Government Attacks K-12 Public Education in Virginia – Chapter 3: The Elusive Costs of the Government Option

by James C. Sherlock

The publicly funded competitors to VDOE-run Virtual Virginia provide VDOE-approved curricula and courses delivered by VDOE-certified teachers employed by highly experienced and nationally prominent companies regulated by VDOE.

You get the point: VDOE oversees its competitors. And it knows what they are paid by the government.

My very rough estimates indicate that a full-time, VDOE-run Virtual Virginia education is more expensive than a similar education provided by those private sector competitors.

But no one in the public or in government could either prove or disprove that assessment. I would call that a problem.

It would take a forensic accountant to determine the true cost of a full-time Virtual Virginia education. We should have those figures. We do not.

Neither does the government.

The hard part. The costs of Virtual Virginia are funded from at least seven sources, only the first five of which are budgeted under Department of Education Central Office Operations. The subcategories are Distance Learning and Electronic Classroom.

Distance learning and electronic classroom

  1. General fund
  2. Special
  3. Trust and Agency.  This budget line is an estimate of expected tuition payments from school districts. The actual tuition charges are paid by the school divisions from their Direct Aid to Schools funds. The Central Office budget line lets VDOE spend the tuition money as it is received.
  4. Federal

Here is the executive budget submission for Virtual Virginia.

Executive Budget submission enrolled as SB 300 – 2022 Session – Distance Learning and Electronic Classroom (18602) – Virtual Virginia

FY 23 FY 24
Total $33,503,634 $40,025,811
Fund Sources

General

$6,021,594 $6,021,594

Special

$105,000 $105,000

Trust and Agency

$27,982,225 $34,504,402

Federal Trust

$55,276 $55,276

In the notes you would find that the Trust and Agency lines represent increases of $26,088,705 in FY 23 and $32,610,882 in FY 24 respectively from those previously considered.

Fall 2019 full-time Virtual Virginia enrollment — before the pandemic — was approximately 235 students.

Fall 2020 full-time enrollment rose to 921 as the program was expanded in response to the pandemic. The total tuition received was less than a million dollars in FY 21.

In FY 22, Virtual Virginia expects to receive about $26 million in tuition payments for the 2021-22 school year for 12,608 full time students.

Remember that the “Trust and Agency” line in Virtual Virginia’s budget authorizes Virtual Virginia to spend tuition money expected to be paid by school divisions from their state shares of Direct Aid to Schools.

The fifth traceable Virtual Virginia funding line supports technology for the learning management system that is required for its operations. That bill is separately budgeted with General Fund dollars at $5,138,000 annually.

The sixth traceable cost is the money paid to Carroll County every year to handle the HR and accounting for the employees of Virtual Virginia. Charlotte County Public Schools receives $386,000 annually along with a 2% administrative fee for processing payroll and benefits.

We are not done.

The seventh source of funds is unaccounted for.

It consists of the considerable non-instructional costs that Virtual Virginia requires the local brick-and-mortar public schools to absorb, which are not identified anywhere. Those costs are paid by the districts using Direct Aid to Public Education funds, but are nowhere broken out, much less shown as a cost of Virtual Virginia.

That same Direct Aid to Public Education money pot is used by the school districts to pay Virtual Virginia tuitions.

Instructional and non-instructional costs are reported by VDOE each year for the state and for each school division. Together they account for the total cost of a full time education — roughly 1/3 non-instructional costs and 2/3 instructional costs with only slight variations statewide.

In the case of Virtual Virginia, non-instructional costs are unreported and virtually untraceable.

That is because Virtual Virginia offloads considerable costs, like counseling and mentoring, testing and special costs associated with IEP, 504 and ELL students that are considered costs of direct instruction by the state school costs accounting standards.

So, the true costs of Virtual Virginia are unknown. It has both fixed costs that are budgeted and levies costs per student that are both known and unknown.

Perhaps we should consider finding out what the total costs are and divide them by the number of students to figure out what Virtual Virginia is really costing. Just a thought.

The easy part. Virtual Virginia

’s competitors are the privately-run options regulated by VDOE that Virginia parents have preferred over the VDOE school.  They submit invoices to the districts with whom they have contracts. Those invoices are paid from the district’s state share of Direct Aid to Schools. No local or federal share is involved. That is the total cost.

Those Virtual Virginia competitors provide directly to their students all of the services that VDOE’s Virtual Virginia offloads onto the brick-and-mortar public schools.

Got all of that? Admit it, you don’t. You don’t have any idea of the costs of Virtual Virginia, and that is before you even begin to assess its relative value.

