Is the Boomergeddon Sky Really Falling?

By Peter Galuszka

Here’s a little reality check.

Baconauts and Boomergedons have been ecstatic, if not orgasmic, over the totally unnecessary and dangerous debt ceiling standoff in Congress and Standard & Poor’s downgrading of U.S. credit. It has been amusing to see them wash themselves in glory as they congratulate each other on their prescience. If only the book had sold better!

Still reality does sneak back on little cat feet. Today’s news is that Fitch Ratings did not downgrade U.S. credit, but kept it at a AAA+ rating. A downgrade could come if Congress keeps acting as a bunch of Tea-drunk imbeciles. Moody’s also has kept Washington at AAA+. That leaves S&P, a firm I know well, since I used to work for its parent firm and I understand just how dicey S&P can be, especially when it applies its genius to the likes of Enron or subprime mortgages.

Another countervailing indicator is Alan Blinder, a Princeton professor and former vice chair at the Fed. Blinder is not exactly Baconaut material. He’s not bankrolled by the Koch Brothers and he’s not associated with some neo-con, libertarian outfit in the shadow of George Mason University, that hallowed, Tier One  institution of higher learning.

Blinder, who isn’t all that impressed with the S&P downgrade considering the source, points out that if the U.S.’s credit-worthiness is so dodgy, how come so many spooked investors ran to Treasury bills when the S–T (sorry I’m not James Young, so I won’t spell it out) hit the fan last week. I mean, if the U.S. government is ready to fall flat on its face, as the author of “Boomergeddon” would have you believe, why the run on T-bills?  This is “not exactly what you would expect from a downgrade. In practice, S&P downgraded itself,” he writes in today’s Wall Street Journal.

To be sure, Blinder is truly concerned about what the Federal Reserve, in its usual euphemism, has said about the state of the nation’s economy — namely that it’s really, really bad. He’s troubled that Fed Chief Ben Bernanke has stated so obviously he’s going to keep the federal funds rate very low for the near term. After all Uncle Ben is running out of bullets.

Blinder’s message is watch the Fed and forget S&P. Also, forget all the doom and gloom you read on this blog. Take some to heart, but keep in mind there’s a strong undercurrent of negative thinking here. It’s a kind of financial nannyism (“Eat up your peas and carrots because the financial end is near and here’s an exact timetable for our misery.”).

I take a different view. Last week I was relaxing on the sand near Cape Hatteras. A small school of dolphins (symbol of good luck)  was swishing in and out of the waves. Their message: “Don’t worry, this, too, will pass.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

12 responses to “Is the Boomergeddon Sky Really Falling?”

  1. there does seem to be a gallows cheering squad with some folks these days. We saw little of that under Bush…. (we saw complaints about his priorities and performance but not people wishing for the govt to fail).

    Now we have rah rah folks out there expressing hope that we’re going to have total collapse of govt – to “prove” that govt is a failure and that starving of it of tax revenue ala Grover Norquest is the proper punishment.

    problem is a great number of these folks don’t know their butts from a hole in the ground when it comes to facts and they are more than willing to accept the propaganda and misinformation coming from the right wing ideologues.

    A lot of them are in Congress. They really do not seem to know the Federal Budget. They think entitlements if the reason why are are on a disaster course.

    Entitlements ARE a problem with about 600 billion in expenditures but with a deficit of 1.5 trillion … cutting these entitlements won’t fix the problem.

    worse than that some of them continue to say that SS is a problem when clearly it’s demonstrably not (it will be in the future if not changes are made). But SS was enacted with a required 75-year look-ahead and over its’ 60+ year history that analysis has proven very effective at making changes far enough in advance to head off those nasty “unfunded liability” problems.

    but the real proof of the rah rah mindset is when you ask them for their list of “cuts”… and then they run away….

    Each one of them has their own favorite “cuts” but there is no unified agenda other than to cut “entitlements”.

    I call them the torch and pitchfork crowd… or in modern parlance.. “don’t confuse me with the facts”….. I’ve already made up my mind….

    It’s one thing for the folks in the electorate who can’t even name their elected officials to feel this way…. it’s quite another for elected officials to conduct themselves this way.

  2. Larry, I think your memory on Bush is a bit sketchy. The hostility from the left towards Bush on all issues was definitely as strong as the hostility towards Obama on the right. We need to control spending. Eliminate direct subsidies to businesses. Tighten up lobbying. Put limits on tax-exempt entities. Foundations should not continue in perpetuity. We need to reduce the size of the military and especially military contracting. Eliminate federal mandates in the area of health care and education and drop the federal funding.

  3. Groveton Avatar

    Liberal timetable …

    Jan 2009 – June 2011, “It’s all Bush’s fault.”.

    Feb. 2009, “I will fix the economy within three years or my presidency will be a one term proposition.”.

    Aug. 2011, “I never said that I would fix things overnight. This is going to take time.”.

    Aug, 2011, What’s wrong with the economy? Everything is fine.

    Peter’s pont about Standard & Poor’s hits the mark.

    How does a company get to be on the Fortune 500? The company must be among the 500 largest American companies by gross revenue.

