Legislators Deal Huge Blow to Upwardly Mobile Poor Kids

Photo credit: Anna Julia Cooper School

by James A. Bacon

Anna Julia Cooper School was founded as a private, nonprofit middle school in 2009 in Richmond’s poverty-ridden East End. The first-year enrollment in the middle school was 29 students. The founders offered a proposition to students’ families: the school would charge no tuition, but parents had to be committed to the program, which made greater demands and set higher expectations than the city’s public schools.

“In the early days, we had to knock on doors and say, hey, we have a school here,” recalls Laura McGowan, director of development and communications. But it didn’t take long for parents to see the value. Anna Julia Cooper School added an elementary school, the student body has expanded to 176, and now there is a waiting list.

The school has widespread charitable support in the Richmond community, including from churches in the Episcopal diocese. But critical to its expansion, says McGowan, has been a state tax credit, the Education Improvement Scholarship Tax Credit (EISTC), which gives philanthropists a credit on their state taxes equivalent to 65% of their donation. For years the program has been capped at $25 million.

“We like to think that people are donating to the school because they believe in our cause, and the tax credit is an added bonus,” says McGowan. “They go, wow, I can give you more money.”

In the current fiscal year, the EISTC has generated more than $15 million tax credits, which in turn are associated with more than $20 million in contributions. But the deal announced by state House and Senate budget conferees would cap the program at $12 million. Millions of dollars in credits and scholarships will be lost.

McGowan and other members of the Virginia Parents Coalition, which was formed in early 2020 to provide political backing for the program, are urging Governor Glenn Youngkin to reject the cuts, although negotiating changes so late in the budgetary process will be exceedingly difficult.

“The tax-credit deal came as a surprise,” says McGowan. There have been threats to the program in the past. For example, Delegate David Bulova, D-Fairfax, submitted a bill a few years ago to repeal the program, but pulled it back in the face of intense opposition. The budget deliberations were conducted almost entirely out of the public eye, so it is not known who was behind the cuts this time or what their reasoning was.

According to the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE), 38 department-approved scholarship foundations across Virginia dispensed 4,674 scholarships in fiscal 2021. Tax credits totaling $556,000 benefiting 137 scholarships were issued through the Anna Julia Cooper Scholarship Foundation. The largest scholarship fund, the McMahon-Parater foundation, tapped credits worth $3.2 million to provide 1,210 scholarships. (See the full list here.)

The scholarship is strictly limited to children from lower-income families. It does not benefit middle-class or professional-class kids.

“The East End (of Richmond) has a high concentration of public housing communities, and poverty, and we’re in the center of that,” says McGowan. “All students are from low-income families. We take at least 75% of them from the public housing community. These are the most at-risk students one can think of. They come from troubled homes. The projects are a rough place to live. There is violence. The kids deal with all kinds of trauma.”

Besides providing an ambitious academic education, the school addresses the children’s emotional well being through counseling and mental health services.

A standard argument against school-choice programs is that they divert resources from public schools that badly need them, and that there is no evidence that they do a better job of educating students than the public schools they compete with. If graduates of these schools fare better, critics say, it’s because they skim the cream of the most motivated families.

I asked McGowan if Anna Julia Cooper has any metrics demonstrating the value of the education the school provides. She pointed to the success in placing its middle-school graduates in top private high schools across the city, where they continue to receive scholarships from the tax-credit program. “The majority of our students end up in private school” such as Collegiate, St. Christopher’s, St. Catherine’s, Steward, and Trinity, and also the Catholic Christo Rey academy, she says. From there, many go on to college.

McGowan didn’t say this, but I will: the chance of kids graduating from Richmond middle schools getting accepted by elite college-preparatory academies are just about zero. According to VDOE data, only 33.5% of economically disadvantaged students in Richmond public schools passed their English reading Standards of Learning Exam in 2020-21. Only 17.5% passed their math SOL. The percentage scoring “advanced” — which one would expect of a student on a college-bound track — was 4.5% and 2.7% respectively. That is criminally low.

Anna Julia Cooper provides a proven way for bright, motivated students in the inner city to escape the dysfunctional disaster of the Richmond Public School system and get on a college-career path. By undermining the finances of Anna Julia Cooper and other schools like it, the budget reconciliation deals a huge blow to upward mobility for poor kids in Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “Legislators Deal Huge Blow to Upwardly Mobile Poor Kids”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    From the diocese

    It is our goal at the Diocese to enable every family who wants to send their children to a Catholic school to do so, regardless of their family’s income. THE most important way we have done this since 2013 is by participating in the Education Improvement Scholarships Tax Credit Program (EISTC). Last year we awarded $4,565,308 in scholarships to 1,345 students through the McMahon Parater Scholarship Foundation. This means that nearly 15% of our 9,200 students rely on EISTC to attend their Catholic school.

