By Peter Galuszka

For all the chatter before the U.S. Supreme Court and pundits, ObamaCare has raised critical questions striking at the heart of individual rights and the Constitution. Yet there’s another, far more powerful and potentially more sinister force out there that is far more ominous along similar grounds: social media.

True, “social media” is considered “private industry” since it is dominated by fast-growing companies such as Facebook and therefore is considered “ok” by the libertarian crowd. They said the same thing back in the 1980s when Bill Gates cleverly forced more than 85 percent of the market to use his mediocre computer operating system, often by predatory tactics, or so critics say.

Now we have Facebook, created by yet another brainy Harvard geek, everywhere, dominating everything and changing, for the worse, how people communicate, how they can protect their privacy, intellectual property, how they think and how they write. (Mind you, it is “OK” because it is “private industry.”)

If you want to check into newspaper stories, you are often forced to go to a Facebook page where you must wade through a swamp of irrelevant crap such as what someone’s latest cat looks like and what they thought of last night’s Fettuccini Alfredo. Grandmothers feel a little heartbroken when their grandchildren say they can’t come over because they have to study, but then post their same-day trips to a theme park on their Facebook pages where Grandma can easily see them. Even common courtesy is being taken apart by this latest fad.

The issues created by Facebook go far beyond ObamaCare requiring everyone to get health insurance. The Virginia State Police is now under fierce attack by civil libertarians for forcing applicant state troopers to hand over passwords so investigators can vet their Facebook pages. In ancient days, it would be like giving inquisitors every personal letter you ever wrote or your diary.

True, vetting state employees especially cops is important. If Gov. Robert F. McDonnell had been a little more attentive about who his personal chef was, he wouldn’t be getting front-page publicity. One wonders why he needs a chef to handle 100 events a year, but I guess it’s better that way, since if he didn’t have a chef, there are plenty of powerful corporations and lobbying firm all too happy to handle his canapés for him. But there must be limits. Not only the State Police, but many companies, are stepping over the personal privacy lane because enormously public Facebook makes it easy.

Another Facebook issue is who controls content. The company has gotten into trouble over this one before. The company line is that what you post is yours, but Facebook pretty much gets to do whatever it wants with it until you officially remove the item. Sometimes, it is hard to change anything with these faceless, computer-driven firms who often don’t even bother to have phone trees, let along Customer Relationship Managers, to handle your problem.

Intellectual property is another big issue. If you post your creative work, how do you know it isn’t being ripped off? This question drills down to a generational divide. Some of the 20-somethings I work with part-time are so part of the Facebook culture, they judge their success by their number of hits, rather than the chances that their content is being ripped off. On the other hand, one of my daughters, a college senior studying art, told me than none of her colleagues will ever post any of their work on Facebook, not even photos of paintings, because they are too afraid of losing ownership control and there seem to be no safeguards.

Lastly, since Facebook and Tweets and Twitters (whatever) are designed around quick, instant messages, they are as forgettable as they are extremely brief. The process puts enormous pressure on users not to do any deep thinking, develop an argument or share any more than the simplest of creative ideas.

What you are seeing is the medium truly becoming the message (or, even better, the massage).  Oops, that sounds so 1960s Marshall McLuhan. I am showing my age.

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. The Virginia State Police is now under fierce attack by civil libertarians for forcing applicant state troopers to hand over passwords so investigators can vet their Facebook pages.

    ================================================
    Why should what anyone writes affect their job performance?

    Nice to know that the State police don’t understand the first amendment .

  2. If you post your creative work, how do you know it isn’t being ripped off?

    Isn’t that the point? When I post an idea, I hope everyone who reads it will adopt it.

    When you get one of those cutsie calendars from the humane society, or a free bagel at Wegmans, it is because they know that the return on investment from such giveaways is about 28 to 1. If you get ripped off on something you posted for free, think of it as someone taking a coupon.

    That 28 to 1 figure is something to think about when you consider the ROI on state “giveaways”. It is a measurable fact that what goes around, comes around, in spades.

  3. As a fellow dinosaur, I share your prejudices about Facebook, twitter and social media generally. I find social media largely, though not totally, useless. (Facebook is good for looking up old friends and associates.) I also think you raise legitimate questions about employers requiring job applicants to turn over passwords. But I take exception to your idea that “anything goes” on Facebook just because it’s private sector. The ownership of Facebook isn’t the issue. What matters is the transparency and voluntary nature of Facebook interactions. As long as people’s activity is voluntary and as long as no fraud is taking place, there is no need for regulation. Your daughter and her friends are exercising their discretion as consumers to keep their intellectual property out of the Facebook domain. That’s real power to the people.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Blogs are a form of social media. In fact, they were one of the earliest forms of social media.

      Interesting that a blogmaster and a group of blog commenters use the internet-based medium of WordPress to complain about social media.

      You guys remind me of the actors and actresses who drive their Priuses to the private airport so they can take the own Gulfstream 5 across the United States.

