Gov. Youngkin’s Latest Event Undermines Nikole Hannah-Jones’ Attack

by Tyler O’Neil

Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin, on Tuesday, joined fourth graders at Fort Monroe outside Newport News, Virginia, hosting an event teaching about the history of the fort, where Black slaves fled during the Civil War to become freemen at what became known as “Freedom’s Fortress.”

The Youngkin event came two days after Nikole Hannah-Jones of The New York Times’ “The 1619 Project,” claimed that Youngkin “does not want children to learn that history.”

“The 1619 Project” author spoke on Feb. 19 at the McLean Community Center in a one-hour speech for which the Fairfax County Public Library system paid her $29,350 and the community center paid her an additional $6,000. She acknowledged that her project rewrites history and urged her audience to support reparations to Blacks for slavery and to “subvert” America’s economic system, which she claimed is beset by institutional racism. She also suggested that the Confederates understood the Constitution accurately, establishing the United States as a “slave nation.”

Hannah-Jones spoke about the central role Virginia plays in the history of American slavery, stating that the “entire legal architecture of what is race, who’s black, who’s not, whose children will be born enslaved, whose children will be born free, it all is created in Virginia.”

“Massive resistance to Brown v. Board, the strategy is born here, and yet you have a governor who does not want children to learn that history even as they still sit in segregated classrooms,” The 1619 Project author claimed. She has previously criticized Youngkin’s efforts to remove critical race theory (a lens encouraging students to view America as institutionally racist) from school curricula, saying he aims to provide a “sanitized” history for “White kids.”

Yet two days after Hannah-Jones attacked Youngkin, the governor was teaching Virginia’s children about slavery, according to footage of the Fort Monroe event obtained by The Daily Signal.

“We just covered in that lesson over 400 years of history, and it’s really important history, starting in 1619, where the first Africans were brought to this country as slaves, and it was a terrible, terrible, terrible beginning,” the governor said after Jess Meadows, education programs manager at the Fort Monroe Authority, led students through a lesson.

“But what we also learned was that, at Fort Monroe, a decision was made in order to give three men freedom that spread to thousands, and that was the beginning of the end of the horrific, terrible institution of slavery. And so right here, we get to see history come alive,” Youngkin added.

The governor noted that the students who joined him, virtually and in person, had “just finished studying the Constitution.” He said that document demonstrates “the fact that we are not perfect, and this country is not perfect, but—boy—are we in pursuit of a more perfect union together.”

Union Gen. Benjamin F. Butler freed three slaves at the fort in 1861, starting a surge of Black refugees who came to the fort to receive their freedom. Butler declared the slaves “contraband of war” and refused to return them to their owners. Although Virginia joined the Confederacy in the Civil War, Fort Monroe remained part of the Union.

Youngkin’s office responded to Hannah-Jones’ claim by pointing to the governor’s efforts to teach all of America’s history, the good and the bad.

“We’re reaching a point in our country where the voices of division are getting louder and angrier,” Martin Brown, chief diversity, opportunity, and inclusion officer for the governor, told The Daily Signal in a statement Wednesday. “Fortunately, volume and emotion don’t create truth. While there will always be some in Virginia who seek to divide, Governor Youngkin will continue to lead by example and push for Virginia to teach all our history — the good and the bad.”

The New York Times stealth-edited claims from The 1619 Project, removing the assertion that the arrival of slaves in Virginia in 1619 represented the country’s “true founding.” Historians criticized the project for claiming that the Founders launched the Revolutionary War to protect slavery and for claiming that the 1619 arrival of slaves in Virginia represents the beginning of slavery in what would become the U.S. Black slaves first arrived in Florida in 1526, and slavery as an institution was nearly universal in early human societies, including among Indigenous North American tribes.

Tyler O’Neil is managing editor of The Daily Signal, where this column first appeared. It is reposted here with permission from The Heritage Foundation.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

88 responses to “Gov. Youngkin’s Latest Event Undermines Nikole Hannah-Jones’ Attack”

  1. DJRippert Avatar

    ” … Fairfax County Public Library system paid her $29,350 …”

    Almost $30,000 of taxpayer money for a one hour talk.

    It’s time to move the public libraries online, fire most of the employees, bulldoze the buildings and sell the underlying land. The funds raised could be used to improve the physical structures of our public schools.

