by James A. Bacon

It would be entirely understandable if Rojai Fentress were angry and embittered by the miscarriage of justice that convicted him of a 1996 murder and kept him imprisoned until July of this year. But in a recent Encorepreneur Zoomcast, he expressed nothing but joy at his new-found freedom, gratitude toward those who had fought to liberate him, and enthusiasm for the new life that awaited him.

Fentriss and Deirdre Enright, a University of Virginia law school professor with the Innocence Project, described the flawed investigation, trial and conviction of the 16-year-old Fentress for the slaying of a white addict in a drug deal gone bad. He spent the next 24 years rotating through more than a half dozen institutions in the state prison system before establishing his innocence and winning a pardon.

When asked what it would take to compensate him for his experience, the gentle, sweet-tempered Fentress said, “I don’t regret a thing. I don’t think God makes mistakes.” He grew up in a tough neighborhood where many of his friends ended up dead. “The worst thing that happened to me turned out to be the best thing that ever happened.” 

Fentress has gone to the Division of Motor Vehicles for a driver’s license, opened a bank account, applied for a job, and enrolled in a community college. He hopes one day to attend a four-year college.

Listening to Fentress is like entering a time warp. His spirit of hope and forgiveness seems totally out of step with the tenor of the times with its emphasis on grievance, victimhood, and reparations. If anyone can legitimately claim to be a victim of systemic racism in the criminal justice system, it is Fentress.

The shooting happened at Midlothian Village in South Richmond where Fentress lived. Two drug addicts, a white male and white female, conducted a drug transaction with a local dealer. The deal went awry and the dealer shot the white addict, Thomas Foley, who staggered off, was rushed to Chippenham Hospital, and died. The incident occurred during the crack epidemic and crime wave that made Richmond notorious as the city with one of the highest murder rates in the country, and law enforcement was under heavy pressure to put offenders behind bars. Someone talking to the police detective investigating the case (who, incidentally, was African-American) implicated Fentress. The Richmond prosecutor offered him a plea deal for five years, and his attorney urged him to accept it but he refused . He was innocent, he maintained. The female companion of the victim, Julie Howard, testified in a one-hour trial that she recognized him, and the jury convicted him. Upon hearing the verdict, he literally fainted.

The case also highlights the problems that poor people have with inadequate legal representation. Fentress said he saw his lawyer twice — first when his family retained him, and then again in court.

Fentress owes his liberation from prison to a fluke. He was incarcerated in the Keene Mountain Correctional Center in far southwest Virginia. In Virginia’s correctional system, inmates the same geographic area band together even if they didn’t know each other outside of prison — D.C. guys with D.C. guys, Tidewater guys with Tidewater guys, and so on. As a Richmonder, Fentress fell in with a man named DeAnthony Doane from Fairfield Court, a housing Richmond project. Doane bragged about the many crimes he’d committed. One day he was talking about a drunk white guy he’d shot. To Fentress, the incident sounded remarkably like the case for which he’d been convicted.

in 2014 Doane wrote an affidavit confessing to the shooting. He said he didn’t normally do business in Midlothian Village, and he wasn’t expecting two intoxicated white people. The “gun went off,” the white guy ran away, and he had no idea that he had died.

Armed with Doane’s confession, Fentress asked to be released. But he entered judicial hell. One judge heard his appeal but dismissed Doane’s affidavit on the grounds that convicts frequently confess to each others’ crimes. Fortunately for Fentress, the Innocence Project picked up his case. The UVa law students’ inquiries revealed several irregularities, including the fact that Foley’s female companion had lied about not being intoxicated the night of the killing and the fact that she had identified a person different from Fentress in a police line-up. The Innocence Project filed a request for a gubernatorial pardon from Governor Terry McAuliffe in 2017. Three years later, Governor Ralph Northam granted the pardon.

Fentress reacted to his release from prison by rolling on the ground in joy. Photo credit: The Innocence Project.

