Is Lower Pay for Federal Workers a Good Thing or Bad Thing for Virginia?

It’s no surprise that Barbara Comstock, the Republican congresswoman running a super-competitive re-election bid in Northern Virginia, has expressed her opposition to President Trump’s public ruminations that maybe he should cancel a 2.1% pay raise for federal government employees. After all, her district is chock full of federal employees, and she had distanced herself from the president already, so she had little to lose.

But when Republican Corey Stewart, who has campaigned on the gubernatorial platform that he is Trumpier than Trump, differs with the president, that is news.

At the end of the day, one can predict that political considerations will prevail. This is a policy blog, not a politics blog, so I won’t waste readers’ time delivering an inexpert opinion on the political fallout. More interesting to me are the policy implications.

For Virginians wanting what is in the parochial best interest of Virginians, the easy answer is to say that canceling the pay raise would be a bad thing. It would have a materially negative impact on incomes and economic output in Northern Virginia, the economic locomotive of Virginia’s economy.

But there are subtler considerations. The Northern Virginia unemployment rate now is 2.7%. That qualifies as a labor shortage. The Wall Street Journal recently observed that cutting pay would create a win-win for the economy if a significant percentage of federal workers decided to quit their jobs and work in the private sector. First, the pay-raise cancellation would cut deficit spending by tens of billions of dollars. Second, it would help relieve the labor shortage in places like Northern Virginia.

That makes sense in the abstract. But here’s the trick: Do the federal employees most likely to quit have the skills in demand in NoVa’s tech-heavy private sector? Employees trained in IT probably likely would find it easiest to make the switch. But they may represent the only government employees that private-sector employees actually want. The complacent organizational culture of the federal government does not inculcate the attitudes that entrepreneurial tech companies are looking for.

Another concern: If the federal government’s IT employees depart, will the functioning of the IT infrastructure be impaired? Federal IT systems are not exactly models of efficiency and cyber-security to begin with. Are we prepared for federal IT systems to get worse?

Yet another way to frame the issue: Would the departure of a deputy assistant under Secretary of Agriculture be noticed by anyone or impair the functioning of government? Conversely, is there anyone in the private sector who would want to employ a deputy assistant under Secretary of Agriculture?

Cutting through the thicket of questions with no obvious answers, I would suggest that one issue should move to the forefront for Virginians: Will cancelling the pay raise ultimately advance the goal of diversifying Northern Virginia’s economy? Would such a move stimulate the expansion of NoVa’s private sector? Virginians should back any measure that emancipates NoVa from federal spending.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Is Lower Pay for Federal Workers a Good Thing or Bad Thing for Virginia?”

  1. To answer your question, yes cycling people out of government will help the body of available talent. Some in gov have no clue what the real world is and sharing that with them is good.

    There is so much to talk about on this topic.

    Comstock lost my vote for pandering, she has no clue what is at stake. If Corey also pandered, he is on the wrong track and may not recover at this point.

    Swamp Think dictates, keep doing the same thing and hope for different results. Reallocating pay to those that work for it is a good thing. Those people are demoralized by the slackers that do nothing and expect to get raises. Those that do nothing in their present position need to be moved to a more perfect fit. I am being generous assuming they still WANT to work as a previous post, maybe here, pointed out new govie hires get crushed within 2 years of hire and never recover. They just hang on until retirement age sucking off the tax payer teat.

    So much more to comment on here …..

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      gorhamg –

      Your’s is a fine comment, pregnant indeed. I hope you fill in the details for us.

      For example, didn’t Obama lay this prospective Federal pay raise down as a landmine for his successor as he Obama walked out the door of the White House for the last time?

      Was not Obama’s sole purpose here to blow up the Federal budget and poison the well for his successor just before the next mid-term elections two years after Obama had left the White House?

      Didn’t Obama do the reverse during his own administration, freeze federal pay? And did he not so mandate the reverse to occur two years after he left power solely in order to harm and hobble his successor shortly before an upcoming mid-term election, yet another partisan illegitimate act that Obama had no business doing, but did anyway for political advantage?

      1. I am pretty sure Obama did all the things you list, yes. This has been a problem though for decades. While I’d love to smear BHO with full responsibility, I will deprive myself of that joy this time. 🙂 I have worked along side govies long before BHO was in office. There is a t-shirt many wear …”ignore it long enough and it will go away” when related to government reform. Agency directors stay 2 years and can be easily stonewalled until they move on. Reorganizations that are intended to root out the cancer that perpetuates this fail. Cutting slackers pay might just fix it. DJT is a savior because he ignores the culture of failure and goes in to fix it like no one has been able to before.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    The first thing that should be recognized is the size and scope of the Federal workforce in terms of the Dept of Defense, it’s contractors – and the dozens of other Federal Law Enforcement agencies…

