Lazy Mainstream Media Lied to Virginia

by Kerry Dougherty

Chances are you saw them. Friday’s headlines screaming that “133 Virginia School Superintendents” were protesting Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s reforms to public education, which had been a cornerstone of his campaign.

Every dang school chief in the commonwealth opposes him, they claimed.

Here’s the first paragraph from The Washington Post:

RICHMOND — All 133 Virginia public school division superintendents have urged Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) to scrap the “tip line” set up to let parents complain about teachers and principals and have asked him to stop his campaign against the teaching of “divisive” content in schools.

The old newspaper reporter in me was skeptical. EVERY superintendent in Virginia? Not a single one supports the governor? Even the superintendents in the small, conservative enclaves of Southwestern Virginia? They’re all on board with equity training and equity-based outcomes?

The protest letter came from the Virginia Association of School Superintendents. Like most education organizations this one leans left. Membership dues are on a sliding scale, depending on the size of the school district. Since professional dues are almost usually covered by taxpayers, this non-profit is indirectly funded by the public.

Lucky us.

Turns out those headlines were — let’s be honest — lies.

It took a Richmond television station to finally report the truth. Buried deep in its news story about the outrage over Youngkin’s policies was this gem:

“VASS Executive Director Ben Kiser clarified that the letter was crafted and adopted by the 12 member board and doesn’t necessarily reflect a consensus among all of its members.”

A 12-member board is not the same as 133 school superintendents. Not even close.

Yet these far-left radicals on the board of VASS penned a letter, claimed to be speaking for all superintendents and news outlets from The Washington Post to television news breathlessly ran with it without asking a single question. Democrats were doing their happy dance in Richmond.

In fact, in every news story the focus was the universal opposition to the governor’s policies.

Those policies include striking down the skewed equity-based admissions policies at the governor’s magnet schools that have resulted in the purging of Asian-American students. (The policy at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology was just ruled illegal by a federal judge.)

And there’s opposition to the Richmond tip line that allows parents to report divisive practices or CRT training in their public schools. That raises the question, why are educators so fearful?

Frankly, with disgruntled parents being treated like pariahs at school board meetings, a tip line may be the best way to protect the identities of citizens who don’t want to endure public ridicule by elected officials.

Naturally, when the news broke, there was gloating from State Sen. Louise Lucas, the Democrat who represents Portsmouth, home to some of the worst schools in Virginia:

This Tweet would be laughable — Lucas talking about Youngkin destroying public schools given the state of education in Portsmouth — but it’s sad. The politicians who represent that city push casinos and weed and shrug while the public schools continue to underperform.

There was a time when any partially sober editor would have thrown those “All-133-School-Superintendents” stories back at reporters and ordered them to make a phone call to confirm that every single superintendent in Virginia was on board with the letter.

That didn’t happen. Hey, the story fit an anti-Youngkin narrative. Nothing else mattered.

The mainstream media doesn’t like the term “fake news.” But all too often, that’s what they peddle.

This column has been republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

35 responses to “Lazy Mainstream Media Lied to Virginia”

  1. I’m eagerly awaiting all the corrections and clarifications — in print and on Twitter.

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Twitter folks are going after her. I’m having fun sending screenshots to folks.

    2. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      What is your lung capacity?

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Bring something else to read while you wait. War and Peace will do. You’ll finish before one reporter or editor admits they made a mistake….because they didn’t. They were in on the attack. Five years from now the lie will live and the truth will remain buried.

      Yes, Kerry, copy editors back in the day instantly challenged the words “all” “every” “always” “never.”

      1. tmtfairfax Avatar
        tmtfairfax

        My grade school teachers challenged the use of “all” “every” “always” “never.”

    4. I’ll take that bet

  2. Alert Bacon’s Rebellion readers may recall a post I made back in mid-January, asking the headline question, “Is Resistance Forming to Youngkin’s Education Agenda?”

