Entrepreneurs, Rent Seekers and the Just Society

by James A. Bacon

It’s a lazy, rainy day, and for amusement, I’ve been reading Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s online work, “Principia Politica,” in which he applies his insights into risk, probability, and the non-linearity of complex systems to the realm of governance and politics. The graphic displayed above appears about halfway through the presentation without any elaboration but it beautifully summarizes how I view the world.

The left-hand image summarizes the thinking of the political left in the United States today, which defines “the rich” — the millionaires and billionaires, in Bernie Sanders parlance — as the enemy. The underlying assumption is that all wealth is, to one degree or another, illegitimately gained and that concentrations of wealth are harmful to society. This is the default mode of thinking of much of academia, the journalism “profession, think tank pundits and the nation’s intelligentsia.

The right-hand image summarizes the thinking of those, like me, of a conservative-libertarian bent. I have no problem with the existence of rich people in our society. I am far more interested in how people acquired their wealth. To me, predators, cronies and rent seekers are the bad guys.

Entrepreneurs who acquire wealth by creating products and services that customers purchase voluntarily help make the world a better place. Riches provide a tangible reward for their creativity, passion, and drive. I do not begrudge the wealth of men like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Jeff Bezos. They engaged in win-win wealth creation. My life has improved immeasurably from the invention of the iPhone, Microsoft Office, and e-commerce, and I pay them my money gladly.

The people I resent — those who are, in the typology above, the right enemy — are those who engage in rent seeking, manipulating the coercive power of the state, to accumulate wealth. Rent-seekers and monopolists engage in win-lose wealth creation. Their gain comes at someone else’s expense. Who might fall into this category? Wall Street bankers who use government to privatize profits and socialize losses. Special pleaders who seek government grants, loans, subsidies and tax exemptions not available to others. Businesses that capture the regulatory apparatus to erect barriers to competition and protect their positions of economic privilege.

Here at Bacon’s Rebellion I am dedicated to supporting the activities of wealth-creating entrepreneurs. Every day I ask myself, how can Virginia create a business climate conducive to innovation, productivity and the legitimate creation and accumulation of wealth? I am equally dedicated to exposing the machinations of those who engage in rent seeking at the level of state/local government to extract wealth from those less politically powerful.

Among the rent-seeking extractors of wealth we have called out are the faculty-administrative elites of our colleges and universities and the administrators of our “nonprofit” health care systems. We have focused on these because they have a huge impact on our collective well being, but there are many others, and we will call them out as well when we come across them.

Sadly, the rent seekers hold the power in Virginia. But Bacon’s Rebellion will not relent in its pursuit of a truly fair and just society.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

33 responses to “Entrepreneurs, Rent Seekers and the Just Society”

  1. Great graphic.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead V

      Yeah the graphic is a good one. Never thought about it like this before. Unfortunately it seems the right handed red bar is much bigger in today’s world.

  2. Great graphic.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead V

      Yeah the graphic is a good one. Never thought about it like this before. Unfortunately it seems the right handed red bar is much bigger in today’s world.

  3. Maria Paluzsay Avatar
    Maria Paluzsay

    I couldn’t agree more. I would prefer an alternate term to “rent seekers”, although I understand the usage in terms of “someone wanting gain from no actual work”. Readers who put less thought in will picture landlords, not systems players, and I find private landlords to be risk-takers with their own capital and often their own labor, the best kind of entrepreneur, and sometimes even the protectors for tenants who have found themselves in dire straits. Now to find this ebook.

  4. Maria Paluzsay Avatar
    Maria Paluzsay

    I couldn’t agree more. I would prefer an alternate term to “rent seekers”, although I understand the usage in terms of “someone wanting gain from no actual work”. Readers who put less thought in will picture landlords, not systems players, and I find private landlords to be risk-takers with their own capital and often their own labor, the best kind of entrepreneur, and sometimes even the protectors for tenants who have found themselves in dire straits. Now to find this ebook.

