Making Money from Cultural Cleansing

This imagery was in preparation of the $430,000 contract with the University of Virginia to remove the George Rogers Clark bronze sculpture located at the UVa Corner Park.

by Carol J. Bova

Richmond business owner Devon Henry is best known for his role as owner of NAH, LLC, for procuring a $1.8 million contract from Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney to take down Richmond’s Confederate statues. While Stoney’s handling of the contract outside the normal procurement process became a political liability — a special prosecutor and the Virginia State Police are still investigating the deal — Henry has become the go-to guy for taking down monuments to Confederate generals and other symbols out of fashion with Virginia’s political class.

Henry built a construction company, Team Henry Enterprises, winning bids as a minority contractor, primarily from the federal government. In 2018, Team Henry broke into the state/local contracting business with a contract to erect the Memorial to Enslaved Laborers at the University of Virginia, which after eleven revisions totaled $5.5 million.

The contract with Stoney, under the name of NAH, LLC, came next in July 2020. The NAH proposal covered removal of eight bronze sculptures, two cannons, two decorative bowls and a granite cross, leaving all columns and bases in place. The contract included a mobilization fee of $900,000 to stage an out-of-state sub-contractor in Richmond and five days of work each at $180,000, for a total of $1,800,000.

Next, Virginia Military Institute (VMI) used Henry’s previous monument removals as justification for a sole source award to Team Henry December 7, 2020, to remove the Stonewall Jackson Monument and to subcontract repair of the base to Quarra Stone Company before moving monument and base almost 80 miles away for $209,000.

The VMI Board of Visitors has mandated that the relocation of the statue and base is executed in a safe and timely manner. The sensitive social nature of the move and the delicacy of the art make the project especially challenging. A review of available resources in Virginia reveal Team Henry has developed a specialty in the area of safely and. sensitively moving historic works of art. Team Henry recently removed confederate statues for the City of Richmond and City of Charlottesville.

Then the University of Virginia contracted with Team Henry to take 3-D drone and ground DSLR images of the George Rogers Clark monument and base April 13, 2021, for $10,200. That imagery was in preparation of the contract of July 12, 2021, to remove and facilitate storage of the George Rogers Clark bronze figural group sculpture and stone base in the UVa Corner Park location for $430,000.

After that, the City of Charlottesville, on July 7, 2021, under Outdoor Sculpture Removal and Relocation for Storage, City Council Emergency #22-02, passed a resolution to appropriate $1 million to remove three statues — Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, and the statue depicting Sacajawea, Meriwether Lewis, and William Clark — and move them to a storage area. The job was awarded July 10, 2021 to Team Henry.

The Commonwealth’s eVa Procurement Portal shows a growing number of requests for quotes and bids for monument removals from courthouses and other public property. As well as he’s done, Devon Henry likely won’t be the only one profiting from removal contracts for some time to come.

Society will be poorer for the diminishment of the artistic landscape and the loss of historical reminders of our past. History should be additive, not reductive. Symbolic elimination cannot teach the lessons we need to learn in every generation.

The Historians.org website provides a context for viewing the purging of Virginia’s monuments and memorials:

Physical destruction of culturally significant artifacts grants perpetrators the power to reject them as unimportant and to limit how well they can be known to future generations.

In Virginia we have seen mobs desecrate monuments with that intent. An alternative would have been to preserve the monuments as reminders of our history and to reinterpret their meaning. But Virginia’s political “progressives” aren’t interested in reinterpreting anything, which implies engaging in an ongoing discussion. They are expunging the memorials as a way of imposing their own historical narrative. The statue-removal movement is an exercise in power — and in Devon Henry’s case, enrichment.

* * *

A partial inventory of monuments removed by Devon Henry

Stonewall Jackson
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Mathew Fontaine Maury
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.
.


Civil War-era cannon
Richmond

J.E.B. Stuart
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.
.

Vindicatrix, from the Jefferson Davis statue
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Decorative bowls and plaques
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Joseph Bryan statue
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Bronze globe atop the Matthew Fontaine Maury statue
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.

