IG Report Highlights MWAA Board Conflicts

James A. Bacon

It seems that “partisan Republicans” and “wild-eyed Tea Baggers” aren’t the only people who have problems with the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) board of directors. The inspector general of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the Obama administration expressed concerns in an interim report on its review of the board’s policies regarding travel, ethics, transparency and the awarding of contracts. Some highlights:

MWAA’s policies and practices are generally less rigorous than corresponding State and Federal rules. Notably, MWAA’s government-appointed Board members are not bound to the same State ethics and financial disclosure laws as the elected officials who appointed them.

Our ongoing review has revealed a culture that is largely unaccustomed to external audits and inquiries by the accountability community. While MWAA has freely cooperated in most areas of our review, Board and staff in some areas were reluctant to provide access to key documents and grant us private interviews with Board members. MWAA’s reluctance to provid[e] us full transparency may be attributable to the fact that it has experienced few independent audits since its creation 25 years ago.

On the positive side, the inspectors found that MWAA’s assumptions for Dulles Toll Road revenues appear reasonable. MWAA will rely heavily upon toll road revenues to finance Phase 2 of Rail-to-Dulles construction.

In a letter to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, Rep. Frank Wolf, R-10, declared that he was “deeply troubled” by the findings, honing in on MWAA’s contracting practices, conflict-of-interest policies and recusal practices. Wrote Wolf:

Most egregious are the IG’s findings about MWAA’s contracting practices. … Particularly concerning are the number of sole source contracts issued. As you know, MWAA is required by law to fully compete any contract over $200,000, with limited exceptions. Yet the IG’s report states that “[d]uring the period of our review, MWAA awarded five sole source contracts that were over $200,000, but did not fall under any of MWAA’s categorical exemptions. These contract awards, which amount to $6 million, did not have Board approval.” Not only did MWAA abuse the exemptions permitted under federal law, they issued numerous contracts that failed to meet even these basic standards.

The report points out that while MWAA’s Contracting Manual says some exemptions are allowed, but “comprise only a small portion of MWAA’s contracts and their dollar value,” the IG found that the use of exemptions “has amounted to 40 percent of the Authority’s $589 million in contract awards during the period of our review.”

Wolf focused in particular upon the hiring of the Jenner & Block law firm to advise the board on how to avoid seating two new Virginia board members appointed by Governor Bob McDonnell:

The report details how “… one Board member’s recommendation led MWAA to initiate a $100,000 contract with a law firm despite the fact that an immediate family member worked for the firm.” The report goes on to say that “while this family relationship had been previously disclosed, the Board member did not refrain from participating in matters related to the firm when the issue arose (per MWAA policy), and MWAA awarded the contract to the recommended firm. ….

This particular contract was initiated to procure a legal opinion by the law firm Jenner & Block for the express purpose of advising the board on how it could avoid complying with a bipartisan law passed by Congress and signed by President Obama. Amazingly, the report shows that the contract was requested on November 18, 2011, the same day the president signed the bill into law. It also is worth noting that the report reveals that the law firm submitted its “completed legal opinion to MWAA before the noncompetitive contract [was] documented and officially signed.”

Interestingly enough, Chicago-based Jenner & Block, which maintains a Washington, D.C., office, has collected $78,000 in legal fees this year from the Democratic Party-Virginia Senate Caucus, according to the Virginia Public Access Project. Senate Democrats made it a top priority to fight for state funding for the Rail-to-Dulles project and blocked Governor Bob McDonnell’s efforts to seat two newly appointed board members upon the board. The Dems also fought Republican efforts to tie state funding for Rail-to-Dulles to impartiality between union contractors and open shop contracts in the awarding of the Phase 2 contract. So far, MWAA has held fast in its policy to favor union Project Labor Agreements in evaluating bidders for the estimated $2.8 billion contract.

So, Jenner & Block collected more than $100,000 from MWAA plus $78,000 from the Senate Dems. That certainly creates the appearance that MWAA’s board was actively colluding with Democrats in the Senate to thwart the McDonnell administration’s efforts to hold the board accountable. There is no other way to describe MWAA but as a rogue entity.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. larryg Avatar

    and what the IG report also shows in spades is that there is more to MWAA than PLA agreements…

    Let’s see how many of the PLA-worriers come out swinging on these other issues….

    this is an Agency that has run amok and guess who created it?

