by Shaun Kenney
Last week, The Republican Standard had the opportunity to follow Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears as she toured the Richmond Slave Trail — which included not only the site of the notorious Lumpkins Slave Jail but also the site where Gabriel Prosser was executed and presumably buried in 1800.

Winsome Earle-Sears brought a narrative rooted in the role of hope in human liberation, whether it was in her own tradition from Jamaica to the hopelessness that seems to infect so much of our political discourse today. TRS was able to sit down with the Lieutenant Governor in order to explore her thoughts on this topic and many others.We just toured Lumpkin’s Slave Jail site. Clearly this is a place with a lot of hurt and anguish, but a little bit of courage and heroism. Where do you think that resilience — that hope — comes from given the experiences of the past?

People look at me and think that I have courage, but I don’t. I have no special store of courage more than the next guy, but I have counted the cost and what I say and do comes with consequences.
There are times when people believe that I am not willing to take that stand, but God comes along and tells me to pick up my cross. Many people attribute that to me being a Marine, but it is really not: it is attributable to my Christian Faith.

It is rare to see a public figure so open about that. For you, how do you see the role of courage in public life?

The question is “Are you willing to lose?” because if you are willing to lose then you can do anything. The 56 signers to the Declaration of Independence were ready to lose. Benjamin Franklin reminds us that if we aren’t willing to hang together then we shall surely hang separately.

They weren’t perfect, they didn’t do perfect things, but they left us a document that helped us do different things today. Martin Luther King Jr. pointed to the Declaration, and it was there. It was almost Biblical when you could say that when the time had come full, and because the Founders had violated that basic fundamental principle — which they acknowledged — their children and grandchildren would die in a fight to preserve that liberty which they spoke of in the Declaration, because they asked God to help them win their independence.

Teddy Roosevelt said that to educate a man without morals is to educate a man who will be a menace to society, and we have to tell the truth, but without hope? You tell us about the past, but you don’t say we will rise from that? We will overcome our human failings? Our children will? Our grandchildren will?

So where are the leaders of all colors and stripes to say America must continue? We must acknowledge the wickedness that was done to black people, but at the same time acknowledge as MLK Jr. during his speech to Barat High School in Philadelphia, that doors are opening to you that were never opened to your parents.

I put it to you that those doors have opened, they opened when my dad came to America in 1963 when there were real dog whistles and real fire hoses. Those doors have opened. That’s why on my challenge coin on the reverse the doors have opened. When are we going to acknowledge that?

Have we gotten rid of wickedness? No — and that’s what it is. Slavery was wicked, but so were our other sins. It’s really all sin, that’s what it is, and we are still committing sins. Slavery was one of them, segregation was one of them, but look at the sins of today. We don’t tolerate each other. We take the bread out of one child’s mouth and give it to another, and it doesn’t work — we’ve tried that. The whole shebang is a sin, we are never going to get rid of sin.

Using words such as sin and faith, there are a number of your opponents who take issue with the way you wear your Christian faith on your sleeve. Does that bother you at all?

I don’t care if people call me too religious. I may not be what I’m supposed to be, but I ain’t what I used to be.

They say I’m a white supremacist. Really? The KKK are rolling in their graves because here I am! Second-in-command in the former capital of the Confederacy! Having been elected under the same Declaration of Independence and the same Constitution. Even worse, I’m an immigrant!

I’m not being pollyannish about this world. But we have to tell our children that they can and must rise above it, that we are not raising failures, but success stories. But their ancestors would say that they did not suffer, so that you could be saying at this time and in this century that you could not dream and achieve.

That goes back to a recurring theme today on hope, doesn’t it?

If you say that the socioeconomic conditions that surround us prevent us from achieving, we had the worst economic conditions during slavery and yet those people wanted a good education. It doesn’t get any worse than slavery when talking about socioeconomic conditions. So we have to say that we are dreamers and that we will overcome. We must. And if we allow people — read that, politicians — to keep us at one another’s throats, we must avoid that at all cost. We must teach history, but we are going to continue and thrive despite the abuses we have suffered. That’s it. Who’s saying that we are not acknowledging what is true.

I’ve heard some people say I am a one-off, that black and brown children cannot be like me. While I’m trying to bring hope, they are doing what? Telling our children what they can’t be while I’m saying that they can.

So, who are the politicians at fault? The ones who say, “You can’t.” Or the ones who say, “Yes we can!” or “Si se puede!” And for those who say that Winsome is trying to get everyone to be a Republican, there’s a French word for that, which I better not say!

Sort of goes back to this social determinism and pessimism in the world against a more hopeful vision rooted in a sense of human dignity. Do you think that determinism which says there is no hope is the problem here?

No – I simply want people to let each other be. If you want to be a Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, I say let us be and don’t put people into boxes. Because if we do that, then we can’t speak freely to one another.

There are some people who say I’m the racist. How can that be when I am telling black women to keep their babies? You will have to check my stats on this, I think black women are 10 percent of the population and have 40 percent of the abortions in Virginia. But I’m the racist for helping black mothers to keep their babies. It’s a strange world that we live in, a confused world.

