How to Distort the Most Contentious Issue of Our Time

Source: Wason Center for Civic Leadership

by James A. Bacon

Well, you’ve got to give Virginia Democrats credit: they have succeeded in persuading the public to accept their misrepresentation of Governor Glenn Youngkin’s campaign against “inherently divisive concepts” in public schools as a move to ban teaching the history of slavery, segregation and racism. A poll from Christopher Newport University’s Wason Center shows that 63% of Virginia voters support “teaching how racism continues to impact American society today” and 57% oppose a ban on the teaching of Critical Race Theory.

“While Critical Race Theory is currently not specifically taught in K-12 public schools in the state, the topic gained political traction during the 2021 gubernatorial campaign and Governor Youngkin signed an executive order banning its teaching on his first day in office,” said a Wason Center press release in providing context for the poll results.

The Wason Center statement is a fair description of how Youngkin’s policies are presented by Democrats, and may be a fair reflection of how they are understood by the public. But the polling questions are based on premises that are flat-out wrong.

The implication of the Wason Center questionnaire — and of stunts by Democratic Party lawmakers offering amendments in support of things they want taught in public schools, such as the history of Jim Crow, segregation, and the “Lost Cause” of the Confederacy (see Steve Haner’s “Ten Things Democrats Want Taught in Schools“) — is that someone somewhere actually proposes banning slavery, segregation and racism from the teaching of history.

Youngkin did not “ban” the teaching of “Critical Race Theory” in his executive order, as Wason says outright, much less ban the teaching of racism, as it implies by posing the question.

The executive order ends “the use of” what it terms “inherently divisive concepts, including critical race theory.” But it says nothing about ending the teaching of those concepts. Rather, the executive order seeks to reverse policies implemented by previous administrations. Specifically, the order directs the following:

“The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall review all policies within the Department of Education to identify those that promote inherently divisive concepts. Such policies shall be ended.” Policies shall be ended.

“The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall immediately review all guidelines, websites, best practices and other material produced by the Department of Education…” The focus here is on VDOE policies and communications.

“Executive employees shall be prohibited from directing or otherwise compelling students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to inherently divisive concepts.” Two points here: Youngkin is talking about “executive employees,” or administrators here, not teachers. And he’s upholding the rights of students to maintain freedom of conscience, not be compelled to express adherence to social-justice ideologies.

“The superintendent of Public Instruction shall review the Department of Education’s Cultural Competency Training to determine if it or any portion promotes inherently divisive concepts, and take action consistent with the laws of Virginia to modify such training….” Cultural Competency Training is directed toward teachers, not students. Such training may vary from school district to school district, but in many instances it is informed by “woke” ideological assumptions of “systemic racism,” “White privilege,” and “White oppression.”

The Executive Order is very clear about it’s concerns: inherently divisive concepts are those which “instruct” students to view life only through the lens of race and “presumes that some students are consciously or unconsciously racist, sexist, or oppressive, and that other students are victims.”

The intent of reviewing Cultural Competency Training is to ensure that “teachers and schools are prepared to engage students on important civics and historical issues in a fair and unbiased manner without imposing their own personal beliefs.” Once again, the goal here is to protect students from indoctrination.

There is nothing in here — N-O-T-H-I-N-G — that would ban the teaching of the unsavory aspects of Virginia history along with the uplifting aspects of it. Any insinuation to the contrary is a grotesque lie. Let me spell that out, too: L-I-E.

The legislative companion to Youngkin’s executive order, HB 787, submitted by Delegate Dave LaRock, R-Loudoun, and two co-sponsors, illuminates what Youngkin means by inherently divisive concepts. The bill would prohibit teaching that (and I quote directly):

(i) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex;

(ii) the Commonwealth or the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist;

(iii) an individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously;

(iv) an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of the individual’s race or sex;

(v) an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by the individual’s race or sex;

(vi) an individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex;

(vii) an individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of the individual’s race or sex; or

(viii) meritocracy or traits, such as a hard work ethic, are racist or sexist or were created by a particular race to oppress another race.

(Read the full text here.)

