Bermuda Estates, Chesterfield County

by James A. Bacon

Nobody knows for sure how many trailer parks there are in Virginia, and Del. Paul Krizek, D-Fairfax, wants to find answers. He has introduced a budget amendment to establish a Virginia Manufactured Home Park registry, to be funded with a $100 database maintenance fee from each mobile home park. 

Krizek regards trailer parks as a rare form of affordable housing in the state, and he’s concerned that market forces could put them out of business. Many were built long ago on land that was inexpensive at the time but due to the evolution of real estate markets has become desirable.

“The biggest problem is that the land is so valuable,” Krizek told The Virginia Mercury. “These parks are a gold mine for someone who wants to come in and build a 20-story apartment complex. I understand the need for density, but it’s sad when one of these communities goes away because they have been there for 20-30 years.”

There are two important lessons to be derived from the Mercury’s trailer-park story. They’re not new to readers of Bacon’s Rebellion because we have been pounding the table on these issues for years. But it’s heartening to see a second journalistic voice making the same points.

First, manufactured housing is a source of quality affordable housing. Second, zoning is the biggest obstacle to building more trailer parks. Remarkably, the left-of-center Mercury quotes an academic expert from the market-oriented Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Trailer parks and manufactured housing may be an area where the interests of social-justice Democrats and free-market Republicans can converge.

Trailer parks have a bad reputation dating back to the early days of manufactured housing, but quality and standards have increased remarkably since then. Indeed, most “mobile homes” are not mobile anymore. They don’t have wheels. The Mercury cites an article in Strong Towns, “Reclaiming ‘Redneck’ Urbanism: What Urban Planners can Learn from Trailer Parks.” Author Nolan Gray with the Mercatus Center notes that the average manufactured house costs $64,000 compared to $324,000 for the average site-built, single family house. Manufactured homes are energy efficient and produce less waste. Combined mortgage payments on an after-market trailer and park rent can be as low as $300 to $500 in some places. The cost of a new trailer might run between $700 and $1,000 a month.

Compare that to the cost of government-sponsored “affordable housing” apartment projects that cost in the realm of $250,000 per unit to build in Richmond and $350,000 in Northern Virginia.

One reason the cost of land is low is that trailer parks allow density. The houses are packed tightly together, and parcels are small — far smaller, typically, than lots in neighborhoods of single-family-dwellings where zoning mandates large minimum lot sizes.

Trailer parks are a significant source of affordable housing — and they don’t require government subsidies. But zoning policies in Virginia are not helpful. Residents of more affluent subdivisions don’t like having trailer parks nearby, and zoning codes and comprehensive plans give them tools to keep them out. Writes the Mercury:

Building new mobile home parks, however, can be a near-impossible task under some local zoning laws, many of which have been rewritten over the last few decades to include lower densities, larger setbacks and street circulation requirements that make new parks cost-prohibitive. To get around the new rules and develop a classic layout mobile home park necessitates a special-use permit — an onerous process involving a public review, the local planning commission and city council or the board of supervisors, none of which tend to be keen on new trailer parks. Existing parks have been grandfathered in, but the updated zoning ordinances bar them from adding new homes lest the entire park be brought up to the new code.

There doesn’t seem to be much appetite for tackling the zoning laws. But last year, Krizek got a bill passed that provided trailer-park residents some protection from eviction. Owners must provide tenants 180 day’s notice if their park is to be redeveloped, as well as money to help cover relocation expenses — $3,000 for Northern Virginia residents and $2,000 in the rest of the state.

Meanwhile,  Jonathan Knopf, executive director of the Manufactured Home Community Coalition of Virginia, is working to allow trailer park residents to create a cooperative ownership model, which would allow tenants to band together, purchase, and manage communities themselves.

Gray with the Mercatus Center argues that a secondary benefit of trailer parks is “private governance.” Park management provides order with the park, upholds basic standards on cleanliness and maintenance, deals with unwanted visitors, and settles disputes among neighbors. If the residents themselves make the rules and enforce them, as Knopf envisions, trailer parks become a mechanism for lower-income Virginians to build social capital as well as financial equity.

