How to Make UVa a Research Giant

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
University of Virginia Research Park

by Wade Gilley

Recent news reports reveal that the governance problems at the University of Virginia continue to boil, as evidenced by accrediting issues, student protests, legislators considering the restructuring of the institution’s governing board and other news emerging both locally and nationally.

The problems recently surfacing at Virginia’s flagship university are due in part to changing global economics and a unique weakness in Virginia’s public and private higher education system. The commonwealth has an excellent public university/college system, but in the changing world of global economics one large and critical shortfall is economically challenging to Virginia in the 21st century. That shortfall is the lack of a major private research university.

North Carolina has Duke and Wake Forest, Georgia has Emory, Tennessee has Vanderbilt, and Maryland has Johns Hopkins University. These private universities win billions of dollars in competitive research grants and contracts each year in an age in which research is increasingly a key factor in economic development. Virginia does not have a major private research university, and that void may be responsible for the continuing debate about U.Va.’s future.

A recent report in the Chronicle of Higher Education on institutional success in competing for dollars from the federal government and other sources indicated that North Carolina’s institutions, both public and private, spend roughly $2.2 billion on research each year and Maryland’s universities spend $2.5 billion. In comparison, Virginia’s universities only spend about $950 million, or 40 percent of what institutions in neighboring/competing states spend.

Although $950 million is a lot of money, Virginia’s investment in research still lags dramatically behind our competitors. The difference is primarily due to the fact that North Carolina has both Wake Forest and Duke, while Maryland has Johns Hopkins.

Virginia’s research limitations have been evident for a long time, but no one has ever publicly recognized the problem, so now it is a 21st-century challenge. And one can see that challenge in the recent conflict regarding the mission of U.Va.

Virginia, perhaps subconsciously, has attempted to make up the difference by encouraging U.Va. to act like a private research university without providing the funds or the governing structure that would facilitate that transition.

There are a few simple solutions to this critical problem. First, create a partial privatization of U.Va. with a totally independent governing board, coupled with state assistance/scholarships for Virginians attending the university. This way, U.Va. would be state-supported, but not state-run, and would have both the freedom and additional resources to compete with major private universities across the country.

Second, the state needs to invest more money and resources to expand the research capabilities of all our research universities, especially U.Va. To achieve this, Virginia should offer significant and targeted incentive grants designed to dramatically increase the competitiveness of all our research universities, which is perhaps the most critical of the challenges facing the commonwealth in the new economy.

I am confident that, with freedom from excessive political oversight and encouragement to function more as a private research university, U.Va. could compete more effectively with Duke, Hopkins, Vanderbilt and — yes, over time — Harvard in the research arena. At the same time, our other major doctoral institutions could become increasingly competitive, resulting in a new and powerful economic force for Virginia in the 21st century.

Now is the time for Virginia to focus on building a larger and more competitive state higher education system, which in turn will make Virginia more competitive in the new global economy. With the coming slowdown in federal dollars gushing across the Potomac and down the bay, we need new and productive initiatives to expand Virginia’s economy.

Wade Gilley, a retired university president living in Reston, served as Virginia’s secretary of education from 1978 to 1982 and once served as chairman of the board of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Contact him at jwgilley@yahoo.com. This column was published originally in the Roanoke Times.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “How to Make UVa a Research Giant”

  1. thebyurokrat Avatar
    thebyurokrat

    While private universities have some inherent advantages in competing for research dollars, it has not prevented public institutions in other states from building research programs that dwarf both Virginia Tech and UVA.

    The UC system, the University of Michigan, UNC, Minnesota, Ohio State, Penn State, Georgia Tech, etc., face similar constraints as UVA but have managed to build enviable research portfolios.

    Your proposal of partial privatization will not address a lack of expert management at the university, and decades of under-investment in the research mission at both the state and institutional level. You merely posit a problem and solution without demonstrating a) what aspects of being a public institution limit UVA from growing its research mission, and b) what semi-privatization would accomplish for the university in terms of growing its mission, particularly given the substantial autonomy afforded UVA and other institutions following the devolution of authorities in the 2005 restructuring act.

