Fairfax County’s Incredible Shrinking Growth Forecast

Click on graph for more legible image. Credit: Terry Maynard.

More great analysis from Terry Maynard! In a memorandum to fellow members of the Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force, he tracks the incredible deflating population growth projections for Fairfax County and explores what it means for transportation and land use planning.

As recently as 2008, the sky was the limit. As the federal government had grown and prospered over the decades, so had Fairfax County. Northern Virginia, and Fairfax in particular, had boomed without let-up through the Reagan defense build-up, the S&L fiasco, the Internet boom and 9/11. The region even seemed resistant to the 2007-2008 recession.

But economic recovery has been more sluggish than predicted, and the future for government spending — especially the defense, intelligence and homeland security spending that fueled Northern Virginia’s growth — is looking grim. While population and employment are still expected to expand, they will not do so at the torrid pace expected only a few years ago. The existing 17% vacant office space in Reston, suggests Maynard, could accommodate two-thirds of all forecast non-residential growth through the year 2030. He concludes: “We need to discuss what to do about adapting to the region’s new economic reality.”

Sadly, that discussion is not taking place.

Much of the massive infrastructure investment occurring in Northern Virginia was predicated on pre-2008 growth forecasts. I’m not as worried about the Capital Beltway HOT lanes project, in which private-sector investors will share the financial pain if forecast traffic does not materialize, as I am about the Rail-to-Dulles project, which has no private equity investment to cushion any shortfall in traffic and revenue.

Rail-to-Dulles is essentially a bubble project. The economics of it worked only as long as Northern Virginia’s economy continued to boom. There are three levels of analysis that need scrutiny. The first and most obvious need is to re-examine the traffic and revenue forecasts for the Silver Line itself, which is already projected to lose money on an operational basis. If population and business growth forecasts fail to materialize, will revenue fall short? Will operational deficits increase? And what impact will that have on Fairfax and Loudoun budgets?

A second set of questions arises about the Dulles Toll Road, the toll revenues of which will be siphoned to pay for roughly half of the up-front capital costs for Phase 2 of the heavy rail line. What will lower population growth mean for traffic and revenues? If toll fares fall short, who gets first dibs on the revenue– bond holders or the construction/maintenance needs of the toll road?

Thirdly, what does this mean for the re-development of Tysons Corner? The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors approved massive increases in density around four Tysons station stops under the expectation that the resulting increase in property values would enable landowners to finance a transformation of the hodge-podge business district into a walkable, mixed-use urban center — Fairfax’s answer to Arlington’s Metro corridor. But if office vacancies remain stubbornly high and if population and employment projections are wilting, property owners will be in no hurry to re-develop their assets. If the higher densities and walkable streets take decades longer to materialize than originally thought, there could be a lot of half-empty trains rumbling through Tysons Metro stations.

The Fairfax County board has done its best Hear No Evil imitation, voting to confirm its financial commitment to Phase 2. If the federal spending machine slows, if 2008 population and economic growth forecasts prove too optimistic, if Silver line revenues fall short of projections and operating deficits exceed them, and if Dulles Toll Road revenues fall short and if the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority defaults on its bonds, the county — indeed, the whole region — will be in a world of hurt.

Of course, I am looking at worst possible outcomes. But that’s what intelligent deal makers do — they examine worst-case scenarios to see if they can live with the results. They certainly don’t base multibillion-dollar investments on years-old economic and demographic forecasts that are known to be outdated.  Not one dime should be sunk into Phase 2 until the implications of slower growth for Silver Line and Dulles Toll Road revenues are fully understood. Failure to perform that fundamental analysis is not simple folly. It’s not mere blindness. As far as I’m concerned, it’s criminal negligence.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Gotta love Jim Bacon and his “NIMBY of the week” statistics. First, the 20 years spent analyzing the Charlottesville bypass was too little time. The whole project should be scuttled because there’s a new theory called Charlottesville Tomorrow. No doubt that any actual plans based on that new theory will have to be scuttled when an even newer theory arises. This “analysis paralysis” allows its adherents to sound intelligent while also allowing them to never do anything as they wallow in indecision.

    Jim Bacon, et al live in an imaginary world where plans and models are perfect and if there is ever the slightest deviation from a plan then all forward movement must stop.