    How does a company get to be on the S&P 500? Nobody really knows. The 500 companies are selected by committee. It’s only companies incorporated in America, right? Well, sort of. Except for the 11 companies which aren’t incorporated in America. But those are only companies that used to be incorporated in America but reincorporated outside America, right. Yes, except for the few that were never incorporated in America.

    OK, OK but all the biggest American companies are on the list, right. Yes, except for the ones which aren’t. Like Berkshire Hathaway.

    So, if S&P is such a fracas why does anybody put any stock in what they have to say?

    Because the US government has certified 10 companies as Nationally Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations …

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationally_Recognized_Statistical_Rating_Organizations

    Yes, the rocket scientists at S&P who downgraded the US debt based on a calculation with multi-trillion math errors gains its power through US government regulation.

    And you wonder why I don’t want to give the government any more of my money.

  4. TMT – I agree on the hostility toward the Prez but how many people were cheering on a govt monetary collapse?

    I’m finding myself more and more in agreement with you on many issues these days… very strange….

    the interesting thing about “mandates” on health care is for senior – Medicare Part A – only. Part B is not a mandate.

    but every industrialized country in the world from Singapore to Australia to Germany has an individual mandate on health care.

    The folks that say we can do better with the free market have yet to produce a single country that comes close to achieving this and they most often cite Singapore and Chile – both of which have mandatory payroll taxes and in Singapore’s case – it’s twice our payroll tax.

    So I’m open minded on the issue but I’ve yet to see any real plan on how to accomplish it other than to get govt out of it.

    the only countries in the world with the govt out of health care are 3rd world.

  5. Groveton Avatar

    One should never flick Uncle Sam’s ear apparently:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/44184348

  6. Groveton Avatar

    Time for a major fact check here …

    Per LarryG:

    “Entitlements ARE a problem with about 600 billion in expenditures …”.

    Per the Heritage Foundation:

    Entitlements in 2010 = $2.034T

    http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/06/federal-spending-by-the-numbers-2010

    Let’s go to the OMB and Ask.Com:

    Mandatory Spending, at $2.109 trillion in FY 2012. The largest mandatory spending programs were Social Security and Medicare, as follows:
    Social Security – $761 billion
    Medicare – $468 billion
    Medicaid – $269 billion
    TARP – $13 billion
    All other mandatory programs – $598 billion. These programs include Food Stamps, Unemployment Compensation, Child Nutrition and Tax Credits, Supplemental Security for the Disabled and Student Loans.

    http://useconomy.about.com/library/fy2012budget.pdf

    Preliminary verdict: LarryG’s statement is rated A BOLD FACED LIE.

    The verdict will remain preliminary pending the unlikely possibility of a rational rebuttal from LarryG.

  7. ….. ” The investigation began before Standard & Poor’s cut the United States’ AAA credit rating this month,”

  8. “American idiots: How Washington is destroying the economy”

    http://tinyurl.com/3wcu6hp

  9. A state might well have the authority to impose a mandate on health care — everyone must be insured. But the federal government does not have that authority. Don’t like that result, go spit on Jefferson’s grave. We have a constitutional system that provides the federal government has limited express powers, including the right to regulate interstate commerce. But regulating it sure doesn’t mean the feds have the power to require people to make purchases. That is un-American and smacks of Joe Stalin.

  10. well.. you are required to buy health insurance for the time when you will be 65. The theory is that by that age – the vast majority of people will need health care between age 65 and when they croak.

    Medicare Part a is single payer. what if Medicare Part A was “more flexible” and allowed folks to have their own private plans but required to have them?

    does the Federal govt have the right to require people to pay for pension and disability insurance (SS)?

    It might well be that if ObamaCare is outlawed that the next step will be to attack FICA/SS/Medicare Part A on the same basis that Obamacare was found to be illegal.

    What will happen when FICA/SS/Medicare Part A is declared unconstitutional?

    Some will rejoice, I’m quite sure.

    We’d be the only industrialized country in the world without compulsory payroll deductions for pension and health care.

    the countries, we’d most resemble would be 3rd world.

  11. Just back from vacation (with no Internet access)… And here’s what I read! “If the U.S. government is ready to fall flat on its face, as the author of “Boomergeddon” would have you believe, why the run on T-bills? This is ‘not exactly what you would expect from a downgrade.’”

    I have never suggested that the “U.S. government is ready to fall flat on its face.” When I wrote the book, my timeline for “Boomergeddon” was 15 to 20 years from now. (I still hew to that timetable despite the recent budget deal, which is grossly inadequate.). But I don’t think the government will go into default (or its moral equivalent, hyper-inflation) until the 2020s.

    As for your question about the run on T-bills…. I totally anticipated a continuation of low interest rates for two- three years due to the loss of confidence in the euro. As long as the euro is in crisis, European capital will seek safe haven in Treasuries. Once the Europeans sort things out (either shoring up the euro or abandoning it), the flight-to-safety phenomenon will end.

    Boomergeddon is not an immediate threat, it’s a 15-year to 20-year threat.

  12. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Bacon,
    Never, ever, go on vacation! If you do, you must have Net access. The week before, I went on vacation and you went ahead and published the Tea Party nonsense that I back Tim Kaine. Shame on you!

    Peter Galuszka

Leave a Reply