Kaine Appoints Dominion Counsel to SCC Judgeship

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has appointed James C. Dimitri, the McGuire Woods attorney who has led Dominion Virginia Power legal team bidding to build a high-voltage transmission line through Virginia’s horse country, to the State Corporation Commission.

In making the announcement, Kaine noted that Dimitri had served as senior counsel at the SCC between 1994 and 1996, and has represented numerous clients before the SCC and other regulatory agencies. The governor’s press release did not specifically mention his role in representing Dominion.

“Jimmy Dimitri has worked on utility matters before the SCC for more than 25 years,” Kaine said. “His representation of consumers, manufacturers, utilities, the Commonwealth and the commission itself has given him a complete understanding of all the challenging and important issues before the SCC.”

The appointment has drawn fire from Rep. Frank Wolf, R-10, many of whose constituents oppose the proposed construction of a high-voltage transmission line through the horse country of the northern piedmont. Dimitri is the lead attorney representing Dominion Virginia Power in the highly controversial bid. “Virginia deserves an impartial SCC that will act in the consumer interest,” Wolf wrote in a public letter to Kaine.

Normally, the General Assembly appoints the SCC judges, reports the Northern Virginia Daily. But the legislature has wrangled for three sessions over a replacement for Judge Theodore V. Morrison, Jr., forfeiting the decision to Kaine.

Kaine spokesman Gordon Hickey defended the appointment, noting that in addition to his work for Dominion and the attorney general’s office, he has also been counsel to the commission and the Virginia Poverty Law Center — often opposing utilities like Dominion. Said Hickey: “The fact is that Mr. Dimitri is unique in that he has the broadest perspective on the work of the State Corporation Commission that an individual could have.”

Bacon’s bottom line: I’m not totally buying Hickey’s argument. In his capacity as a defender of consumer interests, Dimitri may have opposed Dominion on issues like rates. But that’s a far cry from saying that he’s neutral on the many environmental issues that come before the SCC. The environmentalists/conservationist community is one key constituency that it appears Dimitri has never represented and, indeed, has actively opposed.

I haven’t received any e-mail alerts from my usual conservationist sources and I can’t find any reaction to the appointment on the Piedmont Environmental Council website, however, so it’ s possible that Dimitri is held in such high regard by everyone whose path he has crossed that he has sparked little opposition.

On the other hand, maybe the PEC and other environmentalists are so stunned by the appointment that they haven’t collected their wits enough to respond. Alternatively, even if they are dismayed, they may not want to alienate Dimitri.

Wolf is pretty tight with the PEC, so it’s conceivable that he represents a back-channel line of communication. But then again, maybe not. Wolf also mentioned Dimitri’s role in representing the Toll Road Investors Partnership in seeking rate increases for the Dulles Greenway. Hard to tell.

Environmentalists and conservationists have had a love/hate relationship with Gov. Kaine. I would be surprised if this appointment doesn’t nudge the needle closer to the hate side of the meter.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Kaine Appoints Dominion Counsel to SCC Judgeship”

  1. floodguy Avatar

    Or perhaps it only reinforces how undoable the concept and policies environmentalists are pushing, a pipe-dream of total clean energy within 10 years. On the otherhand, a fair-minded insider will lead with changes more realistically obtainable.

  2. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Here’s what I would like to see:

    1. – A statement of economic interests much like is required from candidates for elective office

    2. – A list of all his business/professional and social affiliations and memberships.

    3. – an Online Calendar for all of his meetings (who and what for) in which he represents the interests of the SCC.

  3. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    More Power line Stories.

    Officials in California have endorsed a 150 mile power line to bring renewable energy to Sand Diego.

    Environmentalists doen’t want the lne bult because it goes through scenic areas.

    The governor says

    “It’s a kind of schizophrenic behavior. They say that we want renewable energy, but we don’t want you to put it anywhere.”

    RH

    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/27/local/me-park27

  4. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    you mean the ONLY power on that power line will be renewables and they can ONLY be located just to the east of the park?

    or .. is this the next new way to justify a power line… ??

    So maybe Dominion screwed up on the proposed power line to NoVa.

    Should they have instead said that the power line was needed to bring clean renewable power to NoVa instead of coal power?

    see ,, it would be the truth even if only 1/2 of 1% actually came from wind turbines on those WVA mountain ridges…

    you could still say that the power lines were needed to bring that wind power to NoVa…. and all those hypocritical greenies were opposed to “clean” power.

    right?

    I think Ahhhhnulld should roll that turnip truck back into his mansion garage….

  5. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    I don’t know.

    The way it is presented is that the power line is needed to service new solar energy projects to be built in the desert.

    RH

  6. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    "San Diego Gas & Electric and its parent corporation, Sempra Energy, promise that the proposed line, known as Sunrise Powerlink, would carry renewable power from the sun, wind and ground, mostly via yet-undeveloped plants in the bright, hot Imperial Valley.

    State law requires utilities to supply 20% of their energy from renewable sources by 2010 – a benchmark SDG&E has said it cannot meet."