    If people want community centers, they can use the local public elementary schools.

    Brick and mortar public libraries once served and important purpose. That time has come and gone.

    1. I think I’ll “subvert” my county’s economic system by doing everything within my power to see to it that our library never pays her a cent.

      1. Why are people so afraid of opposing views and do not want actual discussion and dialogue? Perhaps because the cancel culture has taken hold of the nation.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          It’s the $30,000 to which I object.

          1. Feel free to file a complaint with the system.

          2. I don’t even object to her being paid $30,000 an hour for a speaking engagement, if some private entity thinks hearing what she has to say is worthwhile.

            I object to taxpayers being required to pay her $30,000 an hour for a speaking engagement at a public library.

        2. Equal time for all racists, put Hannah-Jones and the KKK on a twin bill at the library. They’re flip sides of the same coin.

          No doubt the Klan agrees with Kendi that “The remedy for past discrimination is present discrimination. The remedy for present discrimination is future discrimination.” They would all argue for repeal of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits discrimination in America.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The prefatory sentence to the Kendi quote reads, “The only remedy to racist discrimination is anti racist discrimination.”

          2. And your point is?

            Discrimination is discrimination, against white people just like anyone else. It is against the law. Good thing you didn’t try to make a living as a law yer.

            Congrats on another nice Jim McCarthy silly walk.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar

            It’s easier to be an activist who’s devoid of substance.

          4. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Competent reporting would have included the opening sentence as it creates a context for the two following sentences. The anti racism is directed at discrimination which is not personal. Silly me.

          5. Yes silly, silly you, Whew, you still don’t get it.

            Racial discrimination is illegal. Period. Pro or anti anyone it is both illegal and unconstitutional in every context. That is not a difficult concept. It has been the law of the land for nearly 60 years.

            At least 2 Supreme Court justices have observed that the way to defeat racial discrimination is to stop discriminating. It is pretty simple.

            More racial discrimination does not remedy racial discrimination it compounds it and makes it worse.

            Only racists advocate more racial discrimination. That adds context to you and Kendi and the KKK.

          6. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            I fear it is your failure to comprehend. Since racists inhabit every skin color, it is not racist nor discriminatory to be an anti racist. Nancy Reagan also urged, “Just say no.” Brown v Board is clear evidence that the post Civil War amendments failed to stop racism though their language seemed to do so. Advocating anti racist discrimination is a direct message to confront discrimination, racial and otherwise. Such attitude is NOT directed personally but attitudinally toward all racial discrimination. If “the way to defeat racial discrimination is to stop discriminating,” folks are not listening to such word game admonitions. As a rule, IMO, racists don’t advocate for “more racial discrimination, only that their racism is not exposed. They are happy in the shadows. The advocacy here is not “More racial discrimination” but a call to confront racial discrimination. Even simple minds can appreciate the distinctions.

          7. Matt Adams Avatar

            “As a rule, IMO, racists don’t advocate for “more racial discrimination, only that their racism is not exposed.”

            Your opinion is that of someone who hasn’t the foggiest idea what they are talking about. It’s is clear that you’re okay with discrimination as long as it’s against those whom you don’t agree with. Racism knows, no skin color and its simplest definition is thinking one superior based upon race.

          8. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            My clear statement is that confronting racist discrimination is a remedy. You draw the inference that it’s personal. We agree that racism is expressed and not limited to skin color. It is not always expressed for reasons of superiority; often it’s simply hate.

          9. Matt Adams Avatar

            Your statements are clear as mud and riddled with ways for your say you meant something else.

            “It is not always expressed for reasons of superiority; often it’s simply hate.”

            “: having, reflecting, or fostering the belief that race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a) is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race”

            Yes, it is in fact always expressed based upon a belief of superiority, Merriam-Webster’s cited above is the definition. Hate is based upon a belief of superiority, just for your edification.

          10. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            So much for my hate of drivers who don’t use turn signals.

          11. LarrytheG Avatar

            pissshah… tail-gaters…and left lane loafers, the scourge of the earth!

          12. Matt Adams Avatar

            “James McCarthy 40 minutes ago
            So much for my hate of drivers who don’t use turn signals.”

            Your analogy doesn’t work and Igor there upvoting you and equally obtuse.

          13. Racists are as racists does.

            “The remedy for past discrimination is present discrimination. The remedy for present discrimination is future discrimination”.