Perhaps the true costs of that school are undefinable for a reason. Or perhaps it just reflects lack of interest.

I pick the latter.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

14 responses to “Government Attacks K-12 Public Education in Virginia – Chapter 3: The Elusive Costs of the Government Option”

  1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Not a bad gig for a school teacher. Pay is good. Stipend for extra degrees. Benefits and VRS. Partridge in a pear tree not included.
    https://www.virtualvirginia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/VVA-Teacher-Salary-Scale-2021-2022.pdf

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Applicants have to compete for these jobs. They have the pay and benefits of teaching without any of the hassle, including commutes and meetings. As demand grows, supply of teachers will never be a constraint. The commercial companies even offer regular schools virtual subs.

  2. Jim, can you calculate a cost per student based on identifiable costs for Virtual Virginia? How does that compare to what the state pays Virtual Virginia’s competitors?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Too hard. An accountant will have to do it.

      One of my recommendations in my final chapter will be that the General Assembly commission an audit of the complete costs of both the VDOE and privately-run options.

      A second will be that the General Assembly commission an assessment of the quality of educations provided by both. We have never seen an accounting of the SOL scores of the Virtual Virginia kids. But we know that those scores for MOP-educated kids are terrific even thought they take all applicants regardless of need.

      Finally, we know the demographics of the MOP student bodies have the same percentage of Black kids as do the public schools as a whole. We don’t have corresponding information on the VDOE Virtual Virginia student body.

  3. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    Government does not want peons and serfs knowing the true cost of bloated government programs. They might get upset and vote with their pocketbooks and logic instead of their emotions.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is a common complaint made by advocates of privatization. It is that the true cost of the government program is not transparent because it does not include overhead such as HR, accounting, etc, which the private vendor must reflect in its fee if it expects to make a profit. The complaint has some legitimacy. I tend to think it has less legitimacy in this case. The school district has to provide those non-instructional services even if some of its students are enrolled full-time in Virtual Virginia.

    I am just catching up on this series, so I apologize if you have covered any of this in your previous posts. Are full-time students enrolled in Virtual Virginia or a privately-run program included in a school division’s ADM? Does DOE have a fee schedule for students enrolled in Virtual Virginia? How much does it charge a school division for each student enrolled? Can students take single courses in Virtual Virginia? What is the cost? I know that home school students are not entitled to take Virtual Virginia courses without charge. How much is the charge for a home school student to take one course? What are the comparable charges by the private vendor?

    A few other questions. What is the is for your statement that the school division uses its state basic aid funding and not local funds to pay for Virtual Virginia? I don’t think school divisions have separate accounts for state money and local money. The funds are fungible. And, even if that is the case, what does it matter?

    Finally, the rapid growth of Virtual Virginia would seem to indicate that there is a demand for it and parents are generally satisfied with it. If parents don’t have to pay for it, as they would have to pay a private vendor, that seems to be a benefit.

    Is the money that local school divisions pay DOE for Virtual Virginia money that it would have received from the state in any case? If so, it might be that local school divisions are being shortchanged. They have to pay for Johnny, Sue, and Bob to be enrolled full-time in Virtual Virginia, but having three fewer kids in the brick and mortar school does not reduce their costs any.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Dick, You ask excellent questions. For the answers to most of them, see the first three episodes in the series:
      https://www.baconsrebellion.com/government-attacks-on-parental-choice-in-virtual-k-12-public-education-in-virginia-chapter-2-the-regulatory-state/ ;
      https://www.baconsrebellion.com/government-attacks-on-parental-choice-in-virtual-k-12-public-education-in-virginia-chapter-1-teacher-shortages/; and
      https://www.baconsrebellion.com/government-attacks-on-parental-choice-in-virtual-k-12-public-education-in-virginia-a-prologue/.

      The questions you pose that may not be answered there I will answer below. I rolled this series out in that manner to try to build understanding coming up to this one and especially the next, which will offer solutions to rationalize publicly funded virtual K-12 education in Virginia.

      Lots of things need fixing, starting with the fact that VDOE runs Virtual Virginia and regulates Virtual Virginia’s competitors.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      It is the complexity and lack of transparency of this “system” of virtual public K-12 education in Virginia that needs to be fixed, whatever one’s political views on how things ought to be.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      This is a common complaint made by advocates of privatization. It is that the true cost of the government program is not transparent because it does not include overhead such as HR, accounting, etc, which the private vendor must reflect in its fee if it expects to make a profit. The complaint has some legitimacy. I tend to think it has less legitimacy in this case. The school district has to provide those non-instructional services even if some of its students are enrolled full-time in Virtual Virginia. The school district is not asked to provide these services to students enrolled in the MOPs. So they represent a significant differential cost driver for Virtual Virginia.

