Four Cities Account for Almost 70% of the Increase in Virginia Homicides

While overall crime rates have remained fairly stable in Virginia since 2019, the year before social-justice protests rocked the state and nation, the homicide rate has increased alarmingly. The total number of murders and nonnegligent homicides leaped from 428 in 2019 to 562 in 2021, according to data recently published in the 2021 Crime in Virginia report.

As we struggle to explain what accounts for the surge, one pattern stands out. Four cities — Richmond, Norfolk, Portsmouth and Hampton — account for almost 70% of the increase. The number of homicides increased by 34 in Richmond, 26 in Norfolk, 20 in Portsmouth, and 12 in Hampton over the two-year period.

They weren’t the only localities to see big increases. The number in Fairfax County jumped from 14 to 26, an increase of 12, which also calls out for explanation. But Fairfax has a population larger than all four of the aforementioned localities combined. The wave of killings in Virginia’s aging inner cities is wildly disproportionate not only in absolute numbers but the magnitude of the increase.

Various theories have been proffered to explain the devastating upturn. One blames COVID, on the logic that the pandemic was economically and socially disruptive, throwing people out of their jobs and cooping them up in their homes. Given the highly localized nature of the violent crime surge, however, that seems unlikely. If COVID were to blame, why wouldn’t we see similar increase in the suburbs, smaller cities and rural areas as well?

What else might explain the pattern? I would suggest the answer resides in the nature of local politics and culture.

The biggest jump occurred in the City of Richmond. What distinguishes the city from other localities in Virginia, other than, of course, the state’s largest concentration of lower-income African-Americans? Well, it has a progressive mayor, a progressive daily newspaper, and a large and militant activist community. Many of the activists, it is worth noting, are not African-American, but politically radical Whites with a current or past affiliation with Virginia Commonwealth University.

A deep dive into causality would conduct two layers of analysis. One would be to examine changes in institutions, primarily the criminal justice system. Have law-enforcement practices changed? Has the prosecutorial philosophy changed? To what extent has the population been “de-incarcerated “and criminals been released back into the community through bail reform, parole reform, whatever? Has law enforcement in these localities been hindered by manpower shortages or public outcries about alleged police abuses?

A second level of analysis would examine the prevailing rhetoric of the community in de-legitimizing the criminal justice system. What role do “community organizers” play? To what degree do non-profit advocacy groups support local activists in their militancy? What rhetorical support do militants get from local media, especially the dominant newspaper, and from leading cultural institutions and opinion shapers? To what extent does the dominant rhetoric blame racism, inequality, and the police rather than the individuals who commit the crimes?

These are questions we ought to be asking. If we don’t, it would be folly to expect outcomes to change.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

72 responses to “Four Cities Account for Almost 70% of the Increase in Virginia Homicides”

  1. WayneS Avatar

    I correctly guessed all four of them before even opening the article:

    Richmond
    Portsmouth
    Norfolk
    Hampton

    I almost guessed Newport News instead of Hampton, but in the end I stuck with Hampton. Newport News is #5 though.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Too bad too, since I would guess those cities have the worst record at clearing homicides as well.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        I would make that same guess.

  2. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    Ptroit no surprise there. That it wasn’t #2 was the surprise. Maybe smaller, but given the firings of the Police Chiefs, the out of control councils and school boards, what do you expect? Fired the City Attorney recently … they can’t patrol, they have Chesapeake/Suffolk cops help them out. Sewer lines are a mess, they’ve had trucks going around, they can’t fix their pipes.

    That’s scratching the surface.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Portsmouth was mostly a sh##-hole when I was growing up in Virginia Beach during the 70s and 80s, and nothing seems to have changed.

      1. vicnicholls Avatar
        vicnicholls

        Yeah it has, its gotten worse.

  3. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Although the post avoids the question, from the location of the increases it seems likely that the inference is that this is mostly black people killing other black people, and most of them young guys. Is that correct?