    I noted that Fairfax County School Superintendent Scott Braband — a zealous advocate of Woke-ism in public schools — had been appointed president of the Virginia Association of School Superintendents. (I incorrectly identified him then as executive director, and I’m fully acknowledging the error now.)

    No school superintendent is more threatened by Younkin’s policies than Braband. What enterprising reporter will make the connection?

    Uh… none. Because the mainstream media has lost any semblance of objectivity and has zero interest in telling the whole story.

  3. disqus_VYLI8FviCA Avatar
    disqus_VYLI8FviCA

    The irony of all of this will be lost on the reporters…I mean cheerleaders who work at the WaPo & RTD. Theirs is a mission from God, or from the faculty lounge.

  4. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Also, there are 132 superintendents not 133. Williamsburg and James City are one? Did that change? It might have, but I counted 132 and did not count James City as it says on the VDOE site that James City and Williamsburg are one in the same?

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      The schools are the same. In that area you see JCC Williamsburg on the buses.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is one of the few occasions in which I agree with Kerry. This is bad reporting. I don’t know whether to blame it on bias and pushing an agenda or on the shortage in the editorial ranks. Or maybe both.

    That being said, Kerry indulges in a little exaggeration and bias of her own. She asserts that the new admissions policy for Thomas Jefferson resulted in the “purging of Asian American students.” “To purge” means “to rid” or “to remove”. 54 percent of the first class accepted under the new admissions policy were Asian Americans. That is hardly a purge.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Classic pot calling the kettle black scenario… smh…

    2. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      They were another 20% above that, that’s a purge. If it was under 5% maybe, but the amount they dropped, that’s a purge.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        you mean they actually kicked out those already enrolled? yep, that would be a purge!

    3. ‘Bad report’????? HOW about a LIE

      ‘ . . . on bias and pushing an agenda or on the shortage in the editorial ranks. Or maybe both.’ MAYBE the inability to read and do arithmetic!

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is one of the few occasions in which I agree with Kerry. This is bad reporting. I don’t know whether to blame it on bias and pushing an agenda or on the shortage in the editorial ranks. Or maybe both.

    That being said, Kerry indulges in a little exaggeration and bias of her own. She asserts that the new admissions policy for Thomas Jefferson resulted in the “purging of Asian American students.” “To purge” means “to rid” or “to remove”. 54 percent of the first class accepted under the new admissions policy were Asian Americans. That is hardly a purge.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    yeah, this is bad…. as bad as Kerry often does! But the critics are also lazy. How about identifying the Sups who support Youngkin on this? I’m betting not so many and others just keep quiet.

    And just as bad as BR pretty much calling all public schools leftist wokes!

    1. Cathis398 Avatar
      Cathis398

      exactly. sure would be a lot more meaningful criticism if there were any (let a lone a lot of) superintendents who disagree with the letter.

    2. Cathis398 Avatar
      Cathis398

      exactly. sure would be a lot more meaningful criticism if there were any (let alone a lot of) superintendents who disagree with the letter.

      1. Wouldn’t be the “reporters” job to ask local superintendents for comment?

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Would be fascinating to see a list of the Sups that publically supported the tip line! I recognize that’s not the same at all of publically opposing, but my bet is most Sups value their workforce and not make such a dumb statement even not publically, word would get around and teachers would make decisions.

    How many teachers SUPPORT Youngkins tip line?

    There’s gotta be some “conservative” teachers out there that refuse to teach CRT and stuff, right?

    Other than Youngkins statement, it’s pretty much crickets!

  9. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Wow!! Does Kerry believe the same “representation” analysis applies to the withdrawal of VA by its AG from the ERA lawsuit? The General Assembly of 140 members voted in behalf of the Commonwealth’s 8 million residents for the ERA. The AG alleged in the withdrawal that VA was “no longer of the view” that the lawsuit had merit. Were her old journalist’s ears attuned?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      ………only the “right” ear works……….

  10. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    If everyone who worked for the Post on K Street in D.C. were vaporized, would anyone not related to them by blood or marriage miss them? If they were magically swept away, by what percentage would American journalism improve?

