Leftist Media Canonizes Another Killer

by Kerry Dougherty

Ronald Albert Barnes.

That was the name of the Southampton County Correctional Center guard who died in March of 1975 after being beaten and stomped by two inmates, including convicted rapist Tony Lewis.

If you read Sunday’s Virginian-Pilot, maybe you were moved by the front-page valentine to “Tony The Tiger,” as he was affectionately known by his family, who are trying to get him out of prison after 50 years behind bars.

The story – “A Pursuit Of Freedom Blocked At Every Step” – is what journalists used to call a “Sunday thumb sucker,” a long-form piece dedicated to a heartwarming topic.

Perhaps you, too, read yesterday’s drivel about how this poor guy from Hampton – grew up fatherless in the projects, blah, blah, blah – and has been incarcerated since he was 16. His first conviction was for a 1973 rape (absolutely zero details on THAT crime) and later for his part in the murder of the prison guard, an escape attempt and other crimes associated with a deadly prison riot.

Inches and inches of ink about a killer. Yet the newspaper couldn’t be bothered to print the name of the man he murdered.

Color me unsurprised.

Let’s be honest, giving the dead man an identity might turn Tony the Tiger into Tony the Ruthless Killer and dilute the sympathy The Pilot is trying to gin up for the inmate.

Naturally, as is the case with virtually all of the leftist legacy media, the front page of the paper was dedicated to a poor guy, mistreated by the justice system who is just trying to go fishing again. It wasn’t until the “jump,” on page 16 that there was a passing reference to the crime that’s kept him locked up all these years. As you’d expect, it was treated lightly. Lewis got in trouble for “restraining a correctional officer” who was trying to help another prison guard who later died as the result of the beating he took during what the writer characterized as a “chaotic escape attempt.”

No gory details about the crime. No name for the dead prison guard.

As we all know, the corporate media concerns itself only with criminals, not victims.

And newspapers wonder why they’re in a death spiral.

It took me about five minutes of Google research to find court filings that detailed what went down in the Virginia prison when Officer Barnes was beaten to a pulp. Describing what transpired inside the prison as “chaos” is not accurate.

“Chaos” is what happens in a high school hallway when the final bell rings.

When two bloodthirsty prisoners take down a couple of guards and viciously kick and stomp one of them into unconsciousness, that’s wanton savagery. It was an act so brutal that the inmates involved were sentenced to death for the killing.

Oh, and repeating the tall tale that Lewis was not part of the escape attempt is laughable. He was caught trying to scale the fence.

Their death sentences were commuted to life in prison by then-Gov. Mills Godwin. Not because the two convicts were innocent but because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the way some states, including Virginia, applied the death penalty was unconstitutional.

Now the family of this inmate – who got to live 45 years longer than Robert Albert Barnes – has run to the newspaper in hopes of a front-page bleeding-heart story about how their killer-relative deserves his freedom.

Instead of fleshing out the story of the crime, the newspaper focused on technicalities in the law to make it appear that this murderer should be released back into society because of his age or the circumstances of his commutation. Frivolous legal arguments at best.

There is a passing reference to the reasons Tony was denied parole in the past: the serious nature of his crimes and his need to demonstrate a “longer period of stable adjustment.”

Translation: Tony has probably been a discipline problem in prison. If he hasn’t shown “stable adjustment” after 50 years, he never will.

There are also brief mentions that the newspaper was unable to reach Tony’s rape victim, the dead man’s family or even the prisoner himself before “press time.” Hilarious. As if there was a compelling reason to get this piece in the paper on Sunday.

Beyond that, if the former chair of the parole board, Adrienne Bennett – who merrily freed a passel of murderers – didn’t wave her magic wand of freedom over Lewis, you know he’s a menace.

Frankly, the way the Pilot ended its attempted heart-tugger was absolutely masterful:

Lewis has always cared deeply for his nieces, whose names he had tattooed on his arm. When Carol’s daughter died at age 11, Lewis “tore apart” his cell, the sisters said.