    This isn’t a blow, it is a back door nuclear explosion that will hurt kids, not politicians, but real kids. Meanwhile there is $100 million for lab schools that have no research to back their use. Charter schools and EISTC are real choice, anything less is not worthy of funding. Lab schools were a joke in the 70’s and closed as most students were liberal white flight professors’ kids or other elitists’ kids.

  2. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    You can do what I just did; make a modest donation.

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Your attachment shows that only $12.9 million of the $25 million cap in tax credits was used in FY 2021. That was the information that Sen. Howell was relying on. It could be argued that the budget amendment lowered the cap too much and that a $15 million cap would have been more reasonable. But, why should the cap stay at $25 million if only a little more than half of that cap is used. Why not shift most of those unused tax credit benefits to oversubscribed tax credits that are also designed to benefit low-income areas? “A huge blow” and “undermining” and “nuclear explosion” is a lot of hyperbole.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      A hotter headline and tone will garner more clicks. 🙂

      The Senate had passed Ruff’s bill to increase the cap. Knight’s House Approps Committee killed it. This ain’t Howell’s doing.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        wow. The GOP did it?

    2. Chris Braunlich Avatar
      Chris Braunlich

      Cutting the amount of the tax credit — use of which has risen 20 percent since 2019 — reduces the scholarship funds by $1.2 million and means at least 300 students currently receiving scholarships will be forced back to the public school where they failed to flourish. I assume you are volunteering to look the parents in the eye and tell them that’s not a blow to them, but a lot of hyperbole?

      Cristo Rey — which only operates in places with a program like this and probably would not have come to Virginia had they thought such games would be played — is, I believe now in their third year of expansion and perhaps that goes down the drain, too. Care to explain it to the employers who have brought those students on as interns to teach them real-life work skills (https://www.cristoreyrichmond.org/work-study/our-corporate-partners/)?

      The program received a hit a few years ago when the IRS changed the way it calculated the federal deduction on the program. Foundations, schools and children were just recovering from that when covid hit, from which they are now recovering sans billions in federal covid dollars.

      And a change a year or so ago to allow larger scholarships for students with disabilities (who have demonstrably higher expenses) may now force further calibration as a result — and not in a good way for those underserved children.

      I appreciate your identifying Senator Howell — who has opposed the program and anything that smacks of helping children in this category from the beginning — as the likely instigator of this.

      But whether you wish to call it a huge blow or not, I’ve read your previous posting today, Dick, and let’s agree to call it what it is: An act of cowardice by those who fear a full throated debate.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        We should not be using public money for education and not holding the schools accountable the same way we hold public schools accountable.

        Conservatives have talked about the money “following the student”.

        This is why people oppose Charter Schools – Conservatives say one thing then do another.

        You can’t claim “wonderful results” as your accountability.

        If we are actually serious about this issue – we sure as heck are not showing it.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        The latest DOE annual report shows $12.9 million in tax credits used in FY 2021 for the scholarship program. You and Jim Sherlock use a figure closer to $15 million for the current year, but there is not indication where that figure came from. Regardless of what the figure for FY 2022 is, I did say in my remarks that a valid argument could be made that the GA reduced the cap too much. Even if the FY 2022 figure is somewhere between $12 and $15 million, you did not address my question of why the $25 million cap should not be lowered, if a large portion of it is unused, and those tax credits allocated to other, oversubscribed programs that benefit low-income neighborhoods. I repeat: Reducing a cap in a program in which only a little over half the maximum has been used is not ” a huge blow” to the program. No taxpayers or scholarships will be affected in the current fiscal year. If the total amount of tax credits in FY 2022 does exceed $12 million, the GA can make adjustments next session, either through emergency legislation or through a budget amendment in the mid-biennium budget bill. As Steve Haner points out, using “big blow” in headlines gets more clicks.

        If the Governor sends down an amendment or an item veto, it will be interesting to watch the floor debate. As chairman of the House contingent on the conference committee, it will be Del. Knight’s responsibility to defend the conference report provisions on the floor. Of course, if the Governor just elects to submit an amendment decreasing the cut in the cap, all parties could reach agreement before the Session starts and not contest the amendment.

        By the way, I identified Sen. Howell only because, by law, DOE must send an annual report to the chairs of the Senate Finance (Howell) and House Finance (Vivian Watts at the time) committees. Because she was the only member of the conference committee who got the report, I assumed she was the “insitigator”. But, that was only an assumption.

        Along these lines, reducing the cap on the scholarship tax credits may not have been the primary purpose of the amendment. Most of the amendment’s language deals with increasing the cap on the Neighborhood Assistance Act programs. Ruff’s bill, which passed the Senate, dealt primarily with those programs and had all the hallmarks of a bill prepared by an interest group and handed to a legislator. Howell may have been responding to support in the Senate to make additional tax credits available to the oversubscribed Neighborhood Assistance programs. Rather than increasing the total amount of authorized tax credits, perhaps someone said, “Hey, we could reduce the total tax credits available for the scholarships since only about half are being used.”

