Even Loathsome People Have the Right to Free Speech

Steven Salaita

by James A. Bacon

I’m very pro-Israel, which like every country on the planet is flawed but is more committed than most to democracy and human rights. Likewise, I have little sympathy for Palestinians, whom I regard as, for the most part, the authors of their own miseries. Therefore, I am inclined to take a dim view of someone like Steven Salaita, a far-left scholar of partial Palestinian descent, who courted controversy as a Virginia Tech professor several years ago when he refused to endorse the “Support our Troops” slogan, and later got himself unhired from the University of Illinois after posting a series of anti-Semitic (or anti-Zionist, if you will) tweets.

But as repellant as Salaita’s views may be to me personally, others want to hear them. That includes organizers of the Graduate and Professional Student Research Symposium (GPSS) at Virginia Tech, an event that provides visibility for graduate-student research. I cannot fathom why they would want to give a platform to someone with Salaita’s views, but they do.

Now some Jewish students at Virginia Tech want to dis-invite him. “Steven Salaita does not promote respectful or healthy dialogue,” Briana Schwam, president emerita of Hillel at Virginia Tech and a GPSS senator told Jewish News Syndicate. “[His] public statements threaten my identity as a student because he promotes hate and violence towards individuals who share my identity or who do not share his exact perspective.”

JNS gave an example of one of Salaita’s tweets in 2014, which he posted after three Jewish teenage boys were kidnapped and brutally murdered by Hamas: “You may be too refined to say it, but I’m not: I wish all the f***ing West Bank settlers would go missing.”

Yeah, pretty heinous. If he were a White supremacist, he’d be banned in an instant.

The article also mentions anti-Semitic (or anti-Zionist) actions at Virginia Tech. Some Jewish students and alumni were blocked from the GPSS public Instagram account, Schwam charged. The student senate passed a Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) resolution accusing Israel of ethnic cleansing. Schwam also cites “numerous acts of anti-Semitism on campus in the past year,” without providing details. Collectively, she says, these incidents make Jewish students feel unsafe. “Hate should not be allowed on campus.”

We have three different issues here. First is the right of students to hear Salaita speak. Second is the right of student government associations to signal their virtue by passing resolutions that no one will pay attention to. Third is actual discrimination or harassment directed at individual Jews on the Virginia Tech campus.

Regarding free speech:  conservatives should fight to uphold Salaita’s right to speak at Virginia Tech, no matter how reprehensible we find his views — and even if the lefties who wish to hear him will not reciprocate the courtesy. I’m sorry, but the fact that Jewish students would feel “unsafe” is as unfounded as the gays at the University of Virginia who wish to de-platform Mike Pence on the grounds of his alleged homophobia. No one has a right to not feel “unsafe.” The tendency to profound disagreement is deeply rooted in the human condition, and everybody needs to deal with it.

Regarding the BDS resolution: this is standard idiocy for a student government association. Student governments in universities across Virginia and the U.S. have become leftist cabals as radicals assert themselves everywhere and moderates/conservatives seek refuge from the madness in fraternities, sororities, and other havens. SGAs enact all manner of resolutions supporting the latest lefty causes du jour. The appropriate response is to get involved and elect sane people to student government.

By the way, Jews have a proud history — from two revolts against the Roman Empire to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising against the Nazis to Israel’s innumerable wars of survival — of refusing to be intimidated. You don’t feel “safe”? Get over it. Fight back!

Regarding discrimination: the only tangible example provided is Jews being denied access to the GPSS Instagram account. I hesitate to comment, not knowing the whole story. However, if Jewish students believe they were subject to discrimination, they should explore existing mechanisms at Virginia Tech to address that discrimination. If the bureaucratic apparatus is unresponsive, then speak out. Bacon’s Rebellion will be happy to air your concerns.

