How Fair Is Virginia’s System for Distributing Vaccines?

by James A. Bacon

Virginia has done a much better job in recent days in administering the COVID-19 vaccine. Out the nearly 1.4 million vaccine doses received from the federal government, according to the Becker Hospital Review, 68.7% have been given as shots. But the criteria for distributing the vaccine within the state has not been clear.

According to data published yesterday on the Virginia Department of Health COVID-19 dashboard, vaccines have been distributed unevenly across the state. At one extreme, the Norfolk Health District has received 81,300 doses. Using the VDH’s population estimates for its health districts, that translates into 33.2 vaccines delivered for every 100 population.

At the opposite end of the scale, the Hampton Health District has received only 7,075 doses, or 5.2 doses per 100 population.

“Vaccine distribution within the Commonwealth is opaque,” wrote Virginia Beach City Manager Patrick Duhaney in an email that a third party shared with Bacon’s Rebellion. “[I] cannot find anything that talks in any manner as to the decision process of who gets what percentage of vaccine received from the Federal Supply Chain and who/how those decisions are made.”

Virginia Beach government officials are miffed. Virginia’s most populous city had received only 30,300 doses by yesterday, according to VDH data, or 6.7 doses per 100 people — second worst among all health districts.

Virginia Beach elected officials from Mayor Bobby Dyer to state Sen. Bill DeSteph, R-Virginia Beach have bombarded Governor Ralph Northam with missives decrying the inequitable distribution. In one letter, DeSteph not only criticized Northam for the slow start to Virginia’s vaccination eff0rt — the state ranked 48th in the country at the time he wrote the letter before climbing to 10th in the percentage of doses administered today — he said that he was “outraged” by the disrespectful treatment the Northam team extended Mayor Dyer and city councilmen.

The Northam team, in turn, contends that measuring doses delivered as a percentage of population is not a meaningful metric of the state’s current priorities. The emphasis of the initial rollout was to distribute vaccines to hospital systems to vaccinate front-line medical personnel. Therefore, large medical centers such as Sentara, based in Norfolk, received disproportionate share.

“The vaccine received by geography is consistent with hubs for these large healthcare systems, where the doses were shipped and presumably redistributed at their discretion throughout their system (affiliated hospitals or medical practices),” responded the Virginia Department of Health in an email to Virginia Beach Councilman Guy Tower. If Virginia Beach ranks low on the list for distributed vaccines, it’s because the city does not have a major medical center.

A far better measure, VDH responded, was to measure where the vaccine doses were administered. Using that measure, 48,129 Virginia Beach residents have been vaccinated — a rate of per 100,000. That’s actually higher than for Norfolk, where the vaccination rate is only 7,029 per 100,000.

So, who’s right? Before receiving copies of this correspondence, I was asking the same questions as Virginia Beach officials. Focusing on the VDH vaccination distribution data, I observed that the vaccines were being distributed incredibly inequitably from a geographic perspective. This VDH map shows the variance between health districts.

Looking closer, I noticed that Norfolk had received the most doses per 100 population (33.2) of any health district in the state, while Richmond had received the second most doses (27.6).

(My approach was similar to the one cited in Duhaney’s email, which calculated the Relative Equivalence Value (REV). At the time he was writing, the federal government had delivered doses equivalent to 15.9% of Virginia’s population. REV calculated deviations from that baseline. Thus, Alexandria came in at 31% below the statewide average, and Chesterfield County 8% above. Virginia Beach was 64% below the baseline.)

In numerous statements, Northam and VDH have expressed a desire to ensure that the vaccines are distributed equitably from a racial/ethnic demographic perspective. Noting that both Richmond and Norfolk have a high percentage of African-American citizens, I compared delivered doses as a percentage of each health district’s population to the percentage of African Americans for each district’s population. Here is the resulting table:

I try to adopt a social scientific approach when conjecturing about cause and effect. I hypothesized that the Northam administration distributed doses with an eye to favoring African-American populations, perhaps on the grounds that African-Americans are more likely to contract the COVID-19 virus. I then plotted a graph showing the relationship between doses distributed and African-Americans in the population.

Some health districts with large percentage of African-Americans — Hampton (52.7%), Western Tidewater (38.9%) and Crater (49.7%) have had few doses delivered to them. The scatter graph shows almost zero correlation between the two variables. Indeed, the trend line is slightly negative, although the slope is too small to be meaningful. Based on this data, I concluded that racial considerations did not play a factor in the vaccine distribution. Hypothesis falsified.

In search of another hypothesis, I began wondering if vaccine distribution was  correlated with the presence of hospitals. At one point, I recalled, hospitals had administered more than half of all vaccines in the state. Norfolk was home to Sentara’s flagship hospital, while Richmond was the location of Virginia Commonwealth University health system. Perhaps that explained why those two health districts had received so many vaccines.

