By Peter Galuszka

Hunter Country Day School is slated to open this fall for kindergarten through fifth-grade pupils at a quaint, red-brick outbuilding of the Dover Baptist Church on a leafy Goochland County road a few miles west of the Richmond Country Club.

Its founder is Ann McLean, who has an art history doctorate from the University of Virginia and has said that she wants to offer an education rooted in more classically conservative, Christian values than are available in the area’s public school systems. Her school, which isn’t tied to the church next door, will charge about $6,000 a year for tuition — a bargain, considering typical private school tuition in the Richmond area can run upward of $18,000.

The new school may be opening just in time. After years of bitter fighting, the General Assembly has taken the first of what could be several steps to make it easier to enroll children in private schools and start new ones. Individuals and corporations can get tax credits of as much as 65 percent for contributions they make toward private school scholarships for students of low- and middle-income families.

“We’re hopeful it will open up more opportunities for more students to attend private schools,” says Dan Zacharias, executive director of the Old Dominion Association of Church Schools, a Broadway, Va.-based organization representing 35 Baptist schools statewide.

Critics say the law is just a first step in a conservative movement to undercut public education, funneling resources away from the state’s public school systems. “I think it is a step in the wrong direction,” says Kim Gray, a member of the Richmond School Board. “This is a softer approach to vouchers.”

Indeed, Virginia’s shift is part of what some people say is a national, right-wing movement to promote private schools. Malcom Glenn, the spokesman for the American Federation for Children, a Washington-based, pro-school-choice lobby, says the Old Dominion is one of several states, including Louisiana, Arizona, New Hampshire and New Jersey, that recently have made breakthroughs to promote alternatives to public education.

Although Glenn says it isn’t so, critics in Virginia and elsewhere say the advances in school choices are part of a closely orchestrated conservative agenda related to the American Legislative Exchange Council, which drafts proposed laws for state legislatures. Julie Underwood, dean of the school of education at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, who for years has studied the council known by the acronym ALEC, says that the organization has been trying to get laws passed favoring private schools since 1985.

She says large corporations write the templates for such laws, pay for experts to brief state legislators and then lobby for them during legislative sessions. “ALEC has been very powerful and at the end you see for-profit education companies such as K-12 Inc. get benefits,” she says.

The Virginia law is based on a council template too, says Kitty Boitnott, president of the Virginia Education Association, which has fought laws favoring private schools for years. “It started in Florida and it’s going gangbusters,” she says. “It is part of a much bigger program.”

Generally, laws to push private schools tend to help more religious ones, such as Protestant Christian schools or Catholic parochial schools, as opposed to the more expensive and venerable institutions such as St. Catherine’s and Collegiate schools that for years have taught the children of Richmond’s moneyed elites. All of the schools have suffered with the 2008 recession. Private schools have found that many parents no longer can afford high tuitions while public school systems face layoffs and course cuts.

With money tighter, the legislative debates over tax changes favoring private schools have become more animated. Public-school advocates such as Boitnott say that tax breaks for private schools help them in a zero-sum game in which scarce education money inevitably leaves the public system mandated to educate all children in favor of a cosseted few. Proponents of the private-school tax advantages say that public education doesn’t meet the needs of all students and often comes with politically unacceptable dogma.

One conservative who’s a strong supporter of school choice is James P. Massie, a Republican delegate from Henrico County. His bill to give tax credits to private-school scholarships was one of several that managed to survive this year’s raucous General Assembly session. At the Capitol, newly elected, socially conservative Republicans seized control of the House of Delegates. They brought national attention from “Saturday Night Live” and “The Daily Show” for pushing bills that would have forced women considering an abortion to undergo invasive ultrasound tests that served no clear medical purpose.

Many believe that Massie’s beach-hold victory on private schools will expand into full-scale campaign. Others aren’t so sure. Professor Underwood from Wisconsin, for instance, believes that ALEC got its wings clipped after a slew of large corporations such as Coca-Cola, Mars and Yum Brands fled it after a controversy involving the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin in Florida this year. The man who is accused of killing Martin, a black teenager, said he did so legally under a Florida self-protection law that had been backed by ALEC.

