More Racism on Campus. What Am I Missing Here?

The latest uproar over racism in Virginia is taking place at Mary Washington College in Fredericksburg. There has been a huge outcry over the following:

On Oct. 15, a freshman posted a flier, downloaded from the Internet, on the refrigerator of a dormitory lounge. As reported by the Free Lance-Star, the flier pictured a sobbing black basketball player with his white coach and reads, “Slavery reinstated: Catch yourself a strong one.”

I have a question: What does that mean? I can’t tell. The Free Lance-Star, the Times-Dispatch, NBC news and the college newspaper, The Bullet, all have reported on the incident but none have reproduced the image. Therefore, we lack crucial context in interpreting the flier. Supposedly, some white students found it funny. If there’s a joke, I don’t get it. If anything, it would seem that the flier is equating the status of black athletes with slaves. That’s a comparison that socially progressive sports writers have trotted out from time to time. But it’s just not clear. The words could mean something else entirely.

For the life of me, though, I can’t see anything that is self-evidently racist. I’ve been accused of being unable to see racism — when confronted with the bald facts, I hold my hands over my ears and loudly say, la la la la la la, I can’t hear you! Evidently, I am clueless once again, and I ask Bacon’s Rebellion readers to help me out.

Apparently, acting college president Rick Hurley had no trouble spotting the racism. The trouble began when MWU housekeepers encountered the flier and filed a complaint. Hurley was reported to be “livid” when he first heard about it. His reaction: “I wanted to see [the students responsible] thrown off campus. I don’t think they belong here,” he was quoted as saying in The Bullet. “It’s one of the ugliest, most awful things I’ve ever seen. I got choked up just looking at it.”

That’s strong language. Maybe the artwork in the flier appealed to derogatory racial stereotypes. If so, I don’t blame Hurley for getting upset. But if that’s the case, it hasn’t been reported. The news accounts are frustrating because nobody says exactly what they found offensive. They’re just offended, end of story. There have been rallies. Sensitivity forums are being organized. Professors are discussing the incident in classrooms. UMW has even upped its police presence in the dormitory where the flier was found.

One student associated with the flier has apologized for his “racial insensitivity” as well as conduct that he said was “uncalled for and completely out of line.” But that apparently isn’t the end of it. Reports NBC news: “The student who posted it is being charged with violating university policies and will be subject to possible disciplinary action by the campus judicial system.”

In a separate story, the Free Lance-Star interviewed Hurley:

The poster violates the school’s values, but it’s unclear when “you ask how you prosecute for violations of those values,” [Hurley] said in a telephone interview. Hurley will appoint a task force to make sure the rules are “as comprehensive as necessary to prosecute offenders to the extent legally possible when incidents occur.”

Also, he’s asking an advisory council to immediately form a university policy on how to deal with “bias-related” incidents. Some wondered why the administration didn’t react more decisively to the news.

He wouldn’t say whether the school’s current policies will hinder its prosecution of the student, whom he didn’t name. But he did say that the university must keep First Amendment rights in mind.

Well, that’s reassuring. Offenders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent legally possible for violating “community values,” but at least their “First Amendment rights” will be protected. When the administration does file charges, I hope it will at least specify how the flier offended community values. Otherwise, we’ll all just have to guess.

Unless I’m missing something — and I’m open to the possibility I am, given the incomplete description of the offending flier — my guess is that many white students will learn the wrong lesson: They’ll conclude that the whole notion of “tolerance” on campus is a joke, that certain views and actions are to be tolerated but others are not. I suspect that many will sullenly submit to the PC thought police, keep their opinions about race to themselves, and refuse to engage in the kind of healthy, open dialogue we need if we’re ever to achieve racial conciliation and understanding in this country.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

17 responses to “More Racism on Campus. What Am I Missing Here?”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    Jim,
    Since I am older than you (three weeks) and presumably more experienced, let me try to explain it to you.

    Social mores change over time and what is considered “racist” or “sexist” changes too.

    I think one of the funniest movies I have ever seen is Mel Brook’s 1974 “Blazing Saddles.” In a class scene, Cleavon Little, an African-American, rides in to the little white town of Rock Ridge and, as he announces the Governor’s statement declaring him sheriff, he reachs towards his pants and says, “Let me whip this thing out” to a horrified audience.

    Never happen today.

    And, back when you and I were pre-teenagers in the mid -1960s, we probably both went to see the James Bond movie “Goldfinger.” Well, Mr. Goldfinger’s lead piloit was a buxom, beautiful blonde named “Pussy Galore.”

    A few years ago, I wanted to allude to Ms. Galore at a magazine where I was closing a story. A female editor objected strenuously. But, I said, this was considered pre-teen fare in 1965. Apparently not any more.

    Do you understand now?

