Equity in Virginia School Funding

by Matt Hurt

Virginia Public School Region VII has demonstrated that large per-student budgets are not a prerequisite to ensure success on Virginia’s Standards of Learning assessments. High pass rates indicate that the schools and divisions in the Southwest are meeting the needs of their students for basic skill attainment. However, to achieve Virginia’s 5 C’s — Critical Thinking Skills, Collaboration Skills, Communication Skills, Creative Thinking Skills, and Citizenship Skills — students need access to more educational opportunities than the current state funding formula provides. Affluent localities have provided these opportunities for their students, whereas others have not found the means.

School funding is very complicated as there are so many variables at play. Public school budgets can be broken into four funding sources — federal, state, state sales tax, and local dollars. There are differing criteria for each, which impact the overall budget for a given school division. The degree to which school division budgets vary by funding source can be seen in the table below, drawn from the 2019 Superintendent’s Annual Report. Also included is the range of per pupil funding that year.

This table demonstrates that there is inequitable educational funding in Virginia. On February 17, a House of Delegates committee tabled SJ 275, a proposed constitutional amendment that would have required providing all students with equal opportunities. During this meeting, Del. Mark Sickles said he didn’t understand why folks in rural and small town Virginia couldn’t take the initiative and solve their own problems. The remark seemed to be directed towards Lee County, the division that has the lowest Local Composite Index (the index used to determine a locality’s ability to pay for public K-12 education) in the state.

Please consider some data from the Commonwealth Institute from November 2019. Their data shows that a one-penny increase in real estate tax could increase Lee County revenue by $94,700, or $31.79 per student. The same one-penny increase in Fairfax County (part of which Del. Sickles represents) would net $24,379,500, or $133.06 per student. Below are some other Census Bureau statistics from 2019 that demonstrate how Sickles’ thinking may not align with the reality of the situation on the ground.

Economies of scale is also an important consideration when thinking about school funding and providing equitable educational opportunities. For example, all divisions must conduct the same administrative functions required to operate a school division. Fairfax County can distribute those costs across almost 190,000 students, whereas in Lee County, those costs are only spread across slightly more than 3,000 students.

Given these facts coupled with the very important push for equity in state government, please consider the following questions.

It is a fact that all localities can provide more local educational funding than they currently do. Do localities such as Lee County have the capacity to provide sufficient local funds to provide opportunities equal to those enjoyed by Fairfax County students?

It is a fact that Fairfax County is situated next to Washington, D.C., and as such benefits from high-wage jobs with the federal government and its private-sector contractors. A few years ago (and maybe now), more federal dollars per capita were spent in Virginia than any other state, most going to the northern and eastern part of the state. Is it acceptable that rural students should be denied equitable educational opportunities because their locality isn’t geographically situated to take advantage of the local economies fueled with federal dollars?

Do all students, regardless of color, religion, zip code, etc., deserve equity in funding?

Are students in Lee County ineligible for equity considerations because their parents overwhelmingly vote for the party other than that of those delegates who tabled this proposed constitutional amendment?

Are the delegates who decided to table SJ 275 afraid that the citizens might approve the amendment, which would likely divert funds from their preferred initiatives?

It seems difficult to successfully argue that many localities, such as Lee County, have the capacity, even considering the Local Composite Index, to provide educational opportunities that could rival those currently enjoyed by students fortunate enough to live in Fairfax County. Unfortunately, the priorities of legislators from the more affluent parts of the state did not include equity of educational opportunities for all Virginia students. Hopefully in the future, the General Assembly will allow a constitutional amendment such as SJ 275 to be adjudicated by the citizens of the Commonwealth.

Matt Hurt is director of the Comprehensive Instructional Program, a coalition of non-metropolitan public school systems in Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

66 responses to “Equity in Virginia School Funding”

  1. Matt, I’m a huge fan of what SW Virginia schools have been able to accomplish with meager resources. But I have to part company with you here. SW Virginia schools already benefit from huge wealth transfers from Virginia’s major metropolitan areas, especially Northern Virginia. Seriously, you want bigger wealth transfers?

