Government Attacks K-12 Public Education in Virginia – Chapter 2: The Regulatory State

James Lane, Superintendent of Public Instruction under Ralph Northam

by James C. Sherlock

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) both runs its own virtual school and regulates that school’s competitors.

The Virginia way.

Mark Zuckerberg can only dream.

Virginia’s privately run, state-funded, multidivision online providers (MOPs) constitute the major competitors to VDOE’s own Virtual Virginia, its state-run virtual school.

Virginia law positions MOPs as a publicly funded option for parents.

Putting on its regulatory hat, VDOE is poised to ask the Board of Education to drive the MOPs out of the publicly funded market with regulations that significantly impact their business models and curtail parents’ incentives to register with them.

Pretty much of a two-for-one if you hate the thoughts of both:

  • public education funds going to efficient, nationally recognized private providers who educate hundreds of thousands of American children every year under this model; and
  • parental choice in education.

We know who we mean.

It appears this attempt will fail because of the results of the fall elections, but they may still be trying to slip it through.

The Superintendent of Public Instruction in September 2021 convened one of his famous advisory panels stocked with VDOE employees and allies to consider new regulations for virtual K-12 education.

Unsurprisingly, the executive director of Virtual Virginia was there. Equally unsurprising, no representative of Virtual Virginia’s main MOP competitor was in the room.

The Virtual Learning Advisory Committee (VLAC) was given a presentation by VDOE that recommended regulations for Virtual Virginia‘s competitors that will cause them to withdraw.

I should say competitor.

Virginia Virtual Academy (VAVA), a full-time public virtual school offered by multiple school divisions and run by Herndon-based Stride/K12, thoroughly dominates full-time MOP instruction in Virginia. Until this school year and the 2021 Richmond Public Schools (RPS) contract affair (see previous columns in this series), VAVA had far more full-time students than Virtual Virginia (VVA). (See post-script for the story of the name game.)

You will note from the presentation linked above that no educators from Stride or Virtual Virginia Academy were invited to the regulatory party thrown by VDOE in September of 2021, despite the fact Stride is the largest MOP in the state and serves thousands of students and teachers in Virginia. And MOPs are never mentioned.

You will also note from the presentation that Virginia Virtual Academy‘s educational program, the MOP model driven by state law, could be significantly and negatively impacted if the regulations discussed at the meeting linked above are implemented.

The presentation included provisions that both defined virtual schools and programs without including or even mentioning the MOPs and foreclosed on their education model that parents have found so attractive.

First, Virtual Learning Definitions:

Virtual Program – Organizations that work directly with students and deliver virtual learning services, but are not “schools.” Virtual programs in Virginia include Virtual Virginia and other school division initiatives.

Virtual School – Organizations that work directly with students and deliver virtual learning services as a separate school within a division or region.

(Bolding by the author)

Then the coup-de-gras:

The responsible school division is required to provide services and counseling for special populations, students with disabilities, English Learners, gifted students, minority students, and/or economically disadvantaged students, in the virtual learning setting as in a brick and mortar setting.

And later:

Policies and procedures unique to virtual learning shall include, but are limited to the following:

  • Procedures and policies for application and acceptance;
  • Student and Parent/Guardian Orientation materials;
  • Support for 504, IEP, EL, and other student services (School Counselors, Librarians, ITRT et. al.);
  • Technology Support policies;
    Support for Gifted and Talented services;

(Bolding by the author)

Those services are already required of the public schools in support of Virtual Virginia. That has been true for years. There is even a school counselors’ handbook published by Virtual Virginia with all of the information above in it — and more. The handbook was published well before this conference. There is no new state regulation required to specify these rules.

No other conclusion is available but that the regulations under discussion are meant as an attack on the MOP business model in an attempt to return control of MOP students to the brick-and-mortar schools and clear the market of MOPs for VDOE’s Virtual Virginia. There is also no doubt that the current Board of Education will approve them if it can.