In the meantime, Jews at Virginia Tech ought to be defending everyone’s right to free speech. Given the totalitarian proclivities of campus radicals, Jews are likely to find themselves on the receiving end of the de-platforming mob one day. The worm will surely turn.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

49 responses to “Even Loathsome People Have the Right to Free Speech”

  1. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    The old school ACLU actually got this right with the Nazi march in Skokie in the 1970’s. This guy’s thoughts are so heinous, they disqualify his hatred upon hearing it. And people like him are largely behind BDS, which many people foolishly support. But not if they understand what is really behind it.
    Let him speak! He has all the rope he needs. In fact, the Hillel kids ought to gather his offensive remarks and ask him about them at the event. He’ll either deny them outright (he won’t) or fail to condemn them, showing all you need to know…
    That’s my 2 cents…

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Agree!

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Good article. I don’t really understand the anti-Israel sentiment among the left today. So, if I were in Blacksburg, I would go hear this man speak. I doubt that I’d agree with him but I’d like to hear his opinions.

  3. Penrosian Avatar
    Penrosian

    A lot of talk about protecting free speech in an article whose entire premise is criticizing the Jewish students at VT for exercising their free speech.

    You don’t feel “safe”? Get over it. Fight back!
    They are, you just don’t approve of how they’re doing it.

    I will fight to defend his right to say what he wants while simultaneously criticizing every institution that amplifies or legitimizes his nonsense.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Not really. Jim never attacked the right of the Jewish students to say what they want. He criticized their efforts to shut down opposing opinion. His enjoinder to, “Fight back!” was a call for them to counter Salaita’s comments with counter-arguments.

    2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Free speech is just that, free speech. For all, not just one group.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Some of my best friends are…

    1. Oo, a guessing game. I like guessing games.

      Let’s see… Some of Nancy Naive’s best friends are…

      …blues guitarists?
      …salvage divers?
      …school janitors?
      …bowling alley owners?
      …golden retrievers?

      Okay, never mind, I’ll probably never guess it. Can you offer a clue?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Classical guitarist. My old boss decided he wanted to play classical guitar at the tender age of 60. He got good at it too. But his right hand looks like something out of Nosfaratus or whatever.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Himself. I get the distinct impression that Nancy never met a mirror he didn’t like.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Well, liking oneself is a $#!^ lot better for you than the self loathing around this place.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      anyone who says they don’t understand the anti-Israel sentiment – read NN’s link.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I think it’s the definition of … what’s that word… APARTHEID! That’s the word!

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Not really. First, the article described one politician’s opinion. Second, the Arabs Israelis apparently have full rights. The Black South Africans never did under apartheid. Finally, the Blacks in South Africa were the majority of the population, not 17%.

          As for the claim that Israel is a Jewish state … how does that differ from Saudi Arabia claiming that their country is a Muslim state?

          If being anti-Israel is just one example of a wide spread view of being anti theocracy then I guess I get it. But where are the calls for a BDS against the other theocracies?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            But it’s not just his opinion. It’s just that he admitted it.

            How do they differ from the Saudis? Do you call the Saudis a democracy? Do they call themselves one?

            In one respect they’re the same. They’re not really our friends. We are useful tools.

            Next to France, then China, Israel is one of the biggest actors in industrial espionage against US companies.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar

            Israel is one of the biggest actors in industrial espionage

            That’s on top of just plain old espionage that undermines the national security of the US.

  5. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    The cancel culture redefines free speech as only if I like it. They do not understand that free speech applies to everyone or no one. The conservative Christian churches have understood this for decades. Give them the opportunity to speak so you too can speak against what they say.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Do Churches entertain “free speech” from their flocks?

  6. They have a symposium for professional students?

    Don’t responsible adults try to avoid becoming one of those?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I tried it. Total of 11 years for 2 degrees. Pitched a fit when they gave me my last diploma. I was expecting a gold watch.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Jeez, I thought I was the worst overage in grade at 10 & 1. You’ve got me beat, my hat’s off to you, awesome:)

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Mostly part time in the last 5, and although full time in the first 6, had to stop out to build cas reserves a couple of 3 semesters.

  7. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Unfortunately, cancel culture arises from both extremes of the political spectrum. There are real, actual concerns in extending speech, e.g., tax payer support. As the SCOTUS nominee observed preserving our Constitutional values in times of crisis is crucial however difficult. Let the hate spielers speak. The market for audiences will doom their messages. That was the underlying thought permitting the KKK march in Skokie.