    Here’s where I might sympathize, depending…. The Northam administration is allocating extra resources specifically for lower-income school districts. Will poor SW Virginia school systems get their fair share of this allocation, or will most of the fund go to ameliorating “systemic racism” in black-majority districts? Money for poor localities should be distributed without regard to race. Poverty is poverty, whether you are white or black.

    I don’t know how Northam would distribute those funds, however, so I cannot say if they are biased in favor of predominantly black/Hispanic districts. Not knowing the facts, I shall refrain from further comment.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Pretty good post Matt.

    I got a little confused on the first chart… but got the point.

    I’m not surprised that Jim “parts company” with you, and so will others like DJ and TMT but your essential point is still true in terms of “equity” for ALL kids living in Virginia.

    Even with the State’s LCI, there are disparities in funding.

    Jim calls it a “wealth transfer” but equity funding for each and every child in Virginia is not a “wealth transfer” in my mind. It basically is/should be a policy where each and every child in Virginia receives the same level of education resources, no matter the economic status of the place where they live.

  3. Matt, I’m a huge fan of what SW Virginia schools have been able to accomplish with meager resources. But I have to part company with you here. SW Virginia schools already benefit from huge wealth transfers from Virginia’s major metropolitan areas, especially Northern Virginia. Seriously, you want bigger wealth transfers?

    Here’s where I might sympathize, depending…. The Northam administration is allocating extra resources specifically for lower-income school districts. Will poor SW Virginia school systems get their fair share of this allocation, or will most of the fund go to ameliorating “systemic racism” in black-majority districts? Money for poor localities should be distributed without regard to race. Poverty is poverty, whether you are white or black.

    I don’t know how Northam would distribute those funds, however, so I cannot say if they are biased in favor of predominantly black/Hispanic districts. Not knowing the facts, I shall refrain from further comment.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    Pretty good post Matt.

    I got a little confused on the first chart… but got the point.

    I’m not surprised that Jim “parts company” with you, and so will others like DJ and TMT but your essential point is still true in terms of “equity” for ALL kids living in Virginia.

    Even with the State’s LCI, there are disparities in funding.

    Jim calls it a “wealth transfer” but equity funding for each and every child in Virginia is not a “wealth transfer” in my mind. It basically is/should be a policy where each and every child in Virginia receives the same level of education resources, no matter the economic status of the place where they live.

  5. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
    Eric the Half a Troll

    I don’t see how the first table shows inequitable educational funding. It seems to show that some counties are more reliant on state and federal sources than are others (particularly those in NoVA for the reasons you cite). It looks like you switched the figures on the bottom row though. Since tax rates are meaningless absent appraised value figures, it might be instructional to look at how educational funding would change per student with a 1% tax increase (not tax rate) at the county level. I suspect there will still be a disparity and it may even be larger.

    I don’t know what the solution to this issue might be. As you note, Lee county already gets some 87% of its funding from state or federal sources how asymptotic do you think this should get?

  6. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
    Eric the Half a Troll

    I don’t see how the first table shows inequitable educational funding. It seems to show that some counties are more reliant on state and federal sources than are others (particularly those in NoVA for the reasons you cite). It looks like you switched the figures on the bottom row though. Since tax rates are meaningless absent appraised value figures, it might be instructional to look at how educational funding would change per student with a 1% tax increase (not tax rate) at the county level. I suspect there will still be a disparity and it may even be larger.

    I don’t know what the solution to this issue might be. As you note, Lee county already gets some 87% of its funding from state or federal sources how asymptotic do you think this should get?

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    The method that Virginia uses to fund schools was not designed for full equity. It was designed to provide each child with a minimum standard of education. Localities can and do add to it – to the clear benefit of such kids – as the percent headed to college is higher in those localities.

    Think how school funding could work if Virginia funded 100% with no local match required.

    Then, every kid would get the same amount.

    The funding would come from all taxpayers no matter where they lived – based on their individual wealth or income then it would be spread across the state equally to all kids.

    We wouldn’t be talking about “transfer of wealth” from some counties to others and instead about “transfer of wealth” from taxpayers to , what, kids?