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    JAB holds the public schools feet to the fire on the SOLs but no such requirement for the non-public schools.

    I’ve said before and will say it again. I support funding for non-public schools if they are held to the same academic reporting standards.

    To not do that is a deal breaker for me.

    If we are serious about this issue then we need to walk-the-walk.

    1. Chris Braunlich Avatar
      Chris Braunlich

      Schools receiving these scholarships are required to give their students nationally-normed tests and report them to the state (the state has traditionally not wanted non-public school students taking the SOLs). However, because those tests are not aligned to state standards, they would require cross-walking those results with the SOL exams. When the law first passed I and others argued to put in the funding to permit the state to do that, as is done in Florida, accounting for poverty levels of the students.

      That proposal was rejected. A year or two later, VDOE actually proposed eliminating the requirement to report the results.

      I admit I do not know the current status of analyzing exam results.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        There needs to be transparency and accountability for the expenditure of public funds.

        For all the never-ending blather from Conservatives over transparency and accountability – they have abandoned all of that for this issue IMHO.

        No excuses. Figure it out and do the deed.

        One more time – I SUPPORT the expenditure of public monies for non-public schools for kids the public schools are failing – but without accountability – it’s a scam that diverts public funds without any assurance it was worked.

        1. Chris Braunlich Avatar
          Chris Braunlich

          I respect that and if it is straight state money (a tax credit is not) — say, a state voucher, especially without concomitant reductions in cost — I would find it hard to disagree. Accountability for state funding is important. No blather from me.

          I don’t know if our responses crossed, but as I explained, the opposition to that sort of testing largely came from the state. They control the ability to stand in the way so as to never secure your support.

          I would add one more suggestion: In addition to taking the SOL testing, if a school’s scores surpass area schools of the same demographics they should not only receive the state share of funding per child but the local share as well. Simple matter of accountability, yes? Think there will be any takers?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            If there is transparency and accountability and these schools are more successful, I’d support fully funding them – even if a local school board is opposed.

            But without a push and agreement for accountability from the get go – no support from me.

            The entire premise of these schools is a claim that they outperform public schools and the advocates USE the mandated SOL accountability to make their case that the public schools are “failing” with these kids.

            To allow these kids to switch to a school without equivalent accountability with a claim that they do better is a scam IMHO. Basically, it’s the same as giving public schools a bye on the SOLs.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Is Catholicism our new state religion…??

    1. Chris Braunlich Avatar
      Chris Braunlich

      Care to explain what that has to do with anything?

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “The largest scholarship fund, the Diocese of Arlington Scholarship Foundation, tapped credits worth $1.9 million”

        Kind of speaks for itself….

        1. Chris Braunlich Avatar
          Chris Braunlich

          Well, thank you, “Eric the half a troll”, for having the integrity of an honest screen name. I do think, however, you’ve earned “full troll” status.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Credits? You mean like tax dollars?

        3. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Religious bigotry now? A new low for you. The TAG grants for Liberty or Marymount college kids must gnaw at you.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Any tax money going to a church, any church, temple, mosque, cave of the whatever, does grind on me.

            Secularism.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I would feel the same if we were using tax dollars to fund Muslim, Buddhist, or any other religious education. If that makes me a bigot, so be it.

        4. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          You do know we’ve lost, right? The White Nationalist Evangelicals are laying hands on the public purse and the SCOTUS will not only not stop it, but facilitate it.
          We’re doomed.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I guess I just realized that. The United Church-states of America it is!!

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Meh. Better weather on the North Island of NZ year round than in Virginia, and according to contacts with immigration so long as I have medical insurance and a proveable income source (social security works) I can stay indefinitely. Americans can own any property not designated as “Life Style”, whatever that means.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yes. Turns out Catholic priests and Southern Baptist ministers have stumbled on fertile grounds,… er, I mean common ground.

    3. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      It’s primarily Episcopally founded. Make you happier?

      https://ajcschool.org/our-school/life-and-legacy-of-anna-julia-cooper/

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Nope…

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Didn’t Patrick Henry solve this problem? What was it called? Something like “The Parson’s Penny”?

