Hospitals Continue to Cut Labor and Delivery and NICU Services

Credit Kylie Johnson Photography

by James C. Sherlock

Virginia and the nation continue to see the results of the baby bust.

I wrote yesterday of the baby cliff, the 15% decline in live births that started in the great recession of 2007-09. It continues. And it continues to drive change, much of it not good.

I have written here about such important hospital changes as:

  • the closing of labor and delivery services at Virginia Beach General Hospital and elsewhere in the state; and
  • the consolidation of Neo-natal ICU (NICU) services with the integration of two hospital systems into Ballad Health in Southwestern Virginia and Northeastern Tennessee.

That too is a continuing national trend.

Today’s young people of child-bearing age will find not only fewer places to deliver a child than their parents did, but also to provide specialized care if the baby needs it.

Fewer hospitals with labor and delivery services. Becker’s Hospital Review lists 13 hospitals cutting services in a recent post. Cutting services and closings posts are a regular feature of that blog.

Eight of the hospitals in that article were terminating labor and delivery services.

An example:

Hazel Crest, Ill.-based Advocate South Suburban Hospital is ending labor and delivery services on Aug. 1. The hospital cited a decline in births as the reason for the change in obstetric services, with a 40 percent decrease since 2015.

(Good news for moms — some of the birthing centers are getting nicer.)

I offer no solution, just awareness  (A special shout out to Virginia’s college and university BOVs.)

Fewer Neo-natal ICU (NICU) facilities. NICUs are rarer than they used to be. Consolidating them was part of the Ballad Health fight in an area with too many opioid-addicted babies.

Virginia NICUs. Courtesy Neonatology Solutions

There are currently 29 NICUs in Virginia.

As you see in the adjacent map, there are no Virginia NICU facilities at all at any level west of Hampton Roads and south of Richmond, Lynchburg and Roanoke.

Some Virginians are probably closer to NICUs in adjacent states than they are to facilities in Virginia.

Level IV NICUs. Only four of those Virginia NICUs provide Level IV services, the highest level of care.

Level IV is defined as a subspecialty level newborn service that:

shall provide intensive care for high-risk, critically ill neonates with complex neonatal illnesses. The subspecialty level newborn service shall provide, in-house, a full range of pediatric medical and surgical subspecialists to care for critically ill neonates.

As you see, there is no Level IV NICU facility in Virginia west of the I-64 corridor.

Babies born in these unserved areas will have to be transferred to a Level IV NICU facility if they require that level of care.

As example, below are the Level IV NICUs in North Carolina.

North Carolina Level IV NICUs courtesy Neonatology Solutions

Tennessee is no help with Level IV NICUs for Virginia babies. The closest to Virginia is in Chattanooga. West Virginia? Charleston.

NICU locations are worth the expectant mother and her doctor checking if she lives in one of Virginia’s NICU deserts. OB/GYNs will certainly do that.

COPN is there for us. Virginia’s Certificate of Public Need (COPN) program, set up ostensibly to ensure that there are not “too many’ medical facilities while instead creating monopolies, cannot ensure that there are not too few.

It would be interesting to see what the COPN “need” criteria show about labor and delivery facilities and NICU.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “Hospitals Continue to Cut Labor and Delivery and NICU Services”

  1. Hey, think of it this way — fewer babies means lower future CO2 emissions!

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Fortunately, Indiana is only a 13-hour drive.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    since you seem to like Maryland’s HEZ idea , I’d wonder how you like their COPN which is at least somewhat similar to Virginia:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/39f9db7e07dd6ef59348e020eaead0d6ba84b3e19d4a0c6d07f401a0804dcea2.jpg

    https://mhcc.maryland.gov/mhcc/pages/hcfs/hcfs_con/hcfs_con_overview.aspx

    which actually gets back to the subject of this blog post – the consolidation and reduction of birth-related services – not just “not too many”, but :

    Overview of Maryland Certificate of Need (CON) Program

    The Maryland Certificate of Need (“CON”) program is intended to ensure that new health care facilities and services are developed in Maryland only as needed and that, if determined to be needed, that they are:

    The most cost-effective approach to meeting identified needs;

    Of high quality;

    Geographically and financially accessible;

    Financially viable; and

    Will not have a significant negative impact on the cost, quality, or viability of other health care facilities and services.

    Since the vast majority of such services are paid for with insurance – which has limits on reimbursements, hospitals have to control costs or take a loss and/or hire collection agencies.

    Not the proverbial “free market” at all.

    And the insurance? Well if insurance companies were actually allowed to use medical underwriting in determining who to cover or not and for what premium cost –

    … a large number of people would end up deep in debt or even go bankrupt.

    But the U.S. govt REQUIRES that insurance be made available to everyone and at similar costs if an employer offers health insurance. Medicaid also covers everyone.

    The insurers and the govt basically decide how much will be reimbursed and hospitals have to figure out how to do it at that price and that means that hospitals are doing their own form of COPN by closing facilities that cannot pay for themselves with the reimbursements they do receive.

    Is it a bad thing or a good thing or a necessary thing?

  4. WayneS Avatar

    Today’s young people of child-bearing age will find… …fewer places to deliver a child than their parents.

    Maybe fewer hospitals but not fewer places.

    A woman can still deliver a child pretty much anywhere. A baby is going to be born when it decides to be born and it doesn’t matter where the parents happen to be at the time.

    😉

    And yes, I do realize that I’m being very literal today and that my attempts at humor are often juvenile and stupid.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Tough crowd.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        By the way, despite my foray into silliness, I do recognize the seriousness of this issue.

        For young parents, having to travel 150 or 200 miles to get to the nearest neonatal ICU facility to be with their fragile newborn child will make an already stressful situation a lot worse.

        Twenty years ago, the Ronald McDonald House helped our daughter and her prematurely-born baby immensely. They gave her a place to stay right across the street from the hospital so she could be with our grandson every day without having to drive 80+ miles.

        Her mother and I drove 80+ miles every other day to visit them, but the services offered by RMH greatly reduced the stress on our daughter.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Nope, it wasn’t like that at all.

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    We have a midwifery in Marshall VA. I have always heard good things about this lady. Claims to have delivered over 500 babies in the last 35 years. Could be the next big thing?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Fine as long as babies are healthy.

Leave a Reply