Richmond Fentanyl Deaths Reported by RTD. Next: Efforts to Arrest and Prosecute Local Dealers?

by James C. Sherlock

Sometimes reporters commit errors of omission. Especially when a pet cause is threatened by the facts.

Left-leaning newspapers, which include the large majority of such outlets, tend to write that an “SUV” ran down a crowd at a Christmas parade or that an “illegal gun” shot a cop. That removes personal agency and assigns guilt to inanimate objects.

Which in turn allows them to advocate both “eliminate cash bail” and “prison reform” causes while pushing gun control. They stop short of mentioning criminals unless, of course, they can be identified as right-leaning.

The Richmond Times Dispatch features a 1,200 word story:

Richmond is Virginia’s overdose capital. Nine of 10 fatal overdoses in the city involve fentanyl

Good reporting. Except for that inanimate object thing again. Fentanyl, in this story, is the equivalent of an SUV or an illegal gun.

The Richmond area is the center of the overdose epidemic in Virginia. Within city limits, where more people die of fentanyl overdoses than anywhere else in the state, 9 out of every 10 fatal overdoses involve the drug. Henrico and Chesterfield counties also rank in the top five in the state for the most fentanyl deaths.

Fentanyl… is now … produced illicitly and sold on the streets.

Chesterfield County Sheriff Karl Leonard said that drug dealers are lacing everything from methamphetamine to marijuana with fentanyl because the easy availability, low cost and high potency boost profit margins.

No producers. No pipeline. Just otherwise-unidentified dealers lacing their product with fentanyl.

Unmentioned in the lengthy RTD story is that it is Chinese fentanyl that is killing Virginians. Or that it comes across the wide open southern border smuggled by Mexican cartels. Or that closing the border to illegal immigration would raise the price and limit the availability of the killer drug. Or that reinvigorating ICE and the DEA is warranted. Or that arresting and sentencing local dealers would be a useful thing to do in Richmond.

So far, the paper has reported the deaths of thousands of Virginians without having addressed the agents of those deaths. We hope that will happen in follow-up reporting.

Dealers appear to work freely in Richmond. A police funding issue? A prioritization issue? Political pressure? A prosecutor issue? A risk of inequitable arrest statistics? Sloppy work? Fear? We hope the RTD is working on a story with the answers to those questions.

Without additional reporting, like “defund the police” politicians attending cop funerals in dark glasses and loudly lamenting illegal guns, the RTD is mourning the unexplained.

But good start. We look forward to reading the rest of the story.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

67 responses to “Richmond Fentanyl Deaths Reported by RTD. Next: Efforts to Arrest and Prosecute Local Dealers?”

  1. If only Grumpy Beijing Biden would be as angry at China — the producers and exporters — as he is to American citizens…. maybe we could stop this drug invasion. But as long as the border is open this will continue…if only Ukraine shared a border with us —– he and his Demidiots seem to care more about that border integrity than ours.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Payback’s a bitch, especially when it comes 150 later.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Payback’s a bitch, especially when it comes 150 later.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Payback’s a bear, especially when they come 150 years later.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Payback’s a bear, especially when they come 150 years later.

    5. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Drugs don’t kill people. People kill people.

  2. It’s not a drug overdose problem. It’s murder. Overdose according to Webster is: Too great a dose (as of a therapeutic agent) also : a lethal or toxic amount (as of a drug). The TD story reports nine out of 10 “overdoses” are due to Fentanyl. Wrong. One person overdosed and nine were murdered by someone that doctored another drug and sold it. The individual taking the pill (heroin, cocaine, LSD, mescaline or whatever) may not have taken too much but addition of Fentanyl is what killed them. We are starting to see on social media pictures of individuals killed by this drug. It is time to start charging those that trade in this drug with murder.

    1. All part of the ChiCom’s plan to destroy the USofA

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The RTD published this a Richmond story. Thus my questions for the RTD to follow up on. If I had the resources, I would do it myself, but I do not.

      Your point about increasing the penalties for dealing fentanyl is a good one. Contact your GA delegate and senator. Worth pursuing.