That’s how far I had progressed when the Duhaney memo and the VDH response arrived in my inbox this morning. VDH’s response to Tower supported the conjecture that the presence of hospitals in health district was a key variable explaining the uneven geographic distribution.

As it turns out, if the metric is the percentage of the population that has received a vaccine, Virginia Beach fares second best among the core jurisdictions of the Hampton Roads metropolitan area. While Norfolk was credited statistically speaking with receiving the most vaccines, Sentara had no problem actually delivering doses throughout its healthcare system, including Virginia Beach.

Vaccines administered:
James City — 21,769 per 100,000
Virginia Beach — 10,700 
York — 9,000
Chesapeake — 8,602
Newport News — 8,460
Suffolk — 8,432
Hampton 8,245
Norfolk — 7,069
Portsmouth — 6,052
Williamsburg — 548

(I could not find the figures for Poquoson.)

The Northam administration bungled the early phases of the vaccine rollout, but seemingly has made up for lost time. Moreover, it has begun delivering fewer vaccines to hospitals and more to local health districts. I expect that the Virginia Beach health district numbers will start reflecting that change soon. Not that it really matters. Ultimately, it is less important where the state “delivers” the vaccines than where the doses end up being shot into peoples’ arms.

Virginia Beach officials should be reassured that their citizens have not been short-changed. I would suggest the city manager focus on a new potential bottleneck. The VDH has taken over the registration of individuals signing up for the vaccine. Governor Northam has promised the delivery of a statewide website to accomplish that goal. So far, there still is no website. For the time being, the Virginia Beach health district website says individuals should “pre-register” at a new online portal beginning Jan. 25.

Meanwhile, first-dose vaccines are being delivered directly to health districts across the state, including Virginia Beach’s. (Hospitals are still getting second doses.) What happens locally if the vaccines are arriving but people can’t register to schedule an appointment? If I were a local official, that’s the question I would be asking.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “How Fair Is Virginia’s System for Distributing Vaccines?”

  1. Terrific analysis, Jim. The distribution opacity layer of the onion can indeed be peeled away. But there’s another question I hear in every csual discussion up here in NoVa: “OK, I’m duly registered by email and received confirmation of that, appointment invitation email to follow. Since then, crickets.”

    VDH, how about some idea where the H.D.s are in chipping away at their backlogs, and some sort of crude prognosis of when a person who registered on date X might reasonable receive an invitation to sehedule an appointment — based on your prognosis of deliveries to the State (you have such a prognosis, don’t you)?

  2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    So roughly 750,000 doses in a State of 8,500,000? Unsure supply chain, limited number of didtribution points and personnel?

    What will happen is that those places that move it the quickest will receive more when it becomes available. Supply and demand. Besides, it always looks better if you can tell your boss, “It’s all gone. Just waiting for more.”

    “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job.”

    Those also serve who sit and wait.

  3. idiocracy Avatar

    See, VDH figures out where to send the vaccines the same way VDOT figures out where to spend road money:

    They take a big map of Virginia, hang it up on a wall, and blast a shotgun at it.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    Are the VDH health districts that much different on population?

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      Are you suggesting that the health districts should be formulated based on some sort of metric like population?

      That makes sense.

      Therefore, it will not be done that way.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        not necessarily though if it was not adjusted from time to time, there could be a mismatch of resources and responsibilities.

        I just noticed what seemed to be, big differences in population between health districts.

        Do we think it’s the governor that decide allocations?

  5. ksmith8953 Avatar
    ksmith8953

    I have been waiting for this kind of answer as to why the distribution is muffed up. Great read.

  6. Terrific analysis, Jim. The distribution opacity layer of the onion can indeed be peeled away. But there’s another question I hear in every csual discussion up here in NoVa: “OK, I’m duly registered by email and received confirmation of that, appointment invitation email to follow. Since then, crickets.”

    VDH, how about some idea where the H.D.s are in chipping away at their backlogs, and some sort of crude prognosis of when a person who registered on date X might reasonable receive an invitation to sehedule an appointment — based on your prognosis of deliveries to the State (you have such a prognosis, don’t you)?

  7. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    So roughly 750,000 doses in a State of 8,500,000? Unsure supply chain, limited number of didtribution points and personnel?

    What will happen is that those places that move it the quickest will receive more when it becomes available. Supply and demand. Besides, it always looks better if you can tell your boss, “It’s all gone. Just waiting for more.”

    “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job.”

    Those also serve who sit and wait.

  8. idiocracy Avatar

    See, VDH figures out where to send the vaccines the same way VDOT figures out where to spend road money:

    They take a big map of Virginia, hang it up on a wall, and blast a shotgun at it.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar

    Are the VDH health districts that much different on population?