“This is so beautiful,” Fentress told Charlottesville Tomorrow. “I am in society. I am 40 years old. I am supposed to be able to produce and be able to function as a man. This is what life is supposed to be.”
UVa law students have started a “Support Rojai Fentress’s Freedom” page on GoFundMe. The fund has reached $60,000 of its $70,000 goal.

Bacon’s bottom line: Virginia’s criminal justice system is flawed. Innocent people get convicted, guilty people go free. We can hope that miscarriages of justice like this one are rarer now that the crack epidemic has subsided and the number of shootings and murders has declined since 1996, but as the military saying goes, hope is not a plan. I question the notion, held by many Virginia legislators, that reducing sentences and releasing people early from prison is an adequate answer. Letting guilty people go free does not help people who were wrongfully convicted. Rather, we should focus on efforts on making sure that no more innocents like Rojai Fentress, are imprisoned. Ever.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Justice at Last for Rojai Fentress”

  1. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    “The UVa law students’ inquiries revealed several irregularities, including the fact that Foley’s female companion had lied about not being intoxicated the night of the killing and the fact that she had identified a person different from Fentress in a police line-up.” Uh, sounds like a very pathetic job by some overworked public defender….That second fact in particular needed to be told to the jury. Eyewitness testimony as the total basis of a conviction is always a red flag.

    Anyone pointing to this as a sign of systemic racism won’t get an argument from me. Had it been a middle class white kid shouting his innocence, all involved probably would have paid closer attention (and he’d have had a competent counsel.)

    Not my area, but I suspect that conviction was not eligible for review under the writ of actual innocence process. Until they adjusted that a while back, it was very hard to overcome a jury decision with fresh evidence, and of course the state has the AG’s office charged with maintaining convictions on appeal. GoFundMe is one thing, but expect a (perfectly valid) claim bill for damages when the GA passes another batch of such approvals for bad convictions.

  2. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    “The UVa law students’ inquiries revealed several irregularities, including the fact that Foley’s female companion had lied about not being intoxicated the night of the killing and the fact that she had identified a person different from Fentress in a police line-up.” Uh, sounds like a very pathetic job by some overworked public defender….That second fact in particular needed to be told to the jury. Eyewitness testimony as the total basis of a conviction is always a red flag.

    Anyone pointing to this as a sign of systemic racism won’t get an argument from me. Had it been a middle class white kid shouting his innocence, all involved probably would have paid closer attention (and he’d have had a competent counsel.)

    Not my area, but I suspect that conviction was not eligible for review under the writ of actual innocence process. Until they adjusted that a while back, it was very hard to overcome a jury decision with fresh evidence, and of course the state has the AG’s office charged with maintaining convictions on appeal. GoFundMe is one thing, but expect a (perfectly valid) claim bill for damages when the GA passes another batch of such approvals for bad convictions.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Good piece

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Good piece

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Ditto. Good piece but not a good story.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Ditto. Good piece but not a good story.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Thanks for posting this, Jim. Wrongfully convicted is an area that I am interested in and try to follow, but I missed this one.

    Steve is correct. This one likely would not have met the test for a writ of actual innocence. Usually, some tangible new evidence is required. Confessions or affidavits by other convicted criminals are suspect. If a writ of actual innocence would have been possible, I am sure that the Innocence Project would have goe that route.

    Not mentioned in the accounts is the role of the investigators for the Parole Board. Pardon petitions are referred to that agency for investigation. The Board has several part-time, retired law-enforcement personnel to investigate pardon requests. There is a large backlog of requests. That is likely why it took three years for this pardon to be granted.

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Thanks for posting this, Jim. Wrongfully convicted is an area that I am interested in and try to follow, but I missed this one.

    Steve is correct. This one likely would not have met the test for a writ of actual innocence. Usually, some tangible new evidence is required. Confessions or affidavits by other convicted criminals are suspect. If a writ of actual innocence would have been possible, I am sure that the Innocence Project would have goe that route.

    Not mentioned in the accounts is the role of the investigators for the Parole Board. Pardon petitions are referred to that agency for investigation. The Board has several part-time, retired law-enforcement personnel to investigate pardon requests. There is a large backlog of requests. That is likely why it took three years for this pardon to be granted.

