McAuliffe: “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.”

by Shaun Kenney

Remember the old adage — the goal isn’t to win the debate, but to make sure you don’t lose the debate.

Former Democratic governor Terry McAuliffe was pressed on graphic textbooks — and I mean graphic — of a sexual nature being included in government school libraries, and McAuliffe exploded with rage.

Not towards school districts, mind you — but towards busybody parents who had the audacity to look into what their children were actually being taught in the classroom.

That’s when McAuliffe decided to say the quiet part out loud:

That sound you heard last night was the simultaneous squealing of wheels on the mental pavement of a million Virginians.

Yes — this is what Democrats actually believe.

During the long battle on Critical Race Theory (CRT) and gender ideology in the being enforced on the rest of us in the public square, the heavy-handed approach witnessed by many a conservative lawmaker by public education in Virginia is now showing the mailed fist behind the velvet glove.

For decades, the education major has hammered home the importance of the discipline. Much as the religion major has insisted that the only true religious studies can be done through a disinterested (sic) secular viewpoint, so too has the education major taken upon itself that the only true educators are those who are disinterested in a way parents cannot be.

School administrators and school boards are welcomed into the new gnosticism with dinners and lectured by doctorates in the field about their relevance. After all, this is for the children. Teachers unions rally lest the administrators cut their budgets, six-figure salaries are doled out for good behavior, and the endless racketeering continues as the indulgences pour in.

Mediocrity is celebrated as success; excellence is punished as privilege. Four-year colleges and universities take well-balanced 18-year-olds and teach them how to hate the values of their parents while STEM academies get a great deal of talk, but very little support — for obvious reasons.

Test scores are leveraged, demographics are analyzed, parents are pushed to become more productive consumers of things we can’t afford and don’t need so they can drop their kids off in the worst performing schools in the G20.

The implication is rather simple. Parents simply do not know how to educate their own children — and the education major goes out of its way to validate its own existence by reminding others of its critical need.

What we have here — ladies and gentlemen — is an enduring five- decade-long experiment in failure.

Conservatives have long been aware of the institutional bias of the government education system. Rather than contesting the battlefield, many conservatives have simply abandoned the institutions to the left. The result has been that progressives have taken it upon themselves to educate our children on our behalf, transmitting their values in substitution of our own. The end result has been a five-decade slide where today even liberals find themselves struggling against the cancel culture of woke progressives.

Our children? They adapt and tell the teachers what they want to hear, repeat what they read in textbooks we never review, and roll their eyes whenever someone points towards something important. Our clergy struggles, our grandparents shake their heads, even foreign visitors are aghast at how decadent Americans have become.

What we do not have — yet — is the public will to fix the problem.

Here’s something for Mr. McAuliffe. I do think parents should be telling public schools what to teach.

Education is the transmission of culture — full stop — and if parents are the primary educators of their children as is their natural right then the secular religionists have zero right to impose their faith upon the rest of us, not just because it is wrong but because it is damn near close to a violation of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.

So long as we continue to fuel our own demise by teaching our children how to hate what we believe? By a priesthood trained to do so? By inquisitors who can interrogate whether you are using the correct gender pronouns? Through secular sacraments that demand a four-year college diploma as the only path to prosperity? That demand a creed of envy as the foundation of social justice?

We are going to continue to lose if we don’t see the opposition for what it is.

There’s an old Jesuit saying: Give me the boy and I will show you the man. Which is shorthand for saying that impressionable teenagers can and will acclimate to their environments. Put them at Oxford and you will get scholars. Dump them in trailers and you will get… well… people like me who loved the tornado magnets because they had air conditioning and heat that worked.

McAuliffe is wrong on this.

Not just a little wrong, but wrong in an authoritarian and tyrannical way.
Given how things are going in Australia, a program of gun grabbing, defunding the police, cancel culture and finally the state — not parents — as the primary educators of your children?

That is just positively Orwellian.

No small wonder why most classrooms swap out “1984” for “The Handmaid’s Tale” — you don’t have to burn books, you just have to get people to stop reading them.

Shaun Kenney is the editor of The Republican Standard, former chairman of the Board of Supervisors for Fluvanna County, and a former executive director of the Republican Party of Virginia. This column has been republished with permission from The Republican Standard.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “McAuliffe: “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.””

  1. FluxAmbassador Avatar
    FluxAmbassador

    Conservatives believe this, too, at least when it comes to Black parents wanting more racially conscious material included in schools or the parents of trans children asking for their children’s gender identities to be recognized. McAuliffe just had the guts to say it out loud.

    And he was also right to veto that textbook bill.

    1. Steve Gillispie Avatar
      Steve Gillispie

      This is either maliciously or ignorantly completely false. Flux whatever you are, demonstrate that you actually know someone non-Liberal and have any idea of what that group’s views are on anything.

    2. I don’t think so, Flux, and I don’t think the verifiable evidence will support your pronouncement. You probably think 1619 is authoritative history and that Critical Theory is a legitimate way to pursue truth. Both of these will lead to a saturnine dystopia

    3. DJRippert Avatar

      The bill in question required schools to notify parents if the school was going to assign sexually explicit book to be read as coursework. If the parent objected the parent could insist that a substitute book be assigned.

      In a recent Fairfax County incident, a mother of a student at Fairfax High School took exception to “Gender Queer” and “Lawn Boy” being in the school library.

      The mother went to the school board meeting to complain. She described the books, saying, “The illustrations include fellatio, sex toys”

      Midway through the meeting, school officials appeared to cut her off, saying there were children in the audience.