            You and Kendi and the KKK. Brothers under the sheets and hoods.

          14. A little hyperbole goes a long way!

        3. I am absolutely not opposed to, nor am I afraid of, opposing views. I neither stated nor implied anything of the kind in my comment.

          I am opposed to expending $500 per minute of taxpayer funds to pay someone to proselytize ‘opposing views’ for an hour on public property.

          If what Ms. Hannah-Jones has to say is so critical and important, why charge for her appearances? Maybe I’d respect her more if she spoke gratis at these events, and hawked her book afterwards to make money.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            What’s Youngkin’s hourly taxpayer paid wage to appear and lecture on slavery?

          2. He’s salaried so all the hours are in his annual compensation.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar

            Not to mention he donates his entire salary. Good old Jimmy, with is silly walks.

          4. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            His performance as a teacher is taxpayer funded. Some of the rest of us are not multi millionaires capable of donating from our livelihoods. He, OTOH, has a $175,000 charitable tax deduction – not to mention press coverage.

          5. You object to him donating his time for the public welfare? That’s sort of churlish. Envious of your betters and bitter at your own lack of success?

          6. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Never suggested an objection, only offered an observation. Try to refrain from mind reading and reading between the lines.

          7. Some minds are pretty simple to read. That’s why we call them simple minds.

          8. Simple Minds. An underrated band, in my opinion.

          9. Matt Adams Avatar

            His Animus towards someone who is successful if palpable.

          10. Matt Adams Avatar

            He doesn’t profess to be a teacher and again, he’s salaried. Beyond that he donates the entirety of his salary to different charities each quarter.

            https://www.wric.com/news/virginia-news/gov-glenn-youngkin-donates-part-of-salary-to-petersburg-non-profit/amp/

            “Some of the rest of us are not multi millionaires capable of donating from our livelihoods.”

            Sounds like you’re jealous Jimmy, maybe you should’ve worked harder at your profession.

            $175,000 is exactly.03% of his net, so the notion it would impact his taxes in anyway is even silly walk for you.

          11. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Be sure to advise him of your advice not to take the charitable deduction as trivial. Your hearing and reading need to be checked.

          12. Matt Adams Avatar

            “Be sure to advise him of your advice not to take the charitable deduction as trivial”

            Why would I advise him of anything?
            Pointing out that your statement had no teeth based upon his net worth is valid, sorry you are having trouble with the foot you stuck in your mouth.

            How does ones “hearing” need checked when this is purely a written medium?

            There is a long history in this nation where Chief Executives at both the state and federal level donate their salaries. I don’t imagine you bemoaned JFK when he did the same, afterall you were the age of majority when he did so.

          13. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Again, reading and interpretation issues abound in your comments. Let Youngkin donate his entire worth to charity. You raised some notion of his net worth. If he fails to report the charitable tax deduction, that is his choice. Silly response.

          14. Matt Adams Avatar

            “Again, reading and interpretation issues abound in your comments.”

            Humm, curious.

            Interpretation

            “the act or the result of interpreting : EXPLANATION”

            “Let Youngkin donate his entire worth to charity. You raised some notion of his net worth. If he fails to report the charitable tax deduction, that is his choice. Silly response.”

            Well you’d complain about that as well, seeing as your complaints stem from the (R) listed after his name.

            His net worth is relevant, because you insinuated he did so for a tax deduction, while failing to realize it’s a rounding error in his taxes and would provide him with no relief.

            Nothing is as silly as you and your typical asinine comments.

          15. Matt Adams Avatar

            Yes, yes you did.

            “I noted he could take such deduction but you assert he would not”

            Actually, that’s a strawman and you should go take your own advise on reading. I said it wouldn’t matter, that is not determining one way or the other.

            “it’s his choice to take the deduction or not. If it’s of no advantage, then don’t release such info to the press.”

            Again, I suspect you didn’t complain about JFK or any number of other individual who previously did so.

            https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2020/01/21/u-s-rep-john-yarmuth-donates-congressional-salary-non-profits/4533123002/

            https://thehill.com/homenews/house/424020-here-are-the-lawmakers-who-will-forfeit-their-salaries-during-the-shutdown/

          16. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            You are the one who calculated that the tax deduction was “exactly” a small percent of his net worth. Why would I complain about JFK’s charitable contributions, if, in fact, he made them? Again, mind reading. If the charitable contribution is personal, why report it to the press?

