Just Asking…

A 45-year-old Hampton man, Timothy Raymond Moran, has pleaded guilty in circuit court to committing bestiality with his dog in 2021, reports The Virginian-Pilot. A nephew reported finding video footage that showed Moran receiving oral sex from his dog, JB, at his aunt’s home. Penalties could include five years in prison and a fine of $2,500.

Moran’s ex-wife, Jessica Phillips, told the Pilot that the bestiality charge disgusted her. “I felt sick. It’s quite disturbing,” she said. “To me it goes along with pedophilia and other deviant sexual crimes. It’s not a normal action people do.”

My question to readers: is Phillips being too judgmental? If the act was consensual — if the dog was not being coerced into doing whatever he (or she… or they, not sure how the dog identifies) did — what’s the big deal? Do dogs suffer trauma from… from whatever it was that the dog was doing? Consider that dogs have very different attitudes towards sniffing and licking body parts than humans do. What is “normal” anyway? Whose normality are we talking about? Is the bestiality law a relic of Virginia’s racist, patriarchal, heteronormative specie-ist past?

Or can we state unequivocally that Phillips is absolutely right; that sexual taboos still properly exist in our society, and that bestiality is one of them? Social mores are evolving so fast that I can’t keep up. Can we agree on anything?

Bonus question: did Phillips violate JB’s privacy rights by filming the encounter?

Update: I have received several responses from readers who were shocked by this post. Was I serious about defending Moran’s behavior? The answer is NO, I was not serious! I was being totally tongue in cheek when I asked if Phillips was being judgmental about her calling her husband a sexual deviant. My purpose was to troll progressives who have continually defined deviancy down and find out if there are any limiting principles to what they find acceptable. My sense from the comments is that, no, they don’t approve of bestiality but they cannot articulate any limiting principles…. Some behaviors absolutely should be taboo, but we appear to be on a slippery slope.

C’mon people, privacy rights for dogs? Surely you knew I was being facetious! Still, if I failed to make my intention crystal clear, the fault is mine.

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

32 responses to “Just Asking…”

  1. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    “Virginia Man” seems to be keeping up with, if not outdoing, “Florida Man” as of late.

      1. I’m sure his parents are very proud.

        1. dave schutz Avatar
          dave schutz

          As PT Barnum said, “I don’t care what people say about me as long as they say something.”

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Can’t see how it could be right.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      By right, you mean Conservative?

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    The article notes that the couple divorced in 2007 and the “encounter” occurred in 2021 likely outside spousal privilege. The video was apparently disclosed by the wife’s nephew to police, not the wife. Also unclear is who took the video. The defendant is characterized as a videographer. Whether the dog was “coerced” is likely irrelevant. Bottom line: what is the point of this piece?

    1. The point is to watch you squirm.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Nice try but ain’t my story in the V-P.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Fight back. Tell him of the rumors of Thomas Jefferson and his pet 3/5ths of a person.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        If that was your point, you’re a nice kid but about as sharp as a bowling ball.

  4. Taboos aside, such acts cannot be consensual because animals are not persons and cannot give legal consent.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It was prostitution… the dog did it for the peanut butter.

  5. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    I’ll be doggone if I can figure this one out.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It’s just a dog and pony show…

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    no animals were harmed… right?

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Just the defendant’s video and preacher businesses.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Maybe it was CGI?

    1. Speaking of legends being taught as facts…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Righto! Men have to keep them down somehow. When all else fails, go with morally corrupt.

  7. What is it about ex-wives, anyway? So judgmental.

  8. Wow, authentic arguments from 2003.

    Oh, see if you can grab some talking points about WMDs!

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well… the way I see it is this is less about the subject of the story and more about how the content quality of this Yellow Rag of Conservatism just took a serious nosedive.

    Just sayin’.

    Will Part II tie this to the LBGTQ community, or am I jumping the gun by askin’? Just askin’.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I agree. Why in the world is such disgusting behaviors decided as “content” to disseminate?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Dunno. Maybe JAB is dog curious… just sayin’.

        Stay clear of the barnyard…
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enumclaw_horse_sex_case

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “Will Part II tie this to the LBGTQ community…?”

      That is Sherlock’s role… JAB just needs to set thing up with his piercing questions…

    3. Part II:

      Timothy Raymond Moran wants to sponsor after school club for primary school children.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        “Phillips said Moran is a “self-proclaimed” minister, but she’s unsure if he’s ordained. She described the extent of his ministry work to include blog and social media posts.”

        Probably already does.

  10. LGBTQ+D(og) is the new standard? Or maybe DAP for dog attracted people? They could be dapper as in well groomed too. Woof.

  11. I think the whole post was tongue in cheek.

  12. Update: I have received several responses from readers who were shocked by this post. Was I serious about defending Moran’s behavior? The answer is NO, I was not serious! I was being totally tongue in cheek when I asked if Jessica Phillips was being judgmental about her husband being a sexual deviant. My purpose was to troll progressives who have continually defined deviancy down and find out if there are any limiting principles to what they find acceptable. My sense from the comments is that, no, they don’t approve of bestiality but they cannot articulate any limiting principles…. so our society truly is on a slippery slope. I believe that some behaviors absolutely should be taboo.

    C’mon people, privacy rights for dogs? Surely you knew I was being facetious! I apologize for failing to make my intention crystal clear.

Leave a Reply