  4. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Interesting data points and inquiry questions. But, no mention of the population of firearms or their availability. Not likely that the murders are the result of the use of autos as weapons.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Most homicide guns are, and have been, both illegal and widely available. They are not likely to be a variable in this increase.

      If anything Virginia’s one hand gun a month law will have reduced the flow of illegal guns into Virginia’s inner cities.

      JAB has posed a good question. What has changed?

      1. WayneS Avatar

        You make good points.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      You probably do not want to go there.

      The rate of firearm ownership is quite a bit higher in rural areas than in cities, so taking ownership data into account would make things look even worse for these cities.

      ———————————————————

      This study is a bit dated (2017) but there is no reason to think there has been any major changes in the demographics:

      https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/10/rural-and-urban-gun-owners-have-different-experiences-views-on-gun-policy/

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        So firearms located in rural areas do not migrate into cities? The question does not isolate to firearm ownership in cities but to general availability.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          If you are claiming firearms from rural areas of the state account for a significant number of the weapons used in crimes in the cities, then please offer evidence to support your claim.

          By the way, none of the firearms I used to own ever moved anywhere without human intervention. My guns were very well behaved.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Not saying that. My point is that the article did not include the availability of firearms as an issue in the increase in deaths. There is a relationship of availability of firearms to deaths that should be included. Thus, ownership by rural vs urban is not the issue.

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            The firearms used in the city killings are mostly illegally obtained. Any thoughts on how to count illegal weapons to determine availability? If we could count them, we could take them away. That’s what illegal means.

            But to do that, we would have to return to more under cover cops, stop and frisk, criminal profiling, tough sentences, that kind of law enforcement. And tough prosecutors. You’re for that, right?

          3. WayneS Avatar

            Assuming the new laws passed by the GA and signed by the governor in 2020 were effective, guns were less readily available in Virginia during 2021 than they were in 2020. And yet, homicides increased in 2021.

            One could conclude that if guns being less readily available results in an increase in murders, then we should stop making guns less readily available.

            No need to answer, I am being facetious and just a bit sarcastic:

            1) I know there is not yet enough data on the new laws to draw firm conclusions.

            2) I know correlation does not necessarily equal causation, even though you assumed it does in your comment: There is a relationship of availability of firearms to deaths that should be included.

            3) Truth be told, criminals will always be able to get their hands on guns, even if people like you manage to pass laws that make them unavailable to people like me. For you see, criminals, by definition, do not obey laws.

          4. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            If God had meant for guns to move by themselves he’d have given them feet instead of hands.

            Don’t you go out to watch the annual gun migration? Every fall they head for the country and every spring back into the city for the hot weather.

        2. WayneS Avatar

          If you are claiming firearms from rural areas of the state account for a significant number of the weapons used in crimes in the cities, then please offer evidence to support your claim.

          By the way, none of the firearms I used to own ever moved anywhere without human intervention. My guns were very well behaved.

    3. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Btw, in VB, about the same 20 guns commit a lot of the crime. So not surprised.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        That is true pretty much everywhere. A relatively small number of guns are used in a relatively high percentage of crimes.

    4. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      You mean when ladies come to council and tell them their packing, their family does and all visitors: that person tells them to pack. There are all sorts of gun restrictions in the city for the law abiding owner.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      OK, I’ll bite … what is that a graph of?

      1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        I’m guessing that graph is murders per 100,000. I would also guess the point is murder is down so there’s nothing to see here and we’re all good.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          down a lot from years back, now climbing back.

          more to this that just a one year snapshot.

  5. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    It would seem to me that you need to look at this on a per capita basis. If there were 2 murders in small city X in 2019 and 3 in 2021 then small city X experienced a 50% increase in murders which would be worse than any of the four cities at hand.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Rates per 100,000 is the usual approach. But indeed small numbers are a problem even with the per 100,000. Even per capita has problems with doubling small numbers.

      Another problem is when graphs are presented and compared to other populations, you wonder if the persons doing it have any idea what they’re doing. If you compare, say, Portsmouth to Hampton Roads, did they remember to subtract Portsmouth from HR? Correlated data.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        True but almost every state with a high murder rate has areas of vast disproportion. Illinois/Chicago, Missouri/St Louis, Michigan/Detroit, MAryland/Baltimore.