    Peter Galuszka

  2. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I’ve run into folks who did not grow up with racism around them – in their lives …

    I know folks who don’t “remember” Birmingham and some who think lynchings are more myth than reality..

    so .. sometimes I think how something affects you – has a lot to do with you ever had direction knowledge.

    Folks who never were really involved in racism.. now days.. their attitude is sometimes .. “yeah.. not a good thing..but it’s pretty much gone away”.

    I don’t pretend to know others involvement or lack of involvement so I’m just sharing… some of my expenses with folks my age who apparently lived apart from a lot of the racism that I saw a lot of when I was young.

    So.. on one hand.. the UMW thing sounds like much ado about nothing.. if you are white and never had much direct experience with racism.

    but if you are black – that demon is just in the next room.

    and if you are white and have some idea how blacks feel about something like this – you pray that enough people learn from it to cause it to not be repeated again and especially not on purpose.

    One of the reasons cited by those who brought violence on others was that “he/they disrespected me”.

    it’s a powerful emotion not to be underestimated.

  3. Jim Bacon Avatar

    Peter, I understand that social mores change. I also agree that the “Blazing Saddles” episode you cite would not be considered funny today. I would cringe if I heard it today.

    The rules keep on changing. I’m just trying to keep up. But I have yet to see an explanation of what was so offensive about the MWU flier. I didn’t have any trouble figuring out Don Imus’ use of the phrase “nappy headed hos.” One could argue whether it’s reasonable for blacks to use the phrase “ho” while whites cannot, but there wasn’t any question about why the phrase was offensive.

    The problem is, I don’t even understand what the offense stems from in the MWU incident.

  4. Jim Bacon Avatar

    Larry, Fine, I grasp the idea that blacks in America are far more sensitive to racial slights than whites are. Totally understandable. But that still doesn’t answer my question: What was the offense?

  5. boboroshi Avatar

    If anything, I could see it as a condemnation of the collegiate athletic programs in the nation. Schools vying against each other to get star players and shuffle them through education in order to procure more funds for the school and it’s athletic programs.

    Of course, that’s asking a lot for a college student to actually think that deeply about anything besides Lindsey Lohan Rehab Watch.

  6. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    my take:

    the offense was depicting a white college coach (in charge of the Plantation’s “signature” events) thankful for have an athletic black “buck” (a valuable commodity) and a black “buck” thankful for his master (a “special” life reserved for only “special” field hands on the plantation.

    got it now?

    white folks can argue/wonder about what the nuances are – real or imagined but it’s sorta like your wife telling you that you’ve screwed up really badly and you’re running around like an idiot saying “what did I do”.

    “What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.”

    thus the reason for the UMW “conversation”

  7. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    ….”downloaded from the Internet”
    hmmmm… try a GOOGLE key word search for that phrase.

    the only “hits” are the news stories about it.

    I guess it’s possible that another search issue might find it or that all traces have been removed (but then that was sound suspicious).

    could this poster have been a locally grown photoshop creation?

    If so.. I’d say the guy with it is going to be in even deeper doo doo.

  8. Anonymous Avatar

    The poster isn’t so much explicitly racist as it is a reinforcement of incorrect stereotypes about blacks. The stereotype basically being that blacks can only get to college and succeed playing sports and that whites are smarter and must be in charge. For black professionals it’s insulting as it reinforces an existing problem of being respected and treated equally based on work ethic and intelligence when it comes to obtaining work, promotions, and such. It is very common for blacks to have to work harder and better to get the same professional positions as whites.

    This is why there is little to no tolerance for offensive posters, statements, etc. It’s not because blacks are ultra sensitive or can’t understand the joke; it’s because they know that those little jokes and stupid statements can begin a slippery slope where false racial stereotypes remain common knowledge. It’s also realized that some questionable prohibitions on free speech have to be utilized to get the stereotypes out of the national conscience and it will probably take a generation or two to get to those ends.

    ZS

  9. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    very articulate explanation.

    but the free speech thing… I don’t believe that we can stop people from thinking racist or racist-like thoughts and in the day of the Internet.. if someone thinks something.. it’ll get printed, published – and broadcast.

    and we can’t go around fining people or putting them in jail for saying things that others don’t agree with.. not unless we want to be like those governments that insist on “politically correct” speech or else.

    I think society is still adjusting to the fact that “speech” now days can travel around the world in hours.

    But reaction also moves just as fast in the other direction also.

    The guy who makes a racist statement “marks” himself – wide and far – and permanently to a certain extent in the age of electronic data and the Internet.

    Someone in the future, will subsequently find this (and other) skeletons.

    The bottom line is that it’s going to be very, very hard to be a “closet” racist with that knowledge kept to your own racist friends.