    ” 1986 Bill transferring the operation of National and Dulles to a new regional Airports Authority was signed by President Reagan.”

    that’s right – “the govt is the problem” guy did it…

  2. EllieNoVATea Avatar
    EllieNoVATea

    Really? “Wildeyed Tea Baggers”! Don’t plan on being invited back the next time you want to sell your books!!

    1. Ellie, That’s called sarcasm! I’ll put scare quotes around the term to make sure no one gets confused.

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    You guys kill me. Trivial issues. Here’s one with some meat on the bones….

    1. Virginia is one of only four states where judges are appointed by the state legislature.

    2. Virginia is only one of two states where part-time legislators who are also lawyers are directly engaged in the appointment of judges.

    So, you go to court in Virginia. You’d damn well better be represented by one of those part time legislators who is also a lawyer. Otherwise, when that judge comes up for re-appointment he might find the sledding a bit tough.

    There is no auditor who will ever audit this because it is completely lega in Virginia. Just like the Orion Air incident covered by Jim Bacon on this blog.

    Let’s compare and contrast:

    1. The MWAA takes out a $78,000 legal contract for services at a law firm where somebody’s relative works. Yeah, that sounds fishy.

    2. The GA passes a special tax break for a single company in Yorktown. The tax applies to airplanes located in Virginia. It saves the company $800,000 per airplane. The company’s CEO donated thousands of dollars to the two state senators who sponsored the sweetheart deal. In fact, the company hired one of the senators to be its director of community relations.

    You tell me who is more corrupt – MWAA or the Clown Show.

    1. I’m willing to admit that both are corrupt.

      Are you?

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Yes, although I think the Clown Show is more corrupt. And … the MWAA does me more good than our state legislature.

        1. Don, it could be you think the MWAA is doing more good is that no one has bothered covering it before. Did the WaPo ever report on the massive cost overruns for the Dulles people movers?

  4. larryg Avatar

    “…. the inspectors found that MWAA’s assumptions for Dulles Toll Road revenues appear reasonable. ”

    Tollroad News had an interesting chart detailing the actual tolls taken in verses projections on an Orange County Toll Road.

    Everything was on track until about 2008 then things went to mush:

    http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/5933

    The Feds and the State should promptly outlaw what the MWAA is doing with the DTR. It’s going to cause a huge backlash far beyond the actual users of the road.

    It’s being cited already as an example of what can happen when a toll road is approved. I expect trouble along these same lines with the HOT Lanes on 495 and I-95… way more people are watching this than MWAA and others think.

  5. The WaPo is more than ready to accept corruption so long as it comes with higher spending and taxes. But I did notice Dana Hedgepath has already written an article for the Post. It will be interesting to see what Fred and Lee do from the editorial staff.
    The Post is not alone. A number of people, including apparently DJR, are willing to accept corruption so long as something gets built. It doesn’t need to be an effective project or be reasonably priced so long as something is done. I that was the position soundly rejected by voters in 2002.
    Tim Kaine’s campaign commercial was right — unless we control development and tie it to transportation improvements, we will not see any improvement in mobility by putting more money into transportation. Let’s adopt a citizen-enforceable adequate public facilities law and then we might make some progress.
    Interestingly, the Fairfax County staff has told Tysons landowners that if they don’t want to commit to extra taxes sufficient to fund their share of transportation facilities, they can receive part of their requested density, with the rest coming when the funds to build transportation infrastructure are found. So far, no one has expressed any interest in that approach.

  6. larryg Avatar

    I’m still agog at the idea that a government entity has been created that can operate with impunity from the transparency and accountability restraints that apply to most governance in Virginia – and not a soul seems to want to do anything to rein them in.

    In 2002, the voters of NoVa said “no” in a resounding way to the idea that an agency would receive tax revenues and then make decisions about how to spend it without any accountability.

    Ironically, MWAA was already in business at that time and despite Mr. Kaine remonstrations about land-use and transportation – he signed off on VDOT giving a toll road to MWAA. A toll road that VDOT itself did not dream up but instead was a “fix” to commuters co-opting the airport access road.

    If you stand back and look at what happened – it’s not so much corruption as it is just plain incompetence of how the Dulles Airport itself set off a series of events that just seemed to lurch from one bad premise to another until we have an unelected authority that can legally derive revenues from people with virtually no transparency or accountability. It actually seems amazing that they have to “submit” to an IG investigation. I’m quite sure there were folks on the MWAA board who said ” they can’t investigate us”..