One of your friends who joined us on the tours said, “Coming from Jamaica, I can’t relate to any of this.” Do you agree?

You know, it is interesting to note that the [Jamacian] Christmas Insurrection in the 1830s where the leaders, who read the Gospel, picked up and read that no white man could enslave me, and for six months they burned the country until England said that they would end slavery. But because of that insurrection, Britain outlawed slavery in their entire empire. Jamaica did that!

So for that, there is a different perspective. I remember reading where someone said never to hire Jamaican porters, because Jamaica will never pull for another man. Of course, his idea was that we would go back to Africa and become the kings and queens. And of course, we have issues. Sin is sin – it is everywhere. But I know I can be what I can’t be, and why? Because the lawyers are black and judges are black, the generals are black and the PhDs are black.

You know Malcolm Gladwell’s mother is from Jamaica? Even the early oughts were bad in Jamaica, and still Jamaicans wanted to come to America. So there is something about America that is that shining city on a hill. Some of this belongs in the very beginning because there is a theme about America, but Jamaica is no different than any other country, but it is interesting that when MLK Jr. came to Jamaica in 1965 where he felt like a person there (in America), where he felt it was a sanctuary there (in Jamaica), and it was my job in school to dust his photo that was hanging on the wall because every home in Jamaica had a photo of MLK.

Sounds like you have some very fond memories of Jamaica!

Once upon a time, the Jamaican pound was stronger than the American dollar. Then we elected a socialist leader – another AOC? – and they did what socialists do. I knew what IMF meant at 11 years old and the interest rates, and that by continually going to the IMF that we would never be prosperous. So the rich fled, mostly to America.

But here’s my question: why are they all fleeing to America? I thought America was a racist country? Why are all these people coming across the border to a racist country? If they really believed what they believed, they would be telling people, “Stop! Why do you want to come here?”!

But for me, it is all about hope. Our children aren’t even having their babies. We will teach our history, we will give them hope, they will continue the American experiment and they will leave the country better than how they found it. That’s always the hope.

I wanted to ask you about the school choice bill during this year’s General Assembly session. When it was announced, it appeared to have some excellent traction based on others states such as Florida passing similar legislation. What went wrong in Virginia?

You know, we knew that we would be fighting Democrats to give our children a choice in their education. We didn’t think we would have to be fighting our Republican family. That we were not prepared for, because we had agreed that’s what we would be fighting for. During the elections, that’s what we said we would be fighting for.

But we are coming back, and we haven’t given up. We are not going to accept defeat, because if we accept defeat that means we are accepting failing schools. I am absolutely unwilling to accept that proposition. On that, I am unwilling to lose. I wasn’t elected to warm a seat, I was elected to empower parents, to help make Virginia attractive for those who would bring jobs here, to keep our communities save, and to call a thing wrong if it is not right.

I have a question on Critical Race Theory and DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) initiatives. We still seem to be in the grip of this stuff after Governor Youngkin campaigned so hard against it. Is it really all up to the General Assembly, or is there more that can be done at an executive level?

I think that we have done on the executive level, including the Attorney General, what we can just because of the makeup of our constitution.

The governor signed an executive order, and it was challenged in a court and the judge said that the localities who want it can have it and the ones who reject it can rejected it. Our attorney general is looking into things that we can do, but the local school boards have their own authority, so it is really up to the parents of Virginia to change what needs to be changed.
This is a government elected by the people and working for the people, this is not something that the elected officials are going to get done on their own.

So these local school board elections and swapping out bad administrators with good administrators is the entire ball game?

If people are really concerned about this, then they need to offer themselves up for public office and help change things for the better. We are a nation of laws and we have to stand by the laws we have, and we should be mindful of the laws because if we change them to a certain degree, when a different political ideology comes into power they will change it right back. We need reason after all.

So parents really need to double down and get involved, it seems. On that note, and seeing things where you are in Richmond, how important do you think it is to right the ship when it comes to public education?

The question finally is: “Are our children learning?” Some of them are, but they are in schools where you can say parents have made a choice because they can afford to live in those communities where the school is doing very well. But it’s not just a matter of throwing money at it, but rather having high standards in education, that we will not dumb down our children because the real final analysis is that we are not on this planet by ourselves.

We have China, Russia, and all those other places whose goal is world dominance. Meanwhile, we are trying to figure out what is a woman? They’re laughing at us, and the communist countries don’t care if you are are white, black, Asian or Latino – they are fighting for world dominance while we are fighting some semblance of a civil war. So we have to get a grip on reality here pretty quickly.

Your interview with Bill Mahr was a really unique chance to see a conservative find areas of common cause with liberals. Outside looking in, it seemed like a pretty powerful moment.

All I know is this: If we keep at it the way we are where we have politicians who keep telling us they are our saviors, and if they keep pitting us against one another, it does not end well. For me, it comes back to sin.

Earlier, you had mentioned this photo that you had seen with a man’s father and son both looking at him in the casket and what you took from that. Could you explain?