One can quibble with the wording. One cannot say — not without lying through their teeth — that the bill would ban teaching how racism impacts American society.

Here’s an idea. Why doesn’t Wason conduct a poll and ask Virginians to respond to the specific concepts that LaRock et al. propose banning. “Would you agree or disagree that the following concepts should be taught in public schools?”:

  • one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex;
  • the Commonwealth and the United States are fundamentally racist; etc.

I’d like to see those results.

What are the odds Wason will ever poll the questions? About the same that Virginia’s establishment media will ever report the issues fully and honestly.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

50 responses to “How to Distort the Most Contentious Issue of Our Time”

  1. George  Walton Avatar
    George Walton

    Does anyone really believe that those of us taught in Virginia public schools as much as 60 years ago were not taught that slavery was not a horrible blight on our history?

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Yes. We’ve had someone say that in the VP. Flat out.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Did you happen to teach that for nearly 60 years more money was made in Virginia breeding and selling humans than tobacco or any other crop?

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      With the double negatives, I am not sure what you are asking. Yes, the textbooks I had a little over 60 years ago taught me that slaves were generally happy and everything was fine in antebellum Virginia.

      1. George  Walton Avatar
        George Walton

        Then I guess it might have depended on the individual teacher(s). I was certainly taught that slavery was inhumane.

        1. vicnicholls Avatar
          vicnicholls

          more like the physical, psychological and emotion abuse. Small things: weren’t given enough food. Beatings for simple disagreements or none at all. When a master said lay down, you had to lay down. I have no clue where these people were but we did not get the same education.

          1. George  Walton Avatar
            George Walton

            Well of course, recount all the atrocities for the kindergarteners to insure that racial animosities are fully enflamed as these kids are surely responsible for what white people(maybe not even their ancestors) did over 150 years ago.

          2. vicnicholls Avatar
            vicnicholls

            Not for K5 but when you get older a more full explanation of not just slavery is bad, but building on those blocks how people used to treat other people. Religiously, owning another human being is not right. The reason why the Bible indicated that masters’ would be responsible, many miss.

    4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      What did they teach you about Plessy v. Ferguson? That is the real question, I’d say…

    5. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The “accepted” premise is that Virginia’s entire educational structure 60 years ago was steeped in the Lost Cause, taught that slaves loved their status, the South was justified in seeking secession, and the Civil Rights movement was a Soviet front. I didn’t get those lectures either, but we simply must have slept through them.

      Hm, 1962, 2nd grade in Christiansburg. I vividly remember asking why black kids didn’t go to my school and rode different buses. I’d been in integrated AF base schools. My mother told me and held nothing back. After the dependent ban was lifted, we joined Dad overseas and I was back in integrated schools.

    6. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Did you happen to teach that for nearly 60 years more money was made in Virginia breeding and selling humans than tobacco or any other crop?

      A page from the book you used…
      https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/richmond.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/4b/f4bc07b7-c174-5aa8-b2aa-5a340d42ff04/5ae07d70b0756.image.jpg?resize=343%2C500

      1. George  Walton Avatar
        George Walton

        Don’t recall those details but taught that slaves were treated as chattels and sold at auction..

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          That’s because they didn’t teach such details. They taught the “Happy Negro” version.

      2. I have a complete copy of that text book in my library at home. It has an, uh…. …interesting take on slavery.

        My 4th grade Virginia History and Geography class (1973/74) in Va. Beach Public Schools used the text, but I think it had been replaced five years later when my younger brother was in grade 4.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          I moved here in 7th and they did teach Va history but I doubt from that book.

  2. This same poll found that less than half of the respondents approve of Youngkin’s job performance so far.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      One point higher than Biden, 41 vs 40. 🙂 What the poll showed on questions where they revealed the crosstabs was a strong partisan polarization. Strong.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yes, but Mississippi had a vote on Biden

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        oh you think they’re gonna get better for Youngkin after folks realize he’s been misunderstood?

        😉

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      well, heckfire, what do you expect from a “grotesquely worded poll” designed by a bunch of leftists?