          17. Matt Adams Avatar

            “You are the one who calculated that the tax deduction was “exactly” a small percent of his net worth”

            Correct, I took two numbers divided them and multiplied by 100. That’s not providing any sort of advice.

            “Why would I complain about JFK’s charitable contributions, if, in fact, he made them? Again, mind reading. If the charitable contribution is personal, why report it to the press?”

            If in fact he made them? It’s a well know historical fact he donated the entirety of his salary given his families net worth.

            https://www.upi.com/Archives/1962/11/14/JFK-Donates-Full-Salary-To-Charity/3714224962880/

            That foot keeps going deeper in your mouth, Jimmy.

          18. His base salary is $175,000. I’ll go ahead and double it to account for benefits, so $350,000.

            Assuming a 40 hour work week, about $168.25 per hour, which is roughly one-third of the rate per minute Ms. Hannah-Jones’ was paid from the public coffers for her ‘opposing views’.

            The governor is a high-level public official, so it stands to reason he would make public appearances as part of the job the taxpayers are paying him to do. He certainly did not charge any locality a separate fee for his speech.

            By the way, do you take umbrage with any specific remarks he made to the group of fourth graders about the history of Fort Monroe?

          19. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            OK< then. $168.25 for the lesson. Good to know.

          20. Not Today Avatar

            And what are his qualifications as a scholar?

          21. WayneS Avatar

            What are Nikole Hannah-Jones’ qualifications as a scholar?

          22. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            She’s a published author and teacher. Youngkin is neither. You may not like her scholarship but she is, in fact, a scholar.

          23. Speaking fees are common on both sides of most issues. It is one of the services that the taxpayers get in return for their taxes and is not expected to appeal to all. The 1619 project has been and is a major topic of interest and discussion. I am sure that there is a manner in which residents can offer suggestions and criticisms to the library system.

    2. Disagree we visit our local libraries quite often and they are well utilized. A great many people like to read hard copy books along with services such as printing, copying, scanning, and fax.

      1. Some go for the racist CRT/DIE propaganda, and pay a high price to get it. Go figure.

        1. I believe that these sessions are free to the public. Would you feel the same way if the speaker was paid to talk about the evils of CRT/DIE?

          1. The County paid almost $30K, so the public paid, although not for an individual ticket to the event.

            It is my hope we will reach a time that there are public library talks about the evils of racist CRT/DIE.

            No, I do not wish that speakers against racism make the obscene money that racists like Hannah-Jones and Kendi are raking in these days.

          2. Would you feel the same way if the speaker was paid to talk about the evils of CRT/DIE?

            Paid with taxpayer funds? Yes.

        2. In some localities all taxpayers pay that high price.

      2. DJRippert Avatar

        Then privatize the libraries and let people pay to join. Why should tax money be used for people to read hard cover books and use printers and faxes?

        1. We do things that are regarded as a public good like schools, roads, libraries, defense with public money because they benefit us all.

          The idea of mixed capitalism as a balance to offset the excesses of unrestrained capitalism that could kill us all while harnessing its energy has worked, at some times better than others, for close to 250 years.

        2. Obviously, regular people would not be able to afford such a private system. It would become just another institution for the rich. An educated population is a pillar of our democracy and public libraries play an important role.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar

          AARP and United Way tax preparation…..

  2. So we must now catahorize NHJ as the new face of white supremacy for participating in America’s economic system, which she claimed is beset by institutional racism.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “at Fort Monroe outside HAMPTON, Virginia,”

    I guess you have to live in the area.

    BTW, he would have undercut her had he done it two days BEFORE instead of after. After is reactive.

    1. Youngkin has spoken on teaching all of Virginia’s history on several occasions. Perhaps that makes it Hannah-Jones who was reactive in addition to proactively collecting a fat paycheck.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You are known by the company you keep…
        “Under the governor’s order, Virginia is joining three other states – Arkansas, Mississippi, and North Dakota – to see if the “AP African American Studies” course conflicts with any state policies regarding the teaching of race.”

        1. He is worried that it might conflict with his executive order on CRT and divisive topics. Guess you have to look far and wide to find examples so he can play to the base.