  9. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    What? No State reparations for being wrongly convicted? Well, just as well, Kerry would go off on a tear about being ‘soft on crime’.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      There is a state law that provides for compensation for persons wrongfully convicted. (Sec. 8.01-195.11) https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title8.01/chapter3/section8.01-195.11/

      The Code section sets out a formula for calculating the amount of compensation. The General Assembly would need to authorize such compensation. (See HB 460, 2020 Session)

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        I would have just as soon not seen this…

        “Paid … 20 percent of the compensation award with the remaining 80 percent of the principal of the compensation award to be used by the State Treasurer to purchase an annuity from any A+ rated company, including any A+ rated company from which the Virginia Lottery may purchase an annuity, to provide equal monthly payments to such person for a period certain of 25 years…”

        So, somebody profits from the wrongly incarcerated? So Virginia!

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          It is somewhat paternalistic. As I understand the reasoning, it was to protect the wrongfully accused person from blowing all the money at one time.

          1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            That’s compounded foolishness. “I have a structured settlement and I need cash now…”, just victimizes them thrice.

            Virginia’s reputation for larcenous handling of trusts is a sterling one.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        does he get the right to vote back?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          If it is a full pardon, he gets the right to vote back.

          I am going to have to qualify this answer. A person who has been convicted of a felony can vote only if his rights have been restored by the Governor. It is not clear that any pardon–simple, conditional, or full–would automatically restore one’s voting rights. He may have to petition the Governor to restore his voting rights.

  10. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    What? No State reparations for being wrongly convicted? Well, just as well, Kerry would go off on a tear about being ‘soft on crime’.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      There is a state law that provides for compensation for persons wrongfully convicted. (Sec. 8.01-195.11) https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title8.01/chapter3/section8.01-195.11/

      The Code section sets out a formula for calculating the amount of compensation. The General Assembly would need to authorize such compensation. (See HB 460, 2020 Session)

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        I would have just as soon not seen this…

        “Paid … 20 percent of the compensation award with the remaining 80 percent of the principal of the compensation award to be used by the State Treasurer to purchase an annuity from any A+ rated company, including any A+ rated company from which the Virginia Lottery may purchase an annuity, to provide equal monthly payments to such person for a period certain of 25 years…”

        So, somebody profits from the wrongly incarcerated? So Virginia!

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        does he get the right to vote back?

  11. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Re: reparations and paternalism…

    At a minimum, the wrongly convicted should be compensated, a la wage, with all back taxes, payroll taxes, and interest paid by the State, thus making the WRONGLY incarcerated eligible for SocSec and Medicare.

    Hell, it should be considered a State income and the WRONGLY incarcerated should also be eligible for state employee retirement.

    Lemme see, but what wage? Minimum wage should do. $7.35/hr, 24 hr/day, 365 days/year for every year incarcerated, plus any time waiting for trial if denied bail… that should do… for a start.

    Hey, we have the BEST justice system in the world. This shouldn’t happen. It HAS to be a rare occurrence. Right?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      these are good points. Is SS and Medicare paid up for the guy?

      Dick – do you have any knowledge on how compensation is calculated ?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        From the Code section cited: “an amount equal to 90 percent of the inflation adjusted Virginia per capita personal income as reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce for each year of incarceration, or portion thereof.”

        “In addition, such person shall be entitled to receive reimbursement up to $10,000 for tuition for career and technical training within the Virginia Community College System contingent upon successful completion of the training.”

        I don’t know about Social Security and Medicare.

  12. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Re: reparations and paternalism…

    At a minimum, the wrongly convicted should be compensated, a la wage, with all back taxes, payroll taxes, and interest paid by the State, thus making the WRONGLY incarcerated eligible for SocSec and Medicare.

    Hell, it should be considered a State income and the WRONGLY incarcerated should also be eligible for state employee retirement.