  4. Peter, an excellent posting. I see a number of issues as well. What is private and what is public? If I post something for “friends,” there is a strong argument the material must be kept private. If I post something for all to see, I am not sure I have any complaints if my posting becomes even more public. But what if my friend makes my information public?
    Then there is the question of what can Facebook do with my information? They are supposed to follow their privacy policy. But what if they don’t?
    Finally, how do we answer the question, how do we feel about privacy when a person posts information suggesting he/she has serious problems that could lead to violence? A posts information about stalking B? C posts a rant about shooting D? How do we draw lines, if any?

  5. “True, vetting state employees especially cops if important.”

    ==============================================

    I once applied for a police job, and after the interview I had it in the bag.
    When the chief explained the work schedule to me, I pointed out to him that the rotating shifts meant a technical violation the rule about paying overtime for more than forty hours in any 7 day period.

    The Chief positively blew up at me. “You just blowed it!” he exclaimed.

    I just shrugged and said, that’s OK, you flunked my ethics test. Man oh man, was he hot then.

    I wonder who vetted that neanderthal for his job?

  6. one of the essences is that if everyone and their Dog knows from reading your FB that you’re into some sketchy things.. and the police don’t vett you properly as a prospective employee..they’re going to look like incompetent idiots if they hire you and you turn out to be very damaging to their mission.

    So they feel like if others can see who you are…they should also.

    But as always..there is a work-around… You list references…. all the police have to do is check THEIR FB accounts… that likely will LINK to Yours.

    it’s a brave new world out there folks.

    FB is the ultimate in narcissism and gossip… and the bonus is that it’s available to cell phones held in front of steering wheels for folks to gaze at, at 60 mph.

    FB in and of itself…used with moderation and common sense is ok but the way many folks are using it is downright pathetic.

    wanna know how I REALLY FEEL? 🙂

  7. Facebook has allowed me to touch base with friends I lost track of decades ago. It proves the adage that a friend is someone you can complete a sentence with, 20 years later.

    If Facebook shows how mundane and banal aspects of our lives are, it also captures the fact that little moments can be special, like the first time you encounter one of those wall murals. Highlighting the ordinary also allows us to helps us determine what is important, and what is noise.

    It may make us more accepting. Things that might have once been a major scandal are a lot less scandalous when we realize how common they are. Or a lot less accepting, as the vile attitude against cell phone drivers attests.

    It is an endless source of humour, of the sort that is not manufactured. I posted a photgraph of a car I snapped in a parking lot, On the back window was soaped “West Virginia Hotties on a Road Trip”. I thought it was mildy humorous by itself, but the responses were a riot.

    I guess I don’t understand how it is all those people concerned about privacy also want their 20 minutes of fame.

  8. What amounts to sketchy things? Promoting ideas of the other political party, on your own time? Having an illegitimate child? A yard service that uses suspicious looking Latinos?

    If it isn’t illegal and it isn’t written into the job requirements, and an applicant meets the requirements you do have, how do you look like a fool for offering someone an opportunity?

    I once knew a fellow who had a successful car dealership, which he built by getting cheap land near the prison, and hiring only people on work release. He turned their “sketchy” background into oa PR asset.

  9. things in the eyes of the police employer that they would find unacceptable in their employees.

    re: FB and old (or new) friends. That’s all fine but why does everyone who knows you have to know everything that is going on between you and one of them?

    that’s downright creepy in my view. It’s like every time you did something with one person you know that you’d blast out an email to everyone else you know telling them…

    that’s bizarre in my view. It’s as adolescent as it gets…. but apparently some folks are so challenged by their self esteem that they have to shout out to everyone they know every time an “event” takes place in their life.

    no for me.. thanks…

    the FB accounts that I like best is the ones that say “XYZ” share ONLY with certain close friends…. and if you THINK you are one of them..contact him and ask….

    Google+ got it right…. family, close friends, acquaintances … which FB then copied but many of those signed up still go by the original “open up your life to anyone 5 degrees of separation away from you” …folks.

    and.. if you are going to trumpet your life events to every Tom, Dick and Harry that stumbles by your page.. why NOT the police , ESPECIALLY if they are going to employ you?

  10. re: FB from the steering wheel at 60 mph.

    anyone who defends this?

    check around you in traffic… it’s a contagion….

  11. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Have any of you guys ever held a security clearance?

    Getting through that process makes somebody looking at your Facebook musing trivial. Background checks, face to face interviews with family, friends and co-workers and even (for some levels) a full lifestyle polygraph exam.

    Why is this done?

    Because you are going to be exposed to sensitive information and the government wants to know if you are trustworthy.

    Is looking through Facebook pages for state police applicants really such a hardship? Don’t the state police have access to lots of sensitive information? Shouldn’t the government want to know if they are trustworthy people?

    I am always amazed at what a bunch of cry-babies we have in Virginia. Drug tests for state employees? No way! The fact that pre-employment drug screening is a fact of life for most private enterprises and everybody in the military doesn’t mean a thing. The state should take my money by force and give it to people who refuse to take a simple, pre-employment drug test? Really?

    And now, the state wants to take a look at the Facebook pages of people they intend to arm with serious weapons and powers of arrest and detention but that bothers you guys?

    You guys need to get out in the real world and take a look around.