  11. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    The Virginia Association of School
    Superintendents is like any other organization of that type. They elect representatives and those representatives pool their regional enclave and then speak. Much like a nonpartisan democracy. So, in fact, the 133 sups did speak. These are highly educated and “in the trenches” administrators that Youngkin ignored before jumping to election promises. They could answer the question – Is it doable? Probably in hindsight, Youngkin should have invited them to the table. Live and learn.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      https://www.vassonline.org/

      Fascinating website. Look at all the vendors and providers who pay them money to suck up and seek business. Nice photo of Northam and Lane pops up. Then Mrs. Northam. Then McAuliffe! I went there over the weekend trying to read the actual statement (only saw it on Twitter) and to look for a real signature page. Wasn’t one. Trust me, this will not be forgotten. Time to dig up the 990? 🙂

      Braband is ED, Jim.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Post Office pictures. Just ain’t been swapped out yet. Call the sys-ad.

      2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
        Kathleen Smith

        Like any organization, they live by who is in charge. Next year, it will look different.

      3. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Look homeward, sir, to the vendors supporting this website where your voice is heard. Glass houses!!

  12. sbostian Avatar

    I went to the site and based on a cursory review of most of the pages, it seems that the public policy advocacy agenda of the association has only two components: 1) A never ending increase in funding for public schools and 2) Equity issues. I assume that requires no description to this group.

    I failed to see any educational objectives that would be of value to most parents and taxpayers such as students achieving reading, writing, quantitative, logical and critical thinking skills at grade appropriate levels. Perhaps those things are part of the agenda, but I didn’t find them on the website. What I see as a frustrating to many parents and Commonwealth taxpayers is the appearance that administrators do not consider the objectives described in the first sentence of this paragraph to be critical parts of the core mission of the public education system. I also fail to see significant dialog in media attempting to define the core mission of our educational system. The divide seems to me to be rooted in an unspoken conflict between the “classical” content based educational philosophy and the John Dewey rejection of classical educational methods (up through the early 20th Century) in favor of schools being agents of social change (in pursuit of Dewey’s “democratic socialist” vision ).

    Actually debating the divide in public would be helpful, but I somehow think that the school systems and their administrators would not want to participate.

  13. Cathis398 Avatar
    Cathis398

    it’s a fair criticism. the statement and articles & so on should have said “organization that represents Virginia school superintendents has urged,” etc.

    we have plenty of evidence that those individual superintendents feel free to speak their own minds, however, & I see nothing that prevents them from doing so. Surely they too must be upset to have their views misrepresented, if that’s what’s happened.

    serious question: have any of them publicly expressed disagreement with the letter? how many? this criticism would be fair more meaningful if there was substance to back it up–that is, if you could say that some number of the superintendents actually do not endorse the letter.

    lacking that, it’s hard not to derive the inference made in the articles–that in fact the letter does represent the opinion of all or nearly all of the school superintendents.

    because right now, although your criticism is formally correct, the facts could very well be exactly what the headlines suggest, or very close to them.

    we could also pull back a little bit: why does this story worry you? because it suggests that despite your claims that Youngkin intends to be supporting public education, it turns out that some, or very many, or all of the professionals who run that system think the opposite?

  14. Looks like the National Association of School Boards letter to AG Merrick Garland accusing parents of being threatening to school boards — an inside hatch-job trying to masquerade as a wide-spread consensus.

  15. Keep on going guys. Pretty soon some of you will be convincing yourselves that Kerry was lying and VASS was telling the 100% truth!

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Oh Kerry was telling the truth THIS TIME. She’s done plenty of the same thing herself more than a few times. pot, kettle, black.

      Conservatism these days means misrepresent the truth, like with CRT , DEI and so forth so yeah, it looks just as bad on the left but BR does the same itself.

  16. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I consider upsetting VASS a win for Youngkin. He is busy delivering on the promises he made.

Leave a Reply