“I would love to dedicate 10-20 percent of the state’s affordable housing trust fund toward mobile home parks,” said Krizek. “The role of the state in this is to leverage some resources. We’re not talking about developing new mobile home parks, but we should be.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

58 responses to “In Praise of Trailer Parks”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    Here’s the basic problem. Trailers in trailer parks are usually too close to each other to use drain-fields. The ones that have them often have trouble. not enough land to really “perk” and dissipate the sewage and even then where would one safely locate wells?

    On a rural lot – they usually require 100 feet between the well and drainfield – that’s hard to do in a trailer park and the main reason you don’t see new trailer parks – they can’t easily meet more moodern and strict sanitation requirements.

    If water/sewer is available it’s expensive – 12K or so per single connection and the land is much more valuable for apartments – that can accommodate 3, 4, 5 times as many people as a trailer park.

    Zoning won’t help that unless you actually want exclusionary zoning that prohibits apartments and allows trailer parks.

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      If it’s possible to build a septic system that can handle the sewerage needs of a busy rural Interstate highway rest area–then it’s possible to build one to handle the sewerage needs of a trailer park.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        If you have the land……….. and some of the rest areas are what is called packaged treatment plants.. not septic… the same kind of system you might see at a rural school… but you have to have a receiving stream and a permit.

        1. idiocracy Avatar

          Pretty sure that a packaged treatment plant is the same as an AOSS, alternative onsite sewage system. They use aerobic treatment and can be used in places where a conventional septic system won’t work. You can discharge these to a stream with a permit, or use spray or drip irrigation to discharge them to land.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            they’re actually mini treatment plants.. and they do require a permit for the character/composition of the effluent and where it goes .

            Don’t blame the local zoning. This is a VDH issue. Anytime you’re not using a municipal sewage system, you’ve got to meet state requirement. THe state does not trust the locality -with good reason.

          2. idiocracy Avatar

            Yes, I know. AOSS are very common where I live due to the clay soil that doesn’t perc.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Yep – but not cheap even for an individual residence, right?

          4. idiocracy Avatar

            Initial cost isn’t cheap. But nobody pays for it up front. It’s amortized over 30 years.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            that’s not a good bet for a trailer park, eh?

            I dunno. I have no clue what most trailer parks do or not but I’ve read about trailer parks that have issues with their septic systems.

            Back to the original post about “affordable”.

            There is a cost to the utilities and infrastructure for ANY kind of housing but “affordable” does not mean you evade those costs if you can. One way or the other – you actually ARE responsible for what happens to your piss,poop, and washer water. We can’t reasonably and rationally define “affordable” to be those that somehow evade those costs or blame govt for insisting you do be responsible for your pee and poop.

          6. idiocracy Avatar

            Probably, a trailer park developer/owner/operator would get a loan to pay the cost of the AOSS off over the course of time. Just like they might get a loan to buy the land in the first place.

            And then they pay for these loans with the income they make by renting the lots out to people who want to put their manufactured homes on them.

            Maybe some more sophisticated ones might even implement a system to charge the tenants a sewage fee based on the amount of water they use, and use that revenue to pay the loan for the AOSS off (and to maintain the AOSS as well).

          7. LarrytheG Avatar

            This is tangentially related to the anti-vaxxers/anti maskers…. it boils down to what you can do as an individual – if it might affect others.

            With no rules – some people would just dump their pee and poop at their lot line and be happy with it. They’d not pay for trash-pickup, they’d use a barrel to burn it. Their oil changes would go in the same ditch the pee/poop went into… and it would be VERY “affordable” compared to the costs of paying not to do that.

            re: ” Some people are extremely comfortable with the idea of living in filth.”

            yep but the problem comes when they don’t care if others have to live in it also.

          8. idiocracy Avatar

            Some people are extremely comfortable with the idea of living in filth.

            Others don’t need a rule or law to tell them what the right thing to do is.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: ” ……charge the tenants a sewage fee based on the amount of water they use, and use that revenue to pay the loan for the AOSS off (and to maintain the AOSS as well).”

      the heck you say. That makes it less affordable and makes it sound like a Draconian government thing…

      1. idiocracy Avatar

        No, it’s capitalism.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        well, no, not if you FORCE them to pay… and they lose the “right” to not have to pay to dump their sewage. It’s not “capitalism” if it’s the government that forces building the sewage system. That’s the OPPOSITE of “capitalism”.