The local schools are not responsible to provide those educational services when a MOP provides the education in Virginia. In fact, that is the core of their objection to the MOPs other than the way the money is handled (next Chapter).

In the MOP model in Virginia, all of that support listed above as well as testing and everything else is provided directly by the MOP. The kids never set foot in the local school.

That in fact constitutes one of the MOPs major efficiencies when computing the relative costs to taxpayers of Virginia’s state/local school model vs the MOP model.

That model happens to be what attracts many parents.

Those parents do not want their children dependent on the local school. That is the very reason many seek full-time virtual education for their kids. A state-funded MOP is currently the only option to the state-run Virtual Virginia for parents who cannot afford private school.

In other states, online providers successfully offer a model of services to school divisions that matches that of VDOE’s Virtual Virginia model. Or rather vice versa.

Most MOPs did not pursue that approach here specifically to stay out of VDOE’s way. VDOE’s school did not offer full-time instruction for years after the MOPs started in Virginia and Stride’s Virginia Virtual Academy captured that segment of the market.

The joke, it turns out, is on Stride and the other MOPs.

The VDOE regulatory blade is poised to drop starting with the Board of Education meeting in March. The new Virtual Learning Advisory Committee (VLAC) has promised (threatened?) to meet twice a year going forward.

I fully expect Governor Youngkin, his new Superintendent of Public Instruction and the new Attorney General will quash this nonsense before it ever makes it to the Northam-appointed Board of Education, much less to the Virginia’s Administrative Code.

That is why I left this information out of both the Prologue and Chapter 1 of this series. I will not bring it up again.

But I thought the public should know what was in store until the election. It shows intent.

(Post-script. Drafting on the national market leader’s established naming conventions, VDOE had the General Assembly rename its school Virtual Virginia in 2011 after Stride/K12s MOP Virginia Virtual Academy emerged here. (State) Virtual Academy is a trade name under which Stride operates its state-specific virtual public schools across America in partnership with school districts and nonprofit charter schools. (Coincidentally.)


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “Government Attacks K-12 Public Education in Virginia – Chapter 2: The Regulatory State”

  1. John Martin Avatar
    John Martin

    no public funds for charters or private schools!

    1. Mark O Flaherty Avatar
      Mark O Flaherty

      Why not? Current model does not appear to benefit the client (i.e. the children). Competition is solution to continuing failure in education.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Because I don’t want one red cent of my taxes going to a church.

        1. Mark O Flaherty Avatar
          Mark O Flaherty

          That can be your position (which I don’t support as education is education) but you might want to better understand the benefit of charter type schools to serve populations that you have cast off. Recommend consider review of KIPP and similar schools that serve minority communities with success and reduce costs.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Churches are by definition indoctrination. PERIOD!

          2. Mark O Flaherty Avatar
            Mark O Flaherty

            And for your approach to public education which include CRT is not indoctrination. How about considering teaching children skills they will need in an increasingly technical society vice making excuses of why they cannot achieve.

          3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            See my reponse to your friend, Eric the troll, below.

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            My point has nothing whatsoever to do with religion.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Mine does. Churches will worm into any openings.

          6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I don’t disagree with you. Yours is a fair point.

          7. The discussion is about schools in Virginia, not Nevada.

          8. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            My description of the MOPs has struck an exposed nerve, opposition to religion, that is neither in evidence nor permissible in this case. But good to know.

          9. DJRippert Avatar

            So are public schools … what is your point?

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          What church? These MOPs are private companies, including non-profits, and school district programs. No religious-based organizations are eligible.

          You are off on a rant that is not supported by the facts in this case.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Yeah. Right. Foot in the door.

          2. DJRippert Avatar

            What’s new?

          3. DJRippert Avatar

            Don’t muddy the water with facts.

        3. Constitution of Virginia

          Article IV, Section 16, Appropriations to religious or charitable bodies.