        Virginia just doesn’t have any real cities so it takes four “semi-cities” to make up the outlier.

  6. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Are the increases in murders due to the “number one most lethal threat” Biden warned us all about?
    That BS from Biden demonstrates the true institutional racism in America. Where inner city violence is often overlooked/ ignored. It’s disgusting that it doesn’t seemingly deserve national attention. A bunch of good hardworking people are being held hostage by a very small group of thugs in our cities.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: ” Have law-enforcement practices changed? Has the prosecutorial philosophy changed? To what extent has the population been “de-incarcerated “and criminals been released back into the community through bail reform, parole reform, whatever? Has law enforcement in these localities been hindered by manpower shortages or public outcries about alleged police abuses?

    A second level of analysis would examine the prevailing rhetoric of the community in de-legitimizing the criminal justice system. What role do “community organizers” play? To what degree do non-profit advocacy groups support local activists in their militancy?”

    so an obvious question is – do folks who commit murders pay attention to the things JAB cites above and affects whether or not they make a decison to murder or not?

    it’s almost comical to me that the above would be cited as related to how many murders are committed but it’s what Conservatives do with their “law & Order” messaging… and it works for the rubes of which there are a few – and yes, they vote also.

    Most folks are fairly clueless as to the laws on murder or when they change, right?

    In general – do the laws and prosecution of the laws affect the murder rate?

    Here’s one data point: (note the trend in murder rates year to yearalso):

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/25f8aede5cf09a3007b3c5a122ae199033f920e1cbbc9b806bd2bf0651565dcd.jpg

  8. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Give the Richmond Police some credit for once. It appears they acted on a tip and prevented a possible mass shooting event. More tips would be appreciated in some parts of Virginia.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Or… a living wage instead. Hmm, cops work for tips? You’d think they’d shoot fewer customers.

  9. WayneS Avatar

    The total population of all four of those cities (+/-582,000) represents less than 7% of the total state population.

    6.8 % of the population accounts for 75% of the increase in murders.

    Perhaps even more disturbing: those same four cities with 6.8% of the state’s population accounted for 39% of the total number of murders in Virginia during 2021.

    Total = 562
    Richmond = 90
    Norfolk = 61
    Portsmouth = 36
    Hampton = 33

    And that puts the 2021 murder rates (#/100,000 population) at:

    Richmond – 39.3/100K
    Portsmouth – 37.9/100K
    Norfolk – 24.96/100K
    Hampton – 24.4/100K

    The statewide rate was about 6.5/100K in 2021

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Now that looks more like the truth. For its small town look, its has big crime aspirations.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “6.8 % of the population accounts for 75% of the increase in murders.”

      Wow! That’sa lot of murders… wait! Who accounts for the other 25% and are they aliens?

      1. WayneS Avatar

        I suppose the remaining 93.4% of the population accounted for 25% of the increase.

  10. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    That can’t be right. The Confederate statues have been gone from those cities for quite some time now.

  11. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is a good analysis of the crime data and provides valuable information. It is too bad that you ended it with a recitation of the conservative agenda.

    The reasons for significant changes in crime rates are complex. Criminologists still have not adequately explained, even to themselves, the reasons for the long-term decrease in the violent crime rate.

    In your list of factors you could have included the availability and use of automatic weapons, poverty, unemployment, education, and, yes, racism. As for the prevailing rhetoric in Richmond, I struggle to discern the link between “non-profit advocacy groups” and the increase in murders. From what I have read, such groups decry the violence and the killing.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      “In your list of factors you could have included the availability and use of automatic weapons, poverty, unemployment, education, and, yes, racism. As for the prevailing rhetoric in Richmond, I struggle to discern the link between “non-profit advocacy groups” and the increase in murders. From what I have read, such groups decry the violence and the killing.”