    Three states actually do that:

    ” Full State Funding Programs

    Full State Funding is only found in Hawaii. Under such a policy there are virtually no local revenues. States such as Vermont and New Mexico come close to this category through programs that involve very limited local funding sources.”

    https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45827.html#_Toc17719790

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    The method that Virginia uses to fund schools was not designed for full equity. It was designed to provide each child with a minimum standard of education. Localities can and do add to it – to the clear benefit of such kids – as the percent headed to college is higher in those localities.

    Think how school funding could work if Virginia funded 100% with no local match required.

    Then, every kid would get the same amount.

    The funding would come from all taxpayers no matter where they lived – based on their individual wealth or income then it would be spread across the state equally to all kids.

    We wouldn’t be talking about “transfer of wealth” from some counties to others and instead about “transfer of wealth” from taxpayers to , what, kids?

    Three states actually do that:

    ” Full State Funding Programs

    Full State Funding is only found in Hawaii. Under such a policy there are virtually no local revenues. States such as Vermont and New Mexico come close to this category through programs that involve very limited local funding sources.”

    https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45827.html#_Toc17719790

  9. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Matt and Larry both have good points. The quality of education a kid gets should not depend on which section of the state he was born in. The SOQ is meant to deal with funding minimum standards, per the Constitution.

    I am surprised by Mark Sickles’ remark. He has been around long enough and I thought he was smart enough to know that small towns and rural area don’t have the resources that Northern Virginia has.

    Matt asks about the comparable capacities of Lee and Fairfax counties. One method of fiscally comparing the two is the often overlooked fiscal stress index, developed by the Commission on Local Government.

    One component used in the index is revenue capacity. This is defined as how much tax revenue a locality could collect per capita from its revenue base using statewide average tax rates.
    Revenue capacity score:
    Fairfax–$3,600
    Lee County–$1,016

    Another component is effort, which is defined as a locality’s own-source revenue collections divided by revenue capacity. Under this definition, an effort score of 1.00 would mean that a locality got $1.00 of revenue from every $1.00 of capacity.

    Effort score:
    Fairfax–1.0419
    Lee County–0.5578
    (Many rural areas are subject to the criticism that their tax rates are too low. They counter that their residents cannot afford higher taxes.)

    Overall fiscal stress score. In calculating a local government’s fiscal stress score, the Commission combines all the components. A fiscal stress index score of 100 would be the state average.

    Fiscal stress index score:

    Fairfax–92.92 (COLG puts this in its “low” category)
    Lee County–102.54 (COLG, “above average”)

    For more detail (excruciating detail, in fact) on the fiscal stress index, see: https://www.dhcd.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/Docx/clg/fiscal-stress/fiscal-stress-report.pdf.

    1. SuburbanWoman Avatar
      SuburbanWoman

      Based on SOQ funding many rural schools would not qualify for full time guidance, principals, assistant principals and other extras. When the governor talks about “raises” he is only talking about raises for those SOQ positions which means the locality must provide funding for the other employee raises. This year the governor should exclude any administrator making over 75K per year in his raises.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        You make a good point. If I recall correctly, any teacher who is not an SOQ teacher has to be paid in local money, not only salary, but health care and pension and for smaller counties adding any such non SOQ positions often requires local tax increases – in places that are economically fragile.

  10. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Matt and Larry both have good points. The quality of education a kid gets should not depend on which section of the state he was born in. The SOQ is meant to deal with funding minimum standards, per the Constitution.

    I am surprised by Mark Sickles’ remark. He has been around long enough and I thought he was smart enough to know that small towns and rural area don’t have the resources that Northern Virginia has.

    Matt asks about the comparable capacities of Lee and Fairfax counties. One method of fiscally comparing the two is the often overlooked fiscal stress index, developed by the Commission on Local Government.