Fitzhugh Lee Cross
Richmond
.
.
.
.
.

Stonewall Jackson
Lexington
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Making Money from Cultural Cleansing”

  1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Ain’t no time for RFPs when Woke must be accomplished pronto.
    So why does RVA schools need new employees to submit an RFP for George Wythe HS?
    Just bring in Team Henry to build it for about a 300% markup. Besides Stoney needs more $$ in his war chest for his 2025 Gubernatorial Campaign.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Somebody got rich building them, so no surprise somebody now gets rich removing them. But that does explain why this cultural cleansing process cannot stop with the shrinking supply of Confederate monuments and must keep expanding to the removal of just about everybody not up to modern anti-racist standards. Money to be made!

      It is greatly amusing to see the Woke Crowd in Richmond whining in the RTD this morning about how some white filmmakers got paid to the the documentary on the “transformation” of Monument Avenue.

      https://richmond.com/news/local/richmond-activists-raise-questions-about-equity-inclusion-in-documentary-exploring-removal-of-confederate-monuments/article_79d14525-4d4c-5673-a87e-28c1a67b6b5d.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Somebody got rich building them, so no surprise somebody now gets rich removing them. But that does explain why this cultural cleansing process cannot stop with the shrinking supply of Confederate monuments and must keep expanding to the removal of just about everybody not up to modern anti-racist standards. Money to be made!

      It is greatly amusing to see the Woke Crowd in Richmond whining in the RTD this morning about how some white filmmakers got paid to the the documentary on the “transformation” of Monument Avenue.

      https://richmond.com/news/local/richmond-activists-raise-questions-about-equity-inclusion-in-documentary-exploring-removal-of-confederate-monuments/article_79d14525-4d4c-5673-a87e-28c1a67b6b5d.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1

      1. CJBova Avatar

        University of Virginia gave them $89,080 in May to “Create a film about Charlottesville monuments documentary”

      2. CJBova Avatar

        University of Virginia gave them $89,080 in May to “Create a film about Charlottesville monuments documentary”

      3. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        They are just mad that they didn’t think about it first.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    How else would one interpret a statue of a Confederate general other than honoring and glorifying the cause for which he fought?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Okay.

      But how could the Matthew Fontaine Maury memorial be interpreted as honoring and glorifying the confederate cause? His statue depicts him seated, in civilian clothing, and the memorial’s accoutrements highlight his accomplishments in the fields of oceanography and meteorology, not his arguably reluctant service in the Confederate Navy. The sculptor described his design as “an allegory of the sphere of Maury’s mind, which was nothing less than the entire universe.”

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: ” “an allegory of the sphere of Maury’s mind, which was nothing less than the entire universe.”

        impressive! 😉

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well then, we could have replaced it with one of William Schockley. Dabney Lancaster?

        Sadly, there is an Attaboy-Awshucks ratio and like all currency, it fluctuates.

  3. ….and math scores have gone up by how many points?

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Mr Henry’s motto: money get back i’m Alright jack keep your hands off of my stack

  5. A reader passes along this photo with the following observation: “Likely multiple OSHA violations in this picture. No hard hats around heavy equipment while moving heavy statues with a crane, one worker doesn’t have a safety vest or fluorescent shirt, the other worker doesn’t have an OSHA approved vest, and finally, there is no caution tape between the two out riggers which is required to protect people from going into the crane’s swing zone.”

    https://www.baconsrebellion.com/app/uploads/2021/07/lewis-clark.jpg

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yep, that would get somebody fired at the shipyard.

    2. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      They also aren’t using a tag line to control the movement of the item, another big no, no.

    3. WayneS Avatar

      Mr. Stoney’s friend would not be able to maximize his profits if he had to hire subcontractors who concern themselves with such trivial things as hard hats, safety vests and safe zones around work sites…

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        And OSHA doesn’t want to show up, cite somebody and get accused of being racist….No actual rules for Democrats, just the rest of us.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    it’s a dirty business and someone has to do it and it commands a premium!

    1. WayneS Avatar

      It is a dirty business (in more ways than one).