      I don’t know how many times you must be corrected when discussing the topic, but fully automatic firearms are extremely expensive and highly regulated. Their usage in the commission of crimes is slim to none.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Your buddy wrote: “… but fully automatic firearms are extremely expensive and highly regulated. Their usage in the commission of crimes is slim to none…”

      Seem like he is suggesting a correlation that may need to be considered, doesn’t it…??

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Will you please provide a list of crimes committed recently in the United States by a person or persons utilizing automatic weapons.

        I’ve searched all the federal statistics I can find, as well as stats from California, Texas and Virginia, and I cannot find a single incident in the last two years.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          I’m sure whatever Eric wrote was deep and thoughtful. /s

          I believe the last time a fully automatic firearm was used in a crime was the 1997 Hollywood bank attempt. At that the firearm was illegally modified so it wasn’t a born automatic.

          The last legally owned fully automatic firearm crime, I believe was 1988 and that individual was convicted in 1990.

          Most people don’t realize automatic firearms are not very controllable and are typically used for suppression not effective fire.

          Beyond that if someone wanted a fully auto firearm, they can cross the boarder and acquire one from the cartels if they so desire.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Exactly!!

      2. WayneS Avatar

        Will you please provide a list of crimes committed recently in the United States by a person or persons utilizing automatic weapons.

        I’ve searched all the federal statistics I can find, as well as stats from California, Texas and Virginia, and I cannot find a single incident in the last two years.

      3. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        yes. If other weapons as capable of efficient killing as automatic weapons were also made just as difficult to obtain as automatic weapons, would that result in fewer wacadoodles getting their hands on these weapons and using them on innocents?

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Yes, Matt seems to be making that case very well. But don’t tell him that, of course…

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “I believe the last time a fully automatic firearm was used in a crime was the 1997 Hollywood bank attempt. At that the firearm was illegally modified so it wasn’t a born automatic.

          The last legally owned fully automatic firearm crime, I believe was 1988 and that individual was convicted in 1990.”

          He continues to make the case that strict gun regulations reduce gun crimes. He is really nailing it today!!

    3. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I’m sure you probably misspoke when you mentioned automatic weapons as we all know that very, very few crimes are committed using fully automatic weapons.

      And its’s not because criminals wouldn’t use them if they could get them, but actually because they are hard to get in the first place.

      If other weapons, for instance those with 30, 40, 100 round magazines or high velocity ammo, etc – if they were just as hard to obtain as fully automatic weapons, would we see less of them used in mass killings? Perhaps less mass killings or mass killings with far fewer victims?

    4. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Criminologists still have not adequately explained, even to themselves, the reasons for the long-term decrease in the violent crime rate.

      One clearly recognized cause of the long term decrease in crime is the removal of lead from gasoline. When kids who grew up in post leaded gas years reached high crime age they committed far fewer crimes than their predecessors. It is not entirely a mystery.

      Lead poisoning was not just for Romans. We can thank Richmond’s own Ethyl corporation for our recent dose of it.

      Lead water service pipes and leaded paint in older areas of Richmond still contribute to behavioral issues.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Agreed!!

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I had not heard that explanation. Thanks.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          Gladly, it was a surprising outcome, and certainly welcome.

          Unfortunately it does not shed much light on the current increase. I doubt we will find such a simple organic cause for the current surge although we do seem to have a lot of toxic chemicals in foods and their containers.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            There are the any number of lead pipes that feed water throughout of cities of America.

            This only became a problem when they switched to Chloramine form Chlorine.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Wish it was that simple, but it is not. That change caused a systemic crisis in Flint. There are a lot of different ways lead piping can cause lead poisoning in individual houses/businesses. Same goes with lead paint.

            Personally I was glad when I moved out of my house in Richmond’s Fan District that had lead water service to a place with copper pipe. Although, leaching lead out of pipe joints sealed with lead based solder is also an issue.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            The lead pipe issues is currently befalling D.C.

            True, but someone not doing research before switching chemicals wasn’t a great start.