    One component used in the index is revenue capacity. This is defined as how much tax revenue a locality could collect per capita from its revenue base using statewide average tax rates.
    Revenue capacity score:
    Fairfax–$3,600
    Lee County–$1,016

    Another component is effort, which is defined as a locality’s own-source revenue collections divided by revenue capacity. Under this definition, an effort score of 1.00 would mean that a locality got $1.00 of revenue from every $1.00 of capacity.

    Effort score:
    Fairfax–1.0419
    Lee County–0.5578
    (Many rural areas are subject to the criticism that their tax rates are too low. They counter that their residents cannot afford higher taxes.)

    Overall fiscal stress score. In calculating a local government’s fiscal stress score, the Commission combines all the components. A fiscal stress index score of 100 would be the state average.

    Fiscal stress index score:

    Fairfax–92.92 (COLG puts this in its “low” category)
    Lee County–102.54 (COLG, “above average”)

    For more detail (excruciating detail, in fact) on the fiscal stress index, see: https://www.dhcd.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/Docx/clg/fiscal-stress/fiscal-stress-report.pdf.

    1. SuburbanWoman Avatar
      SuburbanWoman

      Based on SOQ funding many rural schools would not qualify for full time guidance, principals, assistant principals and other extras. When the governor talks about “raises” he is only talking about raises for those SOQ positions which means the locality must provide funding for the other employee raises. This year the governor should exclude any administrator making over 75K per year in his raises.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        You make a good point. If I recall correctly, any teacher who is not an SOQ teacher has to be paid in local money, not only salary, but health care and pension and for smaller counties adding any such non SOQ positions often requires local tax increases – in places that are economically fragile.

  11. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Come on man…. “poor kids are just as bright as white kids”
    In today’s US debating Equity between white kids in different localities is hilarious. It’s all about skin color. The state should develop a “hue detector”. Once each kids passes through the “hue detector” a number will assigned to that kid that determines their funding value. Now that’s how we get to Dr Governor’s and Secretary Woke’s vision of educational Equity!

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      Wait! Are poor kids not white? Or white kids not poor?

      What are you quoting?

      1. idiocracy Avatar

        And what about the kids that will turn white when they get the first shower they’ve had in years due to the lack of indoor plumbing?

        1. idiocracy Avatar

          I made no reference to any geographical locations or occupations.

          1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
            Baconator with extra cheese

            So what you’re saying is a good washing will change children of color into white kids?

            I mean Dr Governor did warn us that shoe polish is difficult to wash off your face!

        2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
          Baconator with extra cheese

          Now that is a statement from an Appalachian-phobe!

        3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          The coal mines are closing… kids haven’t worked mines in years.

      2. Matt Adams Avatar

        Our President, is who he is quoting.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Not in the entirety, which is, what? Dishonest?

      3. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        “Come on man”….. that’s a direct quote from Joe Biden!

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          “Come on man” is. But the other? No it’s not. It’s a truncated quote.

          1. djrippert Avatar

            Read it and weep. Biden may have misspoken but he definitely made the offending comment.

            https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-says-poor-kids-are-just-bright-just-talented-white-n1040686

            Or, is NBC News now a Trump mouthpiece?

          2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            I don’t have to read it… They truncated too.

            I can watch and hear it.
            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=idpevmeoK1A

            But like in high school, you guys are gonna have fun picking on the kid with a speech impediment again. The difference is politics. My dollar to your dime you weren’t as Equal Opportunity with Bush43…

            Enjoy.

  12. djrippert Avatar

    Ah, economic analysis in Virginia. Always fun. Cost of living is never considered. Here’s one for you – the “Beltway” area of Northern Virginia has a higher cost-of-living adjusted poverty rate then the Northern Neck / Eastern Shore, South Valley / Piedmont, Richmond area and Virginia Beach / Chesapeake.

    When can the “Beltway” area expect lopsided transfers from the 6 of 10 Virginia regions with lower cost-of-living adjusted poverty rates?

    When will people from Southwest Virginia start demanding equity from Virginia Beach, the Northern Neck and Richmond rather than Alexandria and Arlington?

