If You’ve Lost David Brooks, You’ve Lost America

When keepers of the conventional wisdom and guardian of the status quo like David Brooks say the United States is becoming another Greece, you can pretty well assume that we’re becoming another Greece. The political divide between Ds and Rs is so wide that the New York Times columnist can’t see how the $1 trillion-a-year budget gap can be bridged.

That’s pretty much the conclusion that I came to a year and a half ago when I was writing “Boomergeddon.” Back then, the idea that the U.S. might one day default upon its debt seemed laughable — the raving of a Tea Party fanatic. Now Mr. Establishment, David Brooks, is resigning himself to the inevitable. “The short answer,” he says, “is, welcome Greece. We’re going to be Greece.”

Just a refresher of what I wrote before the 2010 election:

Tea Partiers may propel the Rs to electoral gains in November, but it’s not clear that the Elephant Clan has the will to defy the organized special interests in Washington, D.C., much less to make transformative reforms that can return the country to a sustainable fiscal trajectory. As long as Obama is president, until January 2013 at the very least, even the eviction of the Donkey Clan as the majority party in Congress will result in little change for two more years. By then, the nation will be $3 trillion deeper in hock, the economy will be as hooked as ever upon Keynesian spending stimulus to keep growing, society’s “unmet needs” will be as acute as always, the evaporation of the Medicare Part B trust fund will be looming on the horizon, and foreign investors will be even more antsy about the ability of the U.S. to repay its debt.”

Taxpayers may vehemently oppose deficit spending and the mounting national debt, but those who pay no federal income taxes — about 43 percent of the population, according to the center-left Tax Policy Center — will oppose with equal vehemence any move to cut entitlements, and both parties will demagogue anyone who proposes to touch Social Security and Medicare. Just look at what the Democrats did to George Bush’s proposal to reform Social Security, and observe how Republicans accused Obamacare of undermining Medicare. Any change, if it comes, will likely be incremental and insufficient to divert the federal government from its downward slide.” …

Although it may be theoretically possible to extricate ourselves … the prospects that the political class, either of the two party/clans or even a majority of the American people will be willing to make the necessary sacrifices are remote.

Once again, I repeat my refrain that the only bastion of functional government in the post-Boomergeddon world will be those forward-looking state and local governments that saw the calamity coming and acted aggressively to shore up their finances and reinvent core institutions, such as transportation, land use, schools, higher ed and health care, upon which our well being depends. The Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street are nothing compared to the unrest to come when the financial markets begin dictating U.S. fiscal policy. They are no more than a warm-up act for what’s to come. They’re not even that, they’re the roadies who walk onto the stage and tinker with the amplifiers before the warm up act. Repent, sinners, the judgment day (of the financial markets) soon will be at hand!

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “If You’ve Lost David Brooks, You’ve Lost America”

  1. “Once again, I repeat my refrain that the only bastion of functional government in the post-Boomergeddon world will be those forward-looking state and local governments that saw the calamity coming and acted aggressively to shore up their finances and reinvent core institutions, such as transportation, land use, schools, higher ed and health care, upon which our well being depends.”.

    How is it that you see the problem so clearly but you can’t find the answer?

    While you debate how many angels can dance on the head of a pin in regard to the Rt 29 bypass, the 460 project and Rail To Dulles, the federal government is dying.

    The debt committee was an ultimate clown show stacked with mindless partisans and destined to fail from the start. I hope and pray every day that Eric Cantor is right and they will find an agreement by Wednesday but I know that odds of that are somewhere between slim and none.

    McDonnell is taking all the money he can raise or find and putting it into infrastructure. This is EXACTLY how he should play the hand he has been dealt. How much federal highway money will be forthcoming after Boomergeddon? How much longer can the stimulus be continued?

    When the fit hits the shan, there will be no more money for infrastructure. When the fit hits the shan, the people who have the skills to remain taxpayers will move to where the best lifestyle exists. When the fit hits the shan, the decades of transportation chaos visited upon Virginia by the Clown Show in Richmond will take its toll.

    Good for McDonnell trying to get some things done while he still can. At least, in transportation.

    Because when the fit hits the shan, the federal flow will slow from a river to a creek and the ability of NoVa and Tidewater to carry the Commonwealth financially compliments of Uncle Sam will be severely curtailed. Then, Virginia will have to compete with every other state for the 57% of taxpayers who pay any federal taxes at all.