I was looking at this photo where a father is in a casket while the grandfather is holding his grandson while they both look in the casket. That’s three generations, but here’s the kicker: The father was gunned down by gangs (he was also a gang member), the grandfather had gone to jail, and the grandson at 14 years old was charged with murder.

I want to know, what do we do there? Who is talking about that? The Grandma is 36, the daughter is 16, and the grandchild is just born. That’s another generation. Who is talking about that?
We’ve got issues and they aren’t just Republican and Democrat. It doesn’t boil down that simply to say that all Republicans and all Democrats are bad. The fathers aren’t home, and yet we will say that all these socioeconomic problems that MLK talked about — he did say work hard, stay at home, study, stay in school. So if you say that Winsome is a one-off, I don’t think you’re on the side of Martin [Luther King, Jr.]. When you say I’m pie-in-the-sky, you’re not on the side of Martin.

If there’s a will, there’s a way?

If there are no doors? Break them down. Well, wait. If there are doors locked in our face? Break ‘em down.

Look — I belong in every room I go into. I had someone ask me where do I get that? I have to remind them that to give up is defeat.

Can I ask about Trump?

What’s there to say that hasn’t already been said? I’m just thinking about Melania and their son and what is she thinking when she is hearing all of this? Then we have another woman who has come forward. I think I am looking at this from the perspective of family, not politics, and I think we forget that there are real people.

I know Trump can handle this, but what about his family? That takes it to a different level. I’m just looking at it from Melania’s point of view. Maybe I shouldn’t, but here I am, and maybe that’s the difference between my Democratic opponents and me. They’re trying to destroy me, but I mean the truth will out itself and you know…

You’ve mentioned your own personal security a couple of times. Are you at all concerned?

There are several delegates and senators questioning whether or not they should take their license plates in the event they are targeted. Security is an issue. One hates to think that the Virginia Democrats are waiting for something to happen. I hope not.

For instance, I was in the women’s bathroom in an airport where a random person had approached me and asked me if I was Winsome Sears. I said yes, but I had to ask her how she knew me. “From the back of your hair!”

I’ve asked for security, but the Democrats have not given it to me, so let it be out there. I’ve asked for more staff, and we are inundated, but I only have three staff for the 8.5 million people in Virginia. I guess the Democrats are holding it against me that when Tim Kaine was lieutenant governor 22 years ago, I did vote to cut his staff, but let’s remember what we were facing at that time. We were in a budget deficit. A lot of things were cut. So they are being totally disingenuous.

So the Senate Democrats are freezing both staff and security in order to prove a point? That seems awfully petty on their part.

They talk about forgiveness, and though there’s nothing to be forgiven; the residents of Virginia are asking me for help and I am trying to help them.

We are funded at the same level as 2003, and we are the only office that has been at that same rate over the last 20 years. We have to pay office supplies, our copy paper, our rent. Does nobody think about that?

I guess if I were a lieutenant governor who did nothing, I might be okay with that, but I’m not. This isn’t expanding government, this is doing what I was elected to do. Delegates and Senators don’t pay for their offices or supplies. They get two staff members; the lieutenant governor gets three.

The Democrats seem to believe that if they can keep me looking ineffective, then they win. That’s a terrible game to play when Virginians are asking for help.

Shaun Kenney is the editor of The Republican Standard, former chairman of the Board of Supervisors for Fluvanna County, and a former executive director of the Republican Party of Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

108 responses to “Five Questions: An Interview with Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears”

  1. Lefty665 Avatar

    “They weren’t perfect, they didn’t do perfect things, but they left us
    a document that helped us do different things today. Martin Luther King
    Jr. pointed to the Declaration, and it was there… You tell us about the past, but you don’t say we will rise from that? We will overcome our human failings? Our children will? Our grandchildren will?…

    So where are the leaders of all colors and stripes to say America
    must continue? We must acknowledge the wickedness that was done to black people, but at the same time acknowledge as MLK Jr. during his speech to Barat High School in Philadelphia, that doors are opening to you that were never opened to your parents.

    I put it to you that those doors have opened, they opened when my dad
    came to America in 1963 when there were real dog whistles and real fire
    hoses. Those doors have opened. That’s why on my challenge coin on the
    reverse the doors have opened. When are we going to acknowledge that?”

    Powerful speech from someone with standing.

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Sears vs Filler-Corn for governor?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I hope the Democrats have more sense than that.

      1. No offense, but I hope they don’t.

  3. M. Purdy Avatar

    I actually think Sears is infinitely more interesting a politician than Gov. Youngkin. To me, she seems much more authentic and matter-of-fact. And I think she has really strong political instincts. If she steers clear of the Trump train wreck, she’ll be a star.

    1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      Interesting enough to have backpedaled on a few earlier statements.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        Like I said, talented.

        1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
          Charles D’Aulnais

          I’m sure there’s one out there someplace because Joe Biden has been around too long not to have taken the obligatory “hunting photo” for Democrat candidates. Even Obama’s campaign released a skeet shooting photo (suitable substitute for someone who has never worn blaze orange).

