“Enacting Racial Change by Design”

by James A. Bacon

The backlash against Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in higher-ed and the corporate world may be gathering momentum across the country, but the University of Virginia is rolling out a new DEI initiative oblivious to the shift in the national mood.

UVA’s College of Arts & Sciences has launched a program this semester entitled, “Enacting Racial Change by Design.” Participating faculty will discuss chapters from the book, From Equity Talk to Equity Walk to deepen understanding of “systematic racial inequity in higher education.” Participants will be able to apply for $1,000 grants to implement DEI-related projects.

The rhetoric of the memo announcing the initiative is disconnected from the national conversation now underway. The program shows not the slightest inkling that critics of DEI need be acknowledged much less engaged in dialogue. U.S. Supreme Court ruling on race in admissions? Resignation of the presidents of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania? Helloooo? Anyone home?

This is what happens when an academic elite is captive to DEI dogma and there is not enough diversity of thought for anyone to push back.

Here follows the memo:

Dear Colleagues,

The Office of the Dean at the College of Arts and Sciences invites applications to participate in a semester-long Faculty Lunch and Learn Community titled Enacting Racial Equity by Design. This program will support Faculty’s efforts in enhancing diversity, equity and inclusion within their curricular design and departmental culture.

The community will meet on Friday afternoons with lunch provided. Interested faculty members are invited to sign up at DEI Faculty Learning Community Application by the end of Friday January 26th. Full details follow.

Description

There is a common desire among us to address equity in student outcomes or to close equity gaps for our underserved or underrepresented students. Many questions arise. How does racial inequity affect students’ learning outcomes? How do we identify equity gaps? How do we move from equity talk to equity walk, and eventually develop an equity-minded campus culture?

In the Spring semester, we will be engaging in conversations around Equity and Racial Justice to enhance our personal and practitioner expertise. These conversations will inform our pedagogical practices and the experience we provide in our teaching and learning environment. Faculty and instructors seeking to broaden their understanding of evidence-based practices, to close racial and other systemic and persistent performance gaps in the classroom are invited to participate in this program. No prior knowledge/experience of DEI work is required.

Meeting Details 

The community will meet four times on Fridays (12pm-1:15pm) during the Spring semester (Schedule below). All meetings are in person and lunch will be provided. Meetings will be facilitated by Gail Hunger, Assistant Director of Undergraduate Student Success Initiatives, and Fang Yi, Assistant Director of Learning Design and Technology.

Date  Tentative Topics
Friday, Feb 2 From Equity Talk to Equity Walk
Friday, Feb 23 Building an Equity-Minded Campus Culture
Friday, March 22 Using Data to Advance Equity
Friday, April 19 Developing a Practice of Equity-Minded Teaching

Book Discussions:

Prior to each meeting, participants are expected to read chapters from the book “From Equity talk to Equity walk” by Tia Brown McNair, Estela Mara Bensimon, et al., and other supplemental learning materials. During the meetings, participants will engage in conversations and discussions to reflect, share experiences, and exchange thoughts. This will deepen our understanding of systematic racial inequity in higher education and explore best practices to identify and close equity gaps to achieve inclusive excellence. Books will be provided.

Action Activities: Each semester, we have facilitated this learning community to explore issues or events that have significantly impacted our work in this arena. Our aim is to create an intentional environment where we can appropriately respond to relevant and timely topics in our class, department, or institution are discussed. We may invite guest speakers to share their ideas and experiences, and/or visit sites that relate to the topic.

Participants will be partnered to work on some of the following hands-on DEI in action activities:

  • Evaluate your course materials or programs for equity minded language and practices in your department
  • Gather information on DEI definition/goals as well as past and existing DEI work at the College and University to assess the alignment of our current practices in teaching and learning
  • Investigate and analyze existing data to identify equity gaps
  • Brainstorm and develop project ideas for improving racial equity through the DEI action grant

DEI Action Grant (Exclusive to Learning Community Participants)  

The learning community will also offer the participants an opportunity to apply as working groups or individually for a small grant to implement DEI related initiatives/projects. Grant recipients will receive $1000 per person as a stipend to support their efforts. More information will be shared during the learning community meetings.