    Bacon cites unrented office space in Reston. However, he fails to mention the $45 – $50 per sq ft being paid for office space in the Reston Town Center for 5 – 7 year leases with surprisingly limited availability. He professes to understand human settlement patterns then ignores them when the consequences become apparent.

  2. I don’t profess to know all the answers. But I’m pretty that most other people don’t either. But they make investment decisions involving billions of dollars as if they did.

  3. Meanwhile, you’ve got to admire Don. He’s never seen a transportation megaproject he didn’t like (unless it has HOT lanes), and he’s never blanched at a price tag.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jimbo:

    They beat this into my brain at Dear Ole UVA. Painful as it is to learn, it tends to be very, very important. The Expected Value of Perfect Information.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_value_of_perfect_information

    Take a look at the example. Even if perfect information was obtainable (which it almost never is), it has a finite value. Perhaps more important is the note attached to the example. The time value of money inflates the cost of perfect information. One day I’d like to see an analysis of the expected value of perfect information and the cost of perfect information in regard to a large transit project (road or rail). My bet is that the cost of perfect information is vastly higher than the expected benefit of perfect information. All of which would lead us to ask, “When do we know enough to proceed?”. I can assure you that it is far in advance of acquiring perfect information.

  5. You make a valid point about the diminishing returns to more and better information. But right now, we’re facing a situation where we *know* the information is (a) incredibly outdated and (b) affects the fundamental economics of the project. Moreover, it shouldn’t be that difficult to crank the numbers through all the requisite spreadsheets and see what results we get. It’s like we’re talking about an expensive, two-year study. It’s something that should be achievable within a couple of months.

  6. I think the current BoS is well aware of this likelihood and is generally worried. Not worried enough to make any major changes in policy or spending yet, but worried nonetheless.
    Tysons’ success is predicated on continued big growth and the bulk of such growth occurring in Tysons. However, by actually engaging in planning for Tysons that ties growth to increases in public facilities, especially roads, Fairfax County and the Tysons landowners might be able to ride out some of the slow growth. If the expected growth does not materialize, investment in infrastructure can be slowed. Slow growth will likely result in some bankruptcies and fire sales among the landowners. New owners with a lower cost structure might be more successful. For example, a number of residential real estate developers have stated publicly they would need rents of $2600 per month for an 800 square foot apartment for stick construction. Imagine what high-rise builders will need. A new investor that can pick up these buildings at bankruptcy sales might be able to charge lower rents and be more successful. Ditto for commercial space.
    As Jim states, much of the financial risk for the HOT Lanes rests with the private sector. Since there is no private equity in Dulles Rail, the risk for rail might well lie with the bond holders. I could see scenarios where MWAA cannot redeem bonds. There are practical limits to how high DTR tolls can go. As I recall, MWAA stated informally that $7 and change was the point where raising rates stopped bringing in more funds.
    I remain critical of local officials from both Parties who failed to address the financial issues of Dulles Rail when the financing plan was approved a number of years ago. There aren’t many Harry Trumans in Fairfax County.

  7. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “For example, a number of residential real estate developers have stated publicly they would need rents of $2600 per month for an 800 square foot apartment for stick construction.”.

    Sounds like the type of verbal diarrhea that residential developers spew when they don’t like a special tax district. Who said this? In what context?

  8. I went to a meeting where JBG was discussing its plans for remodelling & expanding car dealership buildings at Tysons for a Walmart store (a by-right development) and its plans to seeking rezoning of other areas near the Tysons Sheraton for mixed use development, including some three-to-five story apartments (stick built). I’ve also heard several other Tysons landowners use the JBG price estimate in general discussions of development plans.
    It’s very clear Tysons will be pricy. Whether the $2600 per month figure occurs, we will need to wait and see. But it’s the best and latest figure I have heard. It may be numbers used as they seek financing to build at Tysons.

  9. You know things are getting weird when the town of Fredericksburg (pop 25K) is ranked as one of the fastest growing jurisdictions in Va.

    What’s going on now is the developers can’t build and sell houses for what they used to before the bubble burst so they are asking local govts for no proffer or low proffer deals with no transportation proffers. They’re saying that the housing industry will not recover soon without “help”.

    With the national debt and focus on the unsustainability of a budget that spends twice what we take in in taxes, the average govt job career-seeker is thinking long and hard about whether they should sign on to a 30-year mortgage with memories so fresh about lifetime investments in homes gone “poof”.