        “Capitalism” is willing buyer-willing seller – not “you WILL connect and pay or else”

        1. idiocracy Avatar

          What if the property owner forces the connection to the AOSS because they know they might have trouble attracting good tenants with rivers of crap and piss flowing through the streets?

          A tenant who doesn’t want to pay for sewage treatment is free to find somewhere else to put their manufactured home.

          I’m sure that there are places in (for example) southwest Virginia where someone could put their manufactured home and have the piss and crap flowing right out onto the ground and nobody will care.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            more than likely, it will be the the GOVERNMENT that comes to visit about the piss flowing across the street onto OTHER PEOPLE’s property, no?

            Your “rights” END at your property line!

        2. idiocracy Avatar

          Larry, a good property manager will deal with the problem caused by a tenant’s sewage BEFORE the government gets involved.

      3. “That makes it less affordable and makes it sound like a Draconian government thing…”

        It’s certainly more “affordable” than not having a trailer park at all. And what is “draconian” about requiring people to pay for the utilities they use?

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Here’s the basic problem. Trailers in trailer parks are usually too close to each other to use drain-fields. The ones that have them often have trouble. not enough land to really “perk” and dissipate the sewage and even then where would one safely locate wells?

    On a rural lot – they usually require 100 feet between the well and drainfield – that’s hard to do in a trailer park and the main reason you don’t see new trailer parks – they can’t easily meet more moodern and strict sanitation requirements.

    If water/sewer is available it’s expensive – 12K or so per single connection and the land is much more valuable for apartments – that can accommodate 3, 4, 5 times as many people as a trailer park.

    Zoning won’t help that unless you actually want exclusionary zoning that prohibits apartments and allows trailer parks.

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      If it’s possible to build a septic system that can handle the sewerage needs of a busy rural Interstate highway rest area–then it’s possible to build one to handle the sewerage needs of a trailer park.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: ” ……charge the tenants a sewage fee based on the amount of water they use, and use that revenue to pay the loan for the AOSS off (and to maintain the AOSS as well).”

      the heck you say. That makes it less affordable and makes it sound like a Draconian government thing…

      1. idiocracy Avatar

        No, it’s capitalism.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        well, no, not if you FORCE them to pay… and they lose the “right” to not have to pay to dump their sewage. It’s not “capitalism” if it’s the government that forces building the sewage system. That’s the OPPOSITE of “capitalism”.

        “Capitalism” is willing buyer-willing seller – not “you WILL connect and pay or else”

        1. idiocracy Avatar

          What if the property owner forces the connection to the AOSS because they know they might have trouble attracting good tenants with rivers of crap and piss flowing through the streets?

          A tenant who doesn’t want to pay for sewage treatment is free to find somewhere else to put their manufactured home.

          I’m sure that there are places in (for example) southwest Virginia where someone could put their manufactured home and have the piss and crap flowing right out onto the ground and nobody will care.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            more than likely, it will be the the GOVERNMENT that comes to visit about the piss flowing across the street onto OTHER PEOPLE’s property, no?

            Your “rights” END at your property line!

        2. idiocracy Avatar

          Larry, a good property manager will deal with the problem caused by a tenant’s sewage BEFORE the government gets involved.

      3. “That makes it less affordable and makes it sound like a Draconian government thing…”

        It’s certainly more “affordable” than not having a trailer park at all. And what is “draconian” about requiring people to pay for the utilities they use?

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    I enjoyed reading this post. Liberals and conservatives can be so elitist in their attitudes towards the “trailer park”. Delegate Krizek is right in the need to assist these communities. A mobile home is often the beach head for working class folks. It can be the first ladder in the climb up to building a better life and down the road a better house.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead V

    I enjoyed reading this post. Liberals and conservatives can be so elitist in their attitudes towards the “trailer park”. Delegate Krizek is right in the need to assist these communities. A mobile home is often the beach head for working class folks. It can be the first ladder in the climb up to building a better life and down the road a better house.