  3. You can argue for decriminalizing pot, and even cocaine and heroin, and investing in drug treatment instead. But here’s the thing with fentanyl. It’s so powerful that it’s in a class by itself. Does drug treatment even work with fentanyl?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      You mean rehab? Or ER?

    2. VaNavVet Avatar

      Many drug users are not intentionally buying fentanyl. They are not aware that even pain killers bought on the internet are being laced with it. For the most part, the components needed to produce the fentanyl are what is coming from China into the US and Mexico.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Many drug abusers are not intentionally doing most of the stupid things they do, but that doesn’t change the end result, does it?

        1. VaNavVet Avatar

          No, I think that the actions of most drug users are intentional. It is an addition and they often can not help doing what they know is stupid. A teenage boy who was not a user died after buying pain killers on snapchat. They came laced with fentanyl.

          1. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            If he wasn’t a user, why was he buying painkillers on snapchat? That’s the very definition of drug abuse!

          2. VaNavVet Avatar

            Not really sure but saw his parents on TV and Snapchat responding to them. Maye he didn’t want to tell his coach or parents about an injury that would have gotten him benched. In any event, I have to feel that they knew more about their son than you do. Seems like this was an OTC drug being offered on snapchat but it could just as well have been on Amazon.

          3. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            If it’s an OTC drug why would he buy it off of Snapchat? Most people get things like that from more legitimate sources: Walgreens, CVS, Wal-Mart…

            As far as the parents, well, denial isn’t just a river in Egypt.

            EDIT: I found the news stories about this and in every single case the person was buying prescription painkillers. Not OTC drugs.

            At a minimum, the buyer was breaking the law by doing that. Perhaps these laws exist for a reason…

          4. VaNavVet Avatar

            I did not recall any mention of a fake prescription but it was probably a bogus site that advertises that no prescription is required. They sell counterfeit drugs and cater to gullible teens that want to keep their problem secret.

          5. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Dunno what they have these days, but back in my day they had DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), seems like this is something that they need to teach in school.

            Even back when I was a teen, though there was no Snapchat, buying illegal drugs was risky because (aside from the illegality of it) you did not know what you were getting, it could have been cut with rat poison for all you knew, and that was part of what they taught in that program.

          6. Exactly my point. One day it will be a senator’s son or daughter and only then will it get mass attention. Too late for thousands of other kids and young adults by that time. Whoever sold the pills should be charged with manslaughter at a minimum. Virginia already has a law on the books: 18.2-54.2 Adulteration of food or drugs.

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        I have a very close friend who is a circuit court judge. Last time we had dinner he told me that if it is bought on the street, it has fentanyl in it. Pretty much guaranteed. And the regular users know it.

        1. VaNavVet Avatar

          Where else would a user be buying it? You can be sure that there is not a lot of quality control. Guess they have to take the dealer at his word and accept the risk.

  4. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Just legalize it. I don’t want to hear all about dealers or users going to jail.
    It’s a Darwinian issue in my opinion.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Like vaccines.

    2. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Should we adopt a “3 strikes and you’re dead” rule for Narcan administration?

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Narcan should be OTC.

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Most of the patients on painkillers get a prescription for Narcan.

      Of course, whether someone who knows where it is (the few people I’ve known to have been on painkillers are not people who have their shit together) will be around to administer it when they OD is another question entirely…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Which is exactly why parents, friends and other loved ones should be able to get and have them if just on the off chance they happen to be there.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Sounds reasonable. I suspect it is not over-the-counter because of side effects “such as other cardiovascular effects (hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia) and central nervous system effects, such as agitation, body pain, brain disease, and coma.”

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Now look up Epipen side effects.

            Maybe not OTC like aspirin, but on request and registered like Sudafed, or like a gun.

            Oh wait, no. Not like a gun. They don’t need to be registered.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Nancy Naive James C. Sherlock • 38 minutes ago • edited
            Now look up Epipen side effects.

            Maybe not OTC like aspirin, but on request and registered like Sudafed, or like a gun.

            Oh wait, no. Not like a gun. They don’t need to be registered.”

            You have to have a prescription to get an EpiPen.

