by Jim McCarthy

Surely, at some point, an accomplished polymath will create Integripedia to provide info-hungry internet users with a comprehensive source on political integrity. Specifically, the compendium should cover the promises and pledges of political leaders as well their foibles and accomplishments and perhaps most memorable statements. For the present, however, we must rely upon Safari, Google, Bing and others to identify such topical information. Worse, we may be relying upon cable news pundits who are no longer characterizing their spiels as journalism.

At the end of April, Virginia’s youngish governor conducted a press conference to discuss his first 100 days in office and parse his administration’s accomplishments. Only a few outlets, rather unenthusiastically, reported upon the signature event. For the most part, the Governor offered that great progress has been made.

A reading of the media coverage confirms that the Governor made no mention of efforts to enhance the Commonwealth’s election integrity, as he promised during his campaign. No mention was made of his legislative amendment to restore integrity to the Loudoun County School Board which, during the campaign, he declared to be guilty of “gross negligence” and “violating the Virginia Constitution.”

Lay folk would likely agree that electoral procedures and processes should be annually administered to ensure the validity and credibility of each and every vote for each and every election. To this end, the proportions or numbers of electoral malfeasance discovered or prosecuted are vital mile posts in identifying soft spots and creating remedial measures.
The Heritage Foundation, a well-respected conservative source, maintains a database (undated) of electoral malfeasance occurrences as “a sampling” of proven instances over several years.

Between 2011 and 2021, Heritage notes a record of 20 cases of proven electoral offenses in Virginia. Only a single instance is cited for the 2020 election, and in that instance an “unabashed conservative” was convicted of a misdemeanor in 2021 on a finding that he cast two votes. Most of the remaining cases involved individuals with felony convictions attempting to vote, which tends to confirm the effectiveness of voting rolls by the state. The sampling is also helpful as it categorizes the types of electoral offense along with details of the cases. For the political voyeur it is fun reading.

By comparison, between 2005 and 2022, a twenty-year span, Texas is recorded with 102 “proven instances.” In either state, the numeric data is not shocking given the millions of votes cast in elections local or national in the reported periods. The Heritage “sampling” enumerates 1,353 “proven instances” with 1,165 “criminal convictions.”

Of course, because Heritage provides only a sampling, actual data may be far greater. The not-for-profit organization caveats its presentation by asserting that its “Election Fraud Data Base” is not “exhaustive or comprehensive.” Still, the data supporting a hair-on-fire conclusion is miniscule.

The electorate of the Commonwealth need not fear that voter rapscallions and wrongdoers will escape detection. Senator Amanda Chase, R-Chesterfield, has been threatening to expose facts of the absence of election integrity in Virginia. She met with Attorney General Jason Miyares in February to present him with material (documents?) demonstrating her claims and, then, made a public presentation in April in Loudoun County. Chase has been cautiously unwilling to share the material more broadly with the public, maintaining that the information is very technical (suggesting untrained lay folk would not understand). The AG’s office indicated that it was evaluating Chase’s submission, while Chase said she would hold a press conference at some later date.

It is significant to note that, according to the Heritage information, a bare attempt to vote in violation of rules is not an offense listed for Virginia, although it might get a violator jail time in Texas. The two failed attempts by the Governor’s son to vote in 2021 were not prosecuted, as they were deemed “no foul, no harm.” Heritage might disagree by the terms of its own characterizations.

In the meantime, the November 2022 elections are but a few months away. Disinformation, misinformation, and the absence of information continue to be propagated and bandied about the stolen 2020 election further exacerbating voter anxieties about election integrity, even as candidates and elected officials mewl from their soapboxes about the existential dangers. By the time Integripedia is available another set of elections will have taken place without some common source available to assess and advise the about miasma about election integrity.

Jim McCarthy is a retired New York City attorney living in Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

24 responses to “Intregripedia”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Nice article. The Virginia Code has a whole chapter setting out criminal penalties for violations for election laws. They range from a Class 3 misdemeanor (fine) to a Class 5 felony (up to 10 years in prison). There is one section that says, essentially, “In case there is a provision that has been overlooked, the violation of that is a Class 1 misdemeanor (up to a year in jail). https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title24.2/chapter10/

    So, for anyone who has evidence of election fraud being committed, the Commonwealth’s attorney is just a phone call away.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I’ll believe it when it works in Georgia.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Worse, we may be relying upon cable news pundits who are no longer characterizing their spiels as journalism.…”

    …or blogs who still attempt to…

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    I’ve seen no material voter fraud in Virginia.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Personally? If you want an example, Haner refers to a cas in SW Va. It was a mayoral contest in which the incumbent illicited the aid of a postal worker to deliver mail-in ballots for mass voting. If I recall, only the schlep mailman was jailed.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Just added into my comment above a link to an indictment announced this week! Charged, not convicted, of course.

