How to Empower Low-Income Communities in Virginia

Public housing project in Richmond.

by Stephen Jordan

There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to describing poverty in Virginia. Portsmouth, aka “Pistol City”, population 93,000, is six hours away from Galax, population 6,000. The housing projects of east and south Richmond are very different from the hollowed out small towns that dot Southside and coal country. Both urban and rural decay are powder kegs waiting to blow, but no one has seriously tackled them in Virginia politics for decades because the issues are so complex.

Conservatives are complicit in this problem because for too long they have allowed liberals to frame the debate and set policy. The result is that since 1964, more than 1,500 “low income apartment communities” have sprung up around the Commonwealth. They are hotbeds of drug abuse and violent crime. Rural Virginia has some of the largest concentrations of people over the age of 65, in part because young people can’t find enough good paying jobs. Democratic mayors, Democratic governors, and Democratic federal policy have predominantly shaped the current state of Virginia’s communities. It is a disgrace.

To start to develop solutions, we have to evaluate the roots of the problem. One of the things that you will notice walking around many housing projects is how isolated and in some cases, empty of outdoor life they are. They are badly designed, set away from services, and with no mixed-use opportunities for jobs close to home. If you can interview some of the residents and get to the point that they trust you, they’ll tell you there is nothing to do but sell some weed, play ball, and wait for something to change.

Another issue that’s terrible for the children is how chaotic living arrangements are. Mom might be strung out or in a clinic. Dad might be splitting time with 5-10 other baby mommas, your Aunt will give you a couch, but she’s dealing with five other kids, and Grandma is tired after commuting 45 minutes each way and working two jobs.

Everyone talks about how important access to the internet is for everything, but what if your community isn’t wired up? What if you don’t own a computer? You go to school and there are a lot of other kids in your same boat.

The lack of maintenance and clean-up is also noticeable. Why do so many people carry guns in urban poor areas? Because there are not enough police around to provide security, and when the police are around, they look at everyone like they are a criminal. Imagine 3-4 generations growing up in situations like this! Then, when you send people to prison, they join a gang for self-protection, and bring the prison culture back to the streets. It’s like poisoning a poisoned victim some more.

So what would a conservative anti-poverty agenda look like?

  1. Overhaul the public housing authority system and redesign urban poor communities to enable home ownership (taking a page from Margaret Thatcher); create jobs close to home; and improve groundskeeping, trash pick-up and other community services.
  2. Build up entrepreneurship and small business technical assistance. For example: One thing connecting many communities around the Hampton Roads area is the love of music. Many people dream of opening their own labels, getting their music out on social media. Other frequent go-to business ideas include health and wellness, fitness, personal care, retail, and restaurants and bars.
  3. Help rural communities and small towns get enhanced connectivity and access to broadband.
  4. Address the challenge of family structures head on. The current system incentivizes single-parent households. What if moms and dads had incentives to stay together? What if low-income care providers received an annual bonus or additional tax break if their children stay in school, get good grades, and stay out of trouble? What if funds attached to the children instead of to the adults?
  5. Connect businesses operating in low-income neighborhoods to large supply chains. In Virginia, large companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, the Port Authority, and many others are always looking to diversify their supply chains and bring them closer to their operations.
  6. Reimagine community policing. English Bobbies did not carry guns but they were successful anyway because they were present and seen as helpful. Currently, the lack of trust in police by many communities has been exacerbated by the national media and narratives aimed at stoking division. This has caused tremendous damage – discouraging people from joining the police and creating an “us versus them” mentality in too many places. Still, the police need to be more present, not less. Their their role and their presence needs to be re-framed and re-introduced.
  7. Ban drugs, increase drug treatment. One of the most asinine things the 2021 General Assembly did was open the door to legalize recreational marijuana. This may please young affluent youth, but more easily accessible drugs on the street will move folks down the road quicker toward harder and harder addictions. Over the past 50 years behavioral scientists have studied how much drugs and alcohol impair judgment – many folks on the streets have been literally dying to get off drugs that were introduced to them in many cases, before they were 10 years old. The opioid crisis in rural Virginia is a disaster. Instead of legalizing drugs, the General Assembly should move forcefully to adopt more drug education, interdiction, and treatment services.
  8. Increase mobile service units. Food trucks have helped to solve the problem of bringing food to people in food deserts. The Red Cross has long known the importance of bloodmobiles. Libraries, before everything went on line, used to be one of the great drivers of literacy with their bookmobiles. People in poorer areas often have longer commutes and more disruptions affecting their ability to travel. Instead of expecting folks to come to them, mobile units can help fill in some of the gaps that lower income, isolated, and vulnerable communities face.
  9. Empower school choice and distance learning tools for low income families. Children from households in the top quintile of income have an 80% chance of going to college. Children in the bottom quintile have a 17% chance. The average number of books in a low-income household is 43 and dropping. Lower income children likely to have only one choice of school and are locked into a system where there is no accountability for performance. Low-income children deserve equality of opportunity, whether alternative schools or via distance learning. If people are truly concerned about income inequality access to education is a critical issue. People with a college degree are likely to make $2 million MORE over the course of their lives than someone with just a high school degree or less.