    Lemme see, but what wage? Minimum wage should do. $7.35/hr, 24 hr/day, 365 days/year for every year incarcerated, plus any time waiting for trial if denied bail… that should do… for a start.

    Hey, we have the BEST justice system in the world. This shouldn’t happen. It HAS to be a rare occurrence. Right?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      these are good points. Is SS and Medicare paid up for the guy?

      Dick – do you have any knowledge on how compensation is calculated ?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        From the Code section cited: “an amount equal to 90 percent of the inflation adjusted Virginia per capita personal income as reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce for each year of incarceration, or portion thereof.”

        “In addition, such person shall be entitled to receive reimbursement up to $10,000 for tuition for career and technical training within the Virginia Community College System contingent upon successful completion of the training.”

        I don’t know about Social Security and Medicare.

  13. Top-GUN Avatar

    They, government, should be going after the witness for false testimony…
    Don’t know if they can do anything about the lawyer,,, a good stiff fine and loose his license maybe!!!
    And where are the investigators on a case like this…
    Looks like a lot of laziness ….

    1. The witness is deceased — the hazard, I suppose, of being a drug addict.

  14. Top-GUN Avatar

    They, government, should be going after the witness for false testimony…
    Don’t know if they can do anything about the lawyer,,, a good stiff fine and loose his license maybe!!!
    And where are the investigators on a case like this…
    Looks like a lot of laziness ….

  15. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    The character and grace of Mr. Fentress is something most of us could never remotely approach. Here is man I will always be cheering for.

    “I don’t regret a thing. I don’t think God makes mistakes.”

    “The worst thing that happened to me turned out to be the best thing that ever happened.”

  16. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    The character and grace of Mr. Fentress is something most of us could never remotely approach. Here is man I will always be cheering for.

    “I don’t regret a thing. I don’t think God makes mistakes.”

    “The worst thing that happened to me turned out to be the best thing that ever happened.”

  17. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The thing that is striking about this is the fact that the govt has walked away and an external, non-govt group has to use it’s own limited resources to deal with wrongful imprisonment of innocent.

    The govt process is obviously badly flawed and yet seems content with having private groups, who have to prioritize limited resources, deal with it.

    One would think for these cases, that the govt not only compensate the innocent but they also reimburse all legal costs so the Innocence Projects has a revolving fund that allows them to reach all potential cases.

  18. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The thing that is striking about this is the fact that the govt has walked away and an external, non-govt group has to use it’s own limited resources to deal with wrongful imprisonment of innocent.

    The govt process is obviously badly flawed and yet seems content with having private groups, who have to prioritize limited resources, deal with it.

    One would think for these cases, that the govt not only compensate the innocent but they also reimburse all legal costs so the Innocence Projects has a revolving fund that allows them to reach all potential cases.

  19. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    Yet another abject failure of government. Prosecutors who withhold exculpatory information need to go to jail. Public defenders who take on cases and then don’t do the work need to be disbarred. Judges who oversee kangaroo courts need to be thrown off the bench.

    Anybody who watched the OJ Simpson trial should know what a shambles our criminal justice system has become. Burn it down and start again.

  20. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    Yet another abject failure of government. Prosecutors who withhold exculpatory information need to go to jail. Public defenders who take on cases and then don’t do the work need to be disbarred. Judges who oversee kangaroo courts need to be thrown off the bench.

    Anybody who watched the OJ Simpson trial should know what a shambles our criminal justice system has become. Burn it down and start again.

  21. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
    Eric the Half a Troll

    “Letting guilty people go free does not help people who were wrongfully convicted.”

    The issue being addressed by reduced sentences and early release is that laws were written and enforced unfairly by the state. You can think of those “guilty people” as wrongfully convicted as well or at least wrongfully sentenced.

