Here’s What You Look Like to a Traffic Cop

by James A. Bacon

After a recent incident in which two Windsor policemen stopped black army officer Caron Nazario, pepper sprayed him, and forced him out of his car and onto the ground, the driving-while-black phenomenon is back in the news. Most people would agree that the behavior of the senior officer, Joe Gutierrez, was highly unprofessional, indeed egregious, but no tangible evidence has surfaced to suggest that the behavior was racially motivated. That hasn’t stopped the media from treating it as a racial incident and accusing the Windsor police department from profiling and halting black drivers.

I will have more to say about the Windsor traffic stop in a later post. For now, I want to make a prefatory point: It’s a lot harder to determine the race of a motorist while driving than one would think. Indeed, it is usually impossible.

I spend a lot of time walking around my neighborhood. People are friendly. When they drive by in a car, they often wave. Even though they are driving slowly — the speed limit on our streets is only 14 miles per hour — I can almost never identify the person inside the car. I wave back, but I almost never know whom I’ve waving to. That got me to thinking…

Next time you drive around town or zip down the Interstate, observe the cars around you. Most of the time, drivers appear as silhouettes. Often, due to the reflection of light off of windows and windshields, you can’t even see the silhouette. Typically, when the car is whizzing past you in an oncoming lane, it is impossible to distinguish anything about the driver. In my experience there are only two situations in which drivers are identifiable — if you pass them while traveling in the same direction, or if they are driving with their windows down. Even then, there are no guarantees.

To test my perceptions, I stood on the sidewalk outside our neighborhood and photographed the cars driving past on Patterson Ave in Henrico County. The speed limit there is 45 miles per hour, faster than some streets and roads, slower than others. It was daylight, and the conditions were sunny, though slightly diminished by a thin cloud layer. Pretty average daytime driving conditions.

My vantage point was comparable to that of a traffic policeman sitting on the shoulder of the road with a radar. In the photos below, you will see what a hypothetical traffic cop might see when glancing up from his radar gun before pulling into the traffic lane to give you a ticket.

Take a look at the photo at the top of this post. You’ll see a black SUV driving past around 40 to 45 miles per hour. You cannot see the driver. Take a look at the close-up shot below it, which magnifies the view. You still cannot see the driver.  Here is a super close-up:

It looks like there is a person in the passenger seat. Maybe it’s a male. Maybe he’s wearing a white shirt. But you cannot identify anything else about the person. You can see nothing of the driver whatsoever. Remember, if the identity of the driver and passenger are obscure to someone studying a close-up photograph, it is even more likely to be obscure to a policeman as the car flashes by.

Is this example typical or atypical?  Here are the other photos I took of cars driving in the same direction. Decide for yourself.


What the policeman would see
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view

Would the policeman would see
At last! The driver in the white truck is identifiable as white in this closeup view. His window is open and his elbow is resting on the car door, showing a flash of white skin.

What the policeman would see.
Closeup view

What the policeman would see
Closeup view. Big windows, lots of light in the cab, and still all you can see is a silhouette.

It’s a different view in the far lanes. Paradoxically, although cars in the far lane are more distant, the drivers are more visible because they are on the side of the car facing the viewer.
Here, it is discernible in the closeup that the driver is a white woman wearing sunglasses.

What the policeman would see.
If the policeman has sharp eyes, he perceive that this driver is white.

What the policeman would see.
No luck here. You can’t tell a darn thing.

Based on these snapshots located at this particular location under these particular lighting conditions, we can suggest the skin color of the drivers in the far lane is sometimes — but not always — identifiable. The skin color of drivers in the near lane is never identifiable.

Would we get similar  results on the Interstate? I don’t know.

Would we get similar results at night? I don’t know.

Would we get similar results for people driving with tinted windows? I don’t know.

Would we get similar results on U.S. 460 in a 35 mile-per-hour zone? I don’t know.

My point is this: There is a widespread presumption that policemen know the racial identity of motorists they pull over before they pull them over. While that may be true in some circumstances, it is demonstrably untrue in many other circumstances. In the 18 randomly photographed cars shown here, the racial identity of only three might have been detectable from the vantage point of a police car stationed on the side of the road when the officer looked up from his radar gun.

One can argue that police behave in a racist manner to black drivers after they have been pulled over. Perhaps cops are ruder, more belligerent and more unforgiving of black drivers they have stopped. That is an entirely separate issue, and one worth of examination. But the evidence presented here would suggest that policemen typically have no visible clue as to the racial identity of a driver on a highway or the interstate when they pull them.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

34 responses to “Here’s What You Look Like to a Traffic Cop”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I totally agree with you……… BUT………. it’s not the reason for the stop. It’s what happens AFTER the stop. I think you miss the point.

    So cops can do what is called “pretext” stops to pull the car THEN , AFTER, proceed to take actions…. which may be a warning and a let-go or progress to a major deal with the driver taken out of the car and the car searched.

    Do we know of the stops that turn out to be more than a warning – what the numbers show? Do we know for the warnings – what the numbers show?

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      First off under VA law there is no such thing as a “warning” the Leo can give you a ticket, or arrest you and take you in for a booking with a magistrate. What happens after that may be up to you or not. I see problems in the Windsor stop on both sides.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        If you are stopped for a problem like a bad headlight, not sure if we call it a warning, but I got something saying it needed to be fixed in 2 weeks or something like that.

        1. James Kiser Avatar
          James Kiser

          That is an improper equipment citation which is like a ticket but is dismissed if you show proof of repair.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Are you saying it is ILLEGAL for a cop to stop you and give a warning instead of a ticket?