Virginia needs to model a new approach to community development because current approaches are not working. Virginia is worse off today in terms of the War on Poverty than when Lyndon Johnson declared it sixty years ago. The current situation is fuel for resentment, rage, fear, crime, despair, unemployment, and hopelessness. Liberals have failed. Can conservatives do better?

Stephen Jordan is a member of the Kitchen Table Study Group, an initiative of the Virginia Legacy Forum.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “How to Empower Low-Income Communities in Virginia”

  1. Lots of interesting ideas here, Stephen. Perhaps we can do them all, but some are more important than others. The most important (and hardest to tackle) is addressing the problem of single-parent households in low-income neighborhoods. That is a “root” cause, but, given modern-day values, I don’t know how you address it.

    Next on the list would be dismantling the public housing system. Public housing projects are incubators of social dysfunction.

    Third on the list is reforming public schools or, failing that, empowering poor families to escape failing school systems.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      If single-parenting is the root cause to poverty, then clearly as the rate of single-parenting has dramatically increased in the US from say the 1950s to today the poverty rate in America has also dramtically risen. Is that what has happened?

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/95516381a75bbf269d47aa0a5e4e5fd821e1ea68414c0a4ee145a687d7df65e1.jpg

    2. SC Jordan Avatar
      SC Jordan

      Good points.

    3. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      When you say “failing school systems”, do you see them the same way you would a “public housing project” – where BOTH group large numbers of low-income together ?

      If you disperse low income people – does that mean they will still attend schools that are primarily high percentage low-income?

      1. SC Jordan Avatar
        SC Jordan

        I actually have a different take on this. This is a little bit of a radical idea, but I think that it might be worth it to go to a hybrid model of governance. You know how there are interstate highways, state roads, city roads, etc.? Why not have the state responsible for core “life prep” courses through K-12 – STEM, personal finance/home ec, skills-training – it could “rent” space in the K-12 schools, and thereby be able to offer incentives for the best teachers across the state to work with the students who need it the most. Then the local districts could focus on whatever they believe needs to be taught to equip their kids as well – maybe arts, humanities, civics, languages, etc. I think the state life-prep idea would lend itself to a lot of public-private partnerships as well, and it would align teacher incentives with equality of opportunity objectives. The idea of dispersing students is not something done top-down. It should be the choice of students – maybe they see a cool teacher they want to learn from, better facilities, etc. It fosters an incentive for schools to continuously improve themselves while keeping costs down.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          so the state responsible for K-12 state wide?

          1. SC Jordan Avatar
            SC Jordan

            More like a partnership

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            How would K-3 work? Basic reading, writing, and arithmetic…

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Most all of these suggested things cost money and typically the Dems will get behind the funding to do them and typically the GOP will oppose.

    Things like Medicaid, pre-K schooling, child care for working parents, etc are perennial proposals that often and usually the GOP will oppose.

    The one-parent thing is not really near as relevant as the things that will enable the single parent to make a decent living and care for their kids just as well-educated single parents after separation and divorce do.

    Tarring the low-income people for “single-parent” as if there is some moral issue different from well-educated, higher-income single parents is choosing to miss the point IMHO.

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    If you want to “ban drugs” then you should start with alcohol. Unlike marijuana, people do overdose on alcohol and die.

    Studies have found that people in low income communities tend to drink very little or a lot.

    “There was a lot more variation in how much people drank if they had lower incomes, with some drinking heavily and others drinking not at all, the researchers found. By contrast, people with higher incomes were more likely to drink, but also more apt to moderate their drinking.”

    Meanwhile, the CDC says that 1 in 3 Americans drink too much. At the same time it is estimated that 12% of Americans regularly use marijuana. So, a third of Americans drink too much while only 12% smoke pot.

    Yet pot is the problem.

    Why is it that social conservatives love to rail against marijuana when, by almost any measure, alcohol is a far worse and more abused drug? Ask them and they’ll tell you that the prohibition on alcohol didn’t work. Hmmmm …

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/03/17/393554628/income-affects-how-genes-play-a-role-in-drinking-problems

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      Besides that, prohibitions on drugs drive much of the violence in these communities. Folks who trade in drugs cannot rely upon the rule of law to enforce contracts or deal with disputes in their trade. They must rely upon violence.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Interesting view, Matt. I’m trying to understand the connection between banning or not – and violence.

        Do bans on drugs engender violence?

        1. Matt Hurt Avatar
          Matt Hurt

          Well, if I am involved in a legal business, the rule of law provides peaceful, legal redress for transgressions. If I’m selling pot or any other illegal substances, and someone tries to rob my inventory, shall I call the police?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Well I sorta get that.. but folks that sell a range of illicit stuff – will still do that… and we still have things like fentanyl and opioids… Looks like just one item of the product line is affected, no?

          2. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            Yes sir. I assume that simply legalizing pot might not make a dent in this problem. I’m just saying as long as there is the illicit trade, the traders won’t have legal recourse and will have to rely on firearms to settle their disputes.

