Free Speech and Advocacy of Genocide

by James A. Bacon

Chanting “Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea,” hundreds of pro-Palestinian students held a protest on the Lawn at the University of Virginia yesterday. As reported by The Washington Free-Beacon, they demanded the Biden administration defund aid to Israel. The event was part of a national “walkout” organized by Students for Justice in Palestine, and the second demonstration in Charlottesville since Hamas unleashed a wave of terrorist attacks on Israel earlier this month.

“We, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), are sickened by the on-going, escalating genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians by Zionist forces,” said the organizing group in a formal statement signed by two dozen other leftist student groups in the aftermath of the Hamas assault. “We stand in solidarity with Palestinians in the fight for liberation and in their struggle against settler colonialism.” 

While the protesters were not explicit about their ultimate aim, the slogan “Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea” can mean only one thing: the eradication of the Israeli state and the dispossession — or worse — of the Jews within it. Hamas’ slaughter of innocents in its wave of terrorist attacks earlier this month foreshadows the likely fate of the Jewish population should Hamas carry the day.

Even Adolph Hitler did not call for the extermination of the Jews in his antisemitic tract, Mein Kampf. Even the senior Nazis attending the Wannsee Conference to organize the “final solution” for the Jews spoke in euphemisms and knew that their program was too gruesome to reveal to the German people. Hamas is far more open about its aims. The genocidal impulse is all too clear.

The Jefferson Council is grappling with how to respond to the protesters’ apologetics for Hamas’ genocidal aims. Our organization thoroughly condemns the protesters and their rhetoric. At the same time, we have made a commitment to free speech one of our signature causes, and we have criticized those on the left who would suppress “hate” speech. But then again, the pro-Palestinian protesters aren’t engaging in “hate” speech as we typically understand it. They don’t use slurs like “kikes” or “dirty Jews.” Instead, they chant antiseptic euphemisms for genocide.

The University of Virginia community was traumatized five years ago by the rhetoric of mostly out-of-state white supremacists attending the Unite the Right march, whose rallying cry was “Jews will not replace us.” The white supremacists were not calling for a second Holocaust, yet their language was rightfully and roundly condemned by everyone across the political spectrum.

How can the University of Virginia community respect the right to free speech of protesters within our midst while condemning their apologies for the genocidal aims of Hamas? What responsibility does President Jim Ryan have to speak even more forthrightly than he has so far? Should the Board of Visitors issue a statement? Should the advocates of genocide be punished for their views, as, say, student Morgan Bettinger was punished for her throw-away remark about protesters and speed bumps; as professor Jeffrey Leopold was chastised for his joke about Africans and food; and as med student Kieran Bhattacharya was subjected to an official inquiry for questioning the logic of micro-aggressions?

There are no easy answers. Competing principles are in conflict and must be reconciled. Through this blog and email communications, we shall keep UVa alumni informed of the ongoing discussion.

This column has been republished with permission from The Jefferson Council blog. James A. Bacon is publisher of Bacon’s Rebellion and executive director of the Jefferson Council.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

57 responses to “Free Speech and Advocacy of Genocide”

  1. Yes, let them speak freely. Then arrest and try those who opening support Hamas terrorism. Those found guilty must be exiled. College students who protest on State and Federal funded universities, colleges, institutions in support of Hamas terrorism or to support antisemitic values should be immediately expelled and charged under Federal hate speech law.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      I don’t like the pro-Hamas opinions any more than you do. But expelling those who hold such opinions and, especially, charging them is wrong.

      The students who hold those disgraceful opinions should be debated or, perhaps better yet, ignored.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        I will suggest that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act has inarguably been violated by SJP.

        It protects students of any religion from discrimination, including harassment, based on a student’s actual or perceived:
        – shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics, or
        – citizenship or residency in a country with a dominant religion or distinct religious identity

        Any arguments?

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          But are they harassing the Jewish students at UVa through their protests?

          Maybe. I haven’t heard all the commentary. But – it seems like a longshot.

          Were students who supported the Irish Republican Army’s violent efforts to bring Northern Ireland into Ireland harassing students of English lineage?

          1. Turbocohen Avatar
            Turbocohen

            Yes DJ, Jews are being harassed and intimidated. UVA will be JudenFrei.

    2. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Arrest is only warranted if their speech either incites a riot or goes beyond speech to physical violence.

      Elsewise, let the fools remove their feet from their mouths for all the world to see.

  2. DJRippert Avatar

    This sounds like it’s coming from a small minority of UVa students who nobody takes seriously. Let them hiss and spit venom into the air. Who cares?

    The bigger issue comes when the near adolescents try to turn their bizarrely angry rhetoric into action.

    That’s when the adults need to step in.