  2. I think thebyurokrat has hit on some relevant issues….

    who has the strategic plan for this kind of thing?

    the University, the Gov, the General Assembly..?

    and where does the money come from to gin up a research arm, and who keeps track of the ROI?

    and I have to say, I do find the idea that the State and Feds should fund the research to be an interesting and debatable prospect given all the back and forth we’re seeing on govt spending these days.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Very interesting piece and sooo Virginia.

    They don’t want to spend money on research yet want a real world class university that draws in all kinds of research.

    Double talk and assinine thinking — typical Old Dominion.

    1. Cville Resident Avatar
      Cville Resident

      If you really want to get at the root of the problem, it’s not “research dollars” and which University attracts the most grants. It’s the fact that Carolina has successfully turned the RTP into a serious economic development asset.

      But that has nothing to do with U.Va. and has everything to do with 2 other institutions: Virginia Tech and the Virginia Biotechnology Park.

      As you usually state, Virginia went half-ass with the Biotech Park (Richmond was a silly site for it)….and its commercialization efforts have been dwarfed by RTP.

      And let’s not forget that the Warner Administration wanted to make Virginia Tech a “top 50” school in terms of attracting research dollars. The thought was that with that much money and R&D flowing, Roanoke and SWVA would experience an economic revival. As this blog has detailed, that hasn’t occurred. Virginia Tech has been a miserable failure at actually turning Roanoke or SWVA into a hub of commercialization even though I think it is a “top 50” research school in terms of grants attracted. Go to Montgomery or Roanoke Counties and see how successful those efforts have been at transforming SWVA commercially……

      Had either A.) the Biotech Park been located in NoVa; or B.) Warner’s crew not worried about SWVA and made it Mason’s mission to be the “research university” of Virginia…..my guess is that the commercialization efforts would be multiples of what they are today for Virginia.

      1. Cville, I largely agree with what you say, but I would refine the statement. Virginia Tech is indeed a Top 50 research institution, and it has climbed in the rankings in recent years. I think it’s important to add that the R&D has had a local economic impact — just go visit the Virginia Tech research park. That park supports a good number of jobs (a couple thousand, I think).

        But to your larger point, that R&D has had little spill-over outside of Blacksburg itself. It certainly hasn’t revitalized the economy of the larger Blacksburg/Roanoke region. If you could magically pick up that R&D activity and relocate it to the Washington region, or even Richmond or Norfolk, it would have a much larger impact.

        1. I wonder if this is up to the Universities instead of the state since money will be needed.

          why not have our own “triangle” of Blacksburg/Lynchburg?

          the thing is that Va wastes it’s Tobacco Commission money – in almost scandalous ways when the entire purpose of the money was to help revitalize the areas hurt by the loss of tobacco.

          What ever happened to the Northern Va Technology Council??

          oh yeah.. this:

          NVTC/CEA Leadership Series Featuring Gov. Chris Christie

          Co-hosted by Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)

          Date:
          May 1, 2015

          Time:
          7:00 – 8:00 a.m. Registration and Networking
          8:00 – 9:15 a.m. Program

          Join NVTC and co-host Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) on Friday, May 1 for the first event in the 2015-2016 NVTC/CEA Leadership Series featuring Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey, a potential presidential candidate. Christie was sworn in as Governor of New Jersey on Jan. 19, 2010, and re-elected to a second term on Nov. 5, 2013. – See more at:

          geeze – that’s embarrassing…

          We have the money – we lack the strategic vision and we waste the money we do have.

        2. Cville Resident Avatar
          Cville Resident

          I agree.

          I think Virginia Tech will have to be reckoned with sooner or later in terms of whether the state wants to use its universities as catalysts for greater economic development. You’re right, VT’s research park has a couple of thousand jobs….but I imagine if all of that $$$$ had been going to Mason where there is a highly educated workforce, you’d have seen 20,000 or so jobs due to the multiplier effect.

          At some point, I think the “dam will break.” Legislators in SWVA and Roanoke have fought like cats and dogs for VT for decades. But at what point will the Urban Crescent say, “Enough”? It’s just not wise to keep dumping $$$$ out there when those same $$$$ invested in Mason could lead to much greater ROI in terms of economic development.

