Immigrant Bashers: R.I.P.

One of the more curious things about November’s election is how immigrant-bashing somehow evaporated as a Republican issue. Even more interesting is that two of the GOP’s biggest immigrant-bashers – Virgil H. Goode Jr. and Thelma Drake – are toast.

This should be an instructive tale as Virginia moves forward into 2009 and tries to deal with some of the far more serious problems, such as dealing with the worst economic crisis in decades and long-neglected issues such as the large number of Virginians who have no health insurance.

Even the conservative Wall Street Journal’s editorial page noted: “Immigration wasn’t a dominant issue this fall, and other factors contributed to the GOP defeat. But the political reality is that Republicans who thought that channeling Lou Dobbs would save their seats will soon be ex-Members.”

That’s a lesson Goode and Drake learned the hard way. Goode, a 12-year incumbent, was trumped in a squeaker by international lawyer and Albemarle County native Tom Perriello. Drake was dumped by Glenn Nye.

Of the pair, Goode was especially obnoxious. He brought shame and ridicule to the Old Dominion in 2006 by writing on U.S. House of Representatives stationery that unless his hard-right immigration policies, including rescinding current law that children of illegal immigrants born in the U.S. can be U.S. citizens, we will see the influx of undesirables, namely people of the Muslim faith. “If Americans don’t wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there likely will be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran,” he wrote.

So much for religious tolerance. But in his letter, Goode also showed his unspeakable ignorance since the issue had to do with whether a newly-elected Muslim Congressman from the Midwest would be sworn in on the Bible (presumably the King James Version, the preferred one for bashers). Turns out no Congressmen are sworn in “on the Bible.”

Then Goode made idiotic comments that Mexican restaurants shouldn’t display the Mexican flag. What’s next, a ban on the Irish tri-colors outside an Irish bar?

Not that Goode didn’t have other problems. He was linked to a defense contracting scandal that sent fellow Republican Randy Cunningham to prison. The San Diego political and former jet fighter ace in the Vietnam War was convicted for helping get contracts for MZM, Inc., a higher tech national security firm, which gave $88,000 to Goode in political contributions although the firm had nothing to do with Goode’s District. Goode said he redistributed those funds to non-profits.

During his bitter campaign against Perriello, Goode tried to paint the Virginia native and long-time resident of Albemarle County as a Yankee outlander with a funny-sounding, Italian last name. In fact, Perriello is a respected international lawyer and Yale grad who has done lots of work in complex legal issues involving Darfur, Sierra Leone, and Afghanistan. The “New York lawyer,” as Goode’s campaign branded him, won by 745 votes.

Thelma Drake is a kind of Goode-lite. Also an immigrant-basher, she supported such proposals as making it illegal to spend federal money to alert the Mexican government about movements of the Minutemen, a kind of yea-hoo vigilante outfit of anti-immigrant volunteers who, armed with deer rifles, CB radios, night vision glasses and binoculars, take it upon themselves to “patrol” the Southwestern borders.

Now if you want to consider someone who actually knows something about the immigration issue, look at Arizona Governor and former U.S. Attorney Janet Napolitano who has just been picked by President-elect Barack Obama as his candidate for Homeland Security.

Napolitano is not at all in favor of illegal immigration and has the smarts to realize what a complex issue it is. As she told the National Press Club in 2007: “It is too easy for the ‘bad guys’ to enter our country and too difficult for the ‘good guys’ – whose energies and intellects we need – to obtain lawful status.”

Vigilance is needed since in 2006, during one 24-hour period, an estimated 4,000 immigrants would cross into her state illegally. That number dropped by a third with the arrival of National Guard units.

But simply taking a Rambo-stance won’t work. She notes that her state is Mexico’s biggest trading partner by far – representing some $4 billion worth of goods – especially with the bordering Mexican state of Sonora. “I spend more time working with the Governor of Sonora than I spend with any U.S. governor,” she said.