Author’s note: This story originally appeared in Richmond’s Style Weekly. James A. Bacon Jr. wrote about the Hunter Country Day School on this blog several months ago.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. Peter, you forgot to mention that ALEC is funded by the Koch Brothers!

  2. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Excellent point!

  3. “Critics say the law is just a first step in a conservative movement to undercut public education, funneling resources away from the state’s public school systems.”

    This is patently absurd. The motive is not to undercut public schools. The motive is to provide an alternative for parents who desperately want a better education for their children.

    As for harming public schools, every student who gets a private school education saves the state and local government more than $10,000 per student. Hunter Country Day will charge $6,000. That represents a net gain of $4,000 for the public school system for every student who transfers to Hunter Country Day!

    Critics of the new legislation will do everything they can within their power to preserve the public schools’ near monopoly over K-12 education, while also resisting meaningful reforms to the way public schools are run. The public school lobby is one of the most reactionary and retrograde forces loose in America today.

  4. larryg Avatar

    I note that many private schools do not offer much more than the basics…..and NOW the parents are asking that their kids be allowed to take advantage of the “extra” public school offerings.

    If you give tax cuts for private school, that essentially offsets the taxes that would have gone to public schools, right?

    So… the private school attendees will get “free” public education programs that the private schools do not offer?

    How will that work?

  5. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    If tax breaks to private schools mean less money goes to public schools how can the idea that these benefits undercut public education be “patently absurd.?”
    Please explain. Just saying they are offering a “choice” just doesn’t cut it. You have to go farther.

  6. If money for the classroom in public schools is so important, why do public schools have such large central office staffs? For the same reason former Secretary of HEW Joseph Califano told the District of Columbia Bar the Department of Education was created. To keep the Teachers Union (the NEA) happy. Or as former Fairfax County Public Schools superintendent Daniel Domench wrote me “We don’t downsize when times are good.” Jobs for the professional caring class. Whether it helps educate children in a cost-effective manner is immaterial.

  7. larryg Avatar

    As bad as public schools are – if we create an essentially private version of the same thing.. what have we accomplished?

    Yes…you’d end up with non-unionized teachers …working for …”for-profit” companies who will do as all such companies do to squeeze out “waste” and maximize investors returns.

    I’m all for REAL competition – on an apples-to-apples basis.

    That means that private schools should be held to the same exact academic standards as public schools and it means they have to accept all comers – including the demographic “at-risk” kids.

    The 3rd issue is what curricula and extra-curricula offerings and if you allow private schools to offer as much or as little of the extras beyond the core-academic curricula – you might actually get even more competition between the private schools themselves and ultimately save taxpayers money because quite likely the schools that offer “extra” will charge “extra” and/or offer some things as “free’ competitive extras.

    If we do this – all private schools should report the same metrics as public schools and that data easily accessible so that parents can really make informed decisions with regard to performance and costs.

    In other words, if we are really serious about the “competition” idea – let’s do it right. I want to see real plan though before I am convinced this is something more than a scheme to kill teacher unions, “bad” teachers, and worthless administrators.

  8. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “That means that private schools should be held to the same exact academic standards as public schools and it means they have to accept all comers – including the demographic “at-risk” kids.”.

    It seems like we’re getting a bit confused here. Aren’t “at risk” kids generally from families with little money? If so, how would they pay the tuition for the private schools? If the tuition comes from tax vouchers, how private are the schools? It seems to me that voucher based “private” schools are actually alternate public schools.

  9. larryg Avatar

    actually I don’t know if you intended it but you exposed an issue. It does depend on what kind of a “tax break” it is. If it works like the earned income credit – then they’d get the credit no matter what but if it is a credit against tax you owe and you don’t owe any tax, then you won’t get the credit.

    If what is intended is to allow only those who make enough money to afford private schools to get tax breaks.. then I predict this will cook to perfection most any legislator from even reasonably moderate areas who support that approach.

    A lot of this boils down to what the INTENT of the policy is. Do we believe what the advocates say is the reason or do we look at how it actually will work?

    Dealing with the GOP.. you better look at the effect…. no matter what they say.

  10. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Larry, this is for scholarships not tuition.

Leave a Reply