When they talk about what he would’ve done if he’d never gotten in trouble, Lewis has mentioned wanting to serve in the military. He had expressed interest in various trades while a teenager, according to evaluations in the records of his case.

“Here it is that you have a 16-year-old that entered prison and spent so much time — 50 years — he’s never experienced love, he’s never experienced life, he’s never experienced fishing or anything else,” Morrison said. “When he had the eligibility for parole he just felt like that would be his voice or his opportunity.”

What a coincidence!

You know who else never got to experience love, life, or fishing after 1975?

Ronald Albert Barnes.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “Leftist Media Canonizes Another Killer”

  1. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    The death penalty should be reinstated. You kill someone (murder 1), you get the death penalty. No exceptions, pleading, whining, gone.

    1. I’m not as supportive of the death penalty as I once was. I think it should be safe, legal and rare.

      I would use the death penalty only for the worst-of-the-worst criminals – serial killers, child rapists, Yanni fans, etc.

      I would use life in prison without the possibility of parole for most ‘capital’ crimes.

      I would not execute anyone, even a Yanni fan, based solely on circumstantial evidence.

      I would allow anyone who is sentenced to life without the possibility parole to ‘opt-in’ to a death sentence – but I would not allow them to listen to Yanni on headphones during their execution.

      I think this particular guy, Tony Edward Lewis, just needs to die in prison.

      1. James Kiser Avatar
        James Kiser

        Ah yes like abortion, rare.

  2. In some cases the South Vietnamese Police Chief option is the best method….. this is just such a case.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      That’s pretty brutal. 50+ years later I can still close my eyes and see that photograph.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        That, and the 10-year old napalm girl.

        No cheating. Close your eyes, and describe the shirt the executed man is wearing. I’ll bet $1 you get it right.

        1. I guess I owe you a dollar. I even got the pocket correct.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Safe to assume you don’t support Amnesty International.

      Law & Order speaks…. BTW, how that all work out?

      1. I support the Innocence Project. I also support some of the work Amnesty International does – but I still think some crimes deserve the death penalty, and that there are people who need to remain in prison until they die.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It’s summarily being dispatched by a civilian authority that’s the problem, although the Saigon PD Chief was more honest about it than our own.

          1. It’s summarily being dispatched by a civilian authority that’s the problem…

            Agreed. And that is something that is not legal in this country.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Sometimes it get caught. Sometimes it don’t. Video killed the radio star.

          3. But it’s never been legal.

            And besides, you know very well that is not what I meant by ‘death penalty’.

            😉

      2. “Law & Order speaks…. BTW, how that all work out?”

        Pretty well actually.

        Violent crime peaked in 1992, after which Democrats and Republicans worked together to get tough on criminals.

        Reported violent crime rate in the United States from 1990 to 2021(per 100,000 of the population)

        https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          I meant ‘Nam.

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Consistency.

    If a child is too young and his or her brain too unformed to decide on gender altering surgery or treatment,

    If a child is too young to read blatantly sexualized books in the school library,

    If a child is too young to get a permanent tattoo,

    If a child is too young to be exposed to internet based porn,

    If a child is too young to get an abortion without parental consent,

    Isn’t that child also too young to be held accountable as an adult for crimes committed before they turn 18?

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      He was 16 when convicted of rape. Other offenses for which he was incarcerated came later, apparently when he was an adult.

      1. Yes, he was eighteen then.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Convicted at 16 of rape, he was in an adult prison two years later when he killed the guard. My assumption is that he was tried as an adult in the rape case.

        If so, would putting him in a youth detention facility have changed anything?

        Maybe / maybe not.

        But if you don’t believe that children should be allowed to undergo gender surgery because they are too young then it seems logical to me that children not be tried as adults, no matter how heinous the crime.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          You know the old saw about assumptions.

          There is a continuum from infant to adult with differing states of mental capacity along the way. You can make the argument that kids approaching adulthood can do things that deserve to be treated as adults, and some that should not.

          Your if then logic is false. One does not derive from the other. One is protecting children from making decisions that may harm them, the other is holding them accountable for harm they have done to others.