          The General Assembly shall not make any appropriation of public funds, personal property, or real estate to any church or sectarian society, or any association or institution of any kind whatever which is entirely or partly, directly or indirectly, controlled by any church or sectarian society.

          Not one red cent of your tax dollars goes to any church, and nothing mentioned in the above article can/will change that.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Federal law used to say the same thing in 2000, but GW change that with an EO on “Faith Based Initiatives”, and last I saw, churches recieved $80B in direct funds. Slippery slopes and all that rot.

        4. Constitution of Virginia

          Article IV, Section 16, Appropriations to religious or charitable bodies.

          The General Assembly shall not make any appropriation of public funds, personal property, or real estate to any church or sectarian society, or any association or institution of any kind whatever which is entirely or partly, directly or indirectly, controlled by any church or sectarian society.

          Not one red cent of your tax dollars goes to any church, and nothing mentioned in the above article can/will change that.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      A fair position.

      For which the honest approach would be to repeal existing laws that provide public funds for parents who choose privately-run MOPs.

      That is not what the left is doing here. This is an attempt at regulatory override of existing laws.

    3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Based on the recent election a great number of parents are ready to say no to public education. I completely understand why.

  2. dave schutz Avatar
    dave schutz

    “convened one of his famous advisory panels stocked with VDOE employees and allies” Puh-leeze! “stocked” sounds so … harsh. How about “curated”? Sounds much nicer.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      OK, curated.

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “The responsible school division is required to provide services and counseling for special populations, students with disabilities, English Learners, gifted students, minority students, and/or economically disadvantaged students, in the virtual learning setting as in a brick and mortar setting.”

    This is a statement of what the law requires of the “responsible school division” – hence the introductory phrase “Virtual programs must comply with all federal and state laws governing the education of all public school students.” It is simply stating that, as with brick and mortar schools, these services need to be provided. I see no reason why the MOP can’t provide them without involving a brick and mortar facility. It seems that this is what they are already doing if what you wrote is accurate.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      What I wrote is accurate. I got it from direct correspondence with VDOE.

      The issue is that this description is in the process of being applied not only to the state school, Virtual Virginia, which already lives by those provisions, but also to its privately or district-run competitors, who do not.

      VDOE is trying to eliminate those competitors by requiring them to be as dependent on local brick-and-mortar school participation as is the state-run option.

      That, as VDOE knows, is the feature of the non-state MOP options that attracts parents. If they wanted to send their kids to their local public school, they would do so.

      It is great being king – being able to run your own school and regulate those of your competitors.

      Great for everybody but the parents who seek alternatives to their local school. That option is currently offered in Virginia law.

      VDOE is trying to overcome existing law with regulations. You must certainly not be in favor of that. That would give Youngkin appointees the same powers. Think about it.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “The issue is that this description is in the process of being applied not only to the state school, Virtual Virginia, which already lives by those provisions, but also to its privately or district-run competitors, who do not.”

        You said that the MOPs do actually provide these services:

        “In the MOP model in Virginia, all of that support listed above as well as testing and everything else is provided directly by the MOP. The kids never set foot in the local school.”

        There is nothing in the regulation that I can see here that says the MOP can’t continue to provide the services nor that it can’t continue to be virtual (or be provided at a facility other than the local brick and mortar school).

        From what is written in the presentation, it is State and Federal law that all schools (virtual or no) provide these services. Why should MOPs be exempt (especially if they are already providing them)? Should not all children in all publicly funded schools have access to these services (especially if access is required by law)?

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Too much misunderstanding there to unpack and answer. Suffice it to say that the MOPs know what the proposed regulations mean to their educational models, and have protested this proposed new regulatory regime to VDOE.

          I absolutely don’t blame you for being confused.

          It has taken me four months of daily research and about a hundred emails back and forth with VDOE and others to begin to understand virtual public education in Virginia. I still try to pre-clear everything I write with multiple subject matter experts, though any errors remaining are mine.