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    The politics of reimbursing losses associated with diddling children…
    “NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Roman Catholic Church used a special and unprecedented exemption from federal rules to amass at least $1.4 billion in taxpayer-backed coronavirus aid, with many millions going to dioceses that have paid huge settlements or sought bankruptcy protection because of clergy sexual abuse cover-ups.”
    https://apnews.com/article/economy-wv-state-wire-new-york-il-state-wire-dc-wire-dab8261c68c93f24c0bfc1876518b3f6

  8. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Anna Julia Cooper was born into slavery in 1858. By 1924 she had earned a PHD from the University of Paris. Cooper was a noted educator and author. Her book, A Voice From the South: By a Black Women of the South was a trailblazing work that earned Cooper the title “Mother of Black Feminism”. In 1892, Cooper’s vision sought the right to self determination by the uplifting powers of higher education. She was a strident believer of W.E.B. DuBois’s “Talented Tenth” theory. She died in 1964 at the age of 105.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0e15d2d1c32eced6b3f537c7db08adaebb5fdc9d3cbd5c8c3fa7d8066d79069c.jpg

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Thanks for having the foresight, and taking the time, to look up biography. She seems to have been an extraordinary person.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Think about this Mr. Dick. Anna was old enough to remember Appomattox and Lincoln’s death. She was also old enough to remember John Glenn’s flight and Kennedy’s death. And the caper! You are old enough to have known Anna. We do have the best stories Mr. Dick. Right here in dear old Virginia.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: ” The founders offered a proposition to students’ families: the school would charge no tuition, but parents had to be committed to the program, which made greater demands and set higher expectations than the city’s public schools.”

    This is also how the Success Academy’s operate in NYC also and seems to be what some folks believe is “needed” for some kids to succeed.

    Not all kids succeed under these conditions and from what I can tell, they “wash out” and have to leave and that is not counted as a “failure” of that school to educate that child – whereas in a public school, not only can the kid not leave, but if he “fails” it counts against the school for not performing their ‘mission”.

    So these non-public schools really are not being held to the same standards as public schools are and on top of that they really don’t have accountability for their performance – the very thing that public schools are required to do and have their performance judged by.

    If all the low-performing kids in a public school were sent to one of these private schools – what would happen? Would a lot of the kids “wash out’ and be kicked out and sent back to the public schools?

    The advocates of these non-public schools are largely quiet about most of this – the main thing they claim is that they will do better than public schools do – without much evidence nor admitting that some kids probably do “wash out’ and those schools are not judged as “failing” with those kids.

  10. Here’s the accountability built into private schools that LarryG so desperately craves: Parents are free to send their kids to those schools or not. They have a choice. If they’re not happy with the private schools, they always have the public-school option. LarryG may not trust parents to act in their children’s best interest, but I do.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      How is that accountability to the taxpayer? Can we choose not to fund the Catholic Church with our taxes…?? Maybe the Arlington Diocese should be subject to FOIA…

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        It’s not. And JAB is arguing that parents can leave if not satisfied, as if these schools wouldn’t also give A’s and B’s to keep the parents happy.

        cynical and hypocritical.

        If we just want the parents to be happy with the results, why not drop the SOLs also and let the teachers give A’s and B’s?

        JAB is a faux “conservative’ on this issue.

        He runs away from the very issue he spends numerous blogs on hammering public education on.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      And here’s the hypocrisy of JAB’s approach. He uses the SOLS to condemn public schools but then says it’s not needed for private school.

      He uses the accountability data to argue for private schools – with no similar accountability.

      JAB condemns public schools that give A’s and B’s to kids who then fail the SOLS.

      What keeps the private schools from doing something similar if there are no SOLs?

      How would the parents “know” if the private schools give A’s and B’s and the kids would fail SOL standards?

      JAB essentially is advocating that parents “know” and can take their kids out. How would they ‘know”?

      Not an honest approach at all IMHO.

  11. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Noticed that JAB has now cited McMahon-Parater Foundation as the largest recipient at $3.2 million followed by the Diocese of Arlington-$1.9 million). So of the $12.8 million in tax funded donations under this program, 40% go to two Catholic Dioceses – the ultimate recipients. To put this in context, here are a few financial figures from one of those dioceses. Please note that the Arlington Diocese schools who received $1.9 million in tax funded donations ran an annual net surplus of $7.7 million. The church itself also ran an annual surplus of another $17.8 million.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/547ae9840a9f6a15e83141c74c17f80368fa7d3eb339accafc04a0103a0b9561.jpg

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      tax dollars for private religious schools?

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Yes… and ones that turned a profit… largely due to tax dollars… note the PPP grant money…

  12. Ruckweiler Avatar
    Ruckweiler

    The anti-school choice crowd is so beholden to the whims of the NEA/AFT that they can’t break wind without their permission.

  13. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    If private schools are required to pass the SOLs, the people who design the SOLs will have the power to dictate what should be taught — government control of the private schools. Schools can be accredited on the basis of their own tests and grading, as done at the college level; however, even such a system is subject to control by the accreditation organization. It seems we must trust the parents. Some parents will need education about how to evaluate the school. I still favor having the money follow the student, including having the possibility that the parents will choose to send the money to “public” schools.

Leave a Reply