      I am just catching up on this series, so I apologize if you have covered any of this in your previous posts. Are full-time students enrolled in Virtual Virginia or a privately-run program included in a school division’s ADM? They are included in the ADM of the school division if they are enrolled in Virtual Virginia. They are enrolled in the ADM of the school holding the MOP contract, regardless of where they live, if their parents enroll them in a MOP. That has been by far the most popular parental choice until this year. Does DOE have a fee schedule for students enrolled in Virtual Virginia? Yes. How much does it charge a school division for each student enrolled? See https://www.virtualvirginia.org/fees-k-5/ Can students take single courses in Virtual Virginia? Yes. What is the cost? See https://www.virtualvirginia.org/fees-6-12/ I know that home school students are not entitled to take Virtual Virginia courses without charge. How much is the charge for a home school student to take one course? ibid. What are the comparable charges by the private vendor? The private vendor charges are not comparable to Virtual Virginia charges because of the reasons cited in the article above.

      A few other questions. What is the is for your statement that the school division uses its state basic aid funding and not local funds to pay for Virtual Virginia? That is the reason that Virtual Virginia has the sliding scale. At the high end of ability-to-pay, say Loudoun, the school district would have to dip into local funds to pay the full tuition, much less the non-instructional costs. At the low end, Lee County would pay those costs and have state money left over. But on a statewide basis, the state share should cover the tuition costs of Virtual Virginia. I don’t think school divisions have separate accounts for state money and local money. The funds are fungible. And, even if that is the case, what does it matter? It matters because neither Virtual Virginia nor the MOPs wants districts faced with having to use local taxpayer funds for virtual education.. That is why the MOPs have to find districts with which to contract that have high enough state shares, which follow the child, to host out-of-district kids and make a profit on the transaction. Or at least not lose money.

      Finally, the rapid growth of Virtual Virginia would seem to indicate that there is a demand for it and parents are generally satisfied with it. Read my article on the artificial suppression of the supply of MOP “capacity” for this calendar year, which caused them to have to deny admission to 4000 students. That coincided with the vast expansion of Virtual Virginia. If parents don’t have to pay for it, as they would have to pay a private vendor, that seems to be a benefit. Parents pay for neither option. The choice, assuming they are aware of it, is between
      – enrolling their kids in the local public school and asking for virtual instruction, which will be evaluated and decided by the school, and if they agree, the school will apply to Virtual Virginia. This is the only option they will be offered by the local school unless that school district runs its own virtual school, and a few do.; and
      – enrolling their kids directly with a MOP, which will provide that education to as many enrollees as they can under their existing contracts with school divisions to accept out-of-district kids.

      Since the MOPs have decades of experience doing this and the local school is not part of the equation, parents have for years overwhelmingly chosen the MOP option.

      That option was foreclosed in 2021-21 for the 4000 kids mentioned above by the sudden cancellation by Richmond Public Schools of a contract with the leading MOP which had been in place for years.

      Is the money that local school divisions pay DOE for Virtual Virginia money that it would have received from the state in any case? Yes. If so, it might be that local school divisions are being shortchanged. They have to pay for Johnny, Sue, and Bob to be enrolled full-time in Virtual Virginia, but having three fewer kids in the brick and mortar school does not reduce their costs any. It reduces their costs by not having to provide a teacher and a classroom for those kids. It does not reduce the rest of their costs.

    4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      It is the complexity and lack of transparency of this “system” of virtual public K-12 education in Virginia that needs to be fixed, whatever one’s political views on how things ought to be.

      1. JS, I look forward to your recommendations, It appears to this layman on the sidelines, with adult children well past the need for secondary education of any kind, that this issue ought to demand attention from anyone interested in good government. I hope your recommendations end up providing (as they already have with the series thus far) a roadmap for the incoming Aimee Rogstad Guidera, Secretary of Education, who it has been noted is the founder and former CEO of the Data Quality Campaign.

        The subject of providing effective, efficient virtual secondary education should attract attention from all sides of the current political divide, especially now with so much concern about alternatives to bricks-and-mortar school education. This is an opportunity for the new Gov to show that he’s for common sense simplification and transparency in one of Virginia’s most hide-bound bureaucracies.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          I understand that issue has the attention of both the new governor and of Ms. Guidera.

  5. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    You choose the latter… Why not both?

  6. […] school are undefined. Virtual Virginia costs are so multifaceted and murky that they took their own Chapter in this series to partially […]

Leave a Reply