Intellectual Enslavement at UVa

UVa memorial to enslaved laborers

by Jock Yellott

“This year, members of the Class of 2025 are required to attend a historical tour and debrief discussion centered around the history of enslaved
laborers at the University.”
— Sydney Hertzog, Cavalier Daily, Sept. 22, 2021.

Why does this rankle? The University of Virginia, after all, has many mandates:

• Social Sciences – 6 credits from two different departments
• Humanities – 6 credits from two different categories
• Historical Studies – one 3 or more credit course
• Non-western Perspectives – one 3 or more credit course
• Natural Science and Mathematics – 12 credits from two different
departments

Why shouldn’t 1st years also be forced to “learn about the University’s
history of white supremacy and enslavement that has been suppressed for
many years”?

If any students objected, they were smart enough not to say so. To the contrary, according to the Cavalier Daily. Students “really enjoyed going on the tour because it has given them context of where they go to school.”

This is not Woke faculty indoctrination, or at least not directly. Says the Cavalier Daily: “This program was built purely by students.”

Why should it bother us?
Would we react as strongly against a mandatory civics class
(recommended by Justice Breyer and Justice O’Connor before him)?

What if historical studies were required to include Thomas Jefferson, the
University’s Founder, as well as a founder of our nation?

What if UVa required mandatory training about the Honor System, or standards of behavior?

What about the difference between a date and date rape; always ask permission, even to hold hands? That sort of thing.

It is not the mandate per se that is bothersome. It is the subject matter.
Our visceral reaction may reflect our assumptions about that subject
matter. Our own prejudices.

We assume that the tour is not about who made the bricks in the
Serpentine Walls. It’s about about making white students ashamed,
burdened with an Original Sin of their forefathers, which can never be
expiated.

Does the tour leave out the fact that local Indians enslaved each other
long before the whites arrived?

Does it omit to mention that as much as 25% of the freed blacks in some
Virginia counties themselves owned slaves (this from the research of
former U Va professor Carter Woodson, himself black)?

We assume so.

Worse, we assume bitter lessons about the past are meant to lay the
groundwork for excusing today’s difference in test scores, exam grades;
standards of conduct.

Beware of assumptions. Left-wing racism creates the temptation to answer
it in kind, with prejudices and assumptions of our own.

There is this, though — the admitted purpose is political, to create left-wing
activists: “to destroy the legacy of white supremacy here through activism.”
“In the end, we want it to be a call to action.”

That may in part explain our visceral reaction. It is mental enslavement to
left-wing dogma, required Social Justice training.

And political indoctrination is the opposite of critical thinking. Which is what, in
theory at least, a University should be for.

Jock Yellott, a retired lawyer in Charlotesville, is an occasional contributor to Bacon’s Rebellion.


SourcesCavalier Daily

article on mandatory tours: https://www.cavalierdaily.com/
article/2021/09/mandatory-tours-teach-first-years-u-va-s-history-of- enslaved-laborers

UVa College of Arts and Sciences mandated area requirements:
https://college.as.virginia.edu/area

Carter G. Woodson, Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in
1830: https://www.amazon.com/Negro-Owners-Slaves-United-States/dp/
1508771820 or https://www.google.com/books/edition/Free_Negro_Owners_of_Slaves_in_the_Unite/SYjXAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

30 responses to “Intellectual Enslavement at UVa”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” Does the tour leave out the fact that local Indians enslaved each other
    long before the whites arrived?”

    I dunno if pointing out the practices of even less “enlightened” people is really a good point.

    And wonder if any of those students were YAF? we want to be inclusive, right?
    😉

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Isn’t that “whataboutism”?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        it’s become the wart on Conservative butts these days

    2. re: ” Does the tour leave out the fact that local Indians enslaved each other long before the whites arrived?”

      Hey, it might be relevant…

      …if local Indians had founded UVA long before the whites arrived.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “We assume…” And there you go. Btw, who is this “we” you keep citing? Some group of retired lawyers in Charlottesville?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Non-contributing alumni.

