Screen shot from WJLA-7 April 4 report.

People don’t understand!  These political leadership jobs are hard! It is a great sacrifice to serve, and it is only fair that the taxpayers contribute to the comfort and convenience of those of us working so hard for their better future.  They can be so ungrateful….

Did that go through Fairfax Supervisors Chairman Jeff McKay’s mind as he watched local WJLA-7 news kick him around like a rag doll yesterday for using a county car on personal business and, worse, political business? Or was it what should have gone through his mind:  How could I be so dumb and greedy and assume nobody would notice or care?

This is not a new story, because it happens often and gets ratted out all the time.  This is not a partisan story, because this behavior crosses all lines. Lack of electoral competition does contribute to this way of thinking. This may not be a fatal blow for Democrat McKay, who as board chairman recently raised his pay from $100,000 to $138,000 per year (as the televised report helpfully reminds us.)

No, this is a “when will they ever learn” story. People who don’t get the privilege of transportation with the entire bill paid by involuntary tax levies, people who must pay the hated car taxes and registration fees and fuel bills on their cars, tend to get irritated when they find out politicians (or any government employees) use public cars for tons of daily private business.

Someone please forward this to the Internal Revenue Service. I know the folks at the Virginia Department of Taxation, and they can check to see if McKay’s valuable perk was declared for tax purposes. It is very much supposed to be.

Years ago as the administrator in the Virginia Attorney General’s office, I was the office point of contact for complaints about our staff to the state’s taxpayer “waste, fraud and abuse” hotline. Many of these complaints involved employees using (misusing) the state cars, and the employees often seemed totally surprised that somebody would report them via the license plate, and then the motor pool records of vehicle use pointed them out as the drivers that day. Only one member of staff had a car assigned (guess who).

In those cases it was usually legitimate business to have the car, so no harm, no foul, unless the complaint was about speeding or reckless behavior. Woe unto anybody who actually embarrassed the office with a traffic citation (and it would be interesting to know if McKay racked up any of those.) Me, I was never in a state car unless somebody else had checked it out. Less risk to drive my own and get mileage.

It is not a fancy car McKay gets to drive. (Is it an EV? Let’s not go there.) That doesn’t matter. Indulge me in another personal reminiscence, but when Dad was city manager in Roanoke, he would occasionally bring home a banged up city-owned surplus army Jeep and park it out front during snow events. After even folks in our own neighborhood kvetched about it, he went back to risking the family car when called out in the weather.

Good story, WJLA.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

28 responses to “How To Really, Really Tick Off Fairfax Taxpayers”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I asked Dad to teach me to drive the old surplus WWII-era Jeep, with its famously tricking transmission, and he was aghast at the idea somebody would see me behind the wheel. That may be the real reason he stopped checking it out, afraid I’d try it. 🙂

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Do you happen to know whether it had the T-84 or the T-90 transmission?

      The T-90 is better than the T-84 (in my opinion) but they both required double-clutching on downshifts.

  2. Waiting for IRS SWAT team to kick in the door in the wee hours.. will WJLA be notified so it can be across the street?

  3. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    The Headline Test:

    Before you do something, consider what it would look like if there was a headline about it in tomorrow’s newspaper..

    1. dave schutz Avatar
      dave schutz

      And that emphatically includes sending emails!

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    McKay is often in the news over ethics questions:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/fairfax-supervisor-mckay-says-he-has-nothing-to-hide-amid-report-of-criminal-investigation/2019/09/03/5b0fed96-cab0-11e9-a4f3-c081a126de70_story.html

    McKay is a trickster. He makes much of the fact that he grew up on the Route 1 Corridor in Fairfax County because he thinks it makes him sound tough. I grew up there too. So did Sen Scott Surovell. But unlike Sen Surovell and I, McKay attended Bishop Ireton instead of the local public high school. Something tells me that McKay didn’t grow up on Huntington Ave or in the trailer parks that lined Rt 1.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The news team did not say whether it had checked to see if Fairfax policy provides for the assignment of a county vehicle to the board chair for general use. That could well be the case. I know that is done for the heads and key management staff of some state agencies.

    This story reminds me of two stories related to government vehicles. One of my college debate team colleagues was driving a state car (college owned) while returning from a meet and was involved in an accident. It was totally unavoidable and totally not his fault. He complained later that he thought he would never be through with the paperwork involved.

    When I was with the Division of Legislative Services, staff often had to travel overnight to other parts of the state to attend committee meetings or public hearings. While we were preparing for such a trip, my supervisor said he would be driving his care and I could ride with him. When I asked him why he was not checking out a state car to use, he replied, “If I were driving a car with state tags and decided to leave the motel at night to go get a beer, it would be just my luck that somebody would write down the license plate number and call the Governor.”

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      An even greater fear was getting tagged with a DUI while driving a state car.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      With great benefits comes great (usually unforeseen) liability.