      Someone does have to do it (I suppose).

      But there is absolutely no reason whatsoever why the statue removal work should command a premium.

      It ain’t rocket surgery, as they say. In fact, it’s on the low end of of the complexity scale for crane work.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        It’s almost as if Mayor Stoney was lining the pockets of his pal (humm is that a kickback?). Certain posters don’t want to seem to admit that, do they.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I dunno. With Conservatives publically targeting perceived enemies and opponents, some businesses prefer to not be a target.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          Speaking of boogiemen…

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            well that’s what targeting seeks to do right?

          2. WayneS Avatar

            What is what targeting seeks to do?

        2. WayneS Avatar

          By the way, the businesses in Richmond that were burned out and destroyed during last summer’s riots preferred not to be targets too.

          And it sure as hell wasn’t conservatives who publicly targeted them.

          I defy you to name one crane business which has been attacked by these scary “conservatives” you pretend to be so worried about.

  7. SmallTowner Avatar
    SmallTowner

    As someone who is a little familiar with the state’s procurement process, I have another theory. The state’s procurement portal, eVA, lists all the vendors registered to do business with the state. State agencies are supposed to give preference to SWAM vendors – Small, Women-owned and Minority. I would venture a guess that if you were to go on eVA and try to find a company that specializes in removing things like monuments
    and is SWAM certified, there would only be one that specifically fits that bill, although I would bet that others will soon try to include a description that would get them in the running as well.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      SWAM or not, there are procedures which must be followed when issuing a sole-source contract, and mayor Stoney did not follow them.

      Furthermore, NAH LLC does not specialize in crane work.
      NAH LLC had only existed for a few days when the contract was awarded to them. Finally, NAH, LLC has subbed-out the majority of the actual work to contractors who do specialize in crane work.

    2. CJBova Avatar

      Not so. Others have bid and/or been awarded removals. Hard to find without knowing the locality because you can’t use NIGP. There’s no consistency in listing phrase or NIGP. Henry didn’t specialize in removals prior to forming NAH. He was experienced in subcontracting though. And others are SWAM. Will take a little digging to see who else is out there.

  8. WayneS Avatar

    “Henry has become the go-to guy for taking down monuments to Confederate generals and other symbols out of fashion with Virginia’s political class.”

    I’m sure that was mayor Stoney’s goal for his friend when he awarded the original sole source contract, and I’m also sure the astronomical dollar amount agreed to in the original contract was intended to set the basic “going rate” for the future “sole source” work they both knew was coming Mr. Henry’s way.

    My only question is: How much is Mr. Henry kicking back to mayor Stoney?

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Too late now, but maybe you Confederate lovers should have tried getting these monumental mistakes on the UNESCO World Heritage sites list.

    1. CJBova Avatar

      They may be monumental mistakes to you, but most of the courthouse statues and columns were memorials for locals who died and didn’t return home even for burial. Too many reasons for the other monuments for a single statement.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And of the Southerners who fought for the Union? Did they not have relatives? What, no memorial for them?!

        1. CJBova Avatar

          Can’t speak for others without checking, but ours says In Memory of the Soldiers and Sailors of Mathews County, Va. https://www.baconsrebellion.com/app/uploads/2021/06/pedestal.png

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            With a Confederate soldier… leave the pedestal, ditch the statue. Saw that monument last week. The Confederate flags are a nice touch.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Why don’t youse guys make mini castings of these statues for garden decoration? Think of the money you’ll make selling mini “Bobby on His Pony” statues to all of those “good people” with torches.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Would Lawn Jacksons be more racist or less racist than Lawn Jockeys?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Depends on paint… just ask Ralph.

  11. IndigenousUVA Avatar
    IndigenousUVA

    The rear view of the George Rogers Clark statue shows a soldier with a pistol in his hand running forward to attack the Native Americans from behind. Also not clear from the photo is that the Native American woman in the picture is carrying a baby in a cradleboard. The explicit violence of the statue may have been celebrated with glee in 1921, but it is no longer acceptable in 2021.

Leave a Reply