          But the Republican candidates who thought those “Rambo with AR-15” photos would ever advance their national campaigns will find themselves wishing them gone.

          She’ll have fun walking that one back.

          1. What makes you think she will “walk it back”? She had a few pictures taken holding a semi-automatic rifle. What’s the big deal?

          2. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            She may not. And, to far less than half of the population that is appealing.

          3. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            To be honest, it’s the round.

          4. Right. So, .223 AR-15 vs. .30-06 Remington Woodsmaster. Which of them is more deadly?

          5. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            They’ll both do the job, but the .223 will make more venison burgers.

          6. Only if you want to violate one of Virginia’s firearm hunting laws.

          7. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            The deadliest round is the one you can shoot the most of. The .223 is lighter. Lighter means more rounds per pound. I doubt anyone will likely ever be a judge of which “hurts” more, but the .223 is the more devastating of the two.

          8. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “The deadliest round is the one you can shoot the most of. The .223 is lighter. Lighter means more rounds per pound. I doubt anyone will likely ever be a judge of which “hurts” more, but the .223 is the more devastating of the two.”

            That is not a correct statement. The 223 is not more devastating than a 308 or 30-06.

            The US Armed Forces adopted the 5.56 because of combat loads/combat effectiveness, that is not what a hunter uses. A hunter isn’t going out with 120+ rounds and full kit.

            As a matter of fact the Army is changing to the 6.8mm SPC (277 SIG Fury).

            5.56×45 1,796 joules of energy on impact.
            7.62×39 2,070 joules of energy on impact.

          9. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            Which is why Americans should only be permitted to own bolt, pump, or lever loading. Or better still, muzzle.

          10. Which is why Americans should only be permitted to own bolt, pump, or lever loading.

            Says who?

            Also, you said it is “the round” that determines how deadly a firearm is. But now it’s the action? Perhaps you should take some time to decide exactly what, I mean who, it is that makes guns so deadly.

            Or, let’s apply your logic to the 1st Amendment… …which is why Americans should only be able to own a typewriter and a mimeograph machine, or better yet a Guttenberg printing press…

          11. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            Either produces a pamphlet. One will produce more pamphlets per second.

          12. Precisely.

          13. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Smooth, a Remington 7400. Those fetch a pretty price now adays.

          14. M. Purdy Avatar

            100%, the AR15 thing is bad. And to be perfectly clear, I don’t like her politics for the most part.

          15. Why do you think “the AR15 thing is bad”?

          16. M. Purdy Avatar

            Because, IMO, the politics around firearms is changing toward gun control pretty significantly. And it leaves her vulnerable for anyone on the center or left to pillory. She’ll have to explain it if she runs for Gov.

          17. Thank you for your opinion.

            Regarding “the politics around firearms is changing toward gun control pretty significantly”, are you aware that 26 out of the 50 states are now “constitutional carry” (no permit required for concealed carry)?

            Are you also aware that 13 of those states became constitutional carry states in just the last 5 years?

            That hardly seems like a significant shift towards more gun control to me.

            Also, more non whites and women are purchasing firearms than ever before in this country – a positive trend, in my opinion, as long as they are taking the time to become trained in their safe and proficient use.

            Respectfully, I think you are mistaken.

          18. M. Purdy Avatar

            “26 out of the 50 states.” Apples and oranges. As you know, the population of states vary. It can both be true that 2/3s of Americans believe in tougher gun laws, while a majority of *states*, especially red ones, have instituted wacky policies at variance with the vast majority of Americans.

          19. I wouldn’t discount the power of the media and the left to spin and promote their own narrative, no matter what the event.

            Within two weeks of the Covenant School shooting, we have almost forgotten about the victims. don’t talk about what motivated the shooter, and the heroes are the attention grabbing Democrats who disrupted the capital to impose their will and are now basking in the limelight.

            Additionally, the shooter has become a victim, and hatred is directed at anyone who supports the Bill of Rights.

            Lest we forget completely, these are the actual victims of the Covenant School shooting.

            https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/28/us/victims-covenant-school-shooting-nashville/index.html

          20. I wouldn’t discount the power of the media and the left to spin and promote their own narrative, no matter what the event.

            Yes, they have been doing that for a long time – and yet still more than half the states have constitutional carry. Imagine how many more might have it if the media was not in the pockets of the anti-gun crowd.

          21. I wouldn’t discount the power of the media and the left to spin and promote their own narrative, no matter what the event.

            Yes, they have been doing that for a long time – and yet still more than half the states have constitutional carry. Imagine how many more might have it if the media was not in the pockets of the anti-gun crowd.

          22. “…the politics around firearms is changing toward gun control pretty significantly.”

            It’s called Stockholm syndrome. Escape from the bubble and the world looks very different.

          23. M. Purdy Avatar

            About 2/3s of Americans support stricter gun laws. Stockholm Syndrome indeed.

          24. “About 2/3s of Americans support stricter gun laws. Stockholm Syndrome indeed.”

            That’s exactly my point. There are a lot of people who believe whatever they are told.