Expectations 

Participants should expect to attend at least three of the four sessions and to commit up to 2 hours completing reading/learning materials before each session to engage fully in discussion and hands-on work.

Eligibility 

Participants will be any A&S faculty interested in equity and racial justice, including full-time and part-time faculty (tenured/tenure-track, AGFM), and postdocs.

Sponsors 

This FLC is organized with generous support from A&S Learning Design & Technology and A&S Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

Application 

Please submit your application by Jan 26 at DEI Faculty Learning Community Application. Applicants will be contacted shortly thereafter. Please email Gail Hunger (gmh6w@virginia.edu) or Fang Yi (fy5g@virginia.edu) with any questions.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

82 responses to ““Enacting Racial Change by Design””

  1. Nelson Fegley Avatar
    Nelson Fegley

    This sounds like an “adult” version of the “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” program created by Marxist philosopher Paulo Freire.
    It has been used throughout US school systems to advance Critical Race Theory in public education. It tends to suck up educational resources, with negative effects on the acquisition of knowledge by the students. With this program at UVa, not only are expensive DEI administrators involved, but money for project grants, and time and energy of the faculty participants will be consumed.

  2. DJRippert Avatar

    Well, Jim – It could be worse. Here are the 28 racist attitudes and behaviors as defined and taught (in a mandatory class) to University of Wisconsin Law Students:

    https://www.nationalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Common-Racist-Attitudes-no-highlights.pdf

    Here’s the first racist attitude / behavior.

    [Saying] “I’m colorblind. People are just people. I don’t see color. We’re all just human”

    Kind of makes you wonder about the aspirations of whoever said this:

    “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        You mean after Bill Clinton and Obama used regulations under the Community Reinvestment Act to encourage (darn near require!) banks to make home loans to unqualified borrowers and destroy what equity they had built up?
        Oh, and besides the Obama zero interest rate policy which screwed over retirees, and enriched the Lords of Easy Money on Wall Street, arbitraging that easy capital.
        But you do you One Note Larry.
        Also…isn’t it “strange” all that War on Poverty money didn’t fix it?
        Asking for a friend…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          So how is the difference in household family wealth explained?

          and your idea of “fix” is, as usual, at odds with realities:

          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5cdb74a4ff90bf1c7f88da538d47b3df6b7c05e1cad21a46d2f8553a433a2c2c.png

        2. LarrytheG Avatar

          So how is the difference in household family wealth explained?

          and your idea of “fix” is, as usual, at odds with realities:

          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5cdb74a4ff90bf1c7f88da538d47b3df6b7c05e1cad21a46d2f8553a433a2c2c.png

          1. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            So are you contradicting yourself? Getting out of poverty but huge wealth gap?
            Maybe the Great Society policies discouraged entrepreneurial activities, while “lifting” blacks to subsistence non-poverty levels…like the favorite thing you never acknowledge – illegitimacy – tied to bad life outcomes.
            How does that happen? Do we have any clue?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            You’re confusing poverty rate with household wealth.

            The poverty rate has been substantially reduced by the huge gap in household income will take decades to undo the racism and discrimination that was imposed on black folks since the civil war , to Jim Crow and beyond.

            You’re the one who has no clue about much and specifically about “illegitimacy” , just dogma based on racial stereotypes, IMO.

          3. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            It’s always IMO with you and your O is always wrong.

            Daniel Patrick Moynihan warned about the perverse incentives of the Great Society. And illegitimacy is bad for all people.
            Let me give you one easy clue…. If the black illegitimacy rate were 20% instead of 75%, would black net worth be higher?

          4. LarrytheG Avatar

            IF blacks were never discriminated against in the first place for more than 100 years would they be more “equal” now?

            If you’re expecting people to not have sex, let me clue you in… people do it… all races.. and the poor…and the poorly educated.

          5. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Let me clue you in Larry – how did people manage for centuries to minimize illegitimacy…without all that govt “help?”
            Let’s do a test for Larry, and no going to Iceland for your dumb, irrelevant statistics.
            Is it better for a child to grow up in a single parent home or in a home with married parents?

            Hey, Larry – you know Irish and Jews and all sorts of people have been discriminated against? And you know even when America was actually racist that some blacks achieved success, how did that happen?

            The biggest problem blacks have today is the permissive, pernicious low expectations from the racist benevolent white saviors and the anti-Christian, Marxist CRT ideology they peddle.

