How the Best Teachers Help At-Risk Students Succeed

This is third in a series of articles about Virginia’s Standards of Learning assessments.by Matt HurtTeachers play a central role in the education of our students. Therefore, it is important to identify the characteristics of effective teachers, especially those who demonstrate success at educating at-risk students.Prior to the COVID epidemic, the Comprehensive Instructional Program (CIP), an independent consortium of mostly rural school systems, held fall meetings in which teachers shared resources and strategies, vented to peers, cried on each other’s shoulders, and generally supported one another. While some detractors believe that teaching is a pie job, nothing can be further from the truth. If teaching were easy, there would be no teacher shortage. Education is a people business, and people are messy. Teachers must effectively deal with problems their students bring into class before they can make sure their students attain the required skills. They must also deal with a host of organizational and school culture problems.In these fall meetings, the teachers most successful at helping at-risk students, whether those who had disabilities or were economically disadvantaged, were called out in front of the group and asked how they helped their kids pass the SOLs.  In every instance, they would relate three things in common — curriculum alignment, relationships, and expectations.First, the most successful teachers make sure to align instruction exactly with Virginia’s SOLs.  The Virginia Curriculum Frameworks, produced by the Virginia Department of Education, break down the Standards of Learning into the specific components that students are expected to master. The vast majority of textbooks are not 100% aligned to the standards, so teachers do not rely upon them exclusively. They make their own resources, buy them from other teachers online, and borrow them from colleagues. Basically, they curate an eclectic mix of materials to meet the needs of specific students.Second, many of our at-risk students are not motivated by grades. Typically, their parents didn’t have a good experience in school, performed poorly, and expected no differently of their children. Effective teachers of at-risk students understand this. They know that even poorly performing students can be motivated by positive adult relations, and work to cultivate those relationships. A student might sleep or act up in the class of a teacher who not made an emotional investment, but will be attentive and responsive to the teacher who has demonstrated a genuine concern.  The most successful teachers even persuade students that they care about their families. In many instances, families lack the capacity to help students at home, but they if they trust the teacher, they do not object when extra remediation is called for outside of class.Third, the most successful teachers set high expectations for their students. At one of our fall meetings, a teacher was asked to define her idea of high expectations. She relayed that she expected the academically weakest student in her class to score at least 400 (passing) on her SOL test, that it was her job to make sure that happened, and it didn’t matter what label the student had, or on which side of the railroad tracks the student lived.Successful teachers share this mindset, and as soon as a student demonstrates that he/she is unlikely to be successful, they provide extra help outside of class, often during a planning period. They don’t wait until the end of the year, or even the end of the quarter. They do this as soon as they see a student who needs that help — sometimes as early as August.After a few years of the CIP fall meetings of successful teachers sharing their stories, many teachers joined their “Amen corner.” Inspired, these spread the effective practices around. In that way, teachers became major contributors to the successes enjoyed by Virginia’s educational Region VII in Southwest Virginia, as conveyed in the previous article, Poverty Not Destiny for Educational Performance

, in this series.

Matt Hurt is director of the Comprehensive Instructional Program based in Wise.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “How the Best Teachers Help At-Risk Students Succeed”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Once again, thank you!

    I have an observation you and others may or may not agree with and that is that one thing CIP is – is setting standards to be followed by teachers who have at-risk/Economically disadvantaged kids to teach.

    In other words, the practices and methods that successful teachers use are documented and formalized as guidelines for others to use.

    Is that wrong or right or mostly wrong or mostly right?

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    These are good common sense approaches. I don’t particularly like “curriculum alignment”-it is essestially “teaching to the test”—but I understand why it is necessary. The most important Is not lowering expectations. Kids respond to what is expected.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      seems to me if you don’t teach to the test, you are teaching to some other goal and it differs by teacher.

      That pretty much does away with any concept of standardized curriculum and standardized academic performance accountability.

      IMHO.

      That was the essence of No Child Left Behind – to require standardized academic benchmarks and accountability.

      We take that away and we have no idea what level of academic achievement is being attained.

    2. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      I beg to differ. Curriculum alignment is not teaching to the test, although many will claim this. For example, the Standards of Learning in English and Math contain a sequence of skills that span from Kindergarten through 12th grade. These skills are sequential, and build upon each other in complexity from year to year. Curriculum alignment, at least in my definition of the word, means that teachers in each grade level ensure their student go to the next with the prerequisite skills they need to be successful.