            Ask those very people what the current gun laws are that they find deficient, and they don’t know.

            Ask them what want, and they will parrot something they have heard.

            And to demonstrate the above, WayneS can’t get strait answers to his very simple questions which a very much on point to the gun control debate.

          25. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Don’t forget that half the items they will list as wanting, are in fact already law. They just aren’t aware of it, because their politicos don’t know the laws on the books.

          26. M. Purdy Avatar

            I mean, you’re saying something that’s essentially true about every issue, which is that the average American voter doesn’t know the details. What Americans do intuitively know that is someone with mental issues should be allowed to buy a gun willy nilly. And that there’s probably very little need for an AR-type of weapon, expanded magazines, etc. The constitution isn’t a suicide pact, and no right is absolute.

          27. People can’t buy a gun “willy nilly.” Facts are important.

            A few years ago, a reporter wanted to buy a gun to show how easy it was. He went to a gun store and his application was rejected.

            In most cases, it’s not intuition that’s prompting the push for more gun laws, it’s propaganda from politicians who want power.

            If you believe “AR-type” firearms should be banned, then you should be able to explain why.

            In a free country, my intuition shouldn’t be an excuse to take away your rights or property, and your intuitions should be sufficient to take away mine.

          28. M. Purdy Avatar

            https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/30/us/nashville-shooting-guns-used/index.html Like I said, no rights are absolute. You’ll have to accept some basic limits on your ability to purchase certain fire arms in order to prevent the mass shooting crisis in our country.

          29. With all due respect, you continue to parrot back talking points, not facts or solutions. Let’s examine them.

            “Like I said, no rights are absolute.”

            That’s a dishonest talking point that adds nothing to search for a solution.

            Have I, or anyone else, purposed doing away with all laws and regulations related to firearms? Firearms are already one of the most regulated products in the country. There are thousands of laws and regulations.

            “You’ll have to accept some basic limits on your ability to purchase certain fire arms in order to prevent the mass shooting crisis in our country.”

            Another talking point with no substance.

            I have accepted limits. If you seek to impose more, then you state specifically what they, are and why they would work.

          30. M. Purdy Avatar

            “That’s a dishonest talking point that adds nothing to search for a solution.”

            How is that dishonest? You seem to imply on an earlier post that stricter gun laws are an infringement on your rights. Then you freely admit that you don’t want to do away with “all gun laws and regulations.” Well, what is the right that you’re protecting? Is it to protect your home? Own an AR? If there were a ban on ARs, expanded magazines, increased red flag laws and confiscation criteria, would it infringe on your rights? Why or why not?

            “Have I, or anyone else, purposed doing away with all laws and regulations related to firearms? Firearms are already one of the most regulated products in the country. There are thousands of laws and regulations.”

            There’s a post on here about how certain states are loosening regulations, so yes, there is an effort to move the other direction in many states. Will they get rid of all gun laws, no. Will they make it more dangerous to live in those states, certainly.

            “I have accepted limits. If you seek to impose more, then you state specifically what they, are and why they would work.”

            I would ban AR-type weapons, high-capacity magazines, have mandatory training courses and licensing, strict red flag criteria (which wasn’t present in TN), and expanded confiscation criteria, including spousal assault, documented psychiatric issues, violent crime, etc. I would also open manufacturers up to civil liability, along with gun shop owners who skirt the rules. These types of modest reforms would reduce gun violence because they’re the types of requirements that prevent mass shootings from happening in every other modern country at the rate they happen in this country. There are solutions out there.

          31. How is it dishonest to parrot back “no rights are absolute”? It’s dishonest to suggest that gun owners don’t already know that no right is absolute, or that they aren’t already restricted in many ways. It’s largely those who are suggesting the need for more laws who are unaware of existing laws and restrictions.

            What do I need?

            The Bill of Rights is foundational to our system of government. The burden of proof is not on those who enjoy liberty to defend why they “need” it, it’s upon those who seek to take it away. How much First Amendment do you “need.”

            “…certain states are loosening regulations…”

            What specific “loosening” bothers you, and where is the evidence that it is harmful?

            “I would ban AR-type weapons…”

            Define AR-type weapons and document how this would solve the problem.

            I own firearms, none say “AR” on them.

            “high-capacity magazines”

            None of my magazines say “high capacity” on them.

            “These types of modest reforms …”

            The laundry list of “modest” reforms you suggest would make gun ownership nearly impossible for all but the very rich, at the time when crime is rising and district attorneys are more concerned reducing prison rates than reducing crime rates.

          32. M. Purdy Avatar

            You need to first figure out what right it is you’re defending, rather than put up a bunch of reasons why certain regulations can’t work and imply that they somehow infringe on some amorphous right. The BOR is not exactly clear on that point, and apart from the Heller ruling, neither is the SCOTUS. Much more substantial gun regulations are coming in the future.

          33. “You need to first figure out what right it is you’re defending…”

            I understand what I am defending, but you can’t define what you are banning, nor can you document that it would work.