    Finally, if the streets of Northern Virginia are lined with gold why wouldn’t the people living in perennially economically disadvantaged areas of the state just move to Shangri-La and cash in? You know, like the hundreds of thousands of poor, undereducated immigrants who arrive without being able to speak English have done. Is there some right to live wherever you want while being subsidized by others in the Virginia Constitution?

    http://statchatva.org/2013/05/31/regional-cost-of-living-adjustments-for-poverty-rates-in-virginia/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Well, like Hawaii and Vermont what if the State funded K-12 100% and provided higher level SOQs so the rural schools could also provide the “extras”?

      Why would that be bad? All this talk about “wealth transfer” would go POOF!

  13. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Come on man…. “poor kids are just as bright as white kids”
    In today’s US debating Equity between white kids in different localities is hilarious. It’s all about skin color. The state should develop a “hue detector”. Once each kids passes through the “hue detector” a number will assigned to that kid that determines their funding value. Now that’s how we get to Dr Governor’s and Secretary Woke’s vision of educational Equity!

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      Wait! Are poor kids not white? Or white kids not poor?

      What are you quoting?

      1. Matt Adams Avatar

        Our President, is who he is quoting.

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Not in the entirety, which is, what? Dishonest?

      2. idiocracy Avatar

        And what about the kids that will turn white when they get the first shower they’ve had in years due to the lack of indoor plumbing?

        1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
          Baconator with extra cheese

          Now that is a statement from an Appalachian-phobe!

        2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          The coal mines are closing… kids haven’t worked mines in years.

        3. idiocracy Avatar

          I made no reference to any geographical locations or occupations.

          1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
            Baconator with extra cheese

            So what you’re saying is a good washing will change children of color into white kids?

            I mean Dr Governor did warn us that shoe polish is difficult to wash off your face!

      3. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        “Come on man”….. that’s a direct quote from Joe Biden!

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          “Come on man” is. But the other? No it’s not. It’s a truncated quote.

          1. djrippert Avatar

            Read it and weep. Biden may have misspoken but he definitely made the offending comment.

            https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-says-poor-kids-are-just-bright-just-talented-white-n1040686

            Or, is NBC News now a Trump mouthpiece?

          2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            I don’t have to read it… They truncated too.

            I can watch and hear it.
            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=idpevmeoK1A

            But like in high school, you guys are gonna have fun picking on the kid with a speech impediment again. The difference is politics. My dollar to your dime you weren’t as Equal Opportunity with Bush43…

            Enjoy.

  14. Most of the arguments about improving public schools center around inputs: expenditure per student, teachers per student, teacher credentials, and on and on. The favorite, of course, is the easiest to understand, money.

    That makes some intuitive sense. More money spent on schools ought to lead to better staff, better facilities, and more opportunities to learn.

    In fact, if we look at outputs that have something to do with what the kids have learned (the only reasonably general measure in Virginia is the SOL pass rates), it turns out that the expenditure inputs do not correlate with the SOL outputs. For example, https://calaf.org/?p=8098

    I suggest that the better question is, “What are all those low-spending SW VA divisions doing to get such good SOL scores?”

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      I think they may be teaching math, science, and reading/ “english”?
      How dare those SW teachers not concentrate on the vastly more import social justice subjects! I demand that Secretary Woke go crush them. I mean ceasing that SW success would be a rapid parhway to Equity.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      I’d agree that money-alone will not fix issues. The money has to be spent on the right things.

      But even Matt Hurt from CIP makes the point that even when you squeeze the money to get the best you can, without more, additional resources cannot be provided to the kids.

      If one compares the scope and diversity of subjects offered to kids in affluent places like NoVa to what is offered in Lee – there is a big difference.

      The state essentially taxes everyone but distributes by county rather than statewide like 3 other states do. And when they do this, they leave optional courses up to the locality to fund (or not).

      But in my mind, at least some of this ought to be help with virtual access which also ought to be cost-effective.

  15. Most of the arguments about improving public schools center around inputs: expenditure per student, teachers per student, teacher credentials, and on and on. The favorite, of course, is the easiest to understand, money.

    That makes some intuitive sense. More money spent on schools ought to lead to better staff, better facilities, and more opportunities to learn.

