GMU Rebates Tuition Increase Students

by James A. Bacon

George Mason University, the last holdout among Virginia’s public universities in freezing tuition for in-state undergraduate students this year, has announced that it will rebate this year’s 3% tuition increase.  Now all 15 public colleges in Virginia have acceded to a request by Governor Glenn Youngkin to forebear on raising tuition during a year in which Virginia families have been pummeled by 9% inflation.

The statement came, interestingly enough, from the office of Governor Glenn Youngkin. Said the Governor:

Today, George Mason University joined the 14 other public college and university boards, which serve more than a quarter-million undergraduate college students in Virginia, by pledging to keep tuition flat for in-state students. Early on in my administration, I encouraged all colleges and universities to take on this challenge and I  am pleased that now all of Virginia’s students will have the opportunity to pursue their higher education at every public college, university, and community college in the Commonwealth free from tuition hike fears.

This is a victory, albeit a transitory one, for Youngkin.

For in-state undergraduates, GMU is keeping the tuition increase in place, which will become the new base-line next year. Any future tuition increases will compound on top of a base that has grown from $9,510 for two semesters last year to $9,796 this year.

Second, the rebate does not affect the cost of GMU’s on-campus room and board, which, at $13,120 this year is comparable in size to tuition. I cannot find a reliable source of data online for the previous year, so I cannot say how much this is increasing.

Third, the tuition credit does not affect mandatory student fees. A comparison of 2021-22 versus 2022-23 costs of attendance indicates that “mandatory student fees” are staying flat at $1,803.

GMU, like every other university in the country, is dealing with inflationary pressures just as students’ families are. With 9% inflation, university operating costs go up. On the other hand, the General Assembly allocated hundreds of millions of additional dollars to support higher education in the 2023-24 biennial budget. Two-year General Fund contributions to GMU will be $31.6 million more than in the previous two-year budget, an increase of 17%.

The GMU administration’s presentation to the Board of Visitors Tuition Subcommittee is an elaborate justification for increased tuition, citing the need to keep salaries competitive, increase financial aid, address “inequities” of all kinds, and pursue strategic initiatives.

Mason, says the presentation, continues to invest in operational infrastructure and technological efficiencies. As a result, it shares with Old Dominion University the lowest ratio of employees to students among the state’s six research universities.

The College of William & Mary has twice as many employees per student as GMU, and UVa has more than twice as many. Call me crazy, but I’m betting that administrators at UVa and W&M don’t present this chart to their Boards of Visitors.

Keeping the bureaucracy under control is commendable. That’s more than can be said for some institutions. There is no indication in the presentation, however, that GMU is addressing other drivers of its cost structure in any meaningful way. Is the university reallocating capital and manpower from low-demand disciplines to high-demand (from feminist literature, say, to cyber-security), or is it maintaining low-demand programs while piling on the cost of new programs? Is the university re-evaluating its tenure policies and examining faculty productivity? Is anyone questioning the “facilities arms race” — new buildings, fancier amenities — viewed as necessary to recruit students? How much does GMU now spend on “diversity, equity & inclusion” initiatives, has it set end-goals for those programs, and does it have metrics for measuring progress?

With minimal action on these cost drivers, we can expect to see continued pressure in the years ahead for the Board of Visitors to keep raising tuition. In the grand scheme of things, a one-year respite does not mean much.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “GMU Rebates Tuition Increase Students”

  1. Text immediately below the graph. The College of William & Mary has twice as many employees as GMU

    Might be nice to clarify that is 2x per student, not absolute # of employees.

    1. You’re absolutely right. Correction made.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “GMU Rebates Tuition Increase Students. Good for Now…”

    Punctuation. Not just a good idea

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “GMU Rebates Tuition Increase Students”

      And you think that’s better now?

  3. With about 7 students per staffer at GMU/ODU and 2 1/2 at UVA it is curious that prices at those schools are roughly similar. If average FTE cost is around $70k that would be around $10k per student at GMU/ODU and $28k at UVA.