          6. Not Today Avatar

            The answer is no and if you bothered to look at the fed data, you’d see why. 85%+ of current inequity among black and white households has existed since slavery, the rest exploded during the Reagan/Bush years. Play monopoly where one group starts with money and the other in jail and see what happens sans reparations. Inconvenient truths. There is no black family/community pathology. There is a pathology that accompanies poverty.

          7. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            I guess if you think everything is racist, you think everything is racist. But you said one thing right at the end, probably thinking you were correcting me.
            There is a pathology that accompanies poverty. That pathology currently affects blacks more severely, and it is the goal of the Dems and race grifters to make everybody as miserable as they are.
            Once again, you make assertions without facts. In general, blacks were making progress moving into the middle class in a society by today’s standards that was racist. Then we decided to “help,” and that “help” has been counterproductive. Tearing down the emerging black neighborhoods to “help” – like Jackson Ward…was that a net plus? How about incentivizing illegitimacy? The black rate has gone from something like 20% to 75% when everyone not an obstinate donkey determined to never acknowledge the truth knows that illegitimacy is a huge indicator for future difficulties. The white rate has gone from about 5% to near 40% (maybe over). Is society better since then?
            How about the horrible schools for blacks? Whose failure? How did people get educated before the govt? How come Dems won’t try school choice or other things that might improve schools? Who is proportionally hurt worse by Dem obeisance to the teacher unions? And do you really believe that the answer is more money to the schools? Won’t it just line the pockets of the “professional educators?”

          8. Not Today Avatar

            What is ‘a black?’

          9. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            That’s a good question. Are you of the one drop rule? How do you define “a black?”

            I think the better course is to call people humans, male and female and drop all the divisive , incoherent racial bean counting.

          10. Not Today Avatar

            A black, to me, doesn’t exist. Black is an adjective, a modifier, that describes people. I think, rather than asking me to define blackness, that’s one question white people may be better equipped to answer since they created the category to begin with, imbued it with meaning, and now seek to strip it from a community of people to whom it was applied and who came to find meaning in it themselves (albeit for entirely different reasons). My definition isn’t likely to match yours and has little to do with blood quantum. The ‘black community’ is rooted primarily in shared experience not blood quantum. Do you see the problem with a community of people who created the classification trying to unilaterally undermine it? They now think it has too much power and/or a power they can’t control and use for their own benefit so it must be ignored. That kind of presumptuousness takes real hutzpah.

          11. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            So if black is merely an adjective (maybe the only actual true statement you have written), what is the “black community?” It seems you are back at oppressor/oppressed dynamic. I guess you believe the Hamas barbarism was justified?

          12. Not Today Avatar

            Sir, I answered your question. Graciously. Stop meandering.

          13. Not all black or white families have been here since slavery. Saying “there is no community pathology” is false for just about every ethnic/racial group somewhere in the U.S. Not all white families started with wealth, especially not those who came through Ellis Island and went to work in Appalachia in the 1880’s-early1900’s. There are no simple answers to the issues, no matter what reports you choose.

          14. Not Today Avatar

            There. is. no. evidence of some black community pathology. There is AMPLE evidence of the racial wealth gap, individual families and people notwithstanding. When acres and acres of land are on fire, it’s not a good look to stand on your unburned plat and say, I’m good over here and, oh yeah, so is that person way over yonder! Of course, if you’d like to distract and pivot from the data amply catalogued by the Fed reserve, let’s talk about white on white crime. Also, why are so many white people shooting at strangers through closed doors and chasing people down, accosting them and shooting them on sight?

          15. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Please present some facts instead of unhinged assertions. I think the moderator addressed your denial. There are pathological behaviors that harm people. All people. Larry refuses to acknowledge that illegitimacy is not a social “good,” while everyone, even “SCIENCE!”, points to far better outcomes from a two parent home.
            But since you deny any black pathologies, what is “acting white?”
            People are individuals. They have free will. They can choose to engage in good behaviors or bad behaviors. In general, repeated selection of good behaviors, over time, leads to good outcomes.
            One is not “doomed” from the past. Which you cannot change.