      I liken this to an assembly line, although some might think the analogy cheapens the process- it’s the only way my feeble mind can convey the thought. Henry Ford didn’t tell his workers on the line- “Hey guys, you all just do what you feel is necessary. Everything will turn out peachy in the end.” He gave them a set of specifications at each station to make sure that the Model T’s that rolled off the line would be able to roll off the factory grounds under their own power. Our continuum of skills contains in our Standards is kind of like that- if we want kids to have specific literacy and numeracy skills by the time they graduate, each grade level has to have a set of expectations to work towards.

      Besides, teaching to the test would be providing the students the reading passage from the test, and working with them on that passage all week long prior to the test. If a teacher did this with the SOL test, the BOE could have their teaching license revoked. Then they could go and get an easier job that paid significantly better.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        John Dewey was inspired by the assembly lines of Industrial America. Great series. Man teachers are like soldiers now. Fighting for each other since no one else will.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I appreciate what you are saying. And, I misunderstood your point about curriculum alignment. No textbook covers all the standards; therefore, teachers have to figure out ways to supplement the textbooks.

        I understand the need for having a baseline of the skills and information we want to kids to have mastered at certain stages. And I understand the need to have some way of measuring the extent to which they have mastered those skills and information. Measuring ensures some level of accountability for teachers and school systems and ensures that kids are taught what they need to succeed in life. That’s the theory, at least.

        But, it seems that the SOLs have taken on a life of their own. Achieving a SOL passage rate has become an end unto itself–not the learning of skills and information. Because I don’t have any children or grandchildren in public school, I don’t have direct contact with the schools. But there are anecdotes of classes spending a large part of the spring “preparing” for the SOLs. And then there is the lament of parents, including a Secretary of Education whom I knew, about students spending the last few weeks in school, after the SOLs were finished, essentially just marking time.

        There is one blog or website that provides a “Virginia Educators’ Ultimate Guide to Prepare for SOL Testing.” Nowhere in that guide is there advice on how to effectively teach the material. https://music.amazon.com/lp/freemusic/ref=dmm_acq_mrn_d_br_z_QTX1vliT-dc_c_71193543487261

        The whole SOL system engenders a great deal of stress for teachers and students.

        I don’t know what the answer is. Maybe we should just give students a list of test questions before hand. One of my most vivid memories of college is George Grayson, a W&M professor of comparative politics with an emphasis on Latin America, giving us a list of 9-10 questions about a week prior to the final exam and telling us that the exam would consist of three of those questions. It might sound like he was making it easy until you realized that those questions covered the gamut of his course. As I walked into the room the day of the exam, some wag had written on the board the odds of guessing exactly which three questions would be on the test.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I’d see this in an entirely different way.

          If we did not have the SOLs and instead we had the subjective classroom grading instead, what would we know?

          That’s exactly what caused the No Child Left Behind law to be passed by a large bi-paritsan majority.

          Before NCLB (which required the SOL standardized testing on a per state basis), we really had no way to judge the effectiveness of our K-12 education systems.

          What would you do instead, get rid of NCLB and SOLs?

        2. Matt Hurt Avatar
          Matt Hurt

          Here’s the problem in a nutshell. We still have some SOL tests, particularly the history SOL tests (and science to a lesser degree), that still assess students’ ability to absorb and then regurgitate discrete facts. There are very few if any real skills measured on those tests. These facts are found in the history curriculum frameworks, and the SOL test questions come directly from there. The Board of Education has tried for years to shift from these useless tests in history to much more valuable performance based assessments, which actually better measure student understanding of the content. However, the General Assembly has not gone along with this plan, based on comments I have read, because they want our students to learn their history, and if they don’t take an SOL test, they won’t. The SOL tests in history doesn’t measure the most important things with which we want kids to walk out of the class. The way you get kids to be successful on the history SOL tests is the dreaded kill and drill that has given ALL SOL tests a bad name.

          I still argue that this view of SOL testing is not valid on the reading or math SOL tests. Can these tests be improved, certainly. Are there any skills tested that we would not want our own students to master, not a chance.

          I have seen so many instances in which teachers and administrators poo-poo the SOL tests because they don’t believe their kids can be successful, and they aren’t. That not only affects them in the elementary and middle grades, but reduces their opportunities in high school and post secondary life.

          Denigrating the reading and math SOL tests in general serves no purpose than to lower expectations for our most needy students, IMHO. This is at least the unintended negative consequence of doing so. Criticize it for improvement purposes is fine, but we need some type of measure to make sure our students are progressing, or they won’t.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I think Matt is dead on. “tests” to regurgitate info from memory are not near as important as tests to measure skills and critical thinking – the things all kids will need when they become adults and have to become employed and provide for themselves.