    And every airline magazine I read has state – sponsored ads asking people to relocate their high tech companies to these states. In the current Delta Connections magazine is a plea from Kentucky (low traffic congestion, standard of living based) and South Dakota (natural splendor and hard working workforce based).

    What’s Virginia going to say as the federal torrent slows? BusinessWeek says we’re the best run state for business?

    This state has been mis-managed by the Clown Show for the past 50 years. Only the growth of federal spending has made it work. Now that growth MUST slow. The fit is going to hit the shan.

  2. Groveton, On the one hand, it does makes sense to borrow money while interest rates are low and build projects while bids are low. McDonnell makes a strong point there. On the other hand, it makes no sense to build projects that have no economic justification. What Virginia lacks — and I’m amazed that you don’t lambaste the “clown show” for this — is an objective means to rank projects by economic Return on Investment.

    I’m trying to bring some transparency to the McDonnell administration’s process of picking transportation projects and to apply some critical analysis that otherwise seems to be lacking. I’m trying to ask tough questions and, as Howlin’ Henry Howell used to say, trying to “keep the big boys honest.”

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    David Brooks? Ho-hum. Krugman tells it like it is.

  4. Jim:

    First, the belief that people have a crystal ball for predicting future benefits from projects is hooey. From white elephants like the bridge to nowhere to societal juggernauts like the Hoover Dam – people just don’t know what they don’t know. For example, if Ed Risse is right and the autoNOmobile is going to be beyond the means of most Americans in the near future the value of the Rail to Dulles might be a whole lot higher than expected.

    As many a venture capital person has said, “All models are wrong. It’s just a question of how wrong.”.

    What’s really needed is an objective ROI model with an annual “look back” at the realized benefits vs. the projected benefits. Note: This still won’t provide a real ROI for at least 20 years but the process of modeling and correcting the model would be in place. However, I have no faith that sitting around a whiteboard trying to dream up the perfect model in theory to apply in practice will work.

    Some of these projects have been studied for 20 years. They have been reviewed, revised, refinanced, etc. Yes, they still may be wrong. Or not. But you just can’t get frozen in indecision. Press on. Mistakes may be made. The question isn’t whether you can make perfect decisions (you can’t). The question is whether you can make “good enough” decisions and put in place a process to improve decision making over time.

    You do ask the hard questions. Good for you. However, you also have to ask the hardest question of all …

    “What is the cost of doing nothing?”.

    That’s the question you don’t ask.

  5. Peter:

    Krugman is the left’s version of Karl Rove. No credibility whatsoever. He should have stayed an academic economist and left the politics and punditry to those who can handle such things.

  6. …but Krugman will never have the nickname Turd Blossom.

  7. I’m also uncertain exactly how we compute ROI for an addition to an existing network.

    there are metrics known as measures of effectiveness….

    but how you actually measure or what you choose to measure may or may not have much real world benefit.

    For instance, you could widen an existing road or build a bypass (like the Cville) bypass but what exactly is the benefit?

    so you may, for instance, save 10 or 20 minutes with a bypass around Cville.

    what is the value of that?

    I believe that the way you figure out the value of a road improvement is you run a toll analysis on it.

    what you want with the Cville bypass – is a road that provides enough benefit that people are willing to pay for it so it does cost cost taxpayers a penny and the people who use it – are willing to pay to get the benefit.

    I’m even more flummoxed by METRO and most transit. How much would it cost someone to get a taxi or ride a shuttle to Dulles?

    shouldn’t METRO be able to charge a competitively-priced fare instead of a highly subsidized fare?

    The trouble with the “Groveton” approach is that the money for these things have to come from someone and letting it “happen” means someone other than those who benefit – end up holding the bag.

    In the case of the Cville bypass.. it’s ultimately going to mean that other counties will lose a bit of road money to chip in for the Cville bypass.

    In the case of Dulles METRO – it’s breathtaking to me that they are quite publically saying that users of a particular road are going to pay for it.

    Fairfax leaders are in favor of …taxing Loudoun County commuters to pay for a rail line that benefits Fairfax.

    hey.. maybe Fairfax is not so dumb after all, eh?

  8. What good is the value of transportation if there is no reason to transport?
    What good is more infrastructure in an overbuilt world?

Leave a Reply