ow that President Barack Obama has declared U.S. combat operations in Iraq over, it might be useful to remember just how much this effort and the one in Afghanistan cost.
Mission Not Accomplished
Share this article
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
Comments
10 responses to “Mission Not Accomplished”
-
From my observation the GOP doesn't consider the cost of war in swelling the deficit. They didn't complain from early 2003 when the Bush administration took the deficit from 87B in the black to $374 in the red. And that was before we even got into Iraq. Spending on war is always ok.
The stimulus: one-sixth of the total cost–as you point out, Peter, has not been spent yet–is an all-out effort to to make green energy, green building and green transportation real; launch green manufacturing industries; computerize a pen-and-paper health system; promote data-driven school reforms; and ramp up the research of the future. Investing in our future and saving money in the long run. If the private sector had done more of this kind of investment previous to the crash we might not be in the pickle we're currently in. But it appears private sector has short-term memory deficits about investing in the future. I see signs already the top 1% rich are back into conspicuous consumption. Tiffany & Co.'s fiscal second-quarter net profit rose 19%. I'm sure this is a happy sign for merchants, as they have been polled as not fearing taxes, they fear soft sales. So all the GOP crying about deficit/debt I take with a grain of salt. -
When governments [that use GAAP accounting] appropriate money for something, it is pretty much spent even though cash has not been paid to someone yet.
-
Good article. You are starting to sound almost reasonable.
Probably unecessary war? I agree. We'll never know because we'll never know what Saddam or his sons would have done. However, it sure cost a lot of money to unwravel three maniacs.
Iraq was always winnable. Afghanistan is probably not winnable (despite an exemplary US led fighting force).
Afhganistan reminds me of Vietnam. Somebody once said, "We'll bomb them (meaning Vietnam) into the stone age.". To which someone else remarked, "They are already in the stone age.".
I am not sure what winning in Afghanistan really means because I am not sure that any government (corrupt or not) can really control that so-called country. And if no government can control the country then who would keep terrorists out?
This does not seem like it's going to go well.
Obama is doing the right thing in Iraq. It's still far from a certainty that there will be stability in that country but Obama is on the right path. He deserves credit for ending the combat operations.
Finally, Peter – I think you have a typo. You quote somebody as saying that the cost of the wars could be $1.09B. I think you mean $1.09T.
Moira – not sure what you would have done with regard to Afhganistan. The Taliban were established there and they had just killed 3,000 Americans. Yes, conservatives believe that striking back at the Taliban was worth the cost of doing so … even if it increased the budget.
Obama has been president for almost 2 years. If the stimulus hasn't been spent … whose fault is that? My friends in the fed tell me that the states are dragging their feet. I figured they were just blowing smoke. Maybe not. If McDonnell can't spend the money he should send it to me. I'll spend it to expand George Mason University or develop multi-media lessons and tutorials for our school children.
Merchants fear soft sales more than taxes because they don't pay taxes on losses. So, the only way to even get to the point of fearing taxes is to make a profit which can be subject to tax.
-
Groveton, It is Trillion, sorry.
PG -
Oh an Groveton,
Thanks you very much for saying that my article is one that finally sounds reasonable.Cloming from someone who calls hiself Groovy G. Groveton, that means a lot.
Peter Galuszka
-
"Oh an Groveton,
Thanks you very much for saying that my article is one that finally sounds reasonable.Cloming from someone who calls hiself Groovy G. Groveton, that means a lot.".
Peter:
Yes, I understand that Maslow's hierarchy of needs has its corollary in blogging.
From the bottom up:
Basic logic and writing skills
Reasonableness
Wit and humor
Wisdom
Ability to influence the actions of readers
Congratulations on you successful entry into level 2.
Wishing you the best in making it to level 3.
The Groove-Master
-
Groovy,
Thanks so much for the pat on the head.
Having blogged professionally for bnet.com, part of CBS INteractive and now,The Washington Post, your how-to advice means so much!Goozer
-
Goozer:
When touting your blogging skills it is generally best not to double post the comment.
Just a tip from the Shecky Green of Bacon's Rebellion.
-
Shecky,
I do this by mistake because I never get the visual verification and have to type everything twice. Maybe Bacon is sneding me a message.
PG -
I've had the same problem.
Something about Blogger is broken.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.