Case-Schiller Home Price Index – National

by James C. Sherlock

Housing prices have more than doubled since 2012, reflecting shortages of supply and the resulting speculation. The increasing slope of those curves above is not comforting.

Prices have soared over 20% in a year. Mortgage rates are up. What could possibly happen next? Most can figure that out.

But this article is about the effects on local government property taxes of what most predict will be extreme volatility in the housing market going forward.

How are Virginia real property taxes adjusted to mitigate the effects on both property owner tax bills and government receipts in this boom and very likely bust cycle?

We’ll look at the law.

The S&P CoreLogic Case-Schiller Home Price Index reported that home prices were 20.6% higher than they were in March 2021 across the country.

The baseline Virginia law on real estate taxes is Code of Virginia § 58.1-3201. What real estate to be taxed; amount of assessment; public service corporation property.

That law in part:

All real estate, except that exempted by law, shall be subject to such annual taxation as may be prescribed by law.

All general reassessments or annual assessments in those localities which have annual assessments of real estate, except as otherwise provided in § 58.1-2604, shall be made at 100 percent fair market value and, except as provided in § 58.1-2608, the State Corporation Commission and the Department of Taxation shall certify public service corporation property to such county or city, with the exception of the nonoperating (noncarrier) property of railroads, on the basis of the assessment ratio as most recently determined and published by the Department of Taxation. (emphasis added).

The last decade has certainly been good for the tax receipts of many of Virginia’s local governments. Not so good for property owners and those who pay them rents. But homeowners have been comforted by the paper gains on their investments. Until they had to sell and pay inflated prices for replacement properties.

Commercial real estate has suffered since COVID. It is not clear whether real estate assessments have caught up.

But if markets prove rational, the bubble in residential real estate will burst. Rising mortgage rates and prices portend a collapse in demand from buyers of residential real estate, especially at the first rung of the housing ladder, and an inability of renters to afford increased rents.

One outcome is that local government tax receipts are vulnerable.

To see median property taxes by county go here. Loudoun, of course, leads, at a nearly $5,000 median annual tax bill this year. The median bill in Buchanan County is $284. So, it is OK to call that a significant spread. The valuations and tax receipts have soared in Loudoun. Not so much in Buchanan County.

Most of the total is determined by assessed value of the property, the rest by the rate at which that value is taxed.

Local governments perceive “needs” for the taxes they are getting. Many of those are real, but some have been generated by the increasing tax receipts themselves. Local governments are, after all, run by politicians.

One analysis suggests that Virginia property taxes are assessed at only 74% of real value statewide. So, local tax assessors have room to increase assessed valuation without an increase in the rate.

They can also increase rates.

So, it is unwise for property owners to plan that their property tax bills will go down in a recession as quickly as they have risen in the last decade.

What to do? The next General Assembly may have to deal with this situation if the housing recession develops as many forecast. That will be a circus, but one which may prove necessary and which everyone will watch.

More immediately, citizens and their local governments may wish to work together to develop policy for the path ahead.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Home Price Volatility and Virginia Property Taxes”

  1. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    Localities that have lots of sales such as Chesterfield assess closer to FMV than localities with less turnover.
    For estate tax valuations , it used to be assumed that that statewide localities assessed at 89% of FMV.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Now 74% reportedly.

      1. Super Brain Avatar
        Super Brain

        Please keep posting on this subject. Hopefully the general public will begin to take notice of the increases in monthly house payments due to escrow increases.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    The RE tax should be a tax on the fixed sales price and a gains tax at sale. Period!

    The gains portion could be determined as the RE tax rate applied retroactively to the gain at sale assumed linear over the period between sales. If the property is sold at a loss, a refund could be computed in the same fashion.

    For example a house is purchased at $100K and sold 5 years later at $120K. The tax collected over the 5 years is (tr1+tr2+…+tr5)*$100K. At sale, a retroactive tax would be (tr2*$5K+tr3*$10K+tr4*$15K+tr5*$20K).

    Better do something or else you’ll get:
    Proposition 13, adopted by California voters in 1978, mandates a property tax rate of one percent, requires that properties be assessed at market value at the time of sale, and allows assessments to rise by no more than 2 percent per year until the next sale.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Goes for pretty much everything passed in California.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Jump for joy,
        Be gay and blythe,
        Or weep, my friend, with sorrow.
        What California is today
        The rest will be tomorrow.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          We can only hope the mountains and country between here and there slow down the migration. It pretty much keeps my BiL west of the rockies.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            If the States are the laboratories of democracy, California is Pfizer. It’s actively experimenting.

Leave a Reply