  8. The question for me is where is the line to be drawn? At some point, views/opinions become too extreme or morally or ethically unacceptable to the/a majority and shouldn’t be given a public.platform. In an extreme hypothetical example, someone who openly espouses ethnic or racial cleansing as a policy position or strategy shouldn’t be allowed a public platform, but how to draw the line between that extreme and more perceived offenses caused by Pence/Salaita?

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      The problem with banning a public platform is that you generate conspiracy theories and it just expands underground.

      You need to let them speak and counter it with more speech showing its follies (Counterspeech Doctrine).

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Au contraire, the more loathsome, the more opportunity they should be given to speak. It sounds illogical and all what with Trump, but on average American learn bu experience. You can’t tell them, “No, that’s dangerous,” they have to get burned.

      There was a poll of Madoff’s victims and nearly 1/3 said they would invest with him again. I’ll look for it.

  9. Lefty665 Avatar

    JAB, Our opinions of Israel vary widely. I do however appreciate your discussion of the 3 issues.

    My opinion of Israel changed forever on June 8, 1967 when Israel attacked the unarmed USS “Liberty”. In that act of war the Israelis killed 34 US servicemen and wounded 172, a 70% casualty rate on that ship. https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/liberty/

    Upon Jonathan Pollard’s release, that Israeli spy on the United States was welcomed as a hero in Israel. Israel granted him citizenship in 1995 while he was still in jail in the US for espionage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Pollard

    Although perhaps not in itself an act of war against the United States, like the Liberty and Pollard, the “dancing Israeli’s”, several of whom were Mossad agents, celebrating the 911 attack was hideous. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it/Dancing_Israelis

    BDS is a non violent protest, like US sanctions that are widely applied. It is preferable to violent Israeli actions like “mowing the grass” against Palestinians.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycott,_Divestment_and_Sanctions

    The Middle East is a tough neighborhood and has long been an intractable problem. It is my hope that some day it muddles its way through to a “solution” that is equitable to all. People with differing opinions respectfully discussing their beliefs and the issues is a step in the right direction.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Interesting perspective. I forgot about the USS Liberty. I can’t recall there ever being a full explanation of that fiasco. It seemed like there were cover-ups on both sides. However, one of our Aegis destroyers did shoot down an Iranian airliner in 1988 or thereabouts. As best as I can tell, it was a horrific example of accidental misidentification. I guess the USS Liberty could be an example of a similar problem.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Uh NO. The Liberty was not misidentified. It was clearly identifiable, and flying a LARGE American flag.

        In intercepts of the Israeli pilots and PT boat captains communications they identified the ship as American and questioned their orders to attack. They were commanded to continue their attacks as ordered. They did.

        US Sailors: 34 dead, 172 wounded, oh just a “fiasco”.

        It was no mistake. It was an act of war against the United States by Israel.

        With friends like that, who needs enemies?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          If we ever found all the reason… well, they’re our friends, eh?

          Nobody is friends with an arms merchant… that’s us by the way.

          You neglected to mention that Israeli and Hezbollah diamond merchants BOTH make money for both sides off blood diamonds. Hell, they work together and fund the war on the misery of Congolese and Angolans.

          1. Lefty665 Avatar

            Pls don’t mistake my disgust with Israel with love for the Palestinians. I think they’ve been screwed, but they have their own share of bad actors as you note with the blood diamond trade.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Nor me either. It’s just one side plays us like a fiddle (on the roof?) and the other doesn’t get the chance that neither deserves.

          3. Lefty665 Avatar

            Yes. We execute Israeli foreign policy to the detriment of our own interests. Iraq, Syria and Iran are examples. We expend the blood of our troops and our treasure so the Israelis don’t have to invest their own. What is wrong with this picture?