            Sudafed and firearms are regulated, clearly you’ve never bought a firearm.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            “You have to have a prescription to get an EpiPen.”

            Did I say you didn’t need a Rx for an Epipen?

            “Sudafed and firearms are regulated, clearly you’ve never bought a firearm.”

            Thanks for verifying what I just said about Sudafed.

            Now, show me where if I buy a long gun or revolver from my neighbor in Va., I am required to register it. The VA code number will do.

            BTW, bought a shotgun in late 60s and my father bought me a .22 in the early 60s which had to be registered with the FBI.

            I gave both of them away a couple of years ago.

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            You brought it up as an example with regards to Narcan. Which you also needs a prescription for, their side effects are why they aren’t OTC.

            “Now, show me where if I buy a long gun or revolver from my neighbor in Va., I am required to register it. The VA code number will do.”

            If you sell a firearm to your neighbor and they are legally barred from owning it, you’ve just committed a felony (VA Co 18.2-308.2:1, 18.2-308.7 &54.1-4201.2)

            Furthermore, any and all firearm purchases form authorized dealers (which would be the equivalent of a Pharmacy) requires a background check. If you which you carry your handgun, a permit is required which again involves a background check. They aren’t equivalent to OTC in any means.

            Take your loss and knowledge and move on.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Your inference meter is broken.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Not really, but I can understand your need to deflect from being wrong.

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I drew the distinction between guns and Sudafed.
            Here: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter7/section18.2-265.7/
            Show me a similar regulation for guns.

            If P then Q does not imply if notP then notQ.

          8. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            There is no distinction between the two items, they are both regulated.

            I gave you VA code and again your analogy doesn’t work, a Pharmacy wouldn’t be someone on the street making a private sale.

            Yet again, you incorrectly invoke the Law of Compound or Joint Probability.

            For claiming to be a “math professor” you sure you get lots of “math” things wrong.

          9. Photo ID (and one other form of ID) are required to purchase a gun

            Purchaser must complete and sign a background check questionnaire (two, actually-one fed one state).

            Purchaser must pass a background check.

            The gun dealer must maintain a log of sales and keep records for 20 years.

            The regulations for guns and sudafed are actually quite similar.

          10. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Keyword — dealer.

          11. Okay. In the sudafed/gun analogy, the licensed pharmacist plays the part of the FFL licensed gun dealer.

            As far as private sales go, there is no requirement that I ask for your ID or register the sale with the state for you to pay me for a bottle of sudafed tablets I purchased at CVS. Virginia law does require that you undergo a background check before I can sell you a gun in a private transaction.

            So, yes, while the restrictions on sales are similar, guns are more regulated than cold medicine.

          12. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Let me know when the next Sudafed Show comes to an arena near you.

          13. Background checks are required for all firearms transactions, whether at a show or not.

          14. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You’re correct! I surrender! Please spare the woman and the children!

          15. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            You brought it up as an example with regards to Narcan. Which you also needs a prescription for, their side effects are why they aren’t OTC.

            “Now, show me where if I buy a long gun or revolver from my neighbor in Va., I am required to register it. The VA code number will do.”

            If you sell a firearm to your neighbor and they are legally barred from owning it, you’ve just committed a felony (VA Co 18.2-308.2:1, 18.2-308.7 &54.1-4201.2)

            Furthermore, any and all firearm purchases form authorized dealers (which would be the equivalent of a Pharmacy) requires a background check. If you which you carry your handgun, a permit is required which again involves a background check. They aren’t equivalent to OTC in any means.

            Take your loss and knowledge and move on.

          16. Firearms are not registered in Virginia

          17. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You should have directed your response to Matt.

          18. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Prescriptions and medication aren’t registered either. They are regulated, but he doesn’t grasp that concept.

          19. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “BTW, bought a shotgun in late 60s and my father bought me a .22 in the early 60s which had to be registered with the FBI.

            I gave both of them away a couple of years ago.”

            You’ve never had to “register” a firearm with the FBI. That’s never been the law, even on Military posts they aren’t registered with the FBI. In the 60’s you could mail order a long gun no questions asked.