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      Are you suggesting that the health districts should be formulated based on some sort of metric like population?

      That makes sense.

      Therefore, it will not be done that way.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        not necessarily though if it was not adjusted from time to time, there could be a mismatch of resources and responsibilities.

        I just noticed what seemed to be, big differences in population between health districts.

        Do we think it’s the governor that decide allocations?

  10. LarrytheG Avatar

    Maybe much ado about nothing?

    ” Vaccination drives hold out the promise of curbing Covid-19, but governments and businesses are increasingly accepting what epidemiologists have long warned: The pathogen will circulate for years, or even decades, leaving society to coexist with Covid-19 much as it does with other endemic diseases like flu, measles, and HIV.

    The ease with which the coronavirus spreads, the emergence of new strains and poor access to vaccines in large parts of the world mean Covid-19 could shift from a pandemic disease to an endemic one, implying lasting modifications to personal and societal behavior, epidemiologists say.”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/as-vaccines-raise-hope-cold-reality-dawns-covid-19-is-likely-here-to-stay-11612693803?mod=hp_lead_pos1

  11. LarrytheG Avatar

    Maybe much ado about nothing?

    ” Vaccination drives hold out the promise of curbing Covid-19, but governments and businesses are increasingly accepting what epidemiologists have long warned: The pathogen will circulate for years, or even decades, leaving society to coexist with Covid-19 much as it does with other endemic diseases like flu, measles, and HIV.

    The ease with which the coronavirus spreads, the emergence of new strains and poor access to vaccines in large parts of the world mean Covid-19 could shift from a pandemic disease to an endemic one, implying lasting modifications to personal and societal behavior, epidemiologists say.”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/as-vaccines-raise-hope-cold-reality-dawns-covid-19-is-likely-here-to-stay-11612693803?mod=hp_lead_pos1

  12. ksmith8953 Avatar
    ksmith8953

    I have been waiting for this kind of answer as to why the distribution is muffed up. Great read.

  13. In numerous statements, Northam and VDH have expressed a desire to ensure that the vaccines are distributed equitably from a racial/ethnic demographic perspective.

    Maybe so, but there’s no way to see how equitable the administration of those vaccinations has been with 356,204 vaccinations with no reported race or ethnicity. If you’re going to track something like this, it needs to start from the beginning, not midway.

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      Well, race is one of the data points you are asked to provide when you sign up. They decide who gets called back and offered an appointment, it does not appear to be first in, first called. There is no place to mention pre-existing conditions on the form. Just age and race.

      Letter to the editor in the Richmond TD this morning praising Henrico, somebody who signed up, heard back in four days and was directed to a mass clinic at West Creek. We haven’t heard from Henrico weeks after getting on the list, and I had no idea they were doing clinics at West Creek. Are they still?

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Not sayin’ you is wrong State-wide, but you is wrong on the Peninsula. You are NOT asked for race on the appointment sign-up.

        https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSciZvdaDHsLs97On0dKIdj7aeVwu4jjMpo6FguDa7ssXWY4mQ/viewform

        Plus, there is a separate form for 16-64 with existing health conditions. If i could post two links…

  14. In numerous statements, Northam and VDH have expressed a desire to ensure that the vaccines are distributed equitably from a racial/ethnic demographic perspective.

    Maybe so, but there’s no way to see how equitable the administration of those vaccinations has been with 356,204 vaccinations with no reported race or ethnicity. If you’re going to track something like this, it needs to start from the beginning, not midway.

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      Well, race is one of the data points you are asked to provide when you sign up. They decide who gets called back and offered an appointment, it does not appear to be first in, first called. There is no place to mention pre-existing conditions on the form. Just age and race.

      Letter to the editor in the Richmond TD this morning praising Henrico, somebody who signed up, heard back in four days and was directed to a mass clinic at West Creek. We haven’t heard from Henrico weeks after getting on the list, and I had no idea they were doing clinics at West Creek. Are they still?

  15. The form I filled out in the Chickahominy Health District, which was prepared by Westwood Pharmacy, asked for your race. Here are the health-related questions from the second page of the form:

    1. Are you feeling sick today?
    2. Are you pregnant or do you plan to become pregnant?
    3. Are you breastfeeding?
    4. Have you ever received a dose of COVID-19 vaccine? If so, which one.
    5. Have you ever had a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to something? For example, a reaction for which you were treated with epinephrine or EpiPen®, or for which you had to go to the hospital? If so, was it a result of a Covid vaccine.
    6. Do you have a bleeding disorder or are you taking a blood thinner?
    7. Have you ever had a positive test for COVID-19 or has a doctor ever told you that you had COVID-19?
    8. Have you received passive antibody therapy as treatment for COVID-19?
    9. Have you received any vaccine in the last 14 days?
    10. Are you immunocompromised or do you take a medicine that affects your immune system?