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Back in the 1980s, I went to dinner with a large group. By 11, there were just three of us left drinking in the bar, two older gentlemen, an Englishman and an Irishman, and yours truly. By midnight, the conversation between the two had turned to politics, then to Belfast, the London bombings, and began getting louder and hotter as the alcohol began to ignite.

            It was just about to come to fisticuffs when I slurred out, “Look! I understand the whole English-Irish bad blood history thing. I really do. But, I have one really burning question, ‘Which of ya is which?’” I recall the the two of ’em laughing and clapping each other on the back as I looked up from the between the barstools.**

            We have lost the high ground and the art of diplomacy.

            **poetic licennse. In truth, they both burst out laughing, we had another round and I drove the Irishman home because the dumb Mick parked in a tow away zone.

          5. Lefty665 Avatar

            Too funny. Dangfool colonial upstart:)

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        The Iranian airliner was a scheduled commercial flight on a regular commercial airway. It had a transponder squawking its identity. You cannot write that off as “accidental misidentification”, Criminal negligence and murder is more like it. https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/10/middleeast/iran-air-flight-655-us-military-intl-hnk/index.html
        Not that it matters, but it was a cruiser, the USS Vincennes. It was in Iranian territorial waters at the time.

        It was a precursor to our current Navy that is running destroyers into huge container ships, our submarines into the seafloor and burning up an amphibious assault ship at the dock.

        We best take care not to provoke the Chinese or the Russians. The auguries are not good.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Don’t forget…
      https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-08-15-fi-34524-story.html

      It hasn’t changed either. It’s also a great place to avoid extradition to the US.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        1996 article?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Whatever you do, don’t think things have changed. Those that know just don’t talk about it. We decided that China, Russia, and Iran were enemies that don’t upset segments of the electorate.

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        Yep, true then and still is.

        There’s also US companies like Intel that have Israeli facilities. That is where much of the development of the out of band remote access built into each Intel CPU was done and continues.

  10. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Personally, I am fine if they ban Salaita… You do not have a right to consequence-free speech and being blocked from a college platform is one of those potential consequences.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Being rejected by your audience is a far more severe potential consequence.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Perhaps… will the “free speech” crowd here cry “cancel tyranny!!” if he is booed off the stage then…?? Does the disapproving crowd have 1st amendment rights as well?? Booed off or banned… I refuse to care one iota… either is deserved… and fully legitimate.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I suspect that “cancel” means not only I can say anything to anyone but that they also MUST listen to me and not complain or give “consequences”.

          IOW, you must listen to me or you’re cancelling me….

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Don’t tase me Bro…

  11. Atlas Rand Avatar
    Atlas Rand

    I took Post-Colonial Cultural studies with Dr. Saleita my freshman year at Virginia Tech. As an engineering major with a lot of dual enrollment credits, his would be the only non math/science course I would take other than a 1 credit art class (to fulfill a 3 credit hole in my humanities graduation requirement, and tech at that time required 1 credit of art). I actually thoroughly enjoyed his class, and found discussions thought provoking. I seem to recall him introducing himself as half Syrian half Palestinian, but can’t recall precisely. He left the university around about my senior year, which was when all the hullabaloo took off about his anti-semitism and he loss his job in Illinois. He later ended up teaching in the UAE I seem to recall. In class he was openly pro-Palestine and anti-Zionist, but was always open to differing viewpoints and respectful discussion. I was surprised then and remain so at some of the comments later attributed to him. I would be interested in hearing him speak again, perhaps only for nostalgia sake.

  12. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    I agree wholeheartedly with everything said.

    The only complicating factor not mentioned is this: in a contract signed by Virginia Tech, the GPSS paid Salaita over $10,000 to speak. That money comes from student fees. The GPSS, like any student organization, must apply for those funds.

    Should University funds be allowed to be used for a divisive speaker?

    I still think yes–but with the understanding that this sets a precedent. If a conservative group wants to bring in a controversial political figure and pay him or her, then no amount of backlash from the left should prevent the use of those funds for that purpose.

  13. Beer Baron Avatar
    Beer Baron

    We can all agree that Israel is a shining star of freedom in a region, sadly, largely devoid of it.

Leave a Reply