            Well I hope you did your due diligence and don’t “give them” to someone who was barred from ownership.

          20. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You did if you bought it in Europe with the intent of bringing it on a military base and then back into the US. Maybe it would have been the ATF, minor difference to a minor.

          21. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            The FBI has no jurisdiction on a Military base nor does the ATF. It would be registered with the Provost Marshal and it would be stored in the arms room and you’d check it out when you wanted to go hunting.

          22. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So, you bought a gun in Europe in the 1960s?

          23. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Why would I need to have bought a gun in the 60’s to tell you policy that has been around before that?

            Oh and FYI, the ATF didn’t exist until 1972.

            Military Posts is a Federal Land yes, their laws are administered by the Service who operates the installation.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Some time around 1840, or so, US clippers ran opium into China and raped them for their tea, silk, gold, silver, and anything not nailed down for the next 70 years.

    Bites, don’t it?

  7. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Well you could tart with NMPresident Foggy and Mayorakas who have championed open borders and the flood of Chinese Fentanyl which has killed thousand of Americans and enriched members of the democratic party.

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    One way you could avoid the lacing of drugs with fentanyl… legalize the drugs and regulate the markets. I am sure completing this process for marijuana is really high on Republican’s to-do list… right…??

    1. You want to advocate the legalization of heroin? Be my guest.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        You want to do nothing in the face of thousands of young adults dying from fentanyl poisoning? Be my guest.

  9. PassTheBuckBureaucrat Avatar
    PassTheBuckBureaucrat

    You’re off message. Its not China pills, its the Russian pills. Biden needs more justification to start a war

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Those 100,000+ soldiers on the Russian, and satellite country borders are really Marines and it’s a false flag op. Sheesh. Anagram of omicron.

  10. And there is more to come:

    In 2018 the FDA approved a drug called Dsuvia for certain medical uses. Dsuvia is a synthetic opioid which is 10 time stronger than Fentanyl.

    We all know any drug that is certified for medical use will eventually find its way onto the black market. I wonder how long it will be before newspapers are publishing articles about the drastic increase in Dsuvia overdoses.

    Opium was once a miracle painkiller.
    Opium turned out to be very addictive.
    Morphine was a more powerful opiate which was not only highly effective as a painkiller, it could be used to treat opium addiction.
    Unfortunately, morphine turned out to be even more addictive than opium.
    So, heroin was developed to treat morphine addiction.
    And guess what? Surprise, surprise, heroin was even more addictive than morphine.
    And then Fentanyl was developed…
    And then Dsuvia was developed…
    And then?

    I’m not sure exactly how we think we can solve the “opioid crisis” by developing ever-more powerful opioid drugs.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Thalidomide. On one hand, an excellent tranquilizer. On the other hand, a fetus deformer. Handedness counts.

      The opioid problem will be solved by the lowly coneshell snail.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Thalidomide. On one hand, an excellent tranquilizer. On the other hand, a fetus deformer. Handedness counts.

      The opioid problem will be solved by the lowly coneshell snail.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Thalidomide. On one hand, an excellent tranquilizer. On the other hand, a fetus deformer. Handedness counts.

      The opioid problem will be solved by the lowly coneshell snail.

  11. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Shipping barons like Warren Delano and Robert Forbes got rich from the opium trade in China, which left millions addicted or dead. Introduce us to these men and explain how they squared their Protestant morality with what was essentially drug running, and how it eventually led to the Opium War.”

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/news-clipper-ship-opium-trade-gold-rush

    1. I could not read the entire article due to a paywall, but the portion I could see read like one of those “gun violence” / “assault weapons” articles in which the author assigns blame to an almost supernaturally powerful inanimate object:

      Clipper ships ran drugs to China
      Clipper ships carried slaves
      Clipper ships ran blockades
      Clipper ships had unique abilities which made them superior to regular ships..

      Would the world be a better and safer place if the government had banned private ownership of clipper ships? Or at least limited the capacity of their sales?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Too bad about the paywall. Display in text mode.

  12. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Please do not discriminate against unlicensed pharmacists.

Leave a Reply