    1. mr mozambique Avatar
      mr mozambique

      Taleb states that in a tweet from May 5th 2019, stating “rent seeking has nothing to do with landlords, rather the opposite”

  5. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Why horizontal or vertical slices only? Why not a nice diagonal with an offset?

    At least we (royal?) are considering additional dimensions, but what are they? Ooooh, how about a 50% lobbyist tax?

  6. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Why horizontal or vertical slices only? Why not a nice diagonal with an offset?

    At least we (royal?) are considering additional dimensions, but what are they? Ooooh, how about a 50% lobbyist tax?

  7. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Actually, your vertical cut is more social engineering than is the progressive tax depicted on the left side. The notion you are exhibiting is preferring capital gains versus, oh say, gambling winnings, e.g., coloring money, which is also currently done to some extent. I can day-trade, write losses against gains to the tune of $3K and carry excess loss to the next year, which I cannot do with casino losses. Similarly, there are differing tax rates for the types of properties and time of the investment.

    It’s legislating morality by other means.

    1. sherlockj Avatar
      sherlockj

      What you describe, Nancy, is the work of rent seekers. In the case of Congressional rent seekers, there is no more enticing target than the tax code. That is the case you have made.

      In the case of Richmond rent seekers, some rent-seekers lobby for the good of many (or at least what they perceive to be so) and some of them lobby for the good of a few.

      My personal focus for years has been on health sector lobbyists. I have been educated by the experience.

      Over more than a decade in which I have been close to it, independent private health insurance companies have lobbied for the good of both their clients and themselves because their interests are aligned. They firmly oppose healthcare provider monopolies because they drive up the prices that the insurers must pay and therefore must charge their clients. Demand for private health insurance like with most services varies inversely with cost. High costs drive down public demand for private insurance and drive up demand for government health insurance. Because of the alignment of interests, lower healthcare prices help private sector health insurers do well while doing good.

      But they fight a distinctly uphill battle in Richmond.

      The hospital-centric regional provider monopolies have created their own captive insurers (Sentara/Optima, VCU/Virginia Premier (now Sentara) and Centra/Piedmont Community Health Plan) or exclusive HMO partnerships with a single insurer (Inova/Aetna and Carilion/Aetna). They use these business structures simultaneously to reduce the price negotiation leverage of other private sector insurers, to keep their own healthcare prices high and to put additional pressure on their provider competition.

      As an extra benefit to their cause, with their membership they have largely neutered the largest health insurance industry lobby in Richmond.

      The regional monopolies dominate the GA with a combination of campaign contributions and the power of their economic presence in every member’s district.

      They have proven unbeatable for years when they are strongly for or against something. And they are strongly for or against nearly any piece of healthcare or health insurance-related legislation.

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Well, you can get better medical care in almost 100 other countries, but you can’t pay more for it.

        You have Tricare, or is it TriCare? Either way, I don’t begrudge you that. It was an earned bennie, as is my MediCare (plus supplement), but the Private-Private healthcare system sucks! And Obamacare was a crappy patch on a crappy system, that if it had not been for that crappy patch would have imploded by now.

        In my case, Obamacare came just in time. I wanted to retire in June 2012. I could COBRA for a year, but my company plan for 3 of us was a whopping $20,000 per year. So I sought a cheaper plan. HA! Did I say cheaper?

        The wife had a melanoma about the size of a pin head removed in 2007. She was judged “high risk” and her $10k deductible ($13k max out of pocket) was $28,000 per year!! Then, a policy for my daughter and self would have been another $16k. Age penalty.

        Crooks on both sides of the street. You should wake up every day and kiss that TriCare card, then kiss the spousal unit.

        Maybe single-payer with a sunset clause to give us 20 years to straighten it out?

  8. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    Actually, your vertical cut is more social engineering than is the progressive tax depicted on the left side. The notion you are exhibiting is preferring capital gains versus, oh say, gambling winnings, e.g., coloring money, which is also currently done to some extent. I can day-trade, write losses against gains to the tune of $3K and carry excess loss to the next year, which I cannot do with casino losses. Similarly, there are differing tax rates for the types of properties and time of the investment.