    3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Twenty some years ago, then Supervisor Gerry Connolly led a crackdown on the use of county cars for personal transportation. The county motor pool grew suddenly.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Coulda been a Ferrari… Geez, a cheap Ford.

    I notice the driving recklessly stuff is an “eyewitness” account.

  7. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    It comes on top of huge Ffx property tax increases due to inflated house/used car prices, and the Supervisors are proud to increase spending including their own salaries. Believe they had to cut back on the proposed salary grab due to anger. But we are very Blue here, so they largely get what they want.

    God knows I am one of the chumps paying full car tax. Wish they would go back to parking stickers to ensure everyone paid their fair share, or else just go to a better form of tax.

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Down here you have to pay for the sticker and don’t get one. Too expensive to print and mail the stickers.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      You are not paying “full” car tax. There is almost a billion dollars in the state budget to offset a portion of the car tax for residents in all localities. Of course, as time passes, that billion dollars offsets a smaller proportion of the tax due.

      Now, for people like me, who keep a car for more than 20 years (and it still runs fine, thank you), there really is no car tax.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        He’s paying 26% more than you were to begin with. Quibbling about what is “full” vs what is “subsidized” is a garbage argument.

        Considering the car in question above is not subject to PPT, the poster is paying the “full” tax.

      2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        I think the news was saying McKay’s vehicle was exempt from the car tax, so I am saying not me. Normally if your car is “garaged” at your house, you owe.

  8. WayneS Avatar

    It used to be you would get an “I’m so disappointed in you” letter from the governor, at your home address, if you received a traffic citation in a government-owned vehicle.

    Don’t ask me how I know…

  9. AlH - Deckplates Avatar
    AlH – Deckplates

    This article is another example of FWA. Why are (some) elected representatives + (some) Gov’t employees, have such a condescending attitude, which facilitates an easy decision to use Gov’t money or resources for personal use? Because the leaders either overlook it or do it themselves. Better yet, why in 2023 do Gov’t employees need a retirement pay for life? What makes their services so special over the private sector employees of whom few still have that benefit. ONE effort in restoring confidence in Gov’t is a continuous & substantial review of expenditures & accountability to the voters.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yeah, the real impact of those local salary increases for these entitled/privileged “servants of the people” is the higher pension payoff until the month they die, followed by the higher life insurance check! (Many also get very nice retirement medical subsidies, too.) The free car pales compared to that.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yeah, the real impact of those local salary increases for these entitled/privileged “servants of the people” is the higher pension payoff until the month they die, followed by the higher life insurance check! (Many also get very nice retirement medical subsidies, too.) The free car pales compared to that.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        If you’re in the original VRS plan (and possibly the others) your pension, or at least a portion of it, can keep on going after you die. Under that plan, a partial benefit can be passed on to a beneficiary when one dies. It is a one-time deal, though, the pension dies with the first beneficiary.

      2. WayneS Avatar

        If you’re in the original VRS plan (and possibly the others) your pension, or at least a portion of it, can keep on going after you die. Under that plan, a partial benefit can be passed on to a beneficiary when one dies. It is a one-time deal, though, the pension dies with the first beneficiary.

      3. WayneS Avatar

        If you’re in the original VRS plan (and possibly the others) your pension, or at least a portion of it, can keep on going after you die. Under that plan, a partial benefit can be passed on to a beneficiary when one dies. It is a one-time deal, though, the pension dies with the first beneficiary.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          No survivor benefit in Plan 2? Doubt that. It’s pretty standard. There may still be a plan for elected’s/appointees which is purely defined contribution.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          No survivor benefit in Plan 2? Doubt that. It’s pretty standard. There may still be a plan for elected’s/appointees which is purely defined contribution.

        3. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          No survivor benefit in Plan 2? Doubt that. It’s pretty standard. There may still be a plan for elected’s/appointees which is purely defined contribution.

          1. WayneS Avatar

            There probably is a survivor benefit in Plan 2, but I don’t know much about that plan so I hedged my bets. And I know next to nothing about the “hybrid plan” or whatever they call the 3rd program.

  10. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Bacon sent me this tip, probably knowing I wouldn’t turn it into a partisan hit. Tempting, but this is just such a common attitude, this entitlement mindset. Another story from the AG’s office, again no name. A section chief had his dignity insulted by having to drive the piddly, cheap, rattle trap state fleet cars. He wanted a larger, newer, more dignified vehicle befitting his station. To get the preferential treatment, he sent a letter to the director of General Services demanding it. On office letterhead, meaning the AG’s name was on the letter! Of course it landed on my desk, and I had the joy of deflating his ego. I did it loudly enough that I think it was heard out in the hallway…. 🙂

    I did like making the lawyers salute me…Forgive me, I did.

Leave a Reply