    The ridiculous “state government club” in Virginia needs to be torn down and rebuilt.

  12. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    DKR,
    While I have never been the subject of a security clearance, I know people who have been and have been questioned by authorities about people being considered for secure positions. I have also lived and worked in a country famous at the time for its police state mentality and abilities and know that I was occasionally their target.
    A few points:
    The thoroughness of the background check might be related to the level of clearance required. My guess is that working as an operative or analyst for the CIA might be somewhat higher than what’s needed for a state trooper who is going to check overweight trucks or hand out speeding tickets. The Va. State Police do have investigators whom I am sure need higher security.
    Not sure that even higher clearances would require, by contrast, the object to surrender all personal papers relating to his or her personal life. If someone is going to do a Web search of a Facebook page, that’s one thing. Ordering them to hand over all passcodes is something else.
    You don’t comment on my larger points, such as how, seemingly overnight, yet another tech firm is suddenly dominating the market. Sure I have a right to not use Facebook, but I am increasingly being told that if I want to have to look something up, I have to use Facebook. Same road as Microsoft. Remember when Justice went after them for predatory practices? I do. If we had one gasoline company and everyone had to use it, there would be screaming. But since it is HIGH TECHNOLOGY (whoop-dee-do) we all have to genuflect.
    Comment?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Peter:

      It’s hard to claim any of the social media companies have a monopoly. No sooner than Facebook makes progress then Google launches their social media program. No sooner does Yahoo! look like they’ll dominate search then Google shows up and Microsoft with BING (Because It’s Not Google?).

      I do remember the Microsoft inquiry. I even remember the AT&T break-up and I’ve read of IBM’s anti – trust problems.

      The only one that really got broken up was AT&T.

      I think you are barking up the wrong tree with regard to monopoly. I think the loss of privacy is a far bigger concern. The vast majority of people don’t realize how much information is collected by “free” websites and how that information is used.

      Not only do the sites themselves know more about you than you can imagine, the government collects that information as well. The cover story of the latest WIRED magazine is about the NSA’s information collection program – highlighting social media.

      Orwell wasn’t wrong, he was just 40 years premature (with 1984).

  13. Security clearances come in different flavors even more granular than plain old Secret and TS.

    And you know when you sign up for a job that requires the clearance that they’re going to be nosing through your current and former life.

    People who “inhaled” 20, 30 years ago have to think hard about fessing up because the investigators may well dredge up something. And the irony is if you fess up you may well still be a good security risk because the ones that are not are the the ones that can be blackmailed.

    I don’t have a problem with the concept of social media …blogs or Google+ or FB or others.

    what bothers me is the place that it has not occupied in our lives and (for instance) why I care if a friend of a friend of a friend “likes” a certain Dentist or just bought new shoes for her kid.

    I read that about 1/3 of the divorces in the UK now subpoena FB info to get the “Good” on who is cheating….

    but FB reminds me a lot about high school and the hyper social statusing and social dramas.

    FB just seems awfully unseemly to me… why should I really care how many or how few “friends” I have in the first place and why in the world do I care if others know ?

    I could go on and on here..but I’m probably sounding like an old fogey, eh?

    I’ll tell you what might be interesting about the police use of it and that is …the alarming number of police who themselves are being arrested for sexual misconduct…and law enforcement conduct…

    I would think that anyone who was contemplating employment for a company that took notice of FB… would “cool it” for a while anyhow.

    But if you think this is OK..then think about doing it for every school teacher in Fairfax or Henrico county. That okay?

  14. hey… isn’t this DJ guy someone who went BACK into the closet?

    just saying…..

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      As I’ve warned you and Peter – the data trail you leave on the internet allows for very easy identification. Back when you used your full name, I provided you with some facts about yourself. You then switched to only using the last initial of you sur name. Very smart. Hydra also adopted a pen name. Peter and Jim use their real names and now, so do I. However, I took that step after fairly serious consideration of the implications of that decision.

      Facebook is like talking to friends in a crowded bar. You never know who is listening in and you never know which of your friends will repeat what you have said. Checking whether the State Police have used discretion on Facebook is a reasonable employment test in my opinion. Reading their e-mails is not. You really should have no substantial expectation of privacy on Facebook.

  15. I don’t really have a big problem with social media. It’s a personal preference and I also enjoy being aware of family and friends… to a point.

    but I do not believe people really understand the real implications and consequences of this new way of interacting with others and the world around us.

    it has some pretty significant implications not to mention the pseudo-evil way FB is accessing and using your personal data.

    but I digress……

    I DO HAVE a BIG PROBLEM with people who drive under the “influence” of alcohol, drugs, food, cigarettes, makeup, kids, etc to include staring transfixed into your cell phone.

    This is turning into a disease.

    It’s not only the car,… it’s social get togethers, dinners, weddings…even funerals… but worst of all… at 60 miles an hour weaving left then right as folks are gobbling up every last visual morsel of news/gossip/etc.

    I cannot believe it. Perfectly sane people who gave up smoking, lost weight, fasten their seat belts and fasten their kids into their seats are going down the road at 60 mph staring into their cellphones.

    tell me I’m wrong here…

Leave a Reply