    It’s legislating morality by other means.

    1. sherlockj Avatar
      sherlockj

      What you describe, Nancy, is the work of rent seekers. In the case of Congressional rent seekers, there is no more enticing target than the tax code. That is the case you have made.

      In the case of Richmond rent seekers, some rent-seekers lobby for the good of many (or at least what they perceive to be so) and some of them lobby for the good of a few.

      My personal focus for years has been on health sector lobbyists. I have been educated by the experience.

      Over more than a decade in which I have been close to it, independent private health insurance companies have lobbied for the good of both their clients and themselves because their interests are aligned. They firmly oppose healthcare provider monopolies because they drive up the prices that the insurers must pay and therefore must charge their clients. Demand for private health insurance like with most services varies inversely with cost. High costs drive down public demand for private insurance and drive up demand for government health insurance. Because of the alignment of interests, lower healthcare prices help private sector health insurers do well while doing good.

      But they fight a distinctly uphill battle in Richmond.

      The hospital-centric regional provider monopolies have created their own captive insurers (Sentara/Optima, VCU/Virginia Premier (now Sentara) and Centra/Piedmont Community Health Plan) or exclusive HMO partnerships with a single insurer (Inova/Aetna and Carilion/Aetna). They use these business structures simultaneously to reduce the price negotiation leverage of other private sector insurers, to keep their own healthcare prices high and to put additional pressure on their provider competition.

      As an extra benefit to their cause, with their membership they have largely neutered the largest health insurance industry lobby in Richmond.

      The regional monopolies dominate the GA with a combination of campaign contributions and the power of their economic presence in every member’s district.

      They have proven unbeatable for years when they are strongly for or against something. And they are strongly for or against nearly any piece of healthcare or health insurance-related legislation.

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Well, you can get better medical care in almost 100 other countries, but you can’t pay more for it.

        You have Tricare, or is it TriCare? Either way, I don’t begrudge you that. It was an earned bennie, as is my MediCare (plus supplement), but the Private-Private healthcare system sucks! And Obamacare was a crappy patch on a crappy system, that if it had not been for that crappy patch would have imploded by now.

        In my case, Obamacare came just in time. I wanted to retire in June 2012. I could COBRA for a year, but my company plan for 3 of us was a whopping $20,000 per year. So I sought a cheaper plan. HA! Did I say cheaper?

        The wife had a melanoma about the size of a pin head removed in 2007. She was judged “high risk” and her $10k deductible ($13k max out of pocket) was $28,000 per year!! Then, a policy for my daughter and self would have been another $16k. Age penalty.

        Crooks on both sides of the street. You should wake up every day and kiss that TriCare card, then kiss the spousal unit.

        Maybe single-payer with a sunset clause to give us 20 years to straighten it out?

  9. idiocracy Avatar
    idiocracy

    Virginia is full of rent seekers. The rest of the country pays for it.

    Per capita, Virginia gains $10,301 more in Federal spending than Virginia pays in Federal taxes. This is the highest among all 50 states. For Maryland, the figure is $6,035.

    By way of comparison, per capita, Illinois pays $364 more in Federal taxes than they get back in Federal spending. For New York, it’s $1,792.

    “Virginia’s balance of payments is $10,301, and residents receive $1.97 for every dollar sent to the federal government.”

    Source:

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/donor-states

    1. What types of federal spending are used in the calculation? Is it federal funds being sent to the state for the direct benefit of that state, or is it all federal spending within a state?

      If one includes, for instance, federal spending at the pentagon as federal spending in Virginia, then the numbers are going to be skewed.

      I’d venture to guess that Virginia contains more military bases per-capita and more federal office space per-capita than just about any other state.

  10. idiocracy Avatar
    idiocracy

    Virginia is full of rent seekers. The rest of the country pays for it.

    Per capita, Virginia gains $10,301 more in Federal spending than Virginia pays in Federal taxes. This is the highest among all 50 states. For Maryland, the figure is $6,035.