      And there was a thing in Richmond called “walking around money” that I bet is still a thing.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        I guess the question is whether the fraud was material. There are always some shenanigans.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        I guess the question is whether the fraud was material. There are always some shenanigans.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I propose the Defense of Vote Integrity Act making it a misdemeanor punishable by a $10,000 per occurrence (to include individual votes) to make unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Felony… threaten to take away their guns… that should really get their attention…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        See, if’n like Trump, a candidate says, “Find me 11,000 votes” then he just wrote a fine of 11 million. That’ll get their attention too.

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    In general, as I have said before, I think Virginia’s operation is good. The key is and will always be the close participation of both parties with their electoral board appointees, volunteer election officers and observers. If only one party is in the room, temptation grows. The most positive recent development has been an aggressive effort to grow and train those ranks. Trust but verify, somebody said…

    Forty years of close observation has made me very leery of absentees in general. Where there are weaknesses, they involved people getting absentee ballots in somebody else’s name, filling them out for people, or people having a raft of them sent to a single address (outlawed after an egregious example in SW VA) to be handed out willy-nilly. So the absentee counting process also cries out for close observation.

    To wit: https://cardinalnews.org/2022/05/03/buchanan-county-supervisor-indicted-on-election-fraud-embezzlement-charges/

    Would to think such a thing as “Integripedia” could exist. Nice dream.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      If one thinks the security weakness lies in mail-in absentee voting, then longer in-person early voting seems to be a positive development from a ballot box security perspective…. no…?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Yes, I think early voting with the standard check-in process has been positive (don’t need no 45 days, though…)

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Seems like the longer it is, the less the demand will be on mail-in absentees… right…? In my opinion, polling should be open the day the ballot is set. Anything else seems arbitrary, tbh.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Eric has a point. Moreover, I should be able to verify id and cast a ballot at any municipal center to include police stations.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I agree. If absentee ballots are not trusted then make it super easy to vote more secure. There is no good reason to not do that.

      2. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        That could provide significant economies in enforcement when voting fraud was attempted. Perhaps instead of standing in line voters could wait to vote in some of the secure accommodations.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Eric has a point. Moreover, I should be able to verify id and cast a ballot at any municipal center to include police stations.

    4. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      This is an example of a local election where it would be possible to influence the election but if you want to talk about the HD or Virginia Senate, Congress, US Senate, Gov or POTUS where precincts across the state or across a region were corrupted – how likely is that to be able to happen?

      I just don’t see it – even from absentee ballots – i.e. some organized , coordinated effort across a lot of precincts to corrupt ballots.

      To me that is what should be strongly responded to by everyone instead of pointing at some local corruption that in no way, shape or form, could be actually carried out on a wide-scale basis that affected statewide or national elections.

      We need to strongly denounce such claims.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Well written article – on point – no name-calling, no partisan blather.
    thank you!

  7. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Virginia and national voting machine competence is terrible. The machines are not secure and the chain of custody leaky. Fortunately more of the current generation of machines have paper trails and fewer unverifiable touch screens than the first generation. But, that does not itself make them good.

    Our voting system is not designed to resolve close races. It performs far better and is less subject to corruption when the choice of voters is clear. We have no way to tell who actually won national elections in 2016 or 2020 that were decided by fewer than 100k and 50k votes respectively in a small number of states.

    The issues are so politically fraught that it is very hard to have a rational discussion of both what is wrong with our voting systems and what the remedies are.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Yours is the complaint of Sen. Chase—it is mostly speculative theorizing without concrete evidence. Conspiratorial speculation that winners and losers cannot be determined is simply that. Disbelief is a choice.

  8. CJBova Avatar

    This piece implies nothing’s changed about elections since Youngkin took office because he didn’t mention anything in his press conference. But why would the Governor need to mention the eleven VA Dept. of Elections2022 changes to Virginia’s Election Laws? Most take effect July 1. (Two others are FOIA changes).

    [I listed the changes earlier today, but Disqus decided they needed to review them as spam.]

Leave a Reply