    That DJ would call Richmond a “clown show” at the same time he is patting this Pit Bull of an agency on the head… is sad… because as TMT has intimated, we’ve gone from being frustrated to about how govt does not work to accepting corruption in exchange for action.

    But the “action” of the MWAA with regard to the DTR is a ticking time bomb judging from what I hear from folks who don’t even live in NoVa.

    They are incensed that ANY unelected govt agency can essentially use a toll road as a cash cow to build something on the backs of one group of people for the benefit of …primarily land-developers with access to Dulles as the premise.

    We starting to sound like the way they do business in New Jersey before Chris Christie rode into town…..

  7. constructionandlaborguy Avatar
    constructionandlaborguy

    I thought the OIG interim letter went pretty easy on the Martire/Curto conflict of interest concerns related to the PLA. Well at least they didn’t name them publicly, which is odd.

    Wolf’s letter brings some details to light about the whole MWAA board dysfunction. Give it a read:
    http://wolf.house.gov/uploads/Letter%20In%20Response%20to%20%20IG%20Report%20on%20MWAA.pdf

    Also, MWAA Chair Michael Curto’s wife, Sabine Curto, is the family member at Jenner & Block. You might recall he was instrumental with Martire in pushing the PLA.

    This portion of the OIG letter refers to Curto/Martire suddenly recusing themselves from PLA preference policy discussions. This occurred months after folks raised a stink about Martire and Curto pushing for a PLA mandate (where they both voted and pushed for it). These guys should not have been involved in it at all:

    “Recusal practices—MWAA’s ethics policies are vague regarding when and how Board members should recuse themselves when a conflict of interest arises. MWAA’s policy states that Board members may not participate in any respect related to an entity they have an interest in that is currently or seeking to do business with MWAA. However, the policy does not clarify how Board members should recuse themselves in these situations, raising concerns about the policy’s effectiveness. For example, one Board member left the meeting room for discussions related to a proposal for which he had disclosed a potential conflict. However, another Board member who recused himself in the same meeting remained in the room. While the Board member refrained from participating in the related discussion or voting on the matter, he had been instrumental in drafting the materials that were up for vote, and had a clear interest in the outcome of the vote because of his relationship with organizations that would potentially benefit from the proposal passing. These differing practices raise questions regarding how recusals should be conducted to most effectively prevent undue influence. “

  8. We need both Congress and the Virginia General Assembly to put MWAA under the control of law. I remember an MWAA board member telling me that it would post a copy of the Phase I Dulles Rail construction contract on the Internet even though the federal and state FOIAs did not apply. That’s not good enough. FOIA, open meetings, anti-corruption, administrative procedure, procurement, etc., need to apply.

  9. I wish it was more damning. The fact that the IG reported a reluctance to speak on the part of MWAA people, the fact that the IG found the Audit committee to be meeting exclusively in closed session, and the board in general to be excessively meeting in closed session, the fact that some board member had some relative in a law firm that got a nice juicy contract, the point about MWAA spending $100,000 to fight legislation that forbids board members from serving past their appointed times, etc, looks pretty bad. But the thing that Wolf said he was told – “Why is MWAA paying an individual who never worked a single day for the authority? I am told MWAA refuses to tell the IG’s team the details of the settlement, claiming a confidentiality agreement.” – would have been a smoking gun in the IG report, but it wasn’t there. Also there was no statement yet about the massively excessive line item costs in this project. (That is from the Super Secret Audit initiated on March 15, 2012, though, so it would be expected to be incomplete at this point.)

    The thing about this project that I dislike the most, is that the road tolls crept up a little, but will not skyrocket (as was long denied, and then finally admitted), until AFTER the agreements are signed, when it will be too late to say “HEY! That’s not what I understood” and back out. And now, an audit of massively excessive costs will be handed to us after that point as well.

    Most people think this rail project is just nonsense as usual – they have no idea how it has moved to a whole other level. I say, STOP THE SHOW – until we have those facts in hand, and they have been properly considered.

  10. […] 59!:  Read this great post at Bacons Rebellion about the IG report, especially the stinky law firm deal.  Nice connections between the law firm getting the $100,000 contract and also working for the […]

Leave a Reply