    Morgan Bettinger should never have been harassed by the egomaniacal pre-law students on the Judiciary Committee. In the real world, charges can’t even be filed for serious crimes without a grand jury. Then, a jury of one’s peers decides the guilt or innocence of the accused. There are no “professional juries” like the Judiciary Committee. And for good reason. The kind of jack-wagon who would become a professional juror is exactly the type of person you don’t want deciding anybody’s guilt or innocence.

    The Judicial Review Board (comprised of five faculty and five students unaffiliated with the Judicial Committee) should have overturned the Morgan Bettinger decision. However, I think that the five students on the Judicial Review Board, while not associated with the Judiciary Committee, are permanently assigned to the review board. If true, another professional jury.

    Nothing consequential should have happened to Professor Leopold based on his joke, and apparently – nothing did.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Let them rant and rave. Condemn them openly as advocates of racism and violence (just like we did the Nazis on campus six years ago). Arrest anybody who seeks to commit a violent act. Everything I’ve seen indicates this is a small group compared to the overall population, which current supports Israel’s right to exist and to defend itself. When the Marines go in, or our Navy tangles with Iran, well, then we’ll see how deep that commitment is.

    By the time the U.S. went to war with Germany in late 1941, anybody paying attention knew Jews in Europe were being murdered in droves. And we had been rejecting refugees in droves when the Nazi’s allowed them to leave. The U.S. didn’t declare war on Germany until Germany declared war on us. For that shameful history alone, we must stand with Israel.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Not only stand with Israel, stand for the USA. In a real sense, we are a 2nd Zion.

    2. In all their ranting and raving, I wonder if anyone will explain how the Jewish settlements near Gaza are “illegal under international law” as stated in the SJP letter they signed.

      The 21 Jewish settlements in Gaza were dismantled prior to giving the land up in 2005.

      One of many inaccuracies within the letter.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Not true of the West Bank… many settlements, right?

    3. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      They are Nazis in outlook or more accurately fascists. I always get a laugh when I see queers for Palestine as if the Islamic terrorists won’t have them jumping from roofs if the Islamic turds take over.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Well, many are actually from Palestine or some other Islamic country and I think the motivation has nothing do with economic philosophy. However, the crowds on the campuses are being swelled by the mindless, leftist drones who will attach to any cause of the moment. You are correct that many are ignorant fools who have no idea what Islam or Sharia Law would mean to their favored causes (including the Climate Catastrophe narrative, since fossil fuels pay all of Iran’s and Saudi Arabia’s bills.)

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Well, many are actually from Palestine or some other Islamic country and I think the motivation has nothing do with economic philosophy. However, the crowds on the campuses are being swelled by the mindless, leftist drones who will attach to any cause of the moment. You are correct that many are ignorant fools who have no idea what Islam or Sharia Law would mean to their favored causes (including the Climate Catastrophe narrative, since fossil fuels pay all of Iran’s and Saudi Arabia’s bills.)

        1. Palestine being the historically named land of the Jews – going back to 135AD [Palestina].

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Right. The Romans were better at drawing arbitrary boundaries than the British were. 🙂

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Right. The Romans were better at drawing arbitrary boundaries than the British were. 🙂

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Those Brits had French help, it’s no wonder we are still reaping the benefits of the Treaty of Sevres. We saw those same benefits of the Treaty of Versailles as well, it just took less time.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            The sun never set on the British Empire for a reason. Even God didn’t trust a Brit in the dark. What was that very funny quote by Stalin about Roosevelt’s pocket watch and Churchill?

    4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Not only stand with Israel, stand for the USA. In a real sense, we are a 2nd Zion.

  4. I find it interesting that many of the Jews attacked in their homes near Gaza are actually liberals/Progressives.

    Check out the 60 minutes segment below. It seems this family didn’t even have a weapon in the house to defend themselves, and son had to call his retired general father to come all the way from Tel Aviv with his handgun to save them.

    60 MINUTES OVERTIME
    How a retired Israeli general saved his family during the Hamas attack

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/retired-idf-general-israeli-family-rescue-60-minutes/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I saw that segment and the thing I thought interesting was the concept of a “safe room” which apparently is not uncommon.

      It’s sorta tells me that the Israeli folks were at least somewhat cognizant of the proximity and danger of Hamas and related (to have built these “safe rooms”).

      But in terms of “liberals/progressives”, SOME of them clearly want the Palestinians to have their own autonomous country and to not be occupied or have some of their territory (in the West Bank) taken for Israeli settlements.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Hampton’s motto is “From the sea to the stars”. Care to take a whack at “the only thing” it could mean to indigenous peoples?