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      “5. Have you ever had a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to something? … If so, was it a result of a Covid vaccine.”

      Uh…

  16. djrippert Avatar

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, age 31, received her vaccine on Dec 19. My mother, who turn 93 this month, received her first shot yesterday.

    Politicians are horses asses.

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      I know this won’t help, but it’s also a “red berry” issue, which is also political.

      The monkey won’t eat the red berries until he sees another monkey eat them first. That’s why some young healthy leaders “volunteer” to go first.

      But, here, let me give you the Republican takeaway from this… you can say that I called AOC a monkey.

    2. It’s so dangerous out there on the House floor. Gotta be fully protected from aerosols and other results of free speech, as well as the occasional rioter.

  17. The form I filled out in the Chickahominy Health District, which was prepared by Westwood Pharmacy, asked for your race. Here are the health-related questions from the second page of the form:

    1. Are you feeling sick today?
    2. Are you pregnant or do you plan to become pregnant?
    3. Are you breastfeeding?
    4. Have you ever received a dose of COVID-19 vaccine? If so, which one.
    5. Have you ever had a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to something? For example, a reaction for which you were treated with epinephrine or EpiPen®, or for which you had to go to the hospital? If so, was it a result of a Covid vaccine.
    6. Do you have a bleeding disorder or are you taking a blood thinner?
    7. Have you ever had a positive test for COVID-19 or has a doctor ever told you that you had COVID-19?
    8. Have you received passive antibody therapy as treatment for COVID-19?
    9. Have you received any vaccine in the last 14 days?
    10. Are you immunocompromised or do you take a medicine that affects your immune system?

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      “5. Have you ever had a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to something? … If so, was it a result of a Covid vaccine.”

      Uh…

      1. Hey, I didn’t write the questions.

        I think I am going to have to fill it out again before the second shot, though, so maybe they are covering themselves in case someone had a bad reaction to their first dose.

        I don’t know why any sane person who suffered anaphylaxis from the first dose would sign up for the second shot, but as we know not everyone is sane.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          I suspect that when it comes time to receive the vaccine for those using VDH-Peninsula to sign up, they will be asked those questions.

          Those are fairly standard questions for any medical stuff.

  18. djrippert Avatar

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, age 31, received her vaccine on Dec 19. My mother, who turn 93 this month, received her first shot yesterday.

    Politicians are horses asses.

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      I know this won’t help, but it’s also a “red berry” issue, which is also political.

      The monkey won’t eat the red berries until he sees another monkey eat them first. That’s why some young healthy leaders “volunteer” to go first.

      But, here, let me give you the Republican takeaway from this… you can say that I called AOC a monkey.

      1. djrippert Avatar

        There is no shortage of people wanting the vaccine. I recognize that some people either want to wait or don’t want the jab at all. However, if the local Safeway put out a broadcast text message that they had 1,000 shots – first come, first served … 10,000 people would sho up looking for a jab. The lying wretch didn’t have to get a super early vaccine to ensure that all the available doses got used. That’s just BS.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Publix… not Safeway. They greased the insurection.

      2. I know you did not call her a monkey, but why did you have to imply that she is a “leader”?

        😉

    2. It’s so dangerous out there on the House floor. Gotta be fully protected from aerosols and other results of free speech, as well as the occasional rioter.

  19. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    “I just noticed what seemed to be, big differences in population between health districts.”

    There is no need to make health districts proportional to population. The staff size can increase with an increase in the number of people served. Health districts should be compact because the people they serve sometimes have to visit the offices, and restaurant & sanitation inspectors have to travel to the facilities they are inspecting.

    (Am I doing something wrong? If I click on “Reply” next to a comment, my reply still ends up at the end)

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      yes.. so some districts are much more heavily staffed than others? true?

    2. idiocracy Avatar

      Except they are not compact, as can be seen by looking at the map above. They vary widely in the area that they cover.

  20. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    “I just noticed what seemed to be, big differences in population between health districts.”

    There is no need to make health districts proportional to population. The staff size can increase with an increase in the number of people served. Health districts should be compact because the people they serve sometimes have to visit the offices, and restaurant & sanitation inspectors have to travel to the facilities they are inspecting.

    (Am I doing something wrong? If I click on “Reply” next to a comment, my reply still ends up at the end)

    1. idiocracy Avatar

      Except they are not compact, as can be seen by looking at the map above. They vary widely in the area that they cover.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      yes.. so some districts are much more heavily staffed than others? true?

Leave a Reply