          Our opinions on where those lines should be drawn may vary. But the logic does not.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      The ways we determine what an 18 yr old is capable or or not may be outdated in today’s world.

      A 16 yr old can get get an AR-15 and mow down dozens of people and we argue over whether or not he had the necessary “skills” to function as an adult.

      How we got to 18 … and to your point, the inconsistencies of various things.. are pretty old and dated… do we believe nothing has changed?

      We put people into the military with the idea that they either know or will know what to do with a gun and killing people or not.

      Is it the same today as it was 50 years ago?

      1. “A 16 yr old can get get an AR-15 …”

        No, they can’t legally buy a rifle or ammunition until they are 18.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          can’t legally, but clearly demonstrate by the mass killings they do, that they can.

          right?

          In fact, it seems that even folks who are not supposed to be able to get AR-15s, can and do on a regular basis.

          1. James Kiser Avatar
            James Kiser

            which mass killings are you referring too? Parkland So fbi and local police knew about him, the gender bender in Nashville who hated Christians, family knew about her. All your mass killers were known about by family,police or fbi, connect the dots. Don’t forget the fbi at Waco with their mass killing or the vaunted sniper cold bloodly gunning down Randy Weavers wife.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Are we saying that if “family knew”, that there would have been a way to deny them access to weaponry? I honestly don’t know. I hear both that you cannot deny access to the weapons until AFTER they have done something, not before, not even if they are considered a threat.

            I don’t even see how anyone for any reason can be denied a weapon given the plain text of the 2A. Who decides which restrictions are acceptable with respect to 2a and not? Does the 2a delegate to law-makers the ability to pass laws that restrict?

          3. It’s nice to see you acknowledging that gun laws do not keep guns out of the wrong hands, regardless of what democrat squawking points may say.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            well, some gun laws seem to keep some types of weapons out of the hands of folks. right?

            Imagine if the same folks who can currently get an AR-15 could get a stinger missile or a bazooka or full-auto machine gun before they barged into a school or church, etc… If the 2a says “arms” then why not stinger missiles, full-auto , etc? isn’t that a “restriction” not really in the text of the 2a?

          5. If the 2a says “arms” then why not stinger missiles, full-auto , etc? isn’t that a “restriction” not really in the text of the 2a?

            Missiles aren’t firearms. Not even close.

            The 2A is about firearms, and the test is those that are “in common use for lawful purposes.”

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Would you be inclined to answer a question about the 2A from a Constitutional perspective, your view?

          1. “Would you be inclined to answer a question about the 2A from a Constitutional perspective, your view?”

            A question? Yes.

            A never ending stream of questions? No.

      2. James Kiser Avatar
        James Kiser

        16 years olds drive guided missiles and mow down people too. unless a 16 year old is given the AR-15 by an adult he didn’t buy it, but he/she can buy a car and several states have or are approving 16 year olds to vote and hold office.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Their death sentences were commuted to life in prison by then-Gov. Mills Godwin. Not because the two convicts were innocent but because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the way some states, including Virginia, applied the death penalty was unconstitutional.”

    Wow! Something for which some Virginian are clearly proud.

  5. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    One must assume that the Paper’s publisher and editor are arguing over who would take in Tony the Tiger if he were paroled. I bet both of them have an empty bedroom.

  6. I have not yet studied the transcripts at this link in detail, but what I have read so far leads me to the opinion that this guy needs to die in prison.

    https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-court-records-vol218/7/

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      maybe we can help him along with some democratic party imported fentanyl.

  7. I agree with Kerry. The reporting was biased, disingenuous, partisan and did not serve the best interests of the citizens of VA.

  8. Thomas Dixon Avatar
    Thomas Dixon

    Research on Google? That is like wearing a mask to prevent a virus.

  9. Putting rapists and murderers in prison isn’t a bad thing.

    Violent crime reached a peak in 1992. The country finally had enough, and took measures to address it.

    I’m all for the Innocence Project, but if you do the crime, you should do the time.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b741a8476785acc8118234ba09f197e2a7996e471446a1bd33f7f7838dc35e8f.jpg

Leave a Reply