  6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “While the protesters were not explicit about their ultimate aim, the slogan “Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea” can mean only one thing: the eradication of the Israeli state and the dispossession — or worse — of the Jews within it.”

    I suggest you read this for a better understanding.

    https://jewishcurrents.org/what-does-from-the-river-to-the-sea-really-mean

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Thanks. Yes… sounds a lot like more “interpretation”… being asserted and being applied to ALL Palestinians, no matter what the truth is.

    2. From the article you cite: “Munayyer fails to mention the 750,000 Jews who were violently expropriated and ultimately forced out of the majority of Arab states—including Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Egypt—after 1948 because they may have had Zionist sympathies.”

      If I were a Jew, I would not find this very reassuring.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Oh, there are clearly some horrendous issues to resolve on (and I usually hate this term) both sides. The point was, you and the zealots wanting to make every pro-Palestinian protest into an anti-semitic call for genocide step too far in your claim that the chant can only mean one thing. Seeking freedom for all Palestinians (and they clearly are not free now) does not equate to eradication of the Jews.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Oh, there are clearly some horrendous issues to resolve on (and I usually hate this term) both sides. The point was, you and the zealots wanting to make every pro-Palestinian protest into an anti-semitic call for genocide step too far in your claim that the chant can only mean one thing. Seeking freedom for all Palestinians (and they clearly are not free now) does not equate to eradication of the Jews.

      3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Oh, there are clearly some horrendous issues to resolve on (and I usually hate this term) both sides. The point was, you and the zealots wanting to make every pro-Palestinian protest into an anti-semitic call for genocide step too far in your claim that the chant can only mean one thing. Seeking freedom for all Palestinians (and they clearly are not free now) does not equate to eradication of the Jews.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          No. They mean what they say. You seem to agree.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Republicans consider Israel a democracy. Therein lies the heart of the problem

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            They think the same of early 20th century Southern US… the good old days!!

          2. Israel does too. “​Israel is a parliamentary democracy, consisting of legislative, executive and judicial branches. Its institutions are the Presidency, the Knesset (parliament), the Government (cabinet), the Judiciary and the State Comptroller.

            “The system is based on the principle of separation of powers, with checks and balances, in which the executive branch (the government) is subject to the confidence of the legislative branch (the Knesset) and the independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by law.”
            https://embassies.gov.il/la/AboutIsrael/State/Pages/Israeli-democracy.aspx

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Check Palestinian representation and laws there of. It’s a theocracy at best.
            “Israel is a multiparty democracy with strong and independent institutions that guarantee political rights and civil liberties for most of the population.”

            Most?

            https://freedomhouse.org/country/israel/freedom-world/2021#:~:text=Israel%20is%20a%20multiparty%20democracy,for%20most%20of%20the%20population.

          4. beachguy Avatar

            **Republicans consider Israel a democracy. Therein lies the heart of the problem**
            Compared to their neighbors, Israel is a bastion of infinite tolerance.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            Israel can also be said to be an occupier that is preciding over an apartheid system IMO.

            https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2022/02/israels-system-of-apartheid/

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            That and a dollar is worth 99 cents

        3. But the Hamas charter does, and they a re the elected rulers.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            The Hamas charter does not govern UVa Pro-Palestinian protestors…

          2. But they are in support of it! “…SJP described Hamas’ massacres of Israelis as “a historic win for Palestinian resistance,” and called for “Not just slogans and rallies, but armed confrontation with the oppressors.” In its “Day of Resistance Toolkit,” SJP made clear that it advocates for Hamas or other Palestinian forces to militarily conquer all of Israel…”
            UVA is among the listed chapters. https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/students-justice-palestine-endorses-terrorism-and-dismantling-zionism-plans-day

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            A. I am not saying the protestors are not ill informed. They clearly are.

            B. Being supportive of freedom for the Palestinians does not mean they subscribe to every ideology of the central SJP.

            C. “Armed confrontation with the oppressors” implies military conflict not slaughter of civilians… it should be noted that military conflict with Israel, though, usually results in the killing of Palestinian civilians. The line typically is a fine one… not on Oct 7th mind you, that was far more horrific.

            D. None of your argument so far is evidence that UVa protestors were calling for “the eradication of the Israeli state and the dispossession — or worse — of the Jews within it”. That is simply a step too far in inference and my issue with JAB’s position.

        4. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          No. They mean what they say. You seem to agree.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            yet another leftist/progressive organization for sure! sic

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Israel is to democracy what North Carolina is to… well, democracy.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            The relationship seems to have some parallels to the American Colonies with England prior
            to the “revolution”.

          4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            I agree that Palestinians should be free. I don’t agree with what you imply though.

      4. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, actually the oldest continuously occupied Jewish settlement was in Iraq… until 2003

        Life wasn’t all that pleasant but it was there.