            The problem is that the war on drugs hasn’t limited a single individual from getting anything they’d like. Meanwhile, folks are dying because of it. The police are responsible for a small portion of this body count. The great majority of the deaths I believe could be avoided if these folks could rely on the rule of law rather than taking matters into their own hands.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I agree. Is this a problem specifically with low income communities more so than wider communities. And if so, why is it more a problem in the low income communities? Is it because of economic circumstances?

          4. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            That is an excellent question, and I would assume so. When folks have better things to do, they usually don’t mess with such stuff. I suspect lack of other opportunities make such endeavors more appealing.

      2. Yes. If someone breaks into a house and steals a half a kilo of heroin, the owner is not going to call 911.

    2. SC Jordan Avatar
      SC Jordan

      Is that what you picked up from this? You, Matt Hurt and Larry the G really need to see if you can connect with a community organization or church – of course the issue isn’t just pot, it’s substance abuse period. Until you’ve heard with your own ears kids talking about their family’s “multigenerational engagement with the judiciary system” or the aunt or grandma talking about how hard it is to help their nephew or grandson since his mom is back in jail or on rehab, you don’t know what you are talking about. You need to get out and really see it. It’s tough.

      What the chart about falling poverty compared to single families doesn’t show is the decline in income mobility. Yes poverty rates have declined due to US ever-increasing productivity, but if you check out Brookings metropolitan program and other students of this, they highlight declining income mobility as a huge issue. People get trapped.

      Being poor is tough. The idea of welfare queens or drug lords being around a lot is a myth – maybe 1% of 1% – tack on being a single mom at the ages between 15-25, what do you think child care is going to look like? No one blames them for trying their best, it’s just that the problems would overwhelm any single parent except maybe Murphy Brown.

      There are a lot of stereotypes and myths out there that can be backed up by some stat or other, but you have to really see it to get it.

      I don’t think drugs is the core problem, substance abuse is how folks are trying to escape from the problem, and it is so destructive and sets them back even further.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: ” I don’t think drugs is the core problem, substance abuse is how folks are trying to escape from the problem, and it is so destructive and sets them back even further.”

        Yes. We get distracted from the core issue when we go off on pot or opioids , even prescription drugs. It’s all the same issue which is what is causing people to escape with whatever substance they choose..?

  4. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    All you have to do in the inner city is get rid of white supremacists/ Republicans, legalize pot, and stop enforcing anything short of murder…
    Baltimore has taught me that. It is soon to become a Utopia.

  5. Publius Avatar

    Ban drugs? Yep, solved. Like banning guns and no more dead…
    Jim Bacon is right about the prime cause – single parent, otherwise known as illegitimacy or to go more old school bastardy. Out of “compassion” paying girls to have babies (and relieving the sperm donor fathers of parental responsibility) is the single biggest factor in all of the other disfunctions – crime, poverty, drugs, alcohol, schools…
    Add in tragedy of the commons for “public” housing…
    Add in the job security for the “professionals” and the Dems’ treating the residents as vote farms and you have a perfect recipe for almost impossible to escape horrible living conditions on a generational basis.
    The entire public housing apparatus needs to be demolished. Private charity would do better and did until the Feds decided to “help.” (Hmmm…what has happened to the cost and quality of education with govt “help?”

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Except for the provision about legalizing marijuana, I agree with all the proposals, if not many of the conclusions about their causes. Now, let’s see a conservative gubernatorial candidate run on this platform.

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    This was a good read with some practical solutions. I recently read about Chicago. In the past 20 years Southside Chicago demolished thousands of units of public housing. For the obvious reasons. Havens of crime and poverty. But did it make things better? The study I read said no. The displaced residents were spread around the city of Chicago and now neighborhoods that never had problems are full of problems.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      So they can’t be in projects (I agree) but if we disperse them, that don’t work either?

      what next?

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        That seems to be the case for Chicago. I don’t know what will work Mr. Larry. I do think building up social institutions can put a dent in this. Schools, churches, YMCA, Boys and Girls Club, Salvation Army, Community Crime Watches, etc.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Well, black folks seem to be very strong on Church. Always have been.

          The other things take money.

          Did you every know of Doris Buffet?

          https://fredericksburg.com/news/local/photos-philanthropist-doris-buffet-the-sunshine-lady-in-pictures/collection_b908c57b-df98-5a58-b9e9-3154ce796c33.html#10

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Every church I know takes money…..some even keep it.

          2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Yes Mr. Larry. My mother’s business on Caroline Street, Commonwealth Lighting of Virginia did the lighting for a remodel of her home. I helped my cousin Rich deliver the fixtures many years back. She was a first class lady and we chowed on some homemade chicken salad sandwiches made for us. I did not know until years later the connection to the big cheeze Mr. Warren.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I’m not sure how it came to be exactly, but Mr. Buffet was a major big-cheese in BH Media which bought the Free Lance Star from some equity investors who had a reputation for dismembering what they bought for as much cash as they could get.

            BH Media went on to buy a bunch of newspapers in Virginia but somehow Ms. Buffet settled in Fredericksburg and did quite a bit of philanthropy for low income and such AND she pushed the local government to take more responsibility in services and infrastructure for those communities.

            She was a leader not a follower.

Leave a Reply