          Virginia has a rough row to hoe when it comes to rural VA. South of 64 and west of Chesterfield has become, as Peter puts it, “Arkansas.” Outside of Liberty, Virginia Tech, and Advance Auto Corporate HQ, there’s very little in that part of the state in terms of economic development except for hospitals/health care. There are urban/rural/suburban divides in a lot of Southern states, but Virginia and Kentucky seem to have a much deeper problem than most states.

          1. I thought the History of the NC Research Triangle – pretty much shows
            that the state had a strategic plan and funded it…

            http://www.northcarolinahistory.org/commentary/342/entry

            I also think NC recognized the importance of education of it’s rural residents and affordable higher education – in that plan.

  4. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    A year or so ago SCHEV sponsored a seminar on research at the state universities, seeking some consensus on a plan to move Virginia into more of a leadership position. No one, to my recollection, suggested that letting UVA or any other school go private would make a difference. What would make a difference, but would be hard to achieve, would be an agreement that one particular university would become the centerpiece of the effort. Politics demands that whatever effort is made, the pie will be divided and many will get a taste. Cancer research seed money, for example, is divided between UVA and VCU – sometimes evenly. Perhaps this is just a price we pay for the decentralized system to which Virginia has become so attached. In North Carolina, the state system is unified.

    And of course money would make a difference, and it would take quite a bit. The political problem there is the payback would be slow.

    1. so – how did the other States build their research Universities?

      was it an initiative from their Gov or General Assembly or were there leaders at the Universities that carried that ball?

      or is Virginia just backward in all areas?

      I still think – using taxpayer money at the State level – to build a capability to compete for taxpayer money at the Federal Level – has a certain odd smell to it – especially given all the talk here lately about government spending.

      somewhere between those pesky “liberals” and the contemporary Tea Party – we may discover what role we really want Gov to play.

      And I wait with baited breath from the likes of the Thomas Jefferson Institute and the George Mason Mercatus Center THEIR free-market ideas of how to build a genuine “profit center” for the Universities.

      if you detect a certain cynicism in my words here – you are correct.

      I think our primary mission for higher ED is to produce employable tax-payers…. first and foremost .. to minimize those that have insufficient education to be self-supporting, pay their fair share of taxes – and not need entitlements – NOR govt tax breaks… where is that vision from Conservatives?

  5. John Wahoo Avatar
    John Wahoo

    Just wanted to comment on the photo used with this story … that’s a picture of the former location of PRA International, a for-profit clinical research organization that has a regional office in UVA’s North Fork Research Park. The UVA Real Estate Foundation is the landlord of the facility but UVA is not otherwise involved with the company in any way. Since this photo was taken PRA has moved its global headquarters to RTP in North Carolina, downsized its Charlottesville work force, and moved into a smaller building elsewhere in the research park.

  6. Cville Resident Avatar
    Cville Resident

    larryg,

    For whatever reason, I can’t reply to your post in the chain above. So here’s my reply about your “strategic plan” post:

    You’re absolutely correct.

    HOWEVER, as I posted, a strategic plan for Virginia, economic development, and research would almost assuredly decimate Virginia Tech. And SWVA and Roanoke legislators would howl.

    It would make the most sense to repurpose Mason as the state’s engineering school where you have the workforce to take advantage of commercial spinoffs as well as good infrastructure (airports, etc.).

    It would also make sense to have U.Va. and VCU combine their medical/biotech research efforts.

    1. Cville Resident – lots of things go through my mind on these issues – two of which are:

      1. – why are cities located where they are? what caused them to form where
      they are? Were any of them actually planned locationally?

      2. – same basic question for Universities. Remember – Va Tech is a Land Grant University:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_land-grant_universities

      I think the State would have to design a credible criteria – one that accrues points on the criteria … to demonstrate a level of objectivity.

      I also think – in terms of people – if Va did a better job of tending to the health care and education needs of it’s economically weak areas – it would quiet much of the discontent.

      the folks who actually run the Universities would no doubt – howl.

      but it also does not have to be a winner-take-all proposition now – in the days of the internet – you can have a physical location – and an online network – leveraging the best of each University.

      Finally – Virginia would have to offer real incentives to high-tech companies – and recognize that there is a failure rate – something the right is not very tolerant of these days – aka Solyndra, etc.

Leave a Reply