            “Teaching to the Test” -criticism is also wrongheaded IMHO.

            For instance, what does “Board Certified” mean for a Doctor or other health care provider?

            Airilne pilot? bridge builder? x-ray tech?

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    So when educators like Mr. Hurtt and others comment here that low SOL, low academic performance and achievement is related to “low expectations” , it seems to be shorthand for inappropriate/wrong grading practices that are in conflict with SOL “expectations”.

    And, in fact, in those schools where there are poor SOL scores, they are actually NOT “teaching to that test” and a real question might be what exactly are they teaching – to what goal or standard.

    And more than that , why do schools and school districts allow this kind of grading practices beginning with especially when they know that when the SOLs are finally given, those proverbial chickens will come hone to roost?

    So, when I look at Richmond or Lynchburg schools or even some schools in Fairfax and Henrico (where JAB lives) – and their horrible SOLs – it goes back to the se aberrant classroom grading practices that the principals and district administrators surely are aware of?

    So forget CRT and masks and “woke” and all that other culture war ignorance and ROT – how can Region 7 effectively deal with this issue and other regions cannot?

  4. Rafaelo Avatar

    Kudos to teachers, always and everywhere. I found my 4th grade teacher in retirement and thanked her. I recommend this.

    BUT a Pennsylvania public middle school teacher friend tells me 90% of her time has to be spent on 10% of the students. The lowest 10%.

    This article confirms ‘at-risk’ students need a lot of attention, committed teachers giving up their free time. The article does not address the consequent teacher burn-out.

    Charlottesville Mayor Nikuyah Walker said Monday (apropos spending $75 million to fix dilapidated middle schools) “if parents hadn’t been sending their kids to private school for middle school rather than Buford [middle school], the state of the … buildings would have been addressed sooner.”

    There is truth to that– those who can afford it end their kids to private school.

    Likewise I know a minister — no right wing fanatic — who moved out of Charlottesville because he could not afford private school. Otherwise his kids would be going to public school.

    Could it be that public school teachers having to spend 90% of their time on 10% of the students is the reason? How do you fix that problem?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      so what is the downside of abandoning the “at risk” kids because they are “too expensive” and burn out teachers?

      “at risk” kids are like crime and traffic congestion and poverty. No, we will NEVER … FIX it but that’s not at all like saying there is no use spending resources on reducing it.

      We need LESS binary thinking and MORE accepting realities and getting on with doing what has to be done – in more and better and more efficient and effective ways.

      I have to ask – why do we do so badly at this when almost all other industrialized countries on planet earth do better without “burning out” teachers , etc…???

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Look at the methods and results of Success Academies for your answers.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I have. And they don’t do near as good when you get a more complete look at their data.

          Read this:

          What do we really know about Eva Moskowitz’s success?

          The various factors potentially contributing to Success Academies’ remarkably high test scores are not mutually exclusive; it may well be they are all at work to one degree or another.

          Nor are these factors necessarily independent of one another. Strict “no-excuses” policies toward behavior may affect the type of students who are attracted to—or leave from—Success Academy schools, for example, or the charter application process may contribute to a student body that is somehow better suited to the schools’ instructional approaches.

          What may be most important to note is that these issues are not, for the most part, unique to Success Academies. Charter schools of all kinds routinely boast—or are accused of exploiting—these very same factors. Any credible account of Moskowitz’s apparent success needs to explain not only why her students test so well, but also why they test so much better than even students at other, seemingly-similar charter schools.

          Given how little we know about Success Academies, we should be very cautious about leaping to conclusions—positive or negative—about the factors contributing to their students’ success.

          https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/commentary/what-do-we-really-know-about-eva-moskowitzs-success

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            You win. I absolutely surrender. Won’t happen again.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Just be honest Jim. Admit that non-public schools violate the basic tenets of transparency of results – and accountability – the very thing that critics and Conservatives actually use to impugn public education.

            If it were not for NCLB and the SOLs, you’d have nothing to criticize yet you guys advocate non-public schools SANS the transparency and accountability as the answer to public schools failings.

            Apples to apples.

            I’ve said before and say it again – I SUPPORT non-public schools , public funding for them – IF and WHEN they abide by the same rules for demographics, transparency and accountability.

            You should advocate for the same and then we’d AGREE!

          3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            You imagine that Charter schools are not public schools. I rest my case.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yep. ..but I notice you STILL do not want the same level of transparency and accountability no matter the variant.

            why?

Leave a Reply