    5. WayneS Avatar

      The number of automatic weapons used in crimes is so miniscule that it usually does not show up in annual statistics about the types of firearms used by criminals to commit crimes.

      Even “high powered” AR-15-style semi-automatic rifles are used in only 1% to 2% of crimes committed using firearms.

      Also, will you please explain how racism contributed to the increase in homicides in Virginia last year. I would really like to have an answer to this one.

      I respect your opinions, even though we will most likely never agree on the issue of guns.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        You and others like to quibble over the term “automatic weapons”. We all know what is being referred to. I have asked what would be a shorthand term that would describe something that looks like and functions like this, but have not received any advice: https://assets.wired.com/photos/w_2064/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ar-15-assault-rifle-533114876.jpg

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          “You and others like to quibble over the term “automatic weapons”. We all know what is being referred to. I have asked what would be a shorthand term that would describe something that looks like and functions like this, but have not received any advice:”

          1) It’s not quibbling, they were completely different firearms. Automatic firearms, do just that automatically reload while the trigger is depressed until all rounds are expended. Semi-Automatic firearms expend a single round per a single depression of the trigger.

          2) That is false, the only people who use the words interchangeable are those who lack the understand and knowledge of the topic. That or they are being intentionally misleading using the knowledge that most people don’t know the difference. Either way you’re being disingenuous.

          3) You’ve been provided the shorthand, you’ve chosen to ignore it. Appearance has zero impact on the function of the firearm. It is a semi-automictic rifle, period.

        2. WayneS Avatar

          I call it a semi-automatic rifle and see no reason to shorten that name. However, I think “semi-auto” is considered acceptable if you’re into the whole brevity thing.

        3. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          I have asked what would be a shorthand term that would describe something that looks like and functions like this, but have not received
          any advice:

          Actually you asked me in a recent post and I replied “semi automatic rifle, or informally semi auto”. You referenced my response and stated you would use that term.

          That did not last long. Did you forget you asked the question, that I responded and that you stated that you would use that description?

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            I wouldn’t expect an apology or admission of your statement. It would go against his nature to admit his own error.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Hello, Dick you out there?

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Of course, one of the problems with placing a jurisdiction on murder, or vice versa, is the mobility of the crime. It’s not like bank robbery. A drug deal goes south in VB and a person from Yorktown kills a person from Norfolk. Which city catches, or should, the bad stat?

    Given Ricmond PD’s murder clearance rate of something like 55%, that’s an awful lot of bodies hung on their hat rack just because the body turns up on their doorstep.

    Admittedly, most of the time people are killed where they live by someone from in the same house, or the one next door, but I wonder if statistics of murder are available based on victim/perpetrator home address?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Crime scene investigators are usually quite capable of determining whether a body that “turns up” somewhere was killed on-site or whether it was dumped. However, knowing where a murder victim wasn’t killed does not necessarily help investigators determine where they were killed.

      So, you do make a valid minor point. If criminals know that a certain locality has a low clearance rate for homicides, some small number of them from neighboring cities/towns/counties might pull a dump job and ditch the body in a poorly policed locality. It’s probably not a very high percentage of the total number of murders in that locality, though, since moving a body is risky in and of itself, and since, as you pointed out, most murder victims are killed very close to home.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It’s just that for a measure of “public safety” a useful statistic would be the location where criminals “work” more than where they live.. There is value to policing in saying, “Be alert in this Wal-Mart parking lot.”

        On the other hand, when it comes to averting crime, “social work”, the opposite may be true. Knowing that “this Wal-Mart’s parking lot criminals come from these areas in these cities.”

        1. WayneS Avatar

          Agreed. But those are statistics that can only be gathered by solving cases, and as you point out, Richmond’s homicide clearance rate is abysmal.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      A crime lab guy told me several years ago that Louisa was where to go to kill your spouse. He said they got cases where the story was that the revolver fell off the bedside table and shot the husband 3 times.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        In the back of the head?

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          He didn’t say, but did say that there were enough unprosecuted spousal shootings from Louisa that it caught their attention.

Leave a Reply