Jefferson Institute’s Hit List Bills Mostly Gone

By Derrick Max

Monday was not just the near total solar eclipse in Virginia, but also the deadline for Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) to act on the budget and the remaining bills on his desk. As our Steve Haner wrote, in “Governor’s Budget Compromise Eclipses Fears of Stalemate,” we are generally positive about the approximately 230 budget amendments Governor Youngkin made.

The Governor sacrificed two-thirds of his spending priorities while giving Democrats almost all of theirs. He did this while removing any tax increases from the budget and forgoing all of his recommended tax reforms (reductions). This was more than a good faith offer and should be embraced by any member of the General Assembly, Democrat or Republican, serious about getting a budget compromise passed before the end of the fiscal year.

Just before midnight on Monday, Governor Youngkin acted on the last of the 1,046 bills he had been sent this legislative session. The final tally: he signed 777, proposed amendments for 116, and vetoed 153. He will have a second chance to veto bills where his suggested amendments are rejected.

While I am sure much will be made of the record number of vetoes, Democrats in the General Assembly opted to send a wish list of bills to the Governor that they knew would never get his signature. Nor would some have even passed the muster with previous Democratically controlled General Assemblies or liberal Governors around the country. This is due, in part, to the retirement or defeat of the more moderate members of the Democratic caucuses in the General Assembly.

It is also due, I am sure, to the desire to build talking points for the 2025 elections. Governor Youngkin did not shy away from acting to stop bad legislation. The policy choices facing voters next year are now more clearly defined than ever, and the assumption should be that a governor of the other party will sign those wish-list bills.

Derrick A. Max

The Thomas Jefferson Institute had a list of eight key issues we urged the Governor to veto as we wrote in “Sine Die and Veto Recommendations.” We also spoke out frequently on three other issues which we will review below. Finally, we have urged caution about massive new spending on education and teachers’ salaries without broad-based educational reform or, at a minimum, an update of Virginia’s archaic school funding formula. On those issues, we concede that political forces overwhelmed our view and became a reasonable trade-off for the vetoes and budget amendments the Governor ultimately made.

The future of the budget and the vetoed, amended, and reenacted bills will be determined by the General Assembly in its reconvened session on April 17th. While little to no negotiations have occurred since the end of the legislative session, we hope that little to no negotiations occur now. Governor Youngkin has conceded all the ground that could have been a part of negotiations had the Democrats been willing to heed the Governor’s call to work together. Now the Democrats should grab what they have been given, and both sides, in many ways, can claim victory. No doubt, Virginians will be the main beneficiary of a reconvened session that lacks rancor but has real beneficial results in an on-time budget.

A summary of the Governor’s actions on the Thomas Jefferson Institute’s veto recommendations is provided below. All of these bills have been vetoed, favorably amended, or subjected to reenactment clauses — a positive outcome for our efforts and for the Commonwealth. I have also linked to the Governor’s explanations on each bill. You can also review our original veto reasoning (here).

Other bills we opposed but were not on our main target list:

  • AMENDED Skills Games Approval (SB212). Governor’s Amendment language (here);
  • VETOED Legal Cannabis Market (HB698/SB448). Governor’s Explanation (here);
  •  VETOED Railroad Safety Requiring Two-Person Crews on Freight Trains (HB385). Governor’s Explanation (here).

If you want to thank the Governor and urge him not to cede more ground on these issues or on the budget, you can email him directly at: glenn.youngkin@governor.virginia.gov. You can also contact your state representatives and tell them to uphold the Governor’s vetoes and amendments and to pass the amended budget without change. You can find your representative’s contact information here.

Derrick Max is the President and CEO of the Thomas Jefferson Institute, which first published this commentary. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

16 responses to “Jefferson Institute’s Hit List Bills Mostly Gone”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    It has been amusing as all get out to see Democrats who were applauding former Governor T-Mac for “building a wall” with his hundred or so vetoes now going ballistic as Youngkin approaches 200. Complete the following: “If they didn’t have double standards….”

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      … they wouldn’t be Republicans.

      1. James Kiser Avatar
        James Kiser

        Nope got that wrong but is your typical response.

  2. About 30 of those vetoes were in response to the inane, ridiculous, and unnecessary new restrictions on guns the democrats passed.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Where-ever law ends, tyranny begins”

    It’s not a mission statement.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Do you want to take credit for predicting the eclipse too?

    Scorpion and the turtle, JB.

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      Sunny Hostin claimed the eclipse, the Northeast earthquake and the coming cicada coming out is due to climate change. That is a new level of stupid. Sheila Jackson Lee democrat from TX claimed the moon is all gas, then said it is a planet. Democrats take pride in just how stupid they can be.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And Empty-G said it was God telling the Democrats to repent.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      … but TJC yearns to be relevant…!

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    I suppose you all support this one as well…

    “Youngkin amendment would end state funding for fetal anomaly abortions”

    https://richmond.com/news/state-regional/government-politics/youngkin-funding-fetal-anomaly-abortions-general-assembly/article_abaf1382-f691-11ee-a5da-b3326f61ff3c.html

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I simply do not understand why he did this. What’s the point other than to further interfere with the lives of others trying to deal with tragedy?

      1. Get a grip. He vetoed using taxpayer dollars to pay for the procedure, he did not ban the procedure itself.

        How does deciding not to use other people’s money to pay a person’s bills interfere with that person’s life?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          you mean like other health-related things the state pays for?

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “Get a grip. He vetoed using taxpayer dollars to pay for the procedure, he did not ban the procedure itself.”

          He did nothing of the sort. The program was existing law in Va and has been for years. He attempted to write new legislation into another bill on his desk in an attempt to eliminate the program.

          “How does deciding not to use other people’s money to pay a person’s bills interfere with that person’s life?”

          So if a pregnant mother does not have the resources, she needs to suffer accordingly….

        3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “Get a grip. He vetoed using taxpayer dollars to pay for the procedure, he did not ban the procedure itself.”

          He did nothing of the sort. The program was existing law in Va and has been for years. He attempted to write new legislation into another bill on his desk in an attempt to eliminate the program.

          “How does deciding not to use other people’s money to pay a person’s bills interfere with that person’s life?”

          So if a pregnant mother does not have the resources, she needs to suffer accordingly….

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Good timing though with the Arizona thing…

            we KNOW without a doubt how most GOP “think” about the issue… despite the lying , equivocation, and “messaging”

Leave a Reply