        1. Longer than Jerusalem?

          Jews have been living in Jerusalem continuously for three millennia. I’ve worked there and helped excavate some of the oldest sites.

          “If I forget you, Jerusalem,
          may my right hand forget its skill. May my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you, if I do not consider Jerusalem my highest joy.”
          – Psalm 137
          (written around 500 BCE)

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Cmon! Don’t you know there are no Unionists in Northern Ireland!

      5. Jews are very familiar with life under Arab rule, hence the need for a Jewish state.

        When Jordan ruled Jerusalem from 1948 to 1967, Jews were expelled from the Old City, including the Jewish Quarter. Jews were not allowed to worship at the Western Wall. During that same time period, all but one of the 35 Synagogues in the Old City were destroyed.

        Jerusalem under Israel is respectful of all religions. Out of respect for Muslims, Jews and Christians are forbidden to pray on the Temple Mount.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It sounds like a cry for free transit rights to me. That and the end of two-class citizenship.

      But these folks think Chris Rufo is a genius and expert on CRT too.

    4. One of the most dishonest articles on the subject one can imagine.

      Not stated, but very much confirms the intended desire of a one state solution with Arab Palestinians ruling all of the area. Every map of the area displayed by a Palestinian activist shows this. All Palestine, and no Israel.

      Palestinian Muslims would outnumber Jews and a democratic election would immediately put Hamas or something like it into power.

      From the article:
      “…there has never been an official Palestinian position calling for the forced removal of Jews from Palestine”

      True, they favor extermination over removal.

      Here’s the position of the Palestinian Authority Ministry of Religious Affairs from just last week.

      “The PA Ministry of Religious Affairs posted guidelines for mosque preachers on Thursday instructing preachers what content they should include in their Friday sermons. The most horrific part of the instructions was a quote from a Hadith (Islamic tradition attributed to Islam’s prophet Muhammad) that teaches that the End of Time, the Redemption of humanity, is contingent on Muslims killing and eventually exterminating all Jews:”

      https://palwatch.org/page/34677

      If the Palestinians had there way, the Jews expelled from other Middle Eastern states would not have been allowed to migrate there, nor would Jews escaping persecution or in Europe or elsewhere. That’s why a Jewish homeland was needed in the first place.

      From the article:
      But as Nassar writes, the phrase predates these uses, and has its origins as “part of a larger call to see a secular democratic state established in all of historic Palestine.”

      That may make sense to someone who’s never been there, but it’s absolutely preposterous to anyone familiar with Palestinians in the region. The Palestinians in the Middle East are Muslim, and have been brought up to believe in the most virulent teachings, which the majority of Muslims around the world would not recognize.

      Even Turkey is becoming less secular.

    5. One of the most dishonest articles on the subject one can imagine.

      Not stated, but very much confirms the intended desire of a one state solution with Arab Palestinians ruling all of the area. Every map of the area displayed by a Palestinian activist shows this. All Palestine, and no Israel.

      Palestinian Muslims would outnumber Jews and a democratic election would immediately put Hamas or something like it into power.

      From the article:
      “…there has never been an official Palestinian position calling for the forced removal of Jews from Palestine”

      True, they favor extermination over removal.

      Here’s the position of the Palestinian Authority Ministry of Religious Affairs from just last week.

      “The PA Ministry of Religious Affairs posted guidelines for mosque preachers on Thursday instructing preachers what content they should include in their Friday sermons. The most horrific part of the instructions was a quote from a Hadith (Islamic tradition attributed to Islam’s prophet Muhammad) that teaches that the End of Time, the Redemption of humanity, is contingent on Muslims killing and eventually exterminating all Jews:”

      https://palwatch.org/page/34677

      If the Palestinians had there way, the Jews expelled from other Middle Eastern states would not have been allowed to migrate there, nor would Jews escaping persecution or in Europe or elsewhere. That’s why a Jewish homeland was needed in the first place.

      From the article:
      But as Nassar writes, the phrase predates these uses, and has its origins as “part of a larger call to see a secular democratic state established in all of historic Palestine.”

      That may make sense to someone who’s never been there, but it’s absolutely preposterous to anyone familiar with Palestinians in the region. The Palestinians in the Middle East are Muslim, and have been brought up to believe in the most virulent teachings, which the majority of Muslims around the world would not recognize.

      Even Turkey is becoming less secular.

  7. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    So… the KKK wing of the Democrat party are saying what they think.. and this surprises people?

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      So does this mean you are also supportive of melting down all the public monuments erected by the KKK wing of the Democratic party used to advance their oppression over minority populations in the south? Sounds like you could get behind such an effort.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        and congratulations in order!

Leave a Reply