  22. I posed a question to Deirdre Enright by email asking her if she thought the law-enforcement and judicial standards in Virginia have improved since 1996. She answered after I posted the story, but I thought I would post it here:

    Because there are very few verified statistics, I speak only from my own experience, doing post-conviction work in Virginia and Mississippi for the last 28 years. In Virginia, we have some really good public defender offices, but a lot of indigent and poor people still believe they’ll do better with a paid private attorney. So, like Rojai’s mother, they will scrape together some measly amount (like $5,000) that some attorney will accept, hoping and presuming that he/she will be able to get a deal and convince the client to take it, so they can do little work on the case and make $5,000. Our standards for “ineffective assistance of counsel” haven’t changed. You can still be a very bad lawyer but be legally “effective.” In the US, Virginia court appointed attorneys are in the bottom third of all states for payment to court appointed attorneys. Criminal defense attorneys for the indigent often do not seek appointment of an investigator, and/or don’t get the funds even if they do ask. But many of our cases would never have happened if a thorough investigation been conducted at the outset. We now know that eyewitnesses can be and are wrong a lot of the time, but the law hasn’t changed regarding eyewitnesses either. We now know that wrongful convictions happen way more than anyone thought – certainly in 1996 – but the laws and processes that generated them haven’t changed much.

  23. I posed a question to Deirdre Enright by email asking her if she thought the law-enforcement and judicial standards in Virginia have improved since 1996. She answered after I posted the story, but I thought I would post it here:

    Because there are very few verified statistics, I speak only from my own experience, doing post-conviction work in Virginia and Mississippi for the last 28 years. In Virginia, we have some really good public defender offices, but a lot of indigent and poor people still believe they’ll do better with a paid private attorney. So, like Rojai’s mother, they will scrape together some measly amount (like $5,000) that some attorney will accept, hoping and presuming that he/she will be able to get a deal and convince the client to take it, so they can do little work on the case and make $5,000. Our standards for “ineffective assistance of counsel” haven’t changed. You can still be a very bad lawyer but be legally “effective.” In the US, Virginia court appointed attorneys are in the bottom third of all states for payment to court appointed attorneys. Criminal defense attorneys for the indigent often do not seek appointment of an investigator, and/or don’t get the funds even if they do ask. But many of our cases would never have happened if a thorough investigation been conducted at the outset. We now know that eyewitnesses can be and are wrong a lot of the time, but the law hasn’t changed regarding eyewitnesses either. We now know that wrongful convictions happen way more than anyone thought – certainly in 1996 – but the laws and processes that generated them haven’t changed much.

  24. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    maybe not understanding but after this: ” In Virginia, we have some really good public defender offices, “… we get ” In the US, Virginia court appointed attorneys are in the bottom third of all states for payment to court appointed attorneys. Criminal defense attorneys for the indigent often do not seek appointment of an investigator, and/or don’t get the funds even if they do ask. But many of our cases would never have happened if a thorough investigation been conducted at the outset. ”

    I had assumed that “public defender” were “court-appointed attorneys” and/or ” Criminal defense attorneys for the indigent”

    so maybe I’m the only one confused…

    also had not considered that 5K for a criminal defense attorney was inferior to a public defender attorney…. wow! so much for getting what you pay for!

    finally – if the law requires an appointed public defender but the law won’t pay for an investigator – that doesn’t sound like the state is really serious about effective defense and suspect the public defender knows he/she is handicapped also.

  25. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    maybe not understanding but after this: ” In Virginia, we have some really good public defender offices, “… we get ” In the US, Virginia court appointed attorneys are in the bottom third of all states for payment to court appointed attorneys. Criminal defense attorneys for the indigent often do not seek appointment of an investigator, and/or don’t get the funds even if they do ask. But many of our cases would never have happened if a thorough investigation been conducted at the outset. ”

    I had assumed that “public defender” were “court-appointed attorneys” and/or ” Criminal defense attorneys for the indigent”

    so maybe I’m the only one confused…

    also had not considered that 5K for a criminal defense attorney was inferior to a public defender attorney…. wow! so much for getting what you pay for!

    finally – if the law requires an appointed public defender but the law won’t pay for an investigator – that doesn’t sound like the state is really serious about effective defense and suspect the public defender knows he/she is handicapped also.

Leave a Reply