            “documented psychiatric issues” for example is far too vague to be of any value. It would be helpful to first understand the laws already in place and what specifically you would change.

          34. Lefty665 Avatar

            …imply that they somehow infringe on some amorphous right. The BOR is not
            exactly clear on that point, and apart from the Heller ruling, neither
            is the SCOTUS.

            Actually, the BoR is clear. The right is inherent, and hardly “amorphous”. The amendment explicitly limits government’s latitude to restrict the right to keep and bear arms.

            Heller has been followed by rulings that clarify and, more importantly, expand it. Specifically the ruling last term that struck New York’s restrictions. There will likely be another this term.

          35. M. Purdy Avatar

            I disagree. I actually think the 2A is one of the most difficult to parse provisions of the Const. And Heller established a core right, for sure, but didn’t define the outer limits, which leaves things like regulation of types of firearms completely open for interpretation.

          36. Lefty665 Avatar

            Each subsequent ruling has expanded and further defined Heller. As noted elsewhere in this thread the court has limited restrictions on firearms in common use. While that does not mean no regulation, it is far from “regulation… completely open”.

          37. M. Purdy Avatar

            Sure, but that’s not what we’re talking about in terms of the types of restrictions that gun control advocates are looking for. Gun safety laws, access restrictions, background checks have all been upheld by lower courts. Gun control advocates are looking to expand those types of laws. Heller left all of that open for states and the fed govt. to decide.

          38. Lefty665 Avatar

            Gun safety laws, access restrictions, background checks have all been upheld by lower courts.

            With all of those restrictions in place, what more do you want?

          39. M. Purdy Avatar

            Expanded confiscation criteria, red flag laws with immediate consequences, bans on purchases with history of mental disorders and violence, bans on certain classes of firearms and accessories, increased penalties for parents, increased liability for gun manufacturers, mandatory licensing and training.

          40. Confiscation of firearms is absolutely an infringement on our (all of our) rights. It would require an ex post facto law in order to initiate such a plan, and those are supposed to be illegal in this country.

          41. M. Purdy Avatar

            I’m not talking about an ex post facto law, I’m talking about expanding current laws on the books or instituting them where there aren’t any.

          42. That’s funny.

          43. You have also failed to clarify “documented psychiatric issues.”

            Mental illnesses are common in the United States. It is estimated that more than one in five U.S. adults live with a mental illness (57.8 million in 2021). Mental illnesses include many different conditions that vary in degree of severity, ranging from mild to moderate to severe.

            https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness#:~:text=Mental%20illnesses%20are%20common%20in,mild%20to%20moderate%20to%20severe.

            Then address the legal and constitutional issues related to taking rights away from everyone with “documented psychiatric issues.”

            Virginia already has mechanisms in place, so I am assuming you wish to go further.

          44. I would also open manufacturers up to civil liability, along with gun shop owners who skirt the rules.

            You should research this stuff for yourself. Gun manufacturers and gun stores who skirt the rules already are and always have been fully subject to both criminal and civil liability. Despite the media’s and the democrat party’s continual and perpetual mischaracterization of the law, the protection of lawful commerce act did nothing to change that.

            Seriously, read it for yourself. Read a real legal analysis of it.

            Then perhaps you should ask yourself: If they will deceive me so blatantly about that, what other gun issues are they lying about?

          45. M. Purdy Avatar

            You need to reconsider who’s been duped here. Gun manufacturers cannot be held liable for use of their weapons in crime. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/can-us-gunmakers-be-liable-mass-shooting-2022-05-25/

          46. All rifles, (which includes the black scary looking ones that Democrats hyperventilate about) account for fewer murders than blunt objects like bats.

            It’s inherently unjust to hold manufacterers and retailers of a legal products responsible for criminal use of them.

          47. M. Purdy Avatar

            And it’s inherently unjust that we have mass shootings on a weekly basis because we don’t do anything about guns in this country. I’ll get over the injustice of holding manufacturers liable.

          48. I know exactly what I am talking about. Your comment referred to gun manufacturers and gun stores that skirt the rules.

            Instead of addressing my response, you have changed the subject.

            But now that you have, please explain why you think any manufacturer of anything should be held responsible for the criminal misuse of their product?

          49. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            It is a similar recitation of a talking point, much like the “gun show loophole”.

          50. M. Purdy Avatar

            You misread what I said. Manufacturers of firearms should be open to civil liability via statute, the DOJ, or states attorneys general. Their general liability shield should be repealed.

          51. Okay.

            Now, please explain why you think a manufacturer of a product should be held liable for the actions of third parties who criminally misuse that manufacturer’s product?

          52. “Now, please explain why you think a manufacturer of a product should be held liable for the actions of third parties who criminally misuse that manufacturer’s product?”

            And apply the same standard to alcohol.

            “95,000 Americans die from alcohol-related causes annually; 68,000 of them are men.”

            https://drugabusestatistics.org/alcohol-related-deaths/#:~:text=Miscellaneous%20Death%20Rates%20due%20to%20Alcoholic%20Consumption&text=95%2C000%20Americans%20die%20from%20alcohol,drinking%20too%20much%20over%20time.