    And there is appointment news in California as well. The governor has refused to re-appoint his brother-in-law to the commisssion reviewing the proposal.

    RH

  7. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Here's the other side of the story:

    http://www.ucan.org/energy/electricity/thoughtless_and_careless_summary_of_ucans_opposition_to_the_sunrise_powerlink

    it starts off …"once upon a time in a land far away on a dark and stormy night….the butler stole a bunch of folks bundle of sticks…

    no.. no.. that's another story..

    here's this one:

    "Beginning in early 2006 through October of 2007, UCAN conducted a thorough analysis of SDG&E's proposal and was unable to verify any of the three legs upon which SDG&E's application is precariously perched. In fact, UCAN found that most of SDG&E's assumptions for the STP were either unsupported or, in many cases, blatantly wrong. Many of the linchpin facts upon which SDG&E relies upon in support of its application to spend $1.265+ billion on STP are, in fact, not facts at all. "

  8. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    It has been years, but I practiced against Jimmy Dimitri. He is as capable and ethical as they come. He never wavered in his advocacy for his client but also considered all sides of an issue and tried to reach a fair result.

    Lawyers don’t always get to pick their clients, but they do get to choose how they represent them.

    Find me a person who truly knows Jimmy and his work, and who opposes him for this job representing the Commonwealth. That’s a challenge.

  9. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I don’t have anything against the man in particular and it sounds like he is principled and ethical but I still believe that people in his position – all of them – should be required to meet strict transparency standards about their
    economic inter4ests and affiliations.

    The best person on the SCC in many respects IMHO is a person who has actually worked in the industry that the SCC will regulate – as long as – we have a way to maintain accountability … and trust.

  10. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    It looks like both stories have two sides.

  11. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    “The utility has misled regulators and the public about the costs of the project, misstated the need and timeline for the project, and ignored smarter, more flexible and more economic alternatives. “

    Could have been written by PEC.

    RH

  12. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    People with integrity can change roles or jobs and perform according to the rules. Then there are those who simply attempt to use their new position to advance their old agenda.

    I don’t know Mr. Dimitri. I’d hope he will simply set aside his old role and take on his new one. He probably will.

    But the real question is whether Virginia government is transparent enough to allow the public to monitor the situation. Can we be assured that the rules are the same for everyone? Do only a few have real access to the Commissioners?

    TMT

  13. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I’d like to see more transparency and more accountability.

    I’m sorry but I really don’t care what kind of a reputation someone has – it still does not negate the need for transparency.

  14. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    Let me give an obvious example.

    Someone who had a career at Dominion, more than likely, owns Dominion and possibly other industry-related stock.

    When that person moves from a career in the industry to a role of regulating that same industry – what happens to their investment portfolio?

    I’m not saying this is wrong – but at that point – disclosure and transparency are clearly an issue.

  15. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    First, subject to correction, I believe all appointees, including SCC judges, are required by law to file statements of economic interests.

    Second, if the environmental matters before the SCC are so important, can anyone point me to those laws that require the SCC to make environmental decisions? Last time I checked, our laws devoted those issues to the Department of Environmental Quality, not the SCC.

  16. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    re: statement of economic interests

    I wondered about that – but since they are not online – how would citizens know?

    this also does not solve the problem of investments in the industry being regulated.

    those investments probably should be required to be put in a blind trust or similar.

    re: environment vs commerce

    it looks like to me that there are overlap issues and the SCC essentially overrule DEQ unless DEQ wants to contest.

    I’m speaking of programmatic policy issues verses specific site issues.

    DEQ in Virginia through accident or design and usual practice does not seem to me to have the strength and power and inclination to be strongly assertive on things like power plant emissions.

    For instance, other states have gone to court to contest EPA weakening of rules like treating retrofits differently than new construction – and as I recall Virginia was not among the complaintants even though even agencies like the Interior Department NPS have expressed concerns about the impacts of coal emissions on Shenandoah Park… it appears to me that DEQ was essentially mute…

    feel free to correct my impressions if wrong…

  17. Jim Bacon Avatar
    Jim Bacon

    Anonymous 9:36, The SCC will be called upon to make decisions with major environmental implications. It is a stated goal of the commonwealth of Virginia to generate 10 percent of its electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020 (or some year close to that date). Dominion has issued an RFP for alternative-energy proposals. In many cases alternative energy projects will be more expensive per KW hour than conventional sources. Someone has to balance that 10 percent objective with the objective of holding down costs for ratepayers. That “someone” is the SCC.

  18. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    I think it’s pretty clear.

    As long as Dominion’s strength as a Company is rooted in consumption – it is not in their best interests to promote/encourage more efficient use and that aspect concerns me at the SCC level.

    What is the role of the SCC with respect to decoupling?

    California and New York have decoupled and the results are dramatic as customers in those states use about 2/3 the power as in other states and many don’t pay any more on their bills because it was in both their interest and the power companies interests to reduce usage.

    We’re not going to have effective reductions in use in Va unless we also decouple and the key to this is the SCC.

Leave a Reply