The visa system is in desperate need to revision, she said. For example, according to today’s system, the Dominican Republic, with 8 million people, is granted per capita more visas than Mexico with a population of 100 million. “No wonder it takes, on average, more than 10 years to get a legal immigrant visa from Mexico – talk about an incentive to cross illegally.”

Mind you, these are the ideas of a woman who actually knows something about the immigration issue, not Goode nor Drake. To both of them: good riddance!

Peter Galuszka


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

7 responses to “Immigrant Bashers: R.I.P.”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    We have noted a number of negative impacts from the immagrant bashing.

    That bitter fruit will be harvested for years, it not decades.

  2. Anonymous Avatar

    So it appears that you don’t think that illegal immigration is a problem? You appear to think it’s just fine for anyone, from anywhere to enter this country any way that they can and live and work here? Is that correct?

    While I may not agree with the people who ran for office (don’t know them, I don’t live in your area), I do think that a person needs to be in the country legally to work here and receive any and all benefits that this country bestows on it’s citizens. To me, one of the few positive effects of our recession is that many illegals have moved back and the influx of illegals has slowed down.

    Our future president is fond of using the phrase ‘fair’. Can we go to mexico, or brazil, or greece and live and work illegally? Try it, see how long that lasts for you. IF, a big if, we could do that in their countries, then and only then I would consider it ‘fair’ for it to happen in this country.

    BTW – I agree the inconsistency between comparing legal immigrants from mexico versus those from Dominican Republic show how out of whack the system is; and it should be fixed. However, to me, illegal is illegal and I don’t want them in this country.

  3. Groveton Avatar

    Peter:

    You have an unlikely ally in this. The November 24, 2008 edition of Newsweek has an artile by your soul-mate Karl Rove. Kooky Karl lists 10 things that the Republican Party must do to recover. Point #4 is “Republicans must regain ground among critical voting groups.”. In it he writes, “The GOP won’t be a majority party if it cedes the young or Hispanics to Democrats. Republicans must find a way to support secure borders, a guest-worker program and comprehensive immigration reform that strengthens citizenship, grows our economy and keeps America a welcoming nation. An Anti-Hispanic attitude is suicidal.”.

    Let me repeat that last senetence, “An Anti-Hispanic attitude is suicidal”.

    From Karl Rove.

    Sometimes, I wonder why you aren’t encouraging the Republicans to keep up the anti-immigration, anti-Hispanic rhetoric. It would ensure that the Democratic Party stays in power for the rest of your life.

    Good luck with the neo-cons and their editing.

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    Thanks Groveton,
    I’ve seen Rove’s commentaries here and there and sometimes her does make sense.

    PG

  5. Ray Hyde Avatar

    When it gets to the point that enforcing a law costs more than the damage it is supposed to prevent, then being dogmatic about preventing “illegal” aliens is just stupid.

    When that happens it is time to revise the definition of illegal, change the quotas, revise the paperwork, or do whatever else makes sense, so that you are not shooting yourself in the foot while trying to wipe out an anthill.

    Which would you rather have, aliens that “cost Americans” $5 million in lower wages, or a law enforcement regime that costs $50 million to keep them out?

    RH

  6. Anonymous Avatar

    The solution includes: 1) privatizing enforcement by letting taxpayers and unemployed workers sue employers of illegal workers and recovering their attorneys’ fees; and 2) developing a fair guest worker program that permits workers not already in the US to come for a set period to work and that guarantees them full protection of all labor laws (I also let an authorized guest worker sue to collect unpaid wages, etc., and collect attorneys’ fees too).

    So long as there is no enforcement, even the guest workers will get screwed by employers looking for lower wages through hiring more illegals.

    I suspect, however, that no one really wants to solve the problem.

    TMT

  7. Ray Hyde Avatar

    No one really wants to solve the problem, because the solution costs more than the problem.

    RH

Leave a Reply