            Deaths are the tip of the iceberg. Alcohol is also a major contributor to assaults, rape, child abuse, broken homes, etc.

            We punish the abusers. Prohibition didn’t work.

          53. What Americans do intuitively know that is someone with mental issues should be allowed to buy a gun willy nilly.

            I don’t think that at all. In fact, I don’t think people with serious mental issues should be able to buy guns “willy-nilly”.

          54. M. Purdy Avatar

            Right, typo.

          55. My apologies. It was a cheap shot and I knew it when I posted it.

            However, My snark aside, I really do think we need to find legal and constitutional means to make it harder for mentally ill people to obtain firearms. But I do not think we should infringe on the rights of those who are not mentally ill to do it.

          56. M. Purdy Avatar

            Right, I agree. But it matters what you mean by infringement. As I asked Nathan, I think it’s important to understand what the 2A actually embodies and what we want to protect. The BOR and SCOTUS have not been all that helpful in defining that. Is a thorough background check on sale or transfer an infringement? What about banning certain categories of arms?

          57. “Is a thorough background check on sale or transfer an infringement?”

            It’s a monetary barrier for low income people, and no barrier at all for criminals. If you are planning to commit a crime with a gun, you don’t want that gun to be traceable back to you.

            I am not trying to be contrary here, but I honestly don’t understand why this issue (or several others) is important to you. We have a comprehensive background check law in Virginia.

          58. RE: Is banning certain categories of arms an infringement?

            When the “category” of firearm being banned is the single most popular and best-selling rifle in the history of the United States, then yes, that is an infringement.

          59. M. Purdy Avatar

            Ah, so popularity determines policy in your view. How did we ever get tobacco under control, I wonder. Anyway, good luck with that.

          60. Where firearms in common use are concerned, it is not me saying it, it is the supreme court.

            he Second Amendment protects “arms ‘in common use at the time’ for lawful purposes like self-defense” and arms that are “typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.” Such arms are “chosen by American society,” not the government.

          61. Where firearms in common use are concerned, it is not me saying it, it is the supreme court.

            …the Second Amendment protects “arms ‘in common use at the time’ for lawful purposes like self-defense” and arms that are “typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.” Such arms are “chosen by American society,” not the government.

            How can you possibly argue that the best-selling rifle of all time is not in common use and/or is not typically possessed?

          62. M. Purdy Avatar

            How often are AR15s used for self defense? It’s the weapon of choice for mass killings, and alternatives exist. Heller basically says you have a right to protect your home with a handgun. The rest hasn’t been litigated…but it will be.

          63. “Heller basically says you have a right to protect your home with a handgun.”

            You have been mislead. I suggest you read Heller for yourself.

            Not every case can be heard by the Supreme Court. That’s why rulings like Heller include principles for lower courts to follow that are broader than the specific case before them.

          64. M. Purdy Avatar

            Right, thanks for the legal guidance;-).

          65. Heller basically says you have a right to protect your home with a handgun.

            Heller held: The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

            It’s not limited to handguns.

          66. How often are AR15s used for self defense?

            I don’t know for certain because the “progressive” media rarely covers defensive uses of firearms, but I’ll bet it’s a good bit more often than they are used in mass shootings.

            Georgetown University political economist William English recently (2021) commissioned a nationwide firearms-related survey and provided the results of his analyses. He estimates that there are about 1.67 million incidents per year in the United States in which a firearm is used defensively by its owner.

            Sixty-two percent (62%) of the owners of this very popular rifle cited “home defense” as the main reason for purchasing the weapon. But, even if just one-half of one percent of defensive uses of firearms involve an AR-15, that still comes to about 8,350 defensive uses of AR-15s each year. That is far more than the number of mass shootings in which they are used.

            Also: [The AR-15 is] the weapon of choice for mass killings…

            Wrong. Handguns are used quite a bit more often in mass killings/shootings than are all types of rifles combined.

          67. M. Purdy

            The Second Amendment covers firearms “in common use for lawful purposes.”

            I believe you referenced Heller earlier, but it seems you haven’t read it.

            The right to keep and consume tobacco is not included in the Bill of Rights.

          68. No, they do not.

          69. Ah, the classic AP poll…

          70. Lefty665 Avatar

            “it leaves her vulnerable for anyone on the center or left to pillory. She’ll have to explain it if she runs for Gov.”

            Has anyone ever really pilloried a Marine for a picture of one holding a rifle? Seems if they try that she wraps herself in the flag, service, duty, country and apple pie while the Marine Hymn plays in the background.

          71. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            She’s a Marine (retired). She’s allowed to have various firearms.

          72. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            Yep, we all are. Even crazy people in Tennessee and other “no red flag” states, but selling the AR-15 family Christmas cards to the other 70% is an uphill struggle.

          73. What specifically is so bad about the AR-15 rifle?

          74. You won’t get an answer.

            “Repetition makes a fact seem more true, regardless of whether it is or not. Understanding this effect can help you avoid falling for propaganda, says psychologist Tom Stafford.”