    2. Maybe he has a frog in his pocket…

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Instead of speculating about the content of the tour, it would have been better if Mr. Yellot had actually taken the tour (I assume that the University would not have objected). Then his objections would be credible.

    1. Agreed. His piece would have been more powerful if had reported on the content of a tour. Based on what else we know is going on at UVa, I think he has every reason for concern. But it’s hard to get worked up without knowing how biased and one-sided the tours are.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      This is similar to the claims about CRT in the schools. Someone makes an accusation and from then on, without any real proof, it becomes what some want to believe and show up as rude and abusive cretins “demanding” an end to the practice …. and used to be for journalism, those issues would be confirmed before it got published.

    3. Yes. It’s similar to a movie critic who writes a review for a movie he hasn’t seen.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Instead of speculating about the content of the tour, it would have been better if Mr. Yellot had actually taken the tour (I assume that the University would not have objected). Then his objections would be credible.

  5. The content of the tour may have been developed by students, but someone in the administration made the decision to make it mandatory. Someone in the administration had to cooperate with the student organizers to ensure that all students take the tour. One wonders if anyone in the administration exercises any oversight of the content or which students are selected to run the show.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Sounds exactly like the last guided tour I took at Monticello, which was largely on one topic at every stop. How long until the students at Tennessee or Oklahoma are required to make a ten mile walk along the Trail of Tears? I’m sort of ambivalent of this one, folks. Not getting bent about it.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I always thought youse guys on the Right did self-guided so you could make up your own stories.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          I said it was the “last” one I did. 🙂

    2. Rob Austin Avatar

      No doubt Ryan, Magill, and the horde of their recent DEI hires have fully inoculated the tour leaders with the approved presentation content.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        As the father of a 2003 graduate, guys, trust me — your attention is 20 years behind reality. Maybe 20 years ago you could have changed the trajectory.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          20? 40 years ago they put it on this trajectory by changing the business model of state funded education to a business.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          20? 40 years ago they put it on this trajectory by changing the business model of state funded education to a business.

  6. On the bright side, it does present the opportunity for a new first year drinking game, take a shot every time the words “equity” or “context” are used during the tour. It would probably make an Arlington Bar Crawl look like a temperance meeting.

    1. And a double shot for every mention of “white privilege” or any derivation thereof.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Now you are getting it. Humor and derision are indeed the proper responses. The outrage is tiresome.

        Yes, the school was built largely by slaves, with money earned by slaves, then run by slaves, and they and their children and grandchildren were not able to attend for another century after emancipation. No way to paint lipstick on that pig. But the third generation of black students is there now. Time heals if you let it.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Could be worse. Could be that Lee and Jackson had stain glass windows at the campus chapel too.

    Gee, being forced to learn is enslavement? Should have enslaved anti-vaxxers.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    Seems like the PERFECT opportunity for YAF and project Veritias. No?

  9. This year, members of the Class of 2025 are required to attend a historical tour and debrief discussion centered around the history of enslaved laborers at the University.

    They are required to attend a tour and discussion.

    Are they required to participate in the discussion? If not, I don’t see it as all that big a deal.

    1. half will be on their phones, the other half will have ear buds in…. just like in the classroom.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Texting the person next to them. You forgot that one.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Here’s what you.
    1) Go read a favorite writer in a newspaper. Make it two, say, the WaPo and WashTimes. Fact check each and assign an accuracy percentage.

    2) Pull your last CV or resume, and count the embellishments and assign a percentage.

    3) Write a letter to a friend telling him everything you’ve been up to, and set it aside for a month. Reread it and note the accuracy of your story. Assign a percentage.

    4) Interview a neighbor about an event or a person you both witnessed, or know well. Note the accuracy of his recount, and assign a percentage.

    Average your percentages.

    Biographical History is made thusly.

    1. If you really want to emulate the development of biographical history, you should add “25 years ago” to the end of the first sentence in #4.

Leave a Reply