    Anyone have an idea what proportion of schools revenues are directly paid by students? If those percentages vary widely, as seems likely from the staffing ratios, what makes up the difference?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It’s simple. ODU and GMU are ripping off their students and trading on the good reputation for Virginia state schools established by W&M and UVa.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Interesting perspective:)

        Considering the discussion we’ve had here about DIE staffing, especially at UVA, it would be interesting to see how much that contributes to the staffing ratio there.

        How many DIE FTEs are there at UVA? And by extension, what is the DIE FTE per student ratio at each of the reported schools.

  4. Nice statue. I wonder how long it will remain there.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Needs a necktie tho.

      1. Wouldn’t that be a ‘hate crime’?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Ascot then. Too G?

          1. Let’s think outside the box…

            …Bowtie?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Definitely too G.

          3. Well then, I guess we’re back to the ascot…

            Although, I suppose we could always go with a cartwheel ruff.

            That would get people’s attention.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “The College of William & Mary has twice as many employees per student as GMU, and UVa has more than twice as many. Call me crazy, but I’m betting that administrators at UVa and W&M don’t present this chart to their Boards of Visitors.”

    Or, maybe you should bet that GMU and ODU don’t present this chart to their students.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Wow, I’ve never seen a more adroit job of having both sides of an issue. Very nice. My hat’s off to you. A+++ 🙂

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        All coins have two sides, and the edge… where I live.

  6. DJRippert Avatar

    This rebate scheme is like putting a band-aid on a severed leg.

    Consider the macro picture.

    We have a president who is observably senile. This week’s “senior moment” involved Biden calling out to see if Jackie Walorski was in the crowd during a hunger conference. “Jackie, are you here? Where’s Jackie? I didn’t think she was – she wasn’t going to be here,” Biden said.

    No, – she wasn’t going to be at the White House conference where Biden was speaking. Why? Because Representative Jackie Walorski died in a car crash in August. Biden issued a statement following Walorski’s death in August, saying he and Jill Biden were “shocked and saddened”.

    The man’s a goner.

    Unfortunately, Biden is busy working his demented magic on the US economy. From unnecessary stimulus programs to the absurdly named Inflation Reduction Act to student debt forgiveness, Biden lacks the mental acuity to understand the relationship between endless, debt-financed spending and soaring inflation. Meanwhile, over at the Fed, Jerome Powell is fighting Biden’s economic incompetence with the equivalent of high dosage fiscal chemotherapy. The patient will certainly get much sicker as Powell tries to arrest the cancer of inflation.

    Many economic observers believe we are already in a recession. Far more believe that things are only going to get worse. Yesterday I was told by a well known financial analysis firm that the US economy will continue failing at roughly its current rate until the second half of next year at which point America will be in a deep, long running recession.

    Elections have consequences.

    Against this backdrop, a 3% tuition rebate is less than cosmetic surgery. It is imaginary surgery.

    Many of America’s and Virginia’s four year colleges are headed for a blind date with disaster. Years of spiraling costs and a deep recession will join forces with declining college aged applicants and a growing sense among students and employers that four year college educations are unnecessary. This new reality will see many Virginia colleges and universities fail.

    The time for serious cost cutting was during and immediately after the last recession (2008 – 2010). Now, it is too late.

    Younkin needs to think far more strategically about Virginia higher education. A one year hiatus from tuition increases will seem like spitting into the Pacific by 2024.

    Some state supported colleges and universities will need to be cut off from state funding and allowed to die. The money saved will be needed to prop up the public colleges and universities that can be salvaged.

    The Boards of Visitors at Virginia’s public colleges and universities need to be replaced. The effete intellectuals who run Virginia’s public colleges and universities need to be replaced.

    The one ray of good news is that there is an example of a university that maintained high standards while capping tuition increases – Purdue University in Indiana.