  5. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    There are trailers in Malibu that sell in the high 100s of $1000s.

    Still, if they actually had a tornado in California…

  6. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    There are trailers in Malibu that sell in the high 100s of $1000s.

    Still, if they actually had a tornado in California…

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    You want affordable housing – see the move Nomadland.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    You want affordable housing – see the move Nomadland.

  9. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    One of my most uncomfortable situations when I was lobbying for local governments was in opposing legislation that would have overridden local zoning provisions that discriminated against manufactured housing. Counties were in strong opposition.

    The current situation is different than it was 35 years ago.

    “Trailer park” and “mobile home” are obsolete terms. Anything built before 1976, before the “HUD” code was effective, is a mobile home. Anything built after that date is manufactured housing.

    There is also confusion between manufactured housing and modular housing. Manufactured housing is pre-constructed completely in the factory on a permanent, fixed steel chassis and then set up on the site. Modular housing is pre-built in sections in the factory and assembled at the site.

    Under Virginia law, manufactured housing is regarded as personal property and taxed as such, one concern of local governments. However, under recent legislation, manufactured housing can be converted to real property by removing any wheels and attaching the housing to the property.

    One of the main disadvantages of manufactured housing used to be a depreciation in value over time and reluctance of financial institutions to extend credit for their purchase. Apparently, these conditions are no longer true. https://www.newhomesource.com/learn/manufactured-home-the-right-choice/

  10. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    One of my most uncomfortable situations when I was lobbying for local governments was in opposing legislation that would have overridden local zoning provisions that discriminated against manufactured housing. Counties were in strong opposition.

    The current situation is different than it was 35 years ago.

    “Trailer park” and “mobile home” are obsolete terms. Anything built before 1976, before the “HUD” code was effective, is a mobile home. Anything built after that date is manufactured housing.

    There is also confusion between manufactured housing and modular housing. Manufactured housing is pre-constructed completely in the factory on a permanent, fixed steel chassis and then set up on the site. Modular housing is pre-built in sections in the factory and assembled at the site.

    Under Virginia law, manufactured housing is regarded as personal property and taxed as such, one concern of local governments. However, under recent legislation, manufactured housing can be converted to real property by removing any wheels and attaching the housing to the property.

    One of the main disadvantages of manufactured housing used to be a depreciation in value over time and reluctance of financial institutions to extend credit for their purchase. Apparently, these conditions are no longer true. https://www.newhomesource.com/learn/manufactured-home-the-right-choice/

  11. LarrytheG Avatar

    trailer parks are problematial.

    Let’s say you have a 5-acre subdivision and someone wants to buy 2 5 acre lots and put up a trailer park and all the rest of the homes are single family houses.

    Is the govt using restrictive zoning to deny building a trailer park ?

    How about a 10 acre tract that sits next to a new subdivision of single family homes or perhaps a place like where Jim Bacon lives? Trailer park okay or the government is using zoning to stop it?

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      Prince William County won’t even let you put one single manufactured house on a lot you own.

  12. LarrytheG Avatar

    trailer parks are problematial.

    Let’s say you have a 5-acre subdivision and someone wants to buy 2 5 acre lots and put up a trailer park and all the rest of the homes are single family houses.

    Is the govt using restrictive zoning to deny building a trailer park ?

    How about a 10 acre tract that sits next to a new subdivision of single family homes or perhaps a place like where Jim Bacon lives? Trailer park okay or the government is using zoning to stop it?

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      Prince William County won’t even let you put one single manufactured house on a lot you own.

  13. djrippert Avatar

    Del Krizek represents the area in Northern Virginia where I grew up. There were trailer parks along Rt 1 then and there are trailer parks along Rt 1 now. I would be very surprised to find that the trailer parks in his district are served by wells or septic. There’s nothing rural about the Rt 1 corridor in Fairfax County south of Alexandria.

    As far as affordability – I’m not sue what Paul Krizek really wants to do. Don’t the people who own the land where the manufactured housing units sit have the right to sell that land if they can get a good price?