    In fact, if we look at outputs that have something to do with what the kids have learned (the only reasonably general measure in Virginia is the SOL pass rates), it turns out that the expenditure inputs do not correlate with the SOL outputs. For example, https://calaf.org/?p=8098

    I suggest that the better question is, “What are all those low-spending SW VA divisions doing to get such good SOL scores?”

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      I think they may be teaching math, science, and reading/ “english”?
      How dare those SW teachers not concentrate on the vastly more import social justice subjects! I demand that Secretary Woke go crush them. I mean ceasing that SW success would be a rapid parhway to Equity.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      I’d agree that money-alone will not fix issues. The money has to be spent on the right things.

      But even Matt Hurt from CIP makes the point that even when you squeeze the money to get the best you can, without more, additional resources cannot be provided to the kids.

      If one compares the scope and diversity of subjects offered to kids in affluent places like NoVa to what is offered in Lee – there is a big difference.

      The state essentially taxes everyone but distributes by county rather than statewide like 3 other states do. And when they do this, they leave optional courses up to the locality to fund (or not).

      But in my mind, at least some of this ought to be help with virtual access which also ought to be cost-effective.

  16. djrippert Avatar

    Biden also implied that black and hispanic people don’t know how to use the internet.

    “Not everybody in the community–in the Hispanic and the African American community, particularly in rural areas that are distant and/or inner-city districts–know how to use–know how to get online to determine how to get in line for that COVID vaccination at the Walgreens or at the particular store.”

    Once again, he misspoke. But that’s all right … he cleared it with the following brilliant comment:

    “It’s all about trying to more rationalize in detail so ordinary people, like me, can understand,” Biden stated. “I mean that sincerely. I mean, you know, my grandchildren can use that online–you know, make me look like I’m in, you know, the seventh century.”

    In response, the seventh century called (via ZOOM) and asked Biden to stop insulting the seventh century by claiming to be associated with it.

    https://remezcla.com/culture/president-biden-infers-black-latino-communities-dont-know-use-internet/

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Come one man!
      Orangeman-Bad is gone dude…. this Unifier in Chief hasn’t been a racist since he eulogized his last Klansman-mentor. Oh yeah and don’t forget he spoke out for that “clean” African American gentleman who became a President too….

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I have zero doubt that Biden will screw up. It’s a given. But thank Gawd not on the level of OrangeMan who was unfit to lead but excellent at attracting cult base of many who really wanted to see government dismantled and a 3rd world strongman in charge.

        Just the lack of tweets… one Biden gaff is worth thousands of those inane tweets…

        1. djrippert Avatar

          Biden’s biggest screw ups will be like Obama’s – in foreign policy. Why do you think the Chinese began regular incursions into Taiwanese airspace on almost the day Biden was inaugurated?

          Say what you want about Orangeman-Bad … the worst actors on the world stage were scared to death of him.

          We’ll see what Biden does if China invades Taiwan or Russia invades more of Ukraine.

          Trying to build a border wall and have Mexico pay for it was pretty dumb. Getting into a kinetic war with China would be catastrophic.

          1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
            Baconator with extra cheese

            According to Biden he’s going to push back hard on Russia!
            But that will only happen if Hunter is in the Ukraine smoking rock when Russia invades.

  17. djrippert Avatar

    Biden also implied that black and hispanic people don’t know how to use the internet.

    “Not everybody in the community–in the Hispanic and the African American community, particularly in rural areas that are distant and/or inner-city districts–know how to use–know how to get online to determine how to get in line for that COVID vaccination at the Walgreens or at the particular store.”

    Once again, he misspoke. But that’s all right … he cleared it with the following brilliant comment:

    “It’s all about trying to more rationalize in detail so ordinary people, like me, can understand,” Biden stated. “I mean that sincerely. I mean, you know, my grandchildren can use that online–you know, make me look like I’m in, you know, the seventh century.”