          That, really, is the underlying issue. Virginia’s various laws, regulations and funding streams create a “system” that is no system at all. It is quite literally inexplicable.

          No sentient human being would create what we have on purpose. It has evolved over years without any attempt at rationalization as it evolved.

          I am trying to build for you and others a picture of what is going on one chapter at at time. Wait until you see my article on funding.

          It absolutely need not be this way and must not remain so.

          Virginia’s laws, regulations and funding for both publicly funded and publicly regulated virtual K-12 education need a thorough overhaul regardless of one’s opinion of how things ought to be.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Here comes da Pope! Here comes da Pope! Order in the classroom ’cause here comes the Pope! Apologies to Flip.
      https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ851079
      https://www.chalkbeat.org/2017/7/9/21101013/churches-running-charter-schools-the-latest-supreme-court-decision-could-open-the-door-in-some-state

      Jefferson? Madison? No, Boniface!

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        I read the linked articles. Thank you. Neither is applicable to virtual public schools in Virginia.

        The first, from 2009, is interesting but irrelevant here. It concerns charter schools. Code of Virginia § 22.1-212.6:1:
        “G. No public charter school shall engage in any sectarian practices in its educational program, admissions or employment policies, or operations.”

        In the second article, the author expresses concerns that the Trinity Lutheran case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a religious school could participate in a program that applied safety measures to school playgrounds.

        The article also notes:
        “In a footnote, though, the decision was explicitly limited to the situation at hand. (Two conservative justices, who were part of the majority, disavowed that aspect of the opinion.)”

        So the court not only has not ruled on the situation under discussion here, but it indeed signaled 7-2 that it would not back public funding of religious schools broadly.

        So Boniface, Madison and Jefferson can “requiescat in pace”.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Pax. Or, pox. One or the other. Better to have flunked a Wasserman than to have never loved at all.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            See my new message to Eric above.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Hey. Correction Core of America. Privatized prisons.
    Blackwater. Remember them? Mercenaries..

    Works for prisons and war, why not schools?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      So you are comparing kids to prisoners and terrorists? Just kidding.

      MOPs include both private companies and school divisions offering their services to other school divisions. MOP teachers are state-certified. MOP courses are state certified. VDOE oversees and regulates the MOPs. Parents can complain to VDOE if they feel their child is not getting the services he should.

      MOP students dramatically outperform on SOLs students not attending MOPs. By percentage, there are as many Black students in the dominant MOP as there are in the state public schools as a whole.

      Mercenaries indeed.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        When was the last time a five-year was in your house? Kid? Terrorist? Tough choice.

        Still, it’s an opening door. God knows what’s gonna try and rush in.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Lots of things might happen going forward. Two of those:
          1. Banning of publicly funded, privately-run online public schools in Virginia;
          2. Public funding of online religious schools in Virginia.

          Which do you think is more likely?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Trump was elected president. Which do you think I think will happen?

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Public funding of online religious schools in Virginia would be unconstitutional.

            Elimination of publicly funded, privately-run online public schools in Virginia would not be unconstitutional. All that would be required is repealing the existing Virginia laws that permit them.

            Any observations now on which is more likely?

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    How will the new Governor, Secretary of Education, and new AG “quash” any new regulations before they make it to the BOE? That is not how the regulatory process works. Sec. 2.2-4013 of the Code provides:

    “Not less than fifteen days following the completion of the public comment period provided for in § 2.2-4007.03,
    the agency may (i) adopt the proposed regulation if the Governor has no objection to the regulation; (ii) modify and adopt the proposed regulation after considering and incorporating the Governor’s objections or suggestions, if any; or (iii) adopt the regulation without changes despite the Governor’s recommendations for change.” [emphasis added]

  6. […] that authorize public funding for the privately-run options.  The machinations described in Chapter 2 of this series were a work around to constrain supply of the private […]

Leave a Reply