergraduate and graduate degrees from the University of Virginia, took over her construction firm from her father and is a major donor to political, mostly Democratic, causes.

Helen E. Dragas, 50, president of the The Dragas Cos., was appointed to the Board of Visitors of U.Va. by then Gov. Tim Kaine in 2008. Now Rector or chairman of the BOV, Dragas has been the moving force in the dramatic and secretive effort to remove university President Teresa Sullivan, one of the top academic in the country, after less than two years in office.

Both Dragas and Sullivan have something in common. Dragas is the school’s first female Rector and Sullivan is its first female president. While only giving vague hints at her displeasure with Sullivan, Dragas herself has come under intense fire for allegedly keeping at three of the 16 board members in the dark about her maneuvering to get Sullivan to resign, holding a legally questionable meeting to do so and then giving conflicting information about Sullivan’s alleged inadequacies as an academic visionary and administrator.

Dragas has complained that Sullivan lacked a needed long-term vision and philosophy for the school and fell behind on applying technology, such as online classes, to push Mr. Jefferson’s University into the future. On the contrary, reports The Washington Post, Sullivan had been lobbying to upgrade parts of the school that seemed to be resting on their laurels and had been advocating the use of digital classroom techniques to get undergraduates through introductory courses so more time could be spent in personal instruction in more advanced courses taken by upper classmen.

Sullivan’s outstanding popularity at U.Va. and Dragas’ secretive management tactics have sparked furor at the school.

Who is Dragas, anyway? According to business media articles, she is one of three daughters of a Greek immigrant who built a successful home construction firm operating in Virginia Beach and other parts of Hampton Roads. Helen Dragas started working part-time at the firm in its customer service section at age 13 and later attended U.Va., graduating with a bachelor’s degree in foreign affairs and economics in 1984. An MBA from the Darden School followed in 1988. Her husband is also a double Hoo grad, both College and Law.

Dragas took over the construction firm in the late 1990s and in 2009 won a national trade magazine’s award for “America’s Best Builder.” Her typical products are simple starter homes of about 1,500 sq.ft. each that cost about $200,000 in the typical, car-centric, cul-de-sac neighborhoods that define suburban sprawl.

In business, she defines herself as an “ultraconservative” in handling finances and even uses personal credit scores as a criterion for hiring a worker. “We have a very conservative way of managing our balance sheet,” she has said in interviews. “Emotional intelligence” is another trait she looks for in her employees. Her company has branched from residential into mixed use projects. The Dragas Co. received favorable publicity for replacing badly-made and unhealthy drywall imported from China that had been used in the condominiums it sold.

Her successful operation has generated political campaign contributions mostly to Democratic candidates. She gave more than $7,000 in 2008 to Jody Wagner, A Democrat who had run unsuccessfully for U.S. Congresswoman and as Lieutenant Governor, losing to Bill Bolling. Other recipients of her funds are PACs such as Moving Virginia Forward and One Virginia PAC where she has joined other prominent state political players as Sheila Johnson, Ted Leonsis and James Ukrop.

She also has been made a director of Dominion Resources and has been in contact with its public relations veterans and energy firm head Tom Ferrell about how to manage the catastrophe in Charlottesville.

For recreation, Dragas takes walks on the beach at dawn, attends her children’s sporting events and retreats to Albemarle County near Charlottesville where family members are forbidden to use cell phones and other technology devices.

According to a regional business magazine, Dragas was supporting Sullivan as recently as January. In an interview, she said: “I don’t consider myself the chief executive at U.Va. What I am is more like the chair of the board. My job really is to engage the board and include the board in setting the long-term direction for the university. The academic environment is one of shared governance, which is quite different than running a for-profit company.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. Where is the mention that Dragas is a Democrat?

  2. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    TMT,
    Try reading the first paragraph again.

  3. Peter, I apologize. I missed it.

  4. JP95inGA Avatar
    JP95inGA

    How can the Board and Sullivan be aligned philosophically two years ago, yet we have this today? Philosophies don’t change in two years. Was there misrepresentation on Sullivan’s part, lack of due diligence by the Board in selecting her, a rapid and significant change in strategic direction by the Board that Sullivan could not accept or simply failure to meet established goals? We are owed real answers.

  5. larryg Avatar

    Did Dragas vote to hire Sullivan originally?

  6. WahooLaw Avatar
    WahooLaw

    There is much more about Dragas I would want to know (and the same goes for the others who helped create this kerfuffle). She is determining the future of a great University, acting unusually forcefully for someone in her position, and it’s not clear from the story above that she’s anything other than a rich kid with political friends. I’d like to know:
    1) How did she do at U.Va.? Her LinkedIn profile is somewhat incomplete, but I’m seeing nothing on it that indicates that she excelled while a student. I don’t see academic honors, lawn residency, leadership roles, etc. Given that she seems to have given LinkedIn half a minute to set up, it might just all be omitted, but I would like to know if she was as mediocre a student as is implied by the lack of reference to such indicia of excellence.
    2) Exactly how much money has she given to the University? Plenty of us have given more than $100,o0o since graduation, and we would feel obligated to talk with someone before turning the University upside down. Please tell me that she’s put at least $10,000,000 into the University to give her standing as a serious donor. I’m not seeing references to that anywhere.
    3) If, as seems possible, she’s a rich guy’s daughter who muddled her way through undergrad and Darden without accomplishing much, and has no professional accomplishments to speak of other than inheriting daddy’s firm, it’s a pretty big story that someone so void of accomplishments was handed the keys to the kingdom. She appears not to have contacted or consulted any of the graduates who leave the grounds every year, laden with honors, who then go on to start major companies, rise to leadership positions in established companies, run major universities and non profit institutions, and so on. If she’s so damn accomplished and smart that she can reasonably conclude they’ve nothing to add, that’s one thing. If she’s the rich kid who had them eat her lunch while they shared time in Charlottesville, that’s quite another. I would like to know.
    Thanks for the coverage on this blog. I will look forward to more.

    1. WahooLaw, those are interesting questions to ask about Dragas, particularly in the context of asking if she was the right person to be occupying such a powerful position and exercising the kind of discretion that she did. But it also personalizes what should be impersonal issues: How the university needs to respond to the fiscal, technological and demographic challenges of our time, and how fast it needs to change. We need to be asking those questions as well.

  7. WahooLaw Avatar
    WahooLaw

    When you say that the issue of change should not be personalized, you reveal that you’ve never had to run an organization. I’ve worked in and with organizations large and small, and particularly in the context of ‘change’ it’s all about the people. Even in the world of strategic consulting, they figured out 30 years ago that impersonal strategic plans meant squat without an implementation plan that took into account not just the capabilities but the personal interests of the key players.
    At this critical juncture the Board of Visitors is acting us to trust them and follow. Like most people, when I am asked to follow, I want to know exactly who the leader is. If I don’t trust and respect that leader, nothing happens. If Dragas is the mediocrity she seems to be, she needs to go so a leader can be brought in with the credibility to stabilize the situation. I think I am one of many who wants to know exactly who she is. There is a story here.

  8. larryg Avatar

    How many of the BOV have publically stood behind “their” decision and supported Dragas and their decision?

    If they had done that – would Dragas be twisting and turning in the wind? What can you say of a Board that fires a University President and then is essentially mum about it when it causes legitimate questions that go unanswered?

    There may or may not be a legitimate issue here but the process for consulting and justifying is murky at best.

    Are we saying that when two leaders of a public University have a “personality” clash that it is no one else’s business what it is about?

    How about your prospective candidates for this position watching from the sidelines. Do this promote a professional approach to problem solving or just plain old office-style politics?

Leave a Reply