    Perhaps Governor Younkin can organize a field trip to Indiana to see how it’s done.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Funny what happens when a conservative businessman and politician runs a major university instead of lifelong academic fops and dandies:

      https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/purduetoday/releases/2022/Q3/purdues-decade-long-tuition-freeze,-record-enrollment-levels-help-counter-states-trending-drop-in-college-going-rate.html

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      While assigning blame for ignoring the “relationship between endless, debt-financed spending and soaring inflation”, why do you exclude large tax cuts going primarily to the upper class with no offsetting spending cuts and a large COVID stimulus package enacted under the Trump administration?

      Somehow, I can’t see Youngkin thinking “far more strategically about Virginia higher education.”

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        Because inflation wasn’t soaring under Trump. And the Fed didn’t have to impose draconian rate hikes under Trump. And because the vaccine that was developed under Trump wasn’t available until he left office.

        Once inflation started to spike it seems only logical to stop runaway government spending. Yet Biden didn’t do that. He just kept spending. The last straw for me was his asinine $400B (over 10 years) student loan forgiveness. How is that being paid for? That exercise in buying votes with borrowed money was done way after the problems of inflation were in full view. It seems obvious to me that Biden is willing ti tank the economy in an effort to try to buy mid-term votes.

        Having said that, I have issues with the way Trump handled the stimulus too. A very large part of the economy never missed a beat due to Covid. Yet people working in those parts of the economy still got stimulus checks. Why? Stimulus checks for people who were forced into unemployment by Covid made sense. Forgiven loans for companies which would have laid off their employees because of Covid made sense. But “free money” to people who kept working and companies that kept operating? Ridiculous.

        Reality will catch up with Glenn Youngkin. He doesn’t leave office until early 2026. By then the full impact of the Biden recession will be upon us. If he really wants to cement his legacy as a business-savvy leader he’d better start thinking of what he’ll do during the excruciating economic times to come.

      2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        For 2018, The top 1 percent paid a greater share of individual income taxes (40.1 percent) than the bottom 90 percent combined (28.6 percent). If you want to address tax fairness, let’s eliminate tax exempt status for the many organizations that lobby, get involved in elections or otherwise try to influence public policy or opinion. And put a time limit on the lives of private foundations.

      3. DJRippert Avatar

        Because inflation wasn’t soaring under Trump. And the Fed didn’t have to impose draconian rate hikes under Trump. And because the vaccine that was developed under Trump wasn’t available until he left office.

        Once inflation started to spike it seems only logical to stop runaway government spending. Yet Biden didn’t do that. He just kept spending. The last straw for me was his asinine $400B (over 10 years) student loan forgiveness. How is that being paid for? That exercise in buying votes with borrowed money was done way after the problems of inflation were in full view. It seems obvious to me that Biden is willing ti tank the economy in an effort to try to buy mid-term votes.

        Having said that, I have issues with the way Trump handled the stimulus too. A very large part of the economy never missed a beat due to Covid. Yet people working in those parts of the economy still got stimulus checks. Why? Stimulus checks for people who were forced into unemployment by Covid made sense. Forgiven loans for companies which would have laid off their employees because of Covid made sense. But “free money” to people who kept working and companies that kept operating? Ridiculous.

        Reality will catch up with Glenn Youngkin. He doesn’t leave office until early 2026. By then the full impact of the Biden recession will be upon us. If he really wants to cement his legacy as a business-savvy leader he’d better start thinking of what he’ll do during the excruciating economic times to come.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “How is that being paid for?”

          I assume the same way this is being paid for…:

          “On the other hand, the General Assembly allocated hundreds of millions of additional dollars to support higher education in the 2023-24 biennial budget”

          Which coincidentally allows universities to freeze tuition increases (push more $) back to consumers… 🤷‍♂️

  7. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    https://www.purdue.edu/purduemoves/initiatives/affordability/freezing-tuition.php

    If colleges & universities made an effort to control costs, they could do a lot better, even if they could not match Purdue’s results. And, BTW, my wife’s niece is a full professor at Purdue and has regularly received raises.

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Keeping the bureaucracy under control is commendable.”

    Why do you assume “employees” equals “bureaucracy”? Are not professors and other educators “employees”? Is it possible the UVa and W&M have smaller classes? Would that not be a good thing in terms of the education received?

Leave a Reply