    In response, the seventh century called (via ZOOM) and asked Biden to stop insulting the seventh century by claiming to be associated with it.

    https://remezcla.com/culture/president-biden-infers-black-latino-communities-dont-know-use-internet/

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Come one man!
      Orangeman-Bad is gone dude…. this Unifier in Chief hasn’t been a racist since he eulogized his last Klansman-mentor. Oh yeah and don’t forget he spoke out for that “clean” African American gentleman who became a President too….

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I have zero doubt that Biden will screw up. It’s a given. But thank Gawd not on the level of OrangeMan who was unfit to lead but excellent at attracting cult base of many who really wanted to see government dismantled and a 3rd world strongman in charge.

        Just the lack of tweets… one Biden gaff is worth thousands of those inane tweets…

        1. djrippert Avatar

          Biden’s biggest screw ups will be like Obama’s – in foreign policy. Why do you think the Chinese began regular incursions into Taiwanese airspace on almost the day Biden was inaugurated?

          Say what you want about Orangeman-Bad … the worst actors on the world stage were scared to death of him.

          We’ll see what Biden does if China invades Taiwan or Russia invades more of Ukraine.

          Trying to build a border wall and have Mexico pay for it was pretty dumb. Getting into a kinetic war with China would be catastrophic.

          1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
            Baconator with extra cheese

            According to Biden he’s going to push back hard on Russia!
            But that will only happen if Hunter is in the Ukraine smoking rock when Russia invades.

  18. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    It is possible the success in #SWVA could be in part due to parenting. Parenting, community support, excellent teachers and principals who understand the communities they serve and hard work.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Parenting? Such talk is not woke…

  19. SuburbanWoman Avatar
    SuburbanWoman

    It is possible the success in #SWVA could be in part due to parenting. Parenting, community support, excellent teachers and principals who understand the communities they serve and hard work.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Parenting? Such talk is not woke…

  20. djrippert Avatar

    Ah, economic analysis in Virginia. Always fun. Cost of living is never considered. Here’s one for you – the “Beltway” area of Northern Virginia has a higher cost-of-living adjusted poverty rate then the Northern Neck / Eastern Shore, South Valley / Piedmont, Richmond area and Virginia Beach / Chesapeake.

    When can the “Beltway” area expect lopsided transfers from the 6 of 10 Virginia regions with lower cost-of-living adjusted poverty rates?

    When will people from Southwest Virginia start demanding equity from Virginia Beach, the Northern Neck and Richmond rather than Alexandria and Arlington?

    Finally, if the streets of Northern Virginia are lined with gold why wouldn’t the people living in perennially economically disadvantaged areas of the state just move to Shangri-La and cash in? You know, like the hundreds of thousands of poor, undereducated immigrants who arrive without being able to speak English have done. Is there some right to live wherever you want while being subsidized by others in the Virginia Constitution?

    http://statchatva.org/2013/05/31/regional-cost-of-living-adjustments-for-poverty-rates-in-virginia/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Well, like Hawaii and Vermont what if the State funded K-12 100% and provided higher level SOQs so the rural schools could also provide the “extras”?

      Why would that be bad? All this talk about “wealth transfer” would go POOF!

  21. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Matt, good article. This equity issue is about the haves and have nots not race. This isn’t about wealth transfers, it is about distributing wealth for equity. Some people can’t get their arms around the fact that raising taxes in Lee County is much different than raising taxes is Falls Church. See Dick Hall Sizemore’s comment below. The reason is the distribution of poverty per capita. When it high, it is hard to raise taxes, when it is lower, it is easier. Thus, Virginia’s complicated funding model based on property and wealth.

  22. I have been concerned as to why Lee county public schools would hire a budget clerk/clerk of the board who is in financial debt up the wazoo!? I’m not being mean or nasty just doesn’t make much sense. Even the prisons around here do a credit check before hiring to make sure they won’t be tempted to take a bribe. The budget clerk/clerk of the board has two open warrant for debt cases in court currently (public knowledge, anyone can search it). It’s fully just my opinion but it seems having someone in such financial distress run the school finances is asking for trouble. I hope I’m just being a negative Nancy and completely wrong, because our children/grandchildren deserve every pennies worth of education they can receive!

Leave a Reply