    The knowledge that many commutes will be paying tolls adds to the concerns about moving somewhere where tolls and gasoline are going to take a bigger bite of paycheck also concerns people.

    Fredericksburg? Think VRE. VRE is the cure for I-95 if you live in a nearby home. Spotsylvania? A new VRE station in 2013/14 will likely have a similar effect. VRE is hugely expensive. It costs about $20 per person trip but all but about $6-8 is picked up by a 2.1% gas tax. DJ should like that

  10. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    The VRE subsidy doesn’t bother me. That person paying $20 per person trip must be going to a pretty good job. Let’s say $100,000 per year. That’s about $5,000 in Virginia income tax. Plus they own a home. Let’s sat $200,000. And they pay 1/2 of 1% real estate on the home. That’s another $1,000 in real estate taxes. They pay federal taxes at 20%. That’s another $20,000 per year – some of which comes back to the state in direct payments for things like highways. Call it another $5,000. They buy $20,000 worth of “stuff” and pay 5% sales tax. That’s another $1,000.

    That’s $12,000 per year in taxes coming back to Virginia for a person who receives a riding subsidy of $40 – $16 = $24 per day * 200 days = $4,800. That person puts $7,200 per year into our coffers after the subsidy.

    Now, compare that to a early retiree in a $200,000 house living off a $30,000 per year retirement income who spends $15,000 per year on “stuff”. They have enough deductions that they don’t pay any federal income tax. They pay $1,500 in state income tax, $1,000 in real estate taxes and $3,000 in sales tax. That’s $5,500 into our coffers.

    I’d rather have the subsidized commuter as a neighbor than the early retiree. The subsidized commuter helps keep my taxes lower.

  11. DJ – what do local workers do ? they pay the same taxes plus they subsidize those that commute on VRE. How is that fair?

    In terms of “saving” you taxes, please keep in mind that virtually all of the VRE riders are govt employees or contractors.. paid for with your taxes.

    VRE riders don’t pay $20 per trip, they pay 6-8. the rest is paid for by folks who buy gasoline including local workers who make far less salary than NoVa workers.

    Consider also the folks who ride commuter vans. where is their $16 per trip subsidy?

    why do we subsidize commuters to start with? We’re already paying their salaries with our Fed income tax then we have to pay for their commutes with a tax on gasoline.

    How many folks would commute to homes in the Fredericksburg area if they had to pay their true costs of commuting and did not depend on subsidies from other taxpayers?

    VRE is maxed at 20k riders. That’s good because each new rider costs more in subsidies. It will cost well over a billion dollars to add a new rail so that VRE can expand. Who should pay that cost – the folks who don’t ride VRE?

    the retort we hear down here if we don’t subsidize VRE is that these folks will then “clog up” I-95 – like that’s going to hurt the folks who don’t commute to NoVa and work locally for lower salaries to start with.

    How can we seriously justify charging a local worker higher taxes on gasoline so that he can help subsidize someone who earns 3 times what he earns?

  12. Your comments on the expected value apply to environmental and many other projects. I tried to beat it in to Larry and tmt to no Avail.

  13. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    DJRippert
    Have you noticed that Jim Bacon’s stories break down into three categories? They are:
    (1) NOVA is evil and destined to doom.
    (2) Those nefarious labor unionists and their budget-busting comrades.
    (3) Why Richmond is a bright and lively gem of a place to live.

  14. Hillsboro Avatar
    Hillsboro

    DJs scenario favoring the VRE commuter over the retiree omits the 2.4 kids being educated at 10 to 12k each, and the debt service on new schools built to accommodate them.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Two ways to look at that, Hillsy …

      First, the early retiree already put his 2.4 kids through public school and ought to damn well keep working in order to pay back that debt.

      Or, the best neighbors are twenty-something couples with two jobs and no kids or fifty-something couples with two jobs and 2.4 kids who have grown up and moved away.

      I find it odd that there is so little data profiling different types of residents / families and their relative economic impact to localities and the state. People can move easily from locality to locality. So, you’d think localities would have an economic picture of what kind of resident provides more tax revenue than she consumes in services and visa versa. I’d think you’d want to try to attract “surplus citizens” and discourage “deficit citizens”. I know it sounds cold hearted but life is life. Moving between states is a bit harder but far from impossible – especially if you live in a place like NoVa where MD and DC are only a stone’s throw away.