          16. Not Today Avatar

            Behaviors you term pathological have their roots in white supremacy, including intact families being defined less by marriage than by shared experience. Is that pathology or adaptation? If, for example, hatred for your oppressor (not contentment as the Lost Cause myth promoted) was so deeply ingrained that you resented those who matched or conformed to any aspect of the oppressor’s behavior is that pathology or adaptation? When you are collectively held responsible for individual acts for generations and then develop internal self-policing strategies to enforce group norms, is that pathology or adaptation?

          17. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            You have drunk deeply from Marcuse and Friere and all the other crits haven’t you?
            So, you are not responsible for anything in your life and are a helpless victim of “the system?”
            It just “happens” that the “behaviors” that built “Western Civ” worked.
            Enjoy your repressive tolerance and perpetual unhappiness. It could be…maybe…just a suggestion…the problem is you and your false religion.

          18. Not Today Avatar

            Have you read any original source material from either of those people or do you just reflexively say things you heard somewhere that sound plausible? Neither of these folks was an expert on or especially familiar with black culture in America, nor have I ever been a social science student or practitioner.

          19. Not Today Avatar

            Ooooohhhhhkaaayyyy. For the record, I am quite happy. My children are thriving, succeeding, and advancing. So are my husband and I. We are mentors and friends to similarly content people of all stripes. It’s a beautiful life. That we seek to improve conditions for others doesn’t negate our own position. It seems to me, the most discontented are the people who consistently express rage and frustration that I exist, people who do not know or understand people like me, and need to downplay our achievements and intelligence in order to make the lies they’ve inhaled about their own superiority make more sense. Cognitive dissonance is painful, or so I’ve read.

          20. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            You assume that people who disagree with you are against improving conditions for others. Then you presume that I express rage and frustration that you exist. That’s a silly statement. I have no problem that you exist. I just disagree with you. I think what you advocate is harmful to society and that the better path is to quit dividing people into all of these groupings and instead to treat them as individuals and to rise or fall based on their own efforts. If the govt is involved in picking winners and losers based on using the oppressor/oppressed dynamic, then all of society becomes a victim Olympics contest – help me! Help me! I’m more oppressed than Jane Doe! And I think that dynamic led directly to the Jew hatred that erupted into plain sight after October 7. The DEI indoctrination at UVA (and everywhere) is an unAmerican poison.

          21. Not Today Avatar

            The government has already picked winners and losers, intentionally oppressing multiple groups of people. Corporations>people. White people>everyone else. Men>women and children. Find the lie! This was done through law and policy. That this happened, and the damage was never repaired, ought to be a national scandal. Instead, you’re advocating forgive and forget. Good luck with that. The harm remains and must be addressed.

          22. Not Today Avatar

            Stop projecting your ignorance and behavior on to me. I’m not the one raging, ad nauseum, against the death of my light, just my annoyance at the noise/nuisance these death throes create.

          23. Not Today Avatar

            Have you read any original source material from either of those people or do you just reflexively say things you heard somewhere that sound plausible? Neither of these folks was an expert on or especially familiar with black culture in America, nor have I ever been a social science student or practitioner.

          24. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Then why do you cling to group identity? Were you indoctrinated in school?

          25. Not Today Avatar

            I already answered that question. I don’t have enough time or crayons to draw a picture. You’re not actually open to hearing anything new anyway. You asked a ton of questions that I answered in good faith, or as much as I could muster for you, and you responded to none of my own, just more talking points and word vomit.

          26. Also, why are so many white people shooting at strangers through closed doors and chasing people down, accosting them and shooting them on sight?

            So many? How many, exactly? A couple of highly publicized instances that you read about in the paper qualifies as “so many” to you? Really? I thought you were more data and fact oriented that.

            And what is a “white” person, anyway?

          27. Not Today Avatar

            I’d have to check the latest FBI crime stats but they have definitely indicated an increasing threat from white nationalist sympathizers. And, you’re correct, I’ve linked to that info previously. There are obvs some highly publicized exemplars but the trends are hard to ignore. Why are white people in America so reactionary and scared all the time?

            Your second question probably won’t get the answer you expect from me since the definition of whiteness in America has always been a fluid one. It’s included and excluded different national and ethnic groups at different times. At its core, it’s a set of dominant/preferred norms enforced through exclusionary policy and practice.