    United States Department of State (DOS)
    Bureau of Diplomatic Security
    Diplomatic Security Service (DSS)
    Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigations Division (IRS-CID)
    Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)
    United States Mint Police (USMP)
    United States Treasury Police
    United States Department of Defense (DOD)
    Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS)
    Pentagon Force Protection Agency
    Defense Logistics Agency Police
    United States Army Criminal Investigation Division (Army CID)
    United States Army Military Police Corps
    United States Army Counterintelligence (ACI)
    Department of the Army Civilian Security Guards
    United States Air Force Office of Special Investigations (Airforce OSI)
    United States Air Force Security Forces
    Department of the Air Force Police
    Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)
    Office of Naval Intelligence Police (ONI Police)
    Marine Corps Provost Marshal’s Office
    United States Marine Corps Criminal Investigation Division (USMC CID)
    National Security Agency Police (NSA Police)
    United States Department of Justice (DOJ)
    Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)
    Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (since 1973)
    Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (1968–73)
    Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1930–68)
    Bureau of Prohibition (1927–33)
    Bureau of Drug Abuse Control (1966–68)
    Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
    Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
    United States Marshals Service (USMS)
    United States Department of the Interior (USDI)
    Bureau of Indian Affairs Police
    Bureau of Land Management Office of Law Enforcement & Security
    National Park Service Rangers
    United States Park Police
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Office of Law Enfment
    United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
    U.S. Forest Service Law Enforcement and Investigations
    Office of Inspector General
    United States Department of Commerce (DOC)
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Office for Law Enforcement
    United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
    Office of Criminal Investigations
    United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
    United States Department of Veterans Affairs Police
    United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
    Federal Protective Service (FPS)
    U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
    United States Coast Guard Police (CGPD)
    Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS)
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
    U.S. Secret Service (USSS)
    United States Department of Transportation (DOT)
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
    Other federal law enforcement agencies
    Central Intelligence Agency Security Protective Service (CIA SPS)
    Federal Reserve Police
    Library of Congress Police (Dissolved 2009)
    Smithsonian National Zoological Park Police
    United States Capitol Police (USCP)
    United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS)
    United States Probation Service (USPO)
    United States Supreme Court Police

    Over a million employees – over 1/2 of the entire Federal workforce
    … plus another 1.4 million in the armed forces.

    Most of them receive not only Federal Pensions and healthcare but are often eligible to retire after 20 years and keep their healthcare benefits until Medicare kicks in.

    How many folks realize just how much money we spend for both National Defense and “Domestic defense” –

    By the way – most years, much if not all of the annual pay increase – goes to pay for increased health care premiums… it’s almost in lockstep some years.

    Not arguing for or against – just pointing out the scope and scale of public safety federal employees versus all the others combined which are less in number.

    We have a tremendous number of Federal Public Safety employees.

    1. You, sir, need a promotion. Try writing DJT directly, the WH communications office has caught up on inbound mail. They sort it same day now. You may actually get a letter to DJT while he is in office now.

  3. djrippert Avatar

    Every entity has to make compensation decisions. Looking at equivalent pay at competing organizations is more than a cottage business, it’s a full grown business. Is a 2.1% pay raise fair? At the very highest level it sounds about right to me. However, the devil is in the details.

    Jim’s commentary presumes that there are too many people employed by the federal government in Virginia. If so, restricting pay raises would increase attrition. If not, restricting pay raises will create labor shortages that will, no doubt, be alleviated only by hiring more government employees at the inflated prices required to bring them onto the payroll.

    As for diversifying NoVa’s dependence on the Federal government …

    The majority of NoVa’s economy is not dependent on the Federal government and that’s been true for a long time.

    The percentage of NoVa’s economy dependent on the Federal government is shrinking and expected to continue shrinking.

    “Fuller projects that the federal government will make up 27 percent of the regional economy by 2021, compared to 39.8 percent in 2010.”

    https://www.loudountimes.com/news/economists-express-both-optimism-and-concern-for-northern-virginia-economy/article_e43634c2-5dd6-5470-9114-f78fe1b383d5.html

  4. We have to have a quality federal bureaucracy. There are important things that only the federal bureaucracy can do. But, we have way TOO MUCH of it; government really is way too big, too removed from accountability, too inefficient. In fact the entire idea of delegating legislative tasks to quasi-independent agencies needs to be rethought, a near impossible task given the inertia opposed to such a change. These are conflicting goals; there is no way that cutting the pay of federal bureaucrats is going to increase the quality, let along the quantity, of the work performed. It does not bring us any closer to accomplishing ANY of these goals simply to reduce pay and benefits below what the private sector offers for comparable jobs, so as to induce federal retirements and to please a political “base” that wants a train wreck more than it cares about good government.

  5. We have to have a quality federal bureaucracy. There are important things that only the federal bureaucracy can do. But, we have way TOO MUCH of it. In fact the entire idea of delegating legislative tasks to quasi-independent agencies needs to be rethought, a near impossible task given the inertia opposed to such a change. These are conflicting goals; there is no way that cutting the pay of federal bureaucrats is going to increase the quality, let along the quantity, of the work performed. It does not bring us any closer to accomplishing ANY of these goals simply to reduce pay and benefits below what the private sector offers for comparable jobs, so as to induce federal retirements and to please a political “base” that wants a train wreck more than it cares about good government.

Leave a Reply