Is Dominion Campaigning Behind a Front Again?

By Steve Haner

An electric power industry lobbying and public relations group which has been financially supported by Dominion Energy Virginia is mailing out flyers to voters praising legislative incumbents who helped Dominion pass favorable legislation this year.

A mailer supporting incumbent Fairfax Democratic Senator George Barker caused the Democrat blog Blue Virginia to respond with anger Friday. What appeared to be the same message appeared in mailboxes in the district of Henrico Republican Senator Siobhan Dunnavant. How many other incumbents received the mailer may not be known until the group reports its campaign spending.

If it actually does report the mailers as campaign donations.  Barker is in a very contested party primary June 20, but Dunnavant is not on the ballot until November. The mailer merely “thanks” them for “delivering energy savings for Virginia.” Votes are not directly solicited.

If anybody has received the mailer in support of a Virginia legislator who did not seek a new term, please note that in the comment section. Odds are only legislators seeking new terms got the flyer, one more sign it’s basically a campaign donation, not a legitimate “thank you.”

The group is called Power for Tomorrow and is based in Arlington. The Energy and Policy Institute, a non-profit that often clashes with the utilities over policy, notes that a donation of about $800,000 to Power for Tomorrow appears on a 2021 Dominion disclosure form. A few years back Power for Tomorrow apparently sent out mail in Virginia focused on energy regulation issues, but without using the names or photographs of individual candidates. That drew fire from Ivy Main of the Sierra Club, also reported in 2021 on Blue Virginia.

The Energy and Policy Institute reports Power for Tomorrow spent up to $200,000 on advertising in Virginia between 2018 and 2022, compared to only tiny amounts in a few other states. The Virginia focus for that period was obvious.

Power for Tomorrow does show up on the Virginia Public Access Project’s database as registered to lobby in the legislature during the 2022-23 cycle, when Dominion proposed a very favorable regulatory revision. The bill that eventually passed was changed significantly from the bill as introduced, but still included a higher profit margin for the monopoly and a way for it to delay passing the full cost of fuel onto its customers. The fuel bill (with interest) will hit consumers after the 2023 election instead.

The mailer praising Dunnavant parrots Dominion’s exact talking points in favor of the legislation during the 2023 session. It is all about claims that revisions to the law reduced customer bills, a speculative prediction at best as the utility continues its massive multi-phase, multibillion-dollar investments into wind, solar and battery generation. The claims have been dissected elsewhere (here and here, for example.)

It is fair to now bring up what happened two years ago, when Dominion used another front group to intervene in the Virginia elections while trying to hide its fingerprints. At least this time the issue involved is actually energy regulation, not a faked interest in protecting Second Amendment gun rights. Dominion now needs to be pressed, to the extent Virginia’s toothless media will do so, on whether it funded and wrote the Barker and Dunnavant mailers (or any others).

Energy regulatory matters are complicated and important. The debate over electric deregulation, the impact of various regulatory models on cost and reliability, are all important to consumers and the industry. The views of the industry itself should be asserted forcefully along with other opinions. But dollars spent on behalf of individual candidates, or against those candidates, need to be fully and promptly disclosed.

Dominion still doesn’t seem to get that.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

21 responses to “Is Dominion Campaigning Behind a Front Again?”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “But dollars spent on behalf of individual candidates, or against those candidates, need to be fully and promptly disclosed.”

    Not so sure this is true…

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Might not be legally true but it is true.

      Let’s see how this plays out. Let’s see if anybody can tease out or force out a list of which legislators got these mailings and which didn’t. That will reveal much.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        One will be found, or made.

        Information, misinformation — a difference without distinction.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        One will be found, or made.

        Information, misinformation — a difference without distinction.

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Blue Virginia is notoriously progressive. Dems face a few ideological conflicts in their June 20th primary and general in November. While bashing one candidate supported by Dominion, they must decide their options concerning Hala Ayala who, despite 3 pledges against utility money, accepted $100 K from Dominion in a prior campaign. Ideology can be so uncomfortable.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Uncompromising ideology is tough… take Christianity as a counter example, they are extremely comfortable.

  3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    It’s time to make all nonprofits that try to influence public opinion, public policy, elections and the like taxable entities. This should happen across the board irrespective of ideology, political or economic views from the American Petroleum Institute to the Sierra Club.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I’m not sure Power for Tomorrow is a non-profit, or at least not sure if it has a 501c status. So far I haven’t kicked up a 990. Might be one I just haven’t found.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I wonder if they’ve made their obligatory campaign contributions in Florida yet?

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I wonder if they’ve made their obligatory campaign contributions in Florida yet?

  6. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    I got one of those yesterday, ostensibly for Dunnavant, and wondered if it was a Dominion astroturf thing…

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Dominion pressed? You have to go way back to find an example of that.

  8. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Is this the same group that had a lobbyist sell Tim Kaine and Ann Holton a million dollar condo in Richmond?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      That struck me as a non story. Really. There is no indication that wasn’t just an arm’s length transaction. The units in those towers are popular and the Kaines had sold their big house in Northside.

      1. James Kiser Avatar
        James Kiser

        Story seemed to indicate a sweetheart deal and where was the public offering through a broker so people of color would have a chance to bid on nice home in a lily white neighborhood.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          That very nice Northside neighborhood has been diverse for decades. We loved living there (in a condo for us). IMHO Fox was making schist up on this one, sorry.

          1. James Kiser Avatar
            James Kiser

            first off I didn’t see it on FOX so stop with that canard I still see it as a sweet heart deal just like Kaine funneling 3.5 million to his wife and GMU

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-senator-purchased-luxury-condo-green-energy-exec-pushing-wind-farm-home-state

            Well, Fox started the story making the rounds. Same low level of journalism directed at Justice Thomas.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          That very nice Northside neighborhood has been diverse for decades. We loved living there (in a condo for us). IMHO Fox was making schist up on this one, sorry.

  9. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    I wonder what adds more to our bills, RGGI or PR and lobbying? I recall one cycle no too long ago. Dominion pad for heavy TV ads to push their agenda.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      In theory the stockholders pay for most of that, out of the profit margin, not the ratepayers. But the accounting gets complicated.

Leave a Reply