          28. Not Today Avatar

            When the FBI identifies these folks as our greatest domestic terror threat, yeah, ‘so many’ is an apt descriptor.

          29. I did not believe the FBI when they identified civil rights activists as the greatest domestic threat to America, and I do not believe them now as they are trying to make everyone scared of “white nationalists”.

            The time to be concerned about white nationalists was the mid-1990s. Today, as far as I can tell, those jokers are about as organized as a ‘scurry’ of squirrels with ADHD.

            On a peripherally related note, the ever-increasing numbers of non-whites and non-males (i.e. women) who are opting to obtain, get trained on, and safely carry firearms these days is impressive and long overdue.

            Women like Robin Evans are forces to be reckoned with. And in Ms. Evans’ case, she enthusiastically shares her knowledge.

            https://www.chickswithtriggers.com/

          30. Not Today Avatar

            I don’t necessarily take their word for things either but when innocent civilians like Trayvon and Ahmad and Justin and and and are dying, and these self same perps invade the capitol, I believe my own damn eyes. Are you seriously surprised that women are choosing to arm themselves in the face of unchecked male violence? Really? I won’t even follow local no-cell in class policies for my kid because I know good and darn well they can’t keep my child safe. Republicans value guns over people and men over women, girls, and babies. It’s hard for me to cheer the increasing number of armed people when there is evidence it makes everyone less safe and the most vulnerable significantly less safe. Bandwagoning based on trauma and evidence that policy change is impossible/highly unlikely isn’t a sign of social health.

          31. Are you seriously surprised that women are choosing to arm themselves in the face of unchecked male violence? Really?

            Not at all. I believe you misinterpreted my comment. I think [law abiding] women getting training and arming themselves is a wonderful thing, and I hope to see much more of it in the future. It will save women’s lives.

            I taught two women how to safely handle and operate firearms just a couple of months ago.

          32. Republicans value guns over people and men over women, girls, and babies. It’s hard for me to cheer the increasing number of armed people when there is evidence it makes everyone less safe and the most vulnerable significantly less safe.

            I am not a republican.

            I know you will never believe anything I say to you about guns, so will you at least do me the favor of contacting Robin Evans at ‘chickswithtriggers’ and talking to her about the issue. I think you will find that most of your preconceived notions about guns, gun use, and gun safety are simply not correct.

          33. Not Today Avatar

            It’s not that I don’t believe you. I think you’re a generally thoughtful person, I just know what the data show about guns in America, particularly in homes with children. Unlike other countries with much stronger social fabrics, safety nets, and LAWS, Americans have no desire to responsibly manage firearm use.

            We’re always at each other’s throats, fighting over whether to feed hungry children or even provide emergency healthcare. We are devolving thanks to conservative nihilism and guns make that state of affairs even more volatile. There is nothing moral about maiming women and girls, trapping them in violent relationships and poverty, in order to ‘save babies’ that they have no intention of helping to house, feed, or educate.

            Guns give every dude with a grievance and a God complex the chance to cosplay Rambo. I also know that, just on a topline level – if more guns made us more safe, the US would be among the safest nations on Earth. It’s objectively not.

            I have no doubt that owning firearms make women FEEL safer. I KNOW it doesn’t actually make them safer. I’m much more interested in things that do, in fact, make women and children safer, healthier, and able to thrive. I will never own a gun, learn to shoot a gun, or have a gun in my home but thanks for the tip.

          34. LarrytheG Avatar

            We had black immigrants to this country when? From where?

            When the statistics show a wide gap in family household income between blacks and whites… how does immigration of blacks play into those numbers?

            How do you explain that gap?

          35. We had black immigrants to this country when? From where?

            From 1870 on. Most from Haiti and Jamaica at first, then from all parts of Africa but mostly Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Ghana. The Naturalization Act of 1870 extended right of immigration to Africans. Numerous immigration laws intended to restrict immigration of Jews and Catholics were enacted between 1921 and 1924, and these also excluded most immigration from Africa.

            The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which repealed the restrictive laws of the 1920s was the real turning point for immigration to the U.S. from developing countries, whatever “color” the immigrants might be.

          36. LarrytheG Avatar

            I thought the US had restrictions on immigrants in terms of education and skills , i.e. the immigrant had to benefit the US and not require govt assistance to live. No?