      2. “First off under VA law there is no such thing as a “warning” the Leo can give you a ticket, or arrest you and take you in for a booking with a magistrate. ”

        Those are not the only options. The LEO may also let you go. There may not be a mechanism in Virginia law for an LEO to issue an official written warning, but they are NOT required to cite [or arrest] you after pulling you over.

  2. How dare you bring real world logic and analysis to an issue!!!!!
    Where’s the emotion-based illogical knee jerk dribble?

  3. Ronnie Chappell Avatar
    Ronnie Chappell

    Well done. Despite recent cataract surgery, and the restoration of 20/20 vision I am completely unable in almost all cases to identify the race of a driver in a moving car. I think the more interesting story in Windsor is whether traffic fines are a significant source of revenue for the town and the police department, are officers given quotas and are there places in town — a poorly marked reduction in speed limit — where lots of out of town residents are ticketed? Interesting column in the Daily Press today by Gordon Morse about Hopewell’s million dollar mile.

    1. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      “…traffic fines are a significant source of revenue…

      Like Emporia or “Peckerville”?

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    All of your highfalutin photography and analysis can’t obscure the crucial idea from the progressive playbook that is being played out in this case:

    Officer Gutierrez must be a white supremicist who hates all people of color.

    Wait … something just doesn’t sound right about that.

  5. In this atmosphere, according to Leftists and mainstream news media, it is ‘racist until your head is on a pike’. I doubt that any cop is going to invite the kind of scrutiny that a racially biased stop is going to bring. I have known many cops in my previous life as the son of a firefighter and to a man they considered the importance of professionalism and blind justice as it relates to their job.
    When I have been stopped, the police have been professional, sometimes warmly professional, sometimes coldly professional but until I showed my ass they never initiated a conflict.
    I have learned through the years that the best thing to do is have your paperwork ready because if you can make their job easier they will move on to the next driver. They might catch another easy one or they might catch a potential cop killer wanting to send ‘the man’ to the morgue. They never know for sure.
    Back the Blue, it is a very thin blue line between a generally ordered society and anarchy.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Now conduct the same experiment in Ferguson, MO.

    I guess the Minneapolis cops couldn’t tell regular citizens from the reporters because their credentials were inside plastic holders and the shoulder carried cameras were not obvious.

    1. In your mind, should reporters have more rights or fewer rights than “regular citizens”?

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I am not at all unfamiliar with that stretch of US 460. What the cop saw was $$$$. That is always what they see unless the driver is actually behaving dangerously. Apparently ticket revenue is important to that little town. The General Assembly could change the economic incentives and suddenly more attention would be paid to actual bad driving, less to administrative offenses.

  8. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    There are about 500 photo enforced cameras in Virginia. I bet Windsor and other small town localities will have one soon.
    https://www.photoenforced.com/virginia.html

    1. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      Hope the VA Beach Blvd and Independence intersection at the Beach still has one in operation

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yeah, but the fine$ and co$t$ are way higher when the cop writes the ticket on the side of the road.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        True but the up side is the chance for a social commotion between citizens and the police is greatly reduced.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Yes. Having cameras handle at least some of the traffic “stops” has advantages. No one can accuse a camera of racism.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            The other side of this coin is corruption. Take DC for example. Photo enforced camera fines are a gold mine and it is as crooked as a politician. One of many reasons I refuse to drive to DC.

          2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
            energyNOW_Fan

            I am also terrified if I accidently stray into DC due to the $500 fines for red light cameras etc.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I guess if the choice is $500 or your life, I’ll take the cameras.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            hmmm…. same choice black or white?

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Don’t forget Fairfax shaving time off the yellow to increase redlight running leading to mo’ money…. and traffic fatalities.

          6. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Which Fairfax? The county or the Lt. Gov?

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            The one responsible for Virginia’s current laws on the use of photo-red. What they did in the late 1900s, early 2000s, resulted in the law that prevented the use of cameras for 10+ years.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            How can cameras be “crooked”? I guess I can see how localities that would set up speed traps might abuse them. Probably need the state – good old Dillions rule to ride herd on them.

  9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Black drivers get pulled over by police less at night when their race is obscured by ‘veil of darkness,’ Stanford study finds”

    https://news.stanford.edu/2020/05/05/veil-darkness-reduces-racial-bias-traffic-stops/

    The underlying study…

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0858-1

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      And then, there’s this…

      Two men died after a Tesla vehicle, which was believed to be operating without anyone in the driver’s seat, crashed into a tree north of Houston, authorities said.
      “There was no one in the driver’s seat,” Sgt Cinthya Umanzor of the Harris County Constable Precinct 4 said of the crash on Saturday night.
      The 2019 Tesla Model S was traveling at high speed when it failed to negotiate a curve and went off the roadway, crashing to a tree and bursting into flames, local television station KHOU-TV said.

      PLEASE PEOPLE… it’s driver ASSIST. There is no level 4 autopilot on the market, yet.

      1. Both occupants were in their 50s, so it’s probably pointless to nominate them for a 2021 Darwin Award.

      2. You can’t fix stupid, but sometime stupid fixes itself.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Train derails. Plane strikes the gateway. Bus hits an ambulance. Cop shoots an unarmed child, or mistakes a service weapon for a Tazer.

    Which doesn’t have a mandatory blood tox screen?
    https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/illinois-police-officer-drug-and-87697/

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/appendix-C_to_part_219

    1. What unarmed child? You talking about the every-weekend violence in Chicago where blacks kill blacks and it’s totally acceptable — hell it seems it’s expected.

  11. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    Isn’t the point that the media, in the woke era, jumps to the conclusion that any incident involving police and a person of color is racially motivated? I have not read anything that questions why the officers exited their car with weapons drawn. The senior cop had an attitude problem and needs a new line of work.

Leave a Reply