  14. djrippert Avatar

    Del Krizek represents the area in Northern Virginia where I grew up. There were trailer parks along Rt 1 then and there are trailer parks along Rt 1 now. I would be very surprised to find that the trailer parks in his district are served by wells or septic. There’s nothing rural about the Rt 1 corridor in Fairfax County south of Alexandria.

    As far as affordability – I’m not sue what Paul Krizek really wants to do. Don’t the people who own the land where the manufactured housing units sit have the right to sell that land if they can get a good price?

  15. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    Absolutely nothing wrong with trailers or trailer parks. Some folks think it is acceptable to insult trailer park inhabitants. I know many very successful folks who at one time or another lived in a trailer.
    You can buy an acre of land and put a trailer on it and own real estate. The trailer is taxed as personal property but you own the land it sits on. Many folks start out this way.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      We have them all over Spotsylvania and it is perfect for someone who inherited an acre or more from their family and not uncommon at all – a trailer or double-wide in front of the abandoned farmhouse -not renovated.

  16. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    Absolutely nothing wrong with trailers or trailer parks. Some folks think it is acceptable to insult trailer park inhabitants. I know many very successful folks who at one time or another lived in a trailer.
    You can buy an acre of land and put a trailer on it and own real estate. The trailer is taxed as personal property but you own the land it sits on. Many folks start out this way.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      We have them all over Spotsylvania and it is perfect for someone who inherited an acre or more from their family and not uncommon at all – a trailer or double-wide in front of the abandoned farmhouse -not renovated.

  17. Not quite regarding trailer parks, but those at BR interested in housing policy should find this notable: https://unherd.com/thepost/is-this-the-solution-to-britains-housing-crisis/

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      They mention NIMBY but what keeps America back is NIH.

      As Churchill is purported to have said, “You can trust in America to do the right thing, but not until they exhaust all other possibilities first.”

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yes, the trailer park discussion is very much a part of the bigger discussion about affordability – and it has, over the years, been a much discussed issue in BR and included an original BR blogger named Ed Risse who had significant knowledge and opinions and leaned towards government dealing with the issue rather than the free market. You can google/search for Ed Rise and Bacon’s Rebellion to get more.

      Ed was big on what words meant (or not) and had words and phrases he would call “core confusing words”.

  18. Not quite regarding trailer parks, but those at BR interested in housing policy should find this notable: https://unherd.com/thepost/is-this-the-solution-to-britains-housing-crisis/

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      They mention NIMBY but what keeps America back is NIH.

      As Churchill is purported to have said, “You can trust in America to do the right thing, but not until they exhaust all other possibilities first.”

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yes, the trailer park discussion is very much a part of the bigger discussion about affordability – and it has, over the years, been a much discussed issue in BR and included an original BR blogger named Ed Risse who had significant knowledge and opinions and leaned towards government dealing with the issue rather than the free market. You can google/search for Ed Rise and Bacon’s Rebellion to get more.

      Ed was big on what words meant (or not) and had words and phrases he would call “core confusing words”.

  19. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Katrina Cottages, I believe that’s what they’re called. They’re not the FEMA trailers, but inexpensive one & two bedroom cottages that because they are permanent structures, FEMA want precluded from using.

    https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d0b984_c5f498ced83546ddb61b5cfe56a5d533.jpg

    Of course, anyone who has been to Key West would recognize them as Key West cottages.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yep, and these: https://yellowstonekoa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/WY_KOA_Home-Comfortable-Cabins.jpg

      Campgrounds are the “hidden” trailer parks…

    2. That thing is barely large enough to hold my gun collection…

      😉

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        You need more than one inside that? Better leave the long guns outside or you’ll probably break everything inside just trying to aim it.

  20. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Katrina Cottages, I believe that’s what they’re called. They’re not the FEMA trailers, but inexpensive one & two bedroom cottages that because they are permanent structures, FEMA want precluded from using.

    https://static.wixstatic.com/media/d0b984_c5f498ced83546ddb61b5cfe56a5d533.jpg

    Of course, anyone who has been to Key West would recognize them as Key West cottages.

    1. That thing is barely large enough to hold my gun collection…

      😉

Leave a Reply