          37. LarrytheG Avatar

            Can we not recognize the difference between Blacks that whose ancestors were not slaves and not subjected to decades of Jim Crow?

            If we can identify those that WERE ancestors of slaves, and those subjected to Jim Crow laws, would we do anything to try to help them catch up with those that were not harmed that way?

          38. DJRippert Avatar

            Wow. Trump really did turn things around for Black Americans.

          39. LarrytheG Avatar

            is it “fixed” ? really?

            how?

        3. Not Today Avatar

          You mean republicans and conservatives didn’t bar black farmers, pert near demand that developers not sell homes and lend money to black people for generations? Check your facts. Community lending didn’t cause the mortgage loan collapse. Predatory lending did.

          1. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Then present facts, not your wrong assertions. Racial restrictive covenants were declared unConstitutional…around 1960?
            And which party was in charge in these areas? And it would have been predatory lending only if you consider the banks were forced to make bad loans by the regulators…and those stupid policies came from Democrats.
            How did some blacks achieve success in a real racist country? Shouldn’t it have been impossible?

          2. Not Today Avatar

            I have. Repeatedly. You just choose to ignore it. S’ok. Like I said, I’ll watch.

          3. You mean republicans and conservatives didn’t bar black farmers, pert near demand that developers not sell homes and lend money to black people for generations?

            Actually, democrats are the ones who did the most work in that area, at least in Virginia.

          4. Not Today Avatar

            Ok Rand. You’re making the same mistake.

          5. Whether or not there was a shift in R vs. D racial politics at some point in the past, it is a fact that democrats were the leaders in implementing racial covenants in Virginia.

            Perhaps just say “racist jackasses” and leave out the party names?

          6. Not Today Avatar

            That fact is irrelevant. Conservatives conserve, primarily their own power, regardless of which party they use as a vehicle. The people who consistently trot out that useless factoid, while conveniently ignoring how and more importantly, WHY that switch happened are…conservatives. One can only conclude they believe people are too stupid to know the rest of the story or too ignorant to know there’s never been any doubt in the black community that racists exist in both parties. In the post you quoted, I said quite clearly, republicans and conservatives, knowing this is a favored (if ineffective) conservative line of defense.

          7. I said quite clearly, republicans and conservatives…

            But you won’t say the ‘d’ word….

          8. Not Today Avatar

            White Democrats became Republicans during the civil rights movement. I’ve said that MULTIPLE times.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            It can be said hundreds of times but conservatives will continue to depict the racists as Dems and not Conservatives who rebranded as GOP.

      2. DJRippert Avatar

        Do I think that Martin Luther King thought about the inequalities between White and Black America? Is that a serious question? He thought of little else.

        As for your graph … as usual, you ignore those pesky Asians. You know, those people of color living in a world of White privilege being held back by systemic racism.

        “Asian households overall had more wealth than other households two years since the start of the pandemic. In 2021, Asian households had a median net worth of $320,900, compared with $250,400 for White households. The median net worth of Hispanic households ($48,700) and Black households ($27,100) was much less.”

        https://www.pewresearch.org/race-ethnicity/2023/12/04/wealth-gaps-across-racial-and-ethnic-groups/#:~:text=Asian%20households%20overall%20had%20more,(%2427%2C100)%20was%20much%20less.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          The question about the Asians is – where their ancestors slaves and subjected to 100 years of Jim Crow. And if immigrants, were they financially well off with family wealth in addition to not being slaves or victims of Jim Crow.

          Yes, some folks point out the MLK quote claiming he wanted a color-blind society. He did but he was focused on what was happening right then which was rampant racism that he was politely saying ” some day, perhaps”.

          1. Not Today Avatar

            There’s both the immigrant ethos (not being subject to the same degree of generational persecution), that and the fact that Asians were a significantly smaller proportion of the U.S. population at the time of King’s assassination in 1968 so less of a factor, and the fact that white people courted Asians as white-adjacent (and dismissed them) as needed to meet their own aims. It’s that pesky bit about whiteness being defined in ways that preserved power and suited the dominant group, not in any ideologically, racially or ethnically consistent way. Irish, Italian, Polish, German, even Jewish (the differentiation between Sephardic and Ashkenazi is real) people have alternately been considered white and non-white.