      The simplistic answer is that rich people (who are the biggest “surplus citizens”) will move to where the taxes are low. Well, that makes Manhattan, San Francisco, Boston and a whole lot of other places very hard to understand.

      I think the real answer follows the marginal utility of disposable income. First, you have to calculate disposable income. Then, you have to understand the surplus or deficit positions of people at different points along the disposable income curve. The early part of the surplus curve probably will move to get lower taxes. However, since they are on the early part of the curve, they provide small surpluses. The people further along the curve start experiencing the effects of the marginal utility of money and they quit caring about tax rates. It may be that they provide such a huge surplus that it’s worth raising taxes to provide the services they want even if a lot of people lower on the curve leave.

      How many people making $100,000 per year can you afford to lose if you can attract one Bill Gates to town?

      Probably quite a few.

      1. Hillsboro Avatar
        Hillsboro

        I think the municipalities have a very good picture of which groups contribute a surplus, and I’m sure its been studied extensively.

        As to childless twenty-somethings and empty-nesters being the most lucrative, I’ll grant that you’re probably correct. Retirees would be close behind.

        As for how to attract twenty-somethings, that would be a huge challenge in outlying counties. As you mentioned in another thread, they tend to want to be in the city and the inner suburbs. There’s just no way to re-create that atmosphere in Stafford.

        Fifty-somethings might be a bit easier… high-end condos, town center developments will attract some, but many are content to stay in the same home.

        The well-off elderly are much easier to attract. I can’t speak for Stafford, but Loudoun had great success in the ’90’s attracting large medium- to high density luxury senior housing. I believe that both Falcon’s Landing and Leisureworld were financed with EDA bonds. Both were very successful projects, and probably draw in a higher tax surplus per acre than any other residential project in Loudoun.

  15. spotsylvania calculated exactly as DJ suggests.

    Here’s how it shakes out. The average home in Spotsy pays about $1500 in taxes.

    the county kicks in about 5K per kid for schools but the state kicks in about another 5K that comes from local taxpayers also.

    Who moves to Spotsy?

    People who are married and want to raise a family – BECAUSE they can AFFORD a single-family detached home with front/back yard in a cul-de-saced subdivision.

    Proffers for such homes are about 15K but it’s not the one time construction costs that are the killer.

    It’s the 5K per year that the kid needs in educational services.

    You might ask – who pays the difference between the 1500 and the 5K?

    HINT – it’s not other moms/dads with their own school kids.

    so a kid that goes from K-12 costs the county more than 50K.

    divide that by 1500 and you get the number of years BEYOND the kids graduation that the parents should still be paying if they were covering their own costs.

    It does not end there.

    Mom or Dad want to ride VRE and hae their ride “pimped” to the tune of 20 per trip – paid for by others.

    Mom or Dad want to totally clog local surface streets on their way to VRE or SOLO up I-95.

    Mom/Dad with kids are a total loss for county taxpayers. They basically move down here to get a house on the cheap and guess who picks up the tab?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      LarryG – Why wouldn’t you consider the total profile – including income taxes, sales taxes, gas tax, fees, etc.

      Then, you have to add up what businesses pay.

      A man and a woman each making $125,000 and commuting to and from Fredricksburg to DC probably still contribute a surplus to the locality & state even if they have two kids.

  16. DJ – I DO consider ALL sources. The sales tax is INCLUDED in the county and school budgets and if you REALLY want to look at the WHOLE picture – keep in mind also WHO is paying income taxes that then comes right back to the county to fund the other half of schools.

    In that regard – the burden IS less on retired folks.

    but businesses don’t pay. They tax , for the state.

    your analysis does not hold up when it comes to more students from growth.

    it almost always causes property tax increases to cover the 5K per kid local funding.

    the bottom line is that subdivisions and kids cost money and that kind of growth results in tax increases at the local level.

    and what you did not address is how this dynamic affects people who work locally – like teachers and deputies who …because of the price escalation in homes… have a hard time affording a place of their own unless it is a double-wide out in the sticks.

    the “come-heres” come here to buy a home on cheap and the local workers get the short end of the shaft on taxes and affordability of housing as well as the additional 2.1% tax on gasoline that pays for commuters who make 3 times as much than local workers.

Leave a Reply