            “So, here, captured in the lab, seems to be the source for the saying that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth. And if you look around yourself, you may start to think that everyone from advertisers to politicians are taking advantage of this foible of human psychology.”

            https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I went to Farmville, Va to hear candidates speak in the early season of the Republican race before the ranked choice voting. At the time I was intrigued by Merle Rutledge. But it was Winsome Sears that stole the show. Very impressive. What I saw then (November 2020) was what you see now. I wonder what Merle is doing now?

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Two observations:

    1. The Lieutenant Governor has one duty: preside over the Senate and cast a vote in the case of a tie. That was what she was elected to do. Why does she have more staff than her immediate predecessors: Justin Fairfax and Ralph Northam?

    2. She claims to be “second-in-command.” That is an exaggeration of her position. She has no authority over any agency heads nor over any function of government. Is she involved in the budget decisions? Traditionally, the unofficial second-in-command has been the Governor’s chief of staff. She is no more the second-in-command of Virginia government than Kamala Harris is the second-in-command of the U.S. government.

    1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      John Nance Garner is often quoted on the duties of the “second-in-command”. That’s assuming Al Haig isn’t around, then it’s even more nebulous.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Unlike Kamala, Winsome Sears has been an effective voice for conservative politics.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        VP Harris IMO has never spoken in behalf of conservative viewpoints.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          VP Kamala has been a lousy spokesperson for the Executive Branch. Wherever she goes it is a disaster. Now examine the Lt. Governor of Virginia. She is exceptional at representing the conservative brand. Surely you can recognize this?

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      And the AG is not the “chief law enforcement officer.” But in politics, perception is reality.

      You forgot her second daily duty: call the mansion to see if the Governor made it through the night. 🙂 But in truth some LG’s can take on some power, and if the Senate gets to be 20-20….

      1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
        Charles D’Aulnais

        “But in truth some LG’s can take on some power, and if the Senate gets to be 20-20….”

        20-20 Really? Dollar bet? Chronic myopia.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          I wish the upcoming election cycle would only cost me $1. 🙂 But sure, 20-20 is very possible. I’ve been doing this a long time…

          1. Lefty665 Avatar

            Sorta like betting on green in roulette isn’t it? It doesn’t come up often, but it happens. He should give you pretty good odds on that buck.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “…the local school boards have their own authority, so it is really up to the parents of Virginia to change what needs to be changed.

    This is a government elected by the people and working for the people…”

    Good lord! I agree with her on something (more or less). Well said… and take heed, BR!

  6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “It is rare to see a public figure so open about that.”

    Really…?? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/68585672b0a3c7c47effa485c03862609b19c2a655b3ef826ce163aeebbefe2a.jpg

    “Benjamin Franklin reminds us that if we aren’t willing to hang together then we shall surely hang separately.”

    There is no good evidence that Franklin ever said this, btw…

    1. To be fair, the interviewer did say “open”, not “openly hypocritical”.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        When it comes to politicians and religion, those are pretty much synonymous…

        1. Whatever you say.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        I don’t have to, they caveated the claim by saying “According to the historian Jared Sparks, Franklin replied: “Yes, we must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

        From here:

        https://professorbuzzkill.com/ben-franklin-we-must-all-hang-together-or-all-hang-separately-quote-or-no-quote/

        “Alas, Franklin’s name didn’t get attached to the “we must all hang together” quote until 1840, when it appeared in a ten-volume compendium of Franklin’s writings by Jared Sparks. As is often the case, Sparks gave no source citation for this quote.”

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “We take the bread out of one child’s mouth and give it to another, and it doesn’t work — we’ve tried that.”

    Wow, this is a pretty interesting picture she painted here. Whose children are starving so we can feed others? Maybe a more accurate metaphor would be “we have taken the cake out of one child’s mouth so that others can have crusts of bread.”

    As to whether it works…

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/11b5849a6933fa3c6296e0de3221e52412d2ad399b6b6aa9ec43ecb362b2fbcb.jpg

    1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      Zero Sum. It’s a Conservative mindset, or rather, it is found more often on one side than the other.

      Why, it’s been even been seen that when you show people you don’t believe it to be zero-sum, they think you’re a Communist, or something.

    2. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      Zero Sum. It’s a Conservative mindset, or rather, it is found more often on one side than the other.

      Why, it’s been even been seen that when you show people you don’t believe it to be zero-sum, they think you’re a Communist, or something.

    3. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      The liberal delusion …

      Maybe a more accurate metaphor would be “we have taken the cake out of one child’s mouth so that others can have crusts of bread.”

      Reality …

      https://www.baconsrebellion.com/poverty-does-not-mean-destitution/

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “But that definition is meaningless as a characterization of how people actually live because it excludes massive transfer payments and social services programs designed to cushion “the poor” from deprivation.”

        Which is exactly the “bread” both the LG and I are talking about. She seems to be advocating for not cushioning the poor from deprivation so as to cushion the rich from deprivation….

    4. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Well said, comrade.

Leave a Reply