      3. LesGabriel Avatar
        LesGabriel

        MLK probably did not think of the bulk of the chart that encompasses the years after 1968. But even if he had lived and known about the information, I doubt if his aspirations for his children would have been lowered.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          I agree but the chart has not changed much since he was alive. There are still disparities.
          For instance, the percentages of black doctors is 5% les than half of their population percent.
          Would anyone be surprised on what side of BLM or DEI MLK would have been?

          1. LesGabriel Avatar
            LesGabriel

            If not much has changed since he was alive, on what basis do you conclude he would have changed his mind about color blindness?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            I DON’T think he would have changed his mind. He would STILL be advocating for a more color-blind society and point out the continuing disparities that range from BLM to less doctors for blacks than their demographic percentage.

          3. LesGabriel Avatar
            LesGabriel

            Do I take from your reply that you would also advocate for a color-blind society? If so, perhaps there is hope that we can again strive for that ideal.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar

            From the get go, yes. But great damage has been done to generations that still today are adversely impacted and the motivation to see it as disadvantaged . I just think the MLK quote that some seem to like, they’d not like it so
            much if MLK himself was alive today. He’d very likely align with BLM and DEI by citing continuing disparities and generational disparities that persist – as seen by the disparities in household income as well as the number who
            achieve professional status like Doctors or Military leadership, etc. MLK would NOT approve/support violence – that was his core value – nonviolence but assertive not passive advocacy.

    1. Not Today Avatar

      IF YOU DON’T SEE COLOR, YOU DON’T SEE ME (or all aspects of me). My color, gender, sexual identity, perceived race (different from color), religion (perceived lack of), ability (physical and mental), income (for better or worse), residence, profession, marital status, Nulliparous vs. multiparous vs. primiparous status (and more), while not always visible is part of me. People, particularly younger people, want to be seen as the full people they are. When people are no longer in the workforce, they may not be as familiar with the needs and preferences of those who are, or the priorities of their former employers, or the economic trends that shape their work.

      Quoting MLK in that way, and not his radical condemnation of economic systems, is very telling. It says you don’t really know or respect the man, his work, or his allies in struggle (who still live). Dreams are aspirational…they’re not something you can impose on a society that is far from dream-like. White people have been telling themselves for generations, (a discussion amongst themselves, not with groups affected by exclusion) preferring to lean on their own understanding, that all they have to do is pretend to be ‘blind’ and all will be well. That was, and ever will be, a lie. White people in America, on the whole, possess a DEEPLY flawed understanding of history and current events shaped by an intentional effort to lie/deter (the UDC) and to obscure (White Citizens Councils) and to exclude.

      I’m sorry that happened to you but you are a grown person. You can choose to step out of ignorance.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Entrenched bureaucracies never die a natural death, never implode. They just grind on despite reality having passed them by. Be sure to follow up, get and report all the various grant applications…. 🙂

    1. Joe Jeeva Abbate Avatar
      Joe Jeeva Abbate

      You are right, Stephen. Entrenched bureaucracies never die a natural death, just like slavery, racial violence, racial injustice or the defense of racism did not die a natural death. These issues that divide our country and that continue to manifest in violence and injustice, remain with us even today.

  4. Irene Leech Avatar
    Irene Leech

    A program of the length/magnitude of this was not a project someone did in a few days. I suspect it was created over months – or longer – and by a group. Once a group has invested a lot of time and energy into something, it’s not likely to just drop it due to several events/actions outside the university. Rather than causing it to be cancelled, it is most likely that those recent happenings will influence what is done in the actual meetings/projects. Thus, the outcome could be very different than anticipated by either the planners or outsiders. I wouldn’t assume they are oblivious of current events but rather that they are responding differently than you might.

  5. Not Today Avatar

    I can only laugh and shake my head when people actively welcome exclusion, homogeneity/group-think and inequity. Basically, Bacon (et al.) want public and private institutions to give lie to either or both the ‘melting pot’ and ‘salad’ idea. They want the country to conform (by choice or by force) to their views, to subsume their own intelligence, power and ideas behind his, to deny themselves agency in decision-making, to deny the LACK OF inclusivity and representation in positions of power. That is NEVER going to happen.