    In this particular case, I’m not passing judgment on this young fella. In the eyes of others, he’s committed an act that some consider racist but it does not mean he is considered a racist – yet.

    sort of a “warning” virtual scarlet letter…. if the behavior is not repeated.. forgiven with time.

    but if the behavior is repeated – the world then sees a track record.

    this is another fallout of a “flat” world… it’s almost impossible to move away and start anew….your “history” is in the worldwide archives…

  10. Anonymous Avatar

    I agree that using the word prohibition of speech was inaccurate. I was having difficulty articulating what I wanted to say there. What I’m referring to is societal prohibition or embarrassment such as loss of a job or being expelled from a school, not being put in jail for thinking or saying something. To better state things, it’s believed that there can be little tolerance for offensive speech and stereotyping if everyone is to be put on a fair playing field.

    I’m not advocating restrictions on free speech in any way, I’m just saying the current climate of business and the workplace has little to no tolerance for this type of behavior. Universities are supposed to be a transition for young adults to the real world and what happened at this university demonstrates the consequences of that type of behavior. I know if I ,and probably most people did this at their job, I would get fired and possibly sued. The university president realized the seriousness of the incident and responded in such.

    ZS

  11. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    agree.

    The “University” is probably more worried about the phrases “UMW” and racism being in the same sound-bite.

    Universities these days are just like “brands” with reputations…

    any “brand” associated with a “history” of incidents (perhaps like Denney’s) gets a “tarnish”.

    The academic institutions are interesting critters in an Internet world because they are supposed to be most about free thinking and free speech – even disrespectful of conventional thinking….

    but “free speech” .. DOES have consequences…

    then again… so does censorship..

  12. Anonymous Avatar

    A little more info on the “flier” from msnbc:

    “The flier that hung on the door of freshman Rob Mariani’s room in Jefferson Hall shows a photo of Michigan State’s white basketball coach and an emotional black player, the net around his neck.

    The caption reads, “Slavery Reinstated: Catch Yourself A Strong One.”

    When resident advisers spotted the flier, they ordered it be removed because it was considered a fire hazard.

    The flier resurfaced Oct. 15 over fall break when the housekeeping staff found it inside a common area refrigerator. Most of the housekeeping staff is black.”

  13. Anonymous Avatar

    Here is the “flier” in question:

    http://n2.spikedhumor.com/1/390000/91430_slavery.jpg

    I believe it’s a photo from the 2000 NCAA championships.

    Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but I see it as more of a commentary AGAINST the “treatment” of black athletes.

  14. Anonymous Avatar

    Thanks for posting the link, that does clear things up a bit. I had originally believed from the story that it was a caricature not an actual picture. The actual picture itself is Tom Izzo and a doctored photo of Mateen Cleaves; he almost always smiled especially when they won the championship. I’m originally from the area so I follow a lot of MSU sports. Both of them are first class guys and that photo is demeaning to both of them.

    “Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but I see it as more of a commentary AGAINST the “treatment” of black athletes.”

    How are black athletes treated differently than white athletes. Both are utilized by universities to make a lot of money off athletics while paying athletes in the form of a scholarship. If you wanted to make that commentary it would be much better to be neutral in which races you choose rather than choosing races that clearly represent previously slavery.

    As far as the universities reaction, it was quite warranted. This isn’t about free speech it’s about being complicit in creating an intimidating working environment for their employees. Any workplace that allows that kind of atmosphere for its employees opens itself to lawsuits even if the employees don’t complain initially.

    ZS

  15. Anonymous Avatar

    Not sure why ZS is so quick to dismiss the photo as doctored.

    And the image and caption could certainly be seen as a commentary on the plantation mentality of sports organizations.

    Here’s some info from ESPN. It is a real photo.

    “Victory Tears

    From Michael Jordan’s tearfall after winning his first NBA championship to Mateen Cleaves’ wailing during “One Shining Moment,” after he delivered Michigan State’s second national title, sports is littered with amazing victory cries. My top 10:

    10. Thomas Hill bawling after Christian Laettner’s miracle shot lifted Duke past Kentucky in 1992. Next to Cleaves, Hill might possess the ugliest cry face in sports. It was absolutely beautiful.

    9. Speaking of Cleaves, I put him in my top 10 because I love any athlete who cries during “One Shining Moment.” A lot of them have done this, but what made Cleaves stand out is that he and coach Tom Izzo stood side-by-side bawling like a couple of unmarried women who’ve been bridesmaids 11 times.”

  16. Anonymous Avatar

    Additionally, here is a video clip showing Cleaves removing the basketball net and putting it around his neck.

    http://www.thoughtequity.com/video/clip/306047_065.do

  17. I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
    That is tolerance- those fools protesting in the name of it should read a damn dictionary.

    There is no racism involved- only an ability to view history with a sense of humor, albeit a black one.

Leave a Reply