      So, it was Ok for illustrated sex books to be in the school library but not Ok for a mother to describe those books because there were children present at the school board meeting.

      McAuliffe vetoed a bill that would have required the schools to admit when such books were used. He’d rather join the teachers and staff in slinking around in the dark like cockroaches rather than admit what they are actually doing.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I don’t think there is a problem in removing the books stated but I do wonder if it was opened up to a vote, how many more would be gone.

  2. DJRippert Avatar

    The political point is about the middle or swing voters. Will they come out to vote and, if so, for whom? That’s the whole election in a nutshell.

    McAuliffe took a big step back when he said “Parents shouldn’t be telling the schools what to teach”. On top of the unnecessary school closing all year last year in Northern Virginia, the move to make TJ a lotto rather than merit based admission and the whole CRT debacle … a lot of people in NoVa are seeing the pendulum as having swung far too far in education. Especially in a state that has effectively strangled schools choice.

    This is going to hurt McAuliffe.

  3. Parents should be telling schools what to teach their children until they reach 18 or 21. Then, the State should decide what should be taught. Parents should write checks, just like divorced husbands have to. Parents and other citizens should have no role in educational, cultural, or political affairs. See how easy modern American life can be if you love big media/big government and vote for McAuliffe

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I don’t think the average parent really has a clue about reading , writing and math these days and many of them oppose Common Core which is what other countries teach.

      People in Virgina don’t even realize that Virginia is in the top 10 nationally. We are better than 40 other states.

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    McAuliffe is correct that professional teachers deserve much say in determining education. This blog consistently dissess teachers as being biased, unfit and/or lazy. Although I am past the age of having children in school, I sure as hell would not want other parents who think they have a hold on culture to decide for me what my kids should learn. If they want that, let them go to a religious school. I was privileged to go to a Jesuit high school. It was a great experience albeit at a private school. The Society of Jesus has been in the business of education for centuries. I would not want some other parent with self-assumed attitudes of self-importance to tell the Jebbies what they should be doing. And a couple of supposedly porn books in a high school do not for a scandal make. The real scandal is about the censorship going on with school books in public schools by hard right parents. Remember, Hanover County, a hard-right Republican place, banned “To Kill a Mockingbird” back in the 1960s. Author Harper Lee had some choice comments for their stupidity. And I really do not see how T Mc’s truthful statement is going to cost him the election. Maybe by Bacons Rebellion’s new standards. Ugh! Read the American Library Association is leading banned books. It might amaze you.

    1. The ALA gave prizes for adult books recommended for 12-18 year olds to Gender Queer and Lawn Boy – the Fairfax books with graphic sexual illustrations and descriptions. There’s a huge difference between having books available to adults and being promoted to children.Some of the banned books on the list follow the same model as the two in Fairfax.

      https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      Glad you were able to attend what I assume was an expensive Jesuit, private school. I wasn’t so lucky. For me, it was public high school or nothing. But my kids were different. Two went to Gonzaga. If you think the teachers decided what to teach at Gonzaga you’d be mistaken. A very few actual Jesuit priests work with a large number of lay teachers along with a very active parental and alumni network to make the decisions. Of course, if I didn’t like their direction I could have pulled the boys and sent them to any number of private schools I liked better.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        did not quite understand. Are you saying that parents decide the curriculum at private schools?

    3. Oh dear! A rural southern county banned a book SIXTY years ago. Clearly, the “hard right republicans” are totally out of control…

  5. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Don the Ripper. You are probably right about the changes at Jesuit schools. I attended from 1966 to 1970 so things were likely different. We had priests, lay and scholastics (studying for ordination which took maybe 13 years). I was privileged and I admit it. They do have th Washington Jesuit Academy that is designed to handle lower income, inner city kids, as far as I know. As I have told you and Gonzaga grad Capt. Jim Sherlock, that those guys are considered brighter.
    CJBova, I could care less if the ALA approved the nasty books. Take the trouble to look at the list of banned books. It is two our of 100. Toni Morrison? Give me a break!

  6. This was McAuliffe’s macaca moment, the single statement that doomed his campaign. Polls may show that a majority of Virginians don’t care about (or just aren’t aware of) what’s going in Virginia’s public schools today. But a significant number of parents are aware, and they are fired up about it. Youngkin is taking full advantage of McAuliffe’s mis-step.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zafXDPCDsTU

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Macaca if it changes non-conservative votes. It won’t matter one whit with liberals – they know what he means.

      But independents that lean left and right , we’ll see.

      It won’t take much for Youngkin to win – 3-4 points.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    Of course if they actually took polls on what schools should teach, it would be damned ugly.

  8. tmtfairfax Avatar

    My son had some problems reading and needed further assistance and phonics. But the school (FCPS) pushed back. We had to fight for some time to get him access to phonics instruction. Once he received the instruction, reading clicked and he quickly caught up to the rest of the class.

    I don’t think public schools need to immediately accommodate every request from a parent. I have no trouble when teachers and administrators want to discuss the parents’ request and the underlying problem. But this was a case where the prevailing instruction creed was preventing a student from getting the help he needed.

    Decades ago, one of my good marketing friends taught me to ask several questions. Who is the customer? What does the customer want? How do you know that? How will you know when you satisfied that want? How do you measure your performance?

    I’ve tried to use this knowledge in my practice of law and, IMO, reasonably successfully. That doesn’t mean I automatically do everything I’m asked. But focusing on my client’s needs has made a positive difference. Teachers and most especially administrators need to focus on the needs of students as expressed by their parents or guardians, especially in the early grades.

Leave a Reply