        2. The AP folks have been actively editing their African American Studies course to remove the racist CRT/DIE sections that were problematic. Thumbs up for that.

          The sad commentary is that more states have not stepped up.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Oh, if only there was but one graduate in African-American Studies we could call on to assist us in this debate! Just one.

          2. There’s that fellow at UVa who was the subject of discussion on BR recently…

          3. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            There is dean Baucom at UVA about whom a previous BR article suggested his promotion to dean was linked to a graduate degree in African studies. But he is also a DEI supporter and thus disqualified for such debate.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I’m making a reference to our host, Bacon, who claimed in a comment that he majored in African-American Studies until he thought he didn’t have an advantage in that field.

          5. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Wow! Never heard of A-A Bacon.

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Reread this thread.

          7. For the record, I have an M.A. in African history. My master’s thesis was entitled, “Rebellion and Religious Change Among the Katanga Luba.” I did not complete the PhD program — not because I “didn’t have an advantage” but because it was evident even in 1976 that affirmative action in higher ed would manifest itself first in African and African-American studies, and I was the wrong color. That and the fact that I was totally out of sync ideologically with every professor in the program.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar

            So you said African History (as opposed to African American History).

            did you mean the latter?

            I see this:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cec244d04e06878ce7b039fbab02edd02ab75b688fdf63d980e9e4f4aa118f2c.jpg

          9. Yeah, I meant African history.

          10. Not Today Avatar

            We’re interchangeable, don’t you know? Diaspora be dammed.

          11. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Alas, but in your previous comment…

            However I can, and certainly will, accept this current and much better thought out CV sans possible reference to “white privilege”, and thus won’t lay into your ribs again.

            On the other hand, the constant mischaracterization of CRT, what it is and where it is used and taught, i.e., parroting Rufo, in your publication is disconcerting for someone who is clearly capable of understanding it as simply a framework for evaluating how laws, singularly and in combination, partition the population.

            BTW, when I was in the sixth grade (in California) I wrote a paper on the Watutsi in the area known now as Uganda. We had an incredibly forward thinking teacher. She was a Canadian.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I do hope the good governor mentioned the other historical aspects of Fort Monroe. For example, the end of wooden ships and iron men with the clash of the Monitor and Merrimac. Also, the prison cell occupied for two years by Jefferson Davis. A great history field trip!

  5. The lie that Youngkin doesn’t want to teach the history of slavery, racism and segregation is repeated endlessly — all without documentation of any kind. The mainstream media has shamelessly perpetuated the lies in innumerable articles, and its “fact checkers” have failed to call out the lies. Youngkin’s session with the Newport News school children vividly disproves them. But don’t expect anything to change. The Narrative trumps reality.

    1. Another perspective on “reality” is that Youngkin plays both sides with an end towards advancing his political ambitions.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So… where’s the documentation that he does?

      He did stick his nose in the AP debate along with DeSantis. Ducks. Walks and quacks.

    3. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      “The Narrative trumps reality.” Youngkin might benefit from increased coverage by Faux News where fact checkers, including one of its own, successfully called out its lies about the 2020 election. MSM “lies” about the Gov’s position on teaching the history of slavery in VA can be exposed even more vividly than a taped session in NN. Faux knows how to repeat the “truth.”

  6. $500 a minute is a pretty good wage. A lot of us might say most anything for that billing rate. Clearly Hannah-Jones does.

    Oppose racist CRT/DIE. Defund it in our schools and public sector.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/dei-is-poisoning-college-campuses

    1. As Al Sharpton kicks himself for wasting all that time with all those marches building his finances.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Uh yep, that’s a helluva wage. Now take that 60-minute fee and spread it over the epoch (1619,1865).

      1. Why? She’s only been alive for a fraction of the epoch and she ain’t sharing it with those who came before.

      2. Why would anyone do that?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Why not? OTOH, there are plenty of speakers who collect more than $30K per.

          1. OTOH, there are plenty of speakers who collect more than $30K per.

            If a private entity wants to pay some person $1,000,000 per minute for a speech, they are free to do so. (NOTE: I am in turn free to think they are idiots).

            I object to taxpayers’ money being spent to hire them.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Is it taxpayers money? Ya know those fees students pay…

          3. At a public library?

  7. Not Today Avatar

    The governor was making an appearance. He wasn’t teaching.

Leave a Reply