    It’s crazy (if one wants the privilege of leading/governing anything other than themselves) but if that’s the hill folks want to die on…I’ll watch. If I’m feeling extra generous, I won’t even remark on their wrongness when they inevitably do. I mean…GLORY BE! People are being asked to consider and apply some new ideas based on research and data at a university? Whatever will happen next?
    https://media0.giphy.com/media/3o8doM1LK2PVaxawpO/giphy-downsized-small.mp4

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “The backlash against Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in higher-ed and the corporate world may be gathering momentum across the country…”

    The lies we tell ourselves all have the word “may”. It’s not James. In your dreams. Sadly, your country club will have to suffer “those people”.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “The backlash against Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in higher-ed and the corporate world may be gathering momentum across the country…”

    The lies we tell ourselves all have the word “may”. It’s not James. In your dreams. Sadly, your country club will have to suffer “those people”.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “The backlash against Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in higher-ed and the corporate world may be gathering momentum across the country…”

    The lies we tell ourselves all have the word “may”. It’s not James. In your dreams. Sadly, your country club will have to suffer “those people”.

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3pLDQb5T9U

    Like all weak men he laid an exaggerated stress on not changing one’s mind. -William Somerset Maugham, writer (25 Jan 1874-1965)

    1. Not Today Avatar

      You missed the best part. He challenged the students at one of the oldest and finest HBCUs on their knowledge of black history and got schooled himself. He thought they didn’t know their own history. It’s a common misconception, among conservatives, that black people don’t know their own history and/or that conservatives know it better. It’s ludicrous when you think about it. The survival of black Americans in many parts of the country was dependent on being intimately familiar with what might trigger anger and violence and hatred and more from white people. The reverse has never been true. Black people worked in white homes, raised white children, learned family secrets. Black people, on the whole, know white people. The reverse, not so much.
      https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/04/10/176814431/howard-students-question-rand-pauls-vision-of-gop

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, he does know the history of black Americans. He knows the history that permits him to be insular. That is white privilege.

  10. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Psst… Jim, I heard there was a DE&I book club starting up on campus… you better get in there and pound the table for membership and equal representation in their book choice!!

  11. True equity on campus is simple to achieve. Each professor should ask the class on the first day – Do you want me to take everyone’s final grade at the end of the semester – average it and give that grade to each of you?
    Thus the outcome will have full equity and equality.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      “equity” is before that class and the ability for someone to get into the class at the front of it.
      It does not guarantee equal outcomes at all.

      1. Not Today Avatar

        Equity also ensures that the person standing in front of the class is wise enough not to immediately turn off the students and trivialize their perspectives/issues. For example, asking at the beginning of the class for anyone in need of accommodations based on a hearing/visual impairment, mental health issue, or any other condition covered by the ADA, to schedule a time to talk about their accommodation needs/requests.

      2. Not Today Avatar

        Equity also ensures that the person standing in front of the class is wise enough not to immediately turn off the students and trivialize their perspectives/issues. For example, asking at the beginning of the class for anyone in need of accommodations based on a hearing/visual impairment, mental health issue, or any other condition covered by the ADA, to schedule a time to talk about their accommodation needs/requests.

  12. Here’s the first defense of DEI I’ve seen that makes sense. Read past the click-bait title of the article, to:

    ” . . . most people want the same thing: competitive organizations where everyone who shows up to work has a fair shot at success.

    and

    “It can be tempting to put in place superficial fixes to achieve the optics of inclusion — a primary concern of D.E.I. critics — such as reserving roles for specific demographics. This is often illegal and rarely helpful .. .”

    and

    “That is one reason we end up with all-male boards. Senior teams with no people of color. Professorial ranks with no conservatives. . . “

    “. . . we become more effective leaders when we collaborate skillfully with people who don’t already think like us — people with different perspectives, assumptions and experiences of moving through the world.”

    This last sounds like liberal education: to challenge, to question verities, to widen/broaden/deepen and refine. With a doff of the hat to Tocqueville, we’ll call this DEI Rightly Understood.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/opinion/diversity-equity-inclusion-dei.html

    1. Not Today Avatar

      FTR – I’ve never been in a senior meeting (TBF – I don’t work in academia) with no conservatives…have you?

Leave a Reply