    By way of comparison, per capita, Illinois pays $364 more in Federal taxes than they get back in Federal spending. For New York, it’s $1,792.

    “Virginia’s balance of payments is $10,301, and residents receive $1.97 for every dollar sent to the federal government.”

    Source:

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/donor-states

    1. What types of federal spending are used in the calculation? Is it federal funds being sent to the state for the direct benefit of that state, or is it all federal spending within a state?

      If one includes, for instance, federal spending at the pentagon as federal spending in Virginia, then the numbers are going to be skewed.

      I’d venture to guess that Virginia contains more military bases per-capita and more federal office space per-capita than just about any other state.

  11. Bill O'Keefe Avatar
    Bill O’Keefe

    The increasing complexity of laws and regulations are a rent-seekers dream.

  12. Bill O'Keefe Avatar
    Bill O’Keefe

    The increasing complexity of laws and regulations are a rent-seekers dream.

  13. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    “Among the rent-seeking extractors of wealth we have called out are the faculty-administrative elites of our colleges and universities and the administrators of our “nonprofit” health care systems. We have focused on these because they have a huge impact on our collective well being, …”

    By definition, a society is in systemic crisis when its educational institutions (K-12, undergraduate and post graduate higher education) are dedicated to undermining and destroying that society, using kids and youth as its instruments in that evil quest.

    Unfortunately, that is the decadent place in hell where American finds itself today. Overcoming and replacing that decadent evil, and its destructive tribalism, is our core challenge in America today.

  14. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    “Among the rent-seeking extractors of wealth we have called out are the faculty-administrative elites of our colleges and universities and the administrators of our “nonprofit” health care systems. We have focused on these because they have a huge impact on our collective well being, …”

    By definition, a society is in systemic crisis when its educational institutions (K-12, undergraduate and post graduate higher education) are dedicated to undermining and destroying that society, using kids and youth as its instruments in that evil quest.

    Unfortunately, that is the decadent place in hell where American finds itself today. Overcoming and replacing that decadent evil, and its destructive tribalism, is our core challenge in America today.

  15. Is a company that uses its political connection(s) to grossly overcharges a city for performing a controversial service using a sole-source contract a rent seeker, a crony or a predator? Or maybe all three?

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      I believe in this instance it’s called “Equity”.

  16. Is a company that uses its political connection(s) to grossly overcharges a city for performing a controversial service using a sole-source contract a rent seeker, a crony or a predator? Or maybe all three?

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      I believe in this instance it’s called “Equity”.

  17. TooManyTaxes Avatar
    TooManyTaxes

    One of the biggest and most outrageous examples of crony capitalism happened right here in Fairfax County. The co-opting of the Silver Line by Tysons landowners and real estate developers for increasing their density, while pushing most of the construction costs and all of the cost overruns on the backs of ordinary people driving on the Dulles Toll Road.

    1. The only thing worse than crony capitalism is crony socialism.

  18. TooManyTaxes Avatar
    TooManyTaxes

    One of the biggest and most outrageous examples of crony capitalism happened right here in Fairfax County. The co-opting of the Silver Line by Tysons landowners and real estate developers for increasing their density, while pushing most of the construction costs and all of the cost overruns on the backs of ordinary people driving on the Dulles Toll Road.

    1. The only thing worse than crony capitalism is crony socialism.

  19. Bill O'Keefe Avatar
    Bill O’Keefe

    Rent seeking–act or process of exploiting the political process or manipulating the economic environment to increase one’s revenue or profits–is in all instances is anti-competitive and an example of the art of stealing without getting caught. I highly recommend Bootleggers and Baptists by Bruce Yandle.

  20. Bill O'Keefe Avatar
    Bill O’Keefe

    Rent seeking–act or process of exploiting the political process or manipulating the economic environment to increase one’s revenue or profits–is in all instances is anti-competitive and an example of the art of stealing without getting caught. I highly recommend Bootleggers and Baptists by Bruce Yandle.

Leave a Reply