      Somehow JAB and fellow conservatives don’t seem to understand what percentage of voters in Virginia are “progressive”. When that reality is “confronted” it becomes the fault of the media and other assorted leftists making up bogus polls.

      Here’s the short version: “teachers better be careful what they teach about slavery, Jim Crow, etc because if they are “misinterpreted”, they may well be “reported” on the tip line.

      Self-inflicted wounds are not the fault of Youngkin but the left!

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        JAB and fellow conservatives don’t seem to understand what percentage of voters in Virginia are “progressive”.

        Some Democrats would argue with that.

        https://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/Democrats-are-engaged-in-a-new-politics-of-16935734.php

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          don’t have to argue it – Virginia is solid purple and tends blue especially in Nova and other urbanized areas.

          But yes, the Dems are in deep doo doo with Biden and the “too far left” Dems, and pandemic-related issues about schools and such.

          But I can only imagine what the situation with Russia and the Ukraine would be today if Trump were POTUS.

          thank gawd for small things..

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        You may have a point. The response to cancel culture may be counter cancel culture. Two wrongs seeking a right — unsuccessfully. Just another sign of the rot, I fear. (But the question bias inserted by the word underfunded is classic, classroom example stuff.)

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          HA! The GOP spends all this money on think tanks and anonymously funded front groups and PACs and they can’t do a proper rebuttal poll so they have to whine about polls they don’t like?

          You’d think these yahoos could do their own polls, no?

          And we know why they don’t – they’d NOT like the answers even when they write the questions!

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Start by calling it “the most”.

  4. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    The fact that CRT was not defined makes the answers meaningless. There are a number of interpretations that range from benign to offensive. As one person has stated, CRT has been weaponized. And, it has been conflated with the NYT 1619 project. First, let’s get our history factually correct. There is a lot in our history to be ashamed of in addition to the treatment of blacks. What we did to the Indians in settling the west was morally bankrupt as was the interment of Japanese during WWII.
    We are a work in progress with still a long way to go. As Martin Luther King said the “long arc of history bends toward justice.”

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Yep – and here is a fair and accurate history that if taught would get the teachers reported on the tip line:

      https://zinnedproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2003/05/peopleshistory_audio.jpg

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Praised by NYT and read by a Hollywood nitwit. Yeah, that’s all the endorsement I need!

        To your earlier point Larry, we ran a small poll and the results were shared with Bacon’s Rebellion. And there are parts of this Wason poll it rebuts nicely, meaning the energy/climate questions. But you dismiss it as you do everything so I waste no more time arguing with you…

        1. Matt Adams Avatar

          When someone cites Zinn as a historian is there really any point to engage them at all. It’s does nothing more than indicate they will believe anything they are told by the “right” people.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Ban it then, Haner? Should I buy a copy for the burning Youngkin will be sponsoring?

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            I have never advocated banning a book.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Just gibing you… I’m sure you haven’t…

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Yes, that would be the bridge beyond judging it by who praises it.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar

          It becomes clear with many polls who is giving the poll and their reputation for giving polls over the years. I do dismiss polls that are obviously taken by advocacy groups of any stripe. And you do too and should but ya’ll have this habit of just flat disagreeing with folks taking polls when they don’t agree with your view! There ought not be any surprise that a substantial number of people know EXACTLY what Conservatives are really up to over CRT and “history’. It’s not the “wording” of the polls. It’s the simple fact that many if not most simply do not agree with ya’lls view on race. Ya’ll are becoming dinosaurs to the young and people of color.

        4. LarrytheG Avatar

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_People%27s_History_of_the_United_States

          It’s the kind of book that challenges conventional thinking. Don’t have to agree with but it certaintly points up a lot of actual history that has been ignored by the folks with rose-colored historical glasses.

          The point of such history is not to shame us but to help us understand the good, bad and ugly of our history – something Conservatives say they want but then they don’t….. It’s like “Tell me the truth” and then after hearing it – attack the messenger; – “I hate you leftists”!

      2. Do you care to explain how someone, anyone, could write a “fair and accurate” history of the United States (Highlights from the Twentieth Century) while making no mention whatsoever of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th, 12th, 18th and 20th through 27th amendments to the U.S. Constitution?

  5. tmtfairfax Avatar

    A poll by a university. Given the bias built into universities and colleges based on their open bias against conservatives, why would anyone expect a fair poll?

    Here come the deniers. There’s no bias against conservatives. And Brandon is doing a good job on the economy and immigration.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yes, they’re biased. The less than 600 combined SAT scores aren’t represented. They could fix this by including some Trump voters.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Well, ANY poll that contradicts some folks views are “biased” and that seems to be the problem with folks who say they are “conservative” these days.

        But it IS curious that conservatives and conservative media and even conservative think tanks and institutions don’t seem to be that interested in knowing how folks other than Conservatives feel about issues, especially if it’s a bunch of them!

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Well, trudat. But in his particular case, I cite the very reason.

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Another lesson in question bias. The poll gave respondents two choices on what to do with state surplus funds: “Sending the surplus money back to Virginia citizens in the form of tax cuts or tax rebates” or “Spending the money on underfunded government services like education, public safety, and social services.” Underfunded. That is an opinion, and a loaded word which I am sure pulled positive responses like a flower draws bees.

    Why, mother, it is underfunded! We can’t take any tax cuts when government services are underfunded! Shameless question bias.

    Both House and Senate budgets do both, of course, cut taxes and boost spending, but in different proportions. This poll question will be used against the House’s version like a cudgel (even though 38 percent still wanted tax cuts despite government being “underfunded.”)

    And Jim, the key question bias in the examples you cite are how the first question biased the responses on the second. The poll has other examples of how to write the questions to get the answers you seek.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I agree with you that the word “underfunded” should not have been included.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I saw that as delineating the difference between normal funding of services and the funding of services that are in need of additional funding – really totally consistent with Youngkins view that K-12 is in need of additional funding.

        The fact that the same respondents were IN FAVOR of cutting the grocery tax is an indication that respondents DID recognize the issues, IMHO.

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “There is nothing in here — N-O-T-H-I-N-G — that would ban the teaching of the unsavory aspects of Virginia history along with the uplifting aspects of it. Any insinuation to the contrary is a grotesque lie. Let me spell that out, too. L-I-E.”

    Which is why the proposed amendments explicitly allowing the teaching of those unsavory aspects of Virginia history passed so easily with VaGOP support…. wait… nevermind…

    The proof is in the pudding, JAB.

    1. CRT has been weaponized and misconstrued so much that it has no meaning to the majority of people. These actions by Youngkin and the Republicans are solutions in search of a problem and merely playing to their base.

    2. Just be sure to put ‘Democratic Party supported/promoted initiative’ in front of most of those issues….. we want to be completely truthful in these matters….

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Oh, yes!! We should indeed teach that slavery, Jim Crow, Lost Cause, etc were supported by the Democratic Party (well, they were also supported by white Southern Republicans as well – there were just fewer of them in those days). We should then teach the passage of Civil Rights legislation, the Southern Strategy and the realignment of the main political parties in the south. It will help the children to understand why it is now Republicans who wish to preserve the Jim Crow era memorials to the Confederacy and Dems who seek to remove them.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Red Summer, Massive Resistance, schools and roads named for racists and segregationists, separate bathrooms, facilities, restaurants, motels, etc.

          The whole 9 yards….

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Not just using them for props at school board meetings anymore…
    https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/utah-shooting-mcdonalds-4-year-old-police/

  9. LarrytheG Avatar

    I note the Va Senate also had a discussion about “underfunded services” vs tax cuts.

    In addition, while JAB and Haner claim the poll is biased, but neither of them acknowledged the poll response to ending the grocery tax which was widely supported. So many of the SAME folks likely also supported funding for services over tax cuts.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2915570a0c42946f22a3eb28f4ca9155b6195972a7b5ede1856381d58b02f9c5.jpg

    I would posit that “bias” is really a hallmark of BR at